
'No Dumping Ground': Tunisia Activist Wins Award Over Waste Scandal
Tunisian environmentalist Semia Labidi Gharbi, awarded a global prize for her role exposing a major waste scandal, has a message for wealthy nations: developing countries are "no dumping ground".
Gharbi was among the first to speak out when Italy shipped more than 280 containers of waste to the North African country in 2020.
The cargo was initially labelled as recyclable plastic scrap, but customs officials found hazardous household waste -- banned under Tunisian law.
"It's true, we are developing countries," Gharbi said in an interview with AFP. "But we are not a dumping ground."
The 57-year-old was among seven environmentalists from different countries handed this year's Goldman Environmental Prize -- commonly known as the "Green Nobel" -- in California last week.
The Goldman committee said her grassroots activism helped force Italy to take the waste back in February 2022.
Gharbi "helped spearhead a campaign that challenged a corrupt waste trafficking scheme between Italy and Tunisia," the Goldman committee said.
And her endeavours ultimately led to the return of 6,000 tonnes of "illegally exported household waste back to Italy", the US-based organisation added.
The scandal took on national proportions in Tunisia and saw the sacking of then environment minister Mustapha Aroui, who was sentenced to three years in prison.
A total of 26 people, including customs officials, were prosecuted.
Yet the waste remained at the port of Sousse for more than two years, with Tunisian rights groups criticising the authorities' inaction as Italy failed to meet deadlines to take it back.
Global waste trade often sees industrialised nations offload rubbish in poorer countries with limited means to handle it.
"What is toxic for developed countries is toxic for us too," said Gharbi. "We also have the right to live in a healthy environment."
She added that while richer countries can manage their own waste, developing ones like Tunisia have "limited capacity".
The Goldman committee said Gharbi's campaigning helped drive reforms in the European Union.
"Her efforts spurred policy shifts within the EU, which has now tightened its procedures and regulations for waste shipments abroad," it said.
Gharbi, who has spent 25 years campaigning on environmental threats to health, said she never set out to turn the scandal into a symbol.
"But now that it has become one, so much the better," she said with a smile.
She hopes the award will raise the profile of Tunisian civil society, and said groups she works with across Africa see the recognition as their own.
"The prize is theirs too," she said, adding it would help amplify advocacy and "convey messages".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Middle East Crisis Opens 'Major Schism' In Trump Coalition
Establishment Republicans have backed Israel's strikes on Iran, but the crisis is forcing President Donald Trump to walk a political tightrope between the hawks in his base and the isolationists who helped sweep him to power. Trump ran for reelection as a peacemaker who distained the foreign adventures of his predecessors, boasting that he would have little difficulty ending conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine. Many Trump followers see Israel's offensive as the sternest test yet of his "America First" credentials, fearing that he will allow the United States to get dragged into the hostilities. The announcement of strikes was applauded by Mark Levin, a rightwing political analyst and longstanding Trump loyalist, who crowed: "The Iranians are about to get their asses kicked." "They think this is Joe Biden's administration, that they would get away.... Thank God we have Donald Trump as president of the United States," he thundered on Fox News. Beyond the government buildings and TV studios of Washington, however, Trump's Make America Great Again, or MAGA, activists oppose US boots on the ground abroad and warn against shows of support for Israel. "This is a sticky one for Trump, who has long pledged to end 'forever wars' and keep the US away from dangerous foreign entanglements," Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political scientist, told AFP. "Trump's America First base is divided. There's a strong strain of isolationism there, and yet Israel and efforts to tamp down anti-Semitism pull Trump in the other direction." Levin received blowback from Tucker Carlson, a leading voice on the American far right, who posted on X that his former Fox News colleague was "hyperventilating" to distract from the real goal -- regime change in Iran. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, normally a foreign policy hawk, was quick to distance the United States from Israel's "unilateral" strikes, which hit uranium-enrichment facilities and killed top Iranian military officials. Trump himself had repeatedly insisted that Iran could not be allowed to have nuclear weapons -- but made clear before the strikes that he was against military action. He appeared to have changed tack by Friday, with ABC quoting the president describing the attack as "excellent." That won't sit well with many of his supporters. Saagar Enjeti, a populist right-wing anchor on the Breaking Points YouTube show, accused Trump of letting down the "America First" isolationists in his base. "Trump has now praised Israel's strike, affirmed US material support, and Israeli media is reporting his public opposition was a disinformation campaign to mislead Iran," he said. "So in other words Trump, not Israel, has made a mockery of all of us wanted to avoid this war." Charlie Kirk, a pro-Israel online MAGA star and one of Trump's staunchest allies, went live on his podcast to find out how his pro-Trump audience was reacting to events. "The emails are so largely overwhelmingly against Israel doing this, I'd say it's probably a 99 to one," Kirk said. Kirk went on to ask how the "America First" foreign policy doctrine can "stay consistent with this," before concluding: "This, right now, is going to cause, I think, a major schism in the MAGA online community." Kirk asked his five million X followers if America should "get involved in Israel's war against Iran" and almost 90 percent of the 300,000+ people who had responded by Friday morning said no. Fellow MAGA activist Jack Posobiec warned before the strikes that they would "disastrously split" Trump's coalition. "Trump smartly ran against starting new wars, this is what the swing states voted for," he said. "The midterms are not far and Congress' majority is already razor-thin. America First!" US President Donald Trump (right) made clear that he wanted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to prioritize diplomacy with Iran over military action AFP


DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Can the EU's Schengen agreement survive new border checks? – DW – 06/13/2025
06/13/2025 June 13, 2025 The Schengen agreement is a cornerstone of European Union policy, allowing the free movement of citizens and goods. But with many member states now reimposing temporary border checks as part of immigration controls, can Schengen survive?


Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Gulf Countries Fear Israel-Iran Spillover
Gulf countries on Friday unanimously condemned Israel's strikes on Iran, fearing an escalation that could threaten economic interests and security. "Gulf states are very much caught between a rock and a hard place," Sanam Vakil, director of the Chatham House think-tank's Middle East and North Africa Programme told AFP. While "they are quietly applauding the further weakening of Iran they face real risks and have to play their cards carefully", she said. Their close ties to Israel's protector Washington, which maintains military bases in the region, and their proximity to Iran -- and its missiles -- pose risks. Vakil said that "Saudi diplomats are distancing themselves from Israel and condemning the strikes as a means to stay out of this conflict". The unfolding situation is playing out against a recent diplomatic rapprochement Riyadh has been building with Tehran ever since China in 2023 brokered an agreement aiming to restore ties. "This is a notable difference with the situation that prevailed in the region 10 years ago, when Saudi Arabia was sort of inciting the United States to strike Iran, calling it the 'head of the snake'," said Karim Bitar, a lecturer in Middle Eastern studies at Paris's Sciences Po university. Indeed, as Tehran reeled from Israel's attacks and planned retaliation, Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan called his Iranian counterpart and "stressed the importance of dialogue to address disputes". "Gulf countries realise that this Israeli attack will jeopardise their economic interests as well as the entire stability" of the region, Bitar said. That is a major preoccupation of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has been focusing on economic growth, giga-projects at home and diversification away from oil. During Donald Trump's first US presidency, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates had pushed for a stronger stance against Iran. Gulf countries supported Trump's decision to pull the United States out of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. But Gulf sentiment began to change after the United States failed to provide significant backing following attacks blamed on Tehran, analysts said. A 2019 attack -- claimed by Yemen's Huthis but blamed by Riyadh and Washington on Tehran -- hit Saudi Arabia's Abqaiq processing plant and Khurais oil field, temporarily halving the kingdom's crude output. Tehran denied involvement. The UAE too has been targeted by attacks from the Huthis that hit Abu Dhabi in 2022. Seeking to avert attacks by Iran and its proxies, especially as they host US bases that could become targets in the wake of a broader conflict, Gulf monarchies have pursued a detente. "The greatest concern in the Gulf now will be to what extent the United States will have to rely on their bases to assist in the defence of Israel," said Middle East analyst Andreas Krieg. While Trump's administration has distanced itself from Israel's operation, it has warned Iran not to hit US targets in the Middle East. "It has... drawn a firm red line, warning that any attacks on US personnel or military installations will provoke a response," Vakil said. She added, however, that "for now, Iran is unlikely to target Gulf infrastructure or assets". The leaders of Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar last month had urged Trump, as he visited the region, to not order US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and to pursue a deal instead, according to the US news outlet Axios. "The Gulf states had hoped that Trump would show strong leadership and would contain (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu's neo-conservative tendencies to escalate," said Krieg. Negotiations on Iran's nuclear programme had been going on between Washington and Tehran, although with little headway. Oman had been readying to host a sixth round of talks on Sunday, before Israel's attack threw that into doubt. For Bitar, the Israeli strikes seemed to be trying to "torpedo" the US-Iran talks. "What will be the US reaction? Will they maintain their blind and unconditional support for Israel, or will they try to go back to the negotiating table and reach a new deal?" he asked.