Two activists convicted of harassing justice minister over Israel-Hamas conflict
Two pro-Palestinian activists who accused a Government minister of supporting genocide relating to the Israel-Hamas conflict have been convicted of harassment.
Ayeshah Behit, 31, and Hiba Ahmed, 26, were found guilty of the charge against Alex Davies-Jones, the Labour MP for Pontypridd, following a trial at Cardiff Magistrates' Court on Monday.
They had filmed a confrontation with Ms Davies-Jones, a justice minister, who had been campaigning in the village of Treforest, Rhondda Cynon Taf, in the lead-up to the general election, on June 26 last year.
Senior District Judge Paul Goldspring found both defendants guilty of harassment and sentenced them to a conditional discharge and fine.
Giving evidence during the trial, Ms Davies-Jones told the court she was 'terrified' after being confronted by the two activists.
As she made her way to the campaign meeting place, she saw Behit and Ahmed with leaflets describing her as a 'full-blown supporter of this genocide' – referring to the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Ms Davies-Jones said: 'They asked me about the ceasefire and why I had abstained. I clarified I hadn't abstained, I wasn't in the country, I was paired in that vote.
'It was escalating in terms of passion and intensity. We walked off in the opposite direction. We felt scared and intimidated, and we wanted to leave the situation.
'I had a number of young members with me. They already felt uncomfortable, I didn't want them to feel more at risk.
'They began to follow us. They were shouting and bellowing down the street at us – 'why do you support genocide, why are you murdering babies, Alex Davies-Jones, do you support genocide?''
Later in the day, Behit and Ahmed put posters on the Labour office in Pontypridd – the base of Ms Davies-Jones' campaign for the general election – that referred to politicians 'enabling genocide'.
They also placed stickers in black capital letters reading 'Alex Davies-Jones how many murdered children is too many?' on the office and a poster reading 'Alex Davies-Jones supports genocide' on a bus stop, while a video of the confrontation was uploaded onto social media describing Ms Davies-Jones as racist.
Asked about how their actions made her feel, the politician, who was first elected as MP for Pontypridd in 2019, told the court: 'I was terrified.
'I was worried because of the risk to my team and supporters, and my reputation given it was the general election and what that would mean.'
Sentencing, Mr Goldspring told Ahmed and Behit: 'This was part of a deliberate and sustained campaign targeting the complainant.
'This course of conduct was clearly designed to cause alarm and distress to her and she did experience alarm and distress. She stopped canvassing.
'It was not reasonable and it was oppressive.'
The judge said the defendants did have rights to freedom of speech but this case went 'beyond the boundaries' of this protection and was 'beyond robust scrutiny or political process'.
He sentenced Ahmed, a final year architecture student at Cardiff University with no previous convictions, to a 12-month conditional discharge.
Behit, who has a conviction relating to a protest in Cardiff last year, received an 18-month conditional discharge.
They were both ordered to pay £650 costs and a £26 court surcharge, at a rate of £20 per month.
Mr Goldspring added: 'I would love to say you are remorseful. I suspect you are not.
'I suspect your views will be held until something happens very differently in that area of the world.'
Ahmed, giving evidence, said she and Behit lived in Treforest and had wanted to raise awareness of Ms Davies-Jones' actions on Palestine ahead of the election.
She said the defendants, both of Treforest, had planned to hand out and post leaflets that afternoon when they saw their MP coming towards them.
Ahmed said: 'I was genuinely really surprised when I saw her. I've lived in Treforest for a couple of years, I've never seen her.
'It was like seeing a celebrity almost, like a unicorn in the wild.'
Ahmed said the action taken against Ms Davies-Jones 'wasn't really about her, it was about Palestine'.
Behit told the court: 'She was running for MP and where I lived there were posters everywhere. It was constant, everywhere you looked was pro-Alex.
'My intention was to show a different perspective, to get people to do their own research. It was never about Alex as a person.
'Part of her job as an MP is having people look at her policies, her opinions and how she voted.'
Speaking outside court, Behit confirmed that both defendants would appeal against their convictions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Scoop: Trump pressed to take hard line with Iran after Israel strikes
A group of pro-Israel members of Congress is urging President Trump to ensure "zero enrichment, zero pathway to a nuclear weapon" in negotiations with Iran, Axios has learned. Why it matters: The lawmakers — including a Republican, Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) — said Israel's strikes against Iranian nuclear sites and other military targets has created a "renewed sense of urgency" on the issue. "This decisive action comes after two months of unsuccessful diplomatic attempts and represents a critical chance to stop the Iranian regime from acquiring a nuclear weapon," they wrote in a letter to Trump first obtained by Axios. The White House did not immediately respond to Axios' Saturday afternoon request for comment on the letter. Driving the news: The letter is led by Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), a staunchly pro- Israel centrist Democrat, and signed by seven other House Democrats, in addition to Bacon. The nine lawmakers noted that the two-month deadline which Trump set in March for reaching a nuclear deal arrived on Thursday — the day Israel launched its strike. They urged him to add "crushing diplomatic pressure ... to Israel's military pressure" by working with European countries to impose "Snapback" sanctions on Iran for being out of compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal. What they're saying: Trump told Axios' Barak Ravid on Friday that he believes Israel's strike improved the chance of reaching a nuclear agreement with Iran. "I couldn't get them to a deal in 60 days. They were close, they should have done it. Maybe now it will happen," he said. But Iran's foreign minister said that nuclear talks planned for Sunday have been cancelled, and Trump said Saturday that the war between Israel and Iran "should end."
News24
2 hours ago
- News24
DA to challenge govt's plan for ‘crude racial classification' in workplace to meet quotas
Department of Employment and Labour/X Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once.
The Intercept
4 hours ago
- The Intercept
Democrat Michigan AG Asked FBI to Raid Protesters' Homes — But Won't Tell Students Why
On the morning of April 23, around 7 a.m., the FBI, along with other local and state police, battered down the doors of four residences across Ann Arbor, Canton, and Ypsilanti, Michigan. The homes belonged to pro-Palestine student organizers at University of Michigan. The raids were the latest move by the University of Michigan and the state against student organizers following the protest encampments last spring. The school has seen particularly harsh repression of campus protests against Israel's war on Gaza. While no arrests were made, all electronics were seized into FBI custody and at least two DNA samples were collected, according to local attorneys representing the subjects of the raids. The warrants were from Attorney General Dana Nessel's office and signed by a judge in the 45th District Court in the small town of Oak Point, Michigan, but attorneys also say they have yet to see probable cause for the search and seizures. Nessel, a Democrat, still has not unsealed and shared the affidavits for the warrants with lawyers or the residents they raided. 'These raids were very much seen as an escalation by the state attorney general.' 'These raids were very much seen as an escalation by the state attorney general, who's expressed quite a bit of an extreme reaction against the students' activism on the University of Michigan campus,' said John Philo, executive and legal director of the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, the group representing the targets of the raids. 'In terms of probable cause for the warrants, it's entirely unknown at the moment. The search warrants were issued based on a complaint and the judge has ordered for the affidavit to be suppressed. It's a terribly unusual thing.' Nessel, who asked the FBI to carry out the raids, has positioned herself publicly as one of President Donald Trump's biggest opponents. She also has extensive personal, political, and financial ties to the University of Michigan, which bypassed local prosecutors by enlisting Nessel to crack down on pro-Palestine protesters. According to Philo and Liz Jacob, also of the Sugar Law Center, the FBI presented warrants in Ann Arbor and Canton before entering the premises, but refused to show any at the Ypsilanti residence. 'Folks were shocked, especially to see that the FBI was executing an attorney general warrant,' Jacob told The Intercept in an interview. 'I've never seen that in my experience, and we have not seen that in Michigan around pro-Palestine protests or on any other protests, to my knowledge.' Following the raids, officials denied any connection to the students' political protest, claiming the FBI was becoming involved in a 'vandalism investigation.' In its official press release following the raids, Nessel's office claimed the 12 'coordinated' vandalism incidents that occurred across the state — including graffiti that read 'Free Palestine' — totaled to damages of $100,000. Student organizers have cast doubt on Nessel's denial that the raids were not related to their pro-Palestine protest. 'This is about the occupation and the genocide of Palestinians, and the fact that the state does not care about Americans in any way,' said Ira, a Muslim organizer with TAHRIR, a coalition that advocates against the University of Michigan's complicity in the genocide against Palestinians, who asked to use only their first name for fear of retaliation from the school. 'It's not just about us being targeted right now. All of these people — not just the Trump administration, but these Democrats — who are claiming to fight for Americans are the ones who are attacking and repressing us.' Last October, Nessel filed felony criminal trespass charges against seven student protesters who were arrested last May at a University of Michigan encampment. Those charges were dropped in May, just before a judge was to decide whether or not to disqualify Nessel over alleged bias. Nessel cited 'legal delays and controversies surrounding the case' as to why she dropped the charges. Local organizers, however, fear that the FBI raids are only a stepping stone to something bigger — and that the dropping of the charges is only a temporary relief. Affidavits are typically sealed in cases when there is a confidential informant working with law enforcement who could be compromised. Philo said this would be difficult to understand in this case, especially considering that none of the students raided have any prior criminal activity or pending criminal charges or accusations against them. For what has been alleged, the warrants appeared to be an extreme measure for a vandalism investigation, according to both Sugar Law Center and student organizers who spoke with The Intercept. 'The scope and scale of what is alleged does not seem to warrant three law enforcement agencies descending on the homes of students, who by all calculations and known facts, have been accused of a crime in the past,' said Philo, who describes his clients as 'pretty diligent and responsible students.' The attorney general's raid executed a 'shotgun approach' to further chill protest in solidarity with Palestine, he said. 'To do this in that context with the FBI, state troopers, and local law enforcement,' he said, 'sends a clear message that this is well beyond trying to determine who committed spray painting incidents.' Read our complete coverage While it may be considered unusual for the FBI to become involved in a vandalism investigation, it is not uncommon for the FBI to join forces with local and state law enforcement agencies to work in a joint terrorism task force context, said Mike German, who worked as a special agent in the FBI for six years and is now a fellow at the Brennan Center's liberty and national security program. 'In that context, it's not uncommon for a situation — where a person is alleged to have violated some state law — for them to use the state authorities to pursue that angle of investigation while also gathering evidence for a future terrorism investigation,' he explains. While German does not have any specific information about the Michigan cases, he says this does follow a pattern aligned with the government's increased surveillance of citizens coupled with the FBI's lax approach to far-right violence. He added that the raids in Michigan appear to be part of a broader escalation and expansion of power of the FBI since the September 11 attacks, particularly with the passing of more and more domestic terrorism statutes at federal and state levels. Just having increased powers, German said, created a motivation for using them. 'It has created an insatiable appetite for information,' he said. 'Anywhere that they can get data and information to put into their databases, they'll take those opportunities.'
