
A Trump-era twist to Newsom's oil fight
With help from Alex Nieves
CRUDE SHOWDOWN: A Texas-based oil company is putting Gov. Gavin Newsom's fight with Big Oil to the test in the Trump era.
Sable Offshore Corp. started pumping oil last week out of wells in federal waters off the Santa Barbara coast, almost exactly 10 years after an oil spill from a connected pipeline leaked over 100,000 gallons of crude and shut down production. And while some state agencies are putting up a fight, Newsom isn't.
'Under Gov. Newsom's leadership, California has strengthened its position as a national leader in protecting the coastline and public health,' said Newsom spokesperson Daniel Villaseñor in an email. 'While some offshore drilling continues in federal waters under longstanding federal leases, the governor remains unwavering in his commitment: no new offshore drilling — period.'
Some of Sable's restart is out of Newsom's control: Sable is avoiding some hoops by restarting a dormant operation instead of building a new one (thus technically abiding by Newsom's 'no new drilling' dictum), and President Donald Trump is providing some tailwinds with the declaration of an 'energy emergency' and reversal of a Biden-era ban on new drilling.
But some of it is under Newsom's control, at least sort of. Eight state agencies have piecemeal oversight over the onshore pipeline that ruptured 10 years ago and that Sable bought from Exxon to shuttle the newly flowing crude to refineries — and have made at times contradictory moves towards a full restart.
Sen. Monique Limón, a Democrat who represents the Santa Barbara coast, sees some of those permits as a change in tone from Newsom's two special sessions on gas prices in the last two years, which resulted in measures enabling the state to cap refiners' profits and regulate their gasoline inventories. Newsom's also sought climate damages from the world's largest oil companies and signed a law requiring them to situate new wells far away from homes and schools.
'We really got a lot of messaging about how important it was to keep our community safe, to think about the future and the energy transition,' she said. 'This is a reversal, of course, from even just last fall. … The word I would use is 'disconnect.''
Environmental groups sued the Office of the State Fire Marshal last month over its December conditional permit, or 'waiver,' to Sable for its alternative to corrosion prevention on the pipeline and called for a full environmental analysis. They're also concerned about State Parks' move in early May to waive environmental review for a right-of-entry permit for Sable to make repairs within Gaviota State Beach.
Only one agency has come out swinging against Sable: The California Coastal Commission, which fined the company $18 million for continuing its repairs despite three cease-and-desist orders. (Sable, in turn, sued the Coastal Commission in February, arguing it already has the agency's authorization from decades ago.)
State Fire Marshal Daniel Berlant said his office has more stringent safety requirements than the federal government and that it is still waiting for Sable to do a final pressure test on the pipeline before it allows crude oil to flow.
Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis wrote to Sable on Friday urging it to resolve its issues with other agencies before fully restarting operations or the State Lands Commission, which she chairs, may not approve future leases with the company. She also wrote that Sable failed to meet a requirement to notify the commission before starting up any oil flow, which 'undermines trust of Sable's motives.'
In the meantime, state lawmakers are trying to throw up roadblocks with legislation. Limón's SB 542 would require thorough hydrostatic testing before an oil pipeline that's been dormant five years or more can be restarted. And AB 1448, from fellow Central Coast representative Assemblymember Gregg Hart, would add requirements for State Lands Commission leases for coastal oil and gas infrastructure. Western States Petroleum Association opposes both bills.
Sable has been moving quickly in the past few months and is eyeing July for sales of its crude, which is currently being stored in tanks onshore.
'Sable will continue to aggressively defend our vested rights to pursue low-carbon native California oil and natural gas sorely needed to stabilize supply and lower consumer gasoline prices,' said spokesperson Alice Walton. — CvK
Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here!
GAO COW: Republicans' bucking of the Government Accountability Office on California's vehicle emissions waivers is just the tip of their crusade.
The typically uncontroversial, under-the-radar agency is fighting a slew of attacks against its independence, as Jennifer Scholtes, Jordain Carney and Katherine Tully-McManus report.
From the Office of Management and Budget's criticism of GAO for finding the Trump administration improperly withheld funding for electric vehicle infrastructure to the Department of Government Efficiency's attempts to assign the agency a downsizing team, the office has found itself in the middle of the partisan fray — despite its attempts to stay out of it.
'We're just responding to help Congress,' GAO Comptroller Gene Dodaro said at a recent hearing. 'We're not trying to influence things one way or the other. We're nonpartisan. We're asked a question; we give an answer. It doesn't matter who it is.'
FORKLIFT IN THE ROAD: Amid all the federal rule rollbacks, state regulators issued an advisory Tuesday confirming that they won't enforce a zero-emission forklift rule they never got federal approval for.
The California Air Resources Board, in an email, encouraged companies to voluntarily report their progress at phasing out fossil fuel forklifts but clarified that it wouldn't retroactively hold them responsible if the rule is enforced in the future.
CARB last June approved the proposal to ban the sale of new combustion engine forklifts by 2026 and phase out older models by 2038. But state officials never submitted the rule for an EPA waiver, anticipating that the Trump administration would not approve it.
The Western Propane Gas Association sued in August, arguing that CARB failed to analyze the environmental impacts of new infrastructure needed to operate larger fleets of electric forklifts. — AN
MORE SUSPENSE: We're back with another tranche of bills that either hit a wall or got through Friday's appropriations committee deadline with significant amendments:
Inmate firefighter pay: Assemblymember Isaac Bryan's bid to boost pay for incarcerated firefighters survived appropriations, but only after he agreed to significantly reduce how much they'd earn while responding to an active fire. Bryan lowered his proposal in AB 247 from $19 per hour to $7.25 per hour, equal to the federal minimum wage.
Inmate firefighters are currently paid $30 per day for a 24-hour emergency shift.
Child labor: The Senate Appropriations Committee killed a bill from Sen. Shannon Grove that would have required California to certify that vehicles purchased for state-owned fleets were manufactured with metal and minerals mined at operations without child labor. SB 77 cleared its only policy committee hearing with unanimous support, but the Department of General Services warned that the costs associated with analyzing complex supply chains and working with potentially unwilling vehicle manufacturers would be high.
Leno's Law: Grove also made amendments to her bill championed by comedian Jay Leno that would exempt classic collector cars from smog checks. The Republican added language to SB 712 that would require qualifying cars to have collector's insurance and be required as historical vehicles, which restricts their use to events like historical exhibitions, parades, or club activities. The amendments mirror language originally in the bill that Grove removed in March.
Fuel prices: Assembly Appropriations nixed a bill from Assemblymember Corey Jackson, AB 555, that would have required CARB to submit quarterly reports on the impacts of regulations on transportation fuel prices. CARB argued the proposal could create significant new costs by forcing it to develop new models for calculating the 'cause-and-effect relationships' between its regulations and consumer prices.
The issue isn't going away. Speaker Robert Rivas last month named Assemblymembers David Alvarez and Lori Wilson co-chairs of a new committee to study the state's low-carbon fuel standard and transportation affordability. — AN
SUMMER SPLASH: The federal government gave San Joaquin Valley farmers a 'welcome to summer' gift Tuesday by increasing its expected water deliveries from 50 percent of requested supplies to 55 percent.
The Bureau of Reclamation adjusted its forecast because of 'greater certainty about water availability' now that the state's wet season is over, according to a statement by acting Regional Director Adam Nickels. Reservoirs are currently brimming at or nearly at capacity across California following the third year in a row with average to above average winter precipitation.
The Bureau of Reclamation also cited Trump's January executive order to 'maximize' California water supplies for its new allocation.
The state government's summer allocations, meanwhile, remain at 50 percent for now, though Department of Water Resources spokesperson Ryan Endean said state officials are continuing to analyze snowmelt runoff and current water supply and could still adjust allocations later. — CvK
FROG FIGHT: California water agencies, farmers and utility companies got a temporary reprieve in their fight against expansive habitat protections for the endangered foothill yellow-legged frog.
The federal Fish and Wildlife Service extended its review period from May 17 to July 28 for a proposal to designate 760,071 acres as critical habitat for the 3-inch-long frog that historically ranged from Oregon to Baja California, Michael Doyle reports for POLITICO's E&E News.
The potential habitat designation, published during the waning days of former President Joe Biden's term, has set off alarms across the political spectrum. Groups like the Association of California Water Districts and California Farm Bureau warn that the proposal could hinder efforts to manage water resources on public and private land.
And the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission that a proposed buffer zone for transmission lines and other infrastructure is too large and includes habit unsuitable for the frog. — AN
— Former Los Angeles mayor and gubernatorial candidate Antonio Villaraigosa is defending refineries and accepting campaign donations from oil companies and executives.
— Groundwater losses exceed above-ground losses of water in the Colorado River Basin.
— PG&E has seen requests for power from data center developers jump over 40 percent this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FMCSA eliminates DEI rules for $89M in CDL grants
WASHINGTON — State and local government agencies, schools, small businesses, and others eligible for FMCSA's CDL grants will see fewer restrictions tied to the application process than was the case under the previous administration. FMCSA announced on Friday up to $89.4 million available in the latest round of competitive grant funding through its Commercial Driver's License Program Implementation (CDLPI) grant. The grants are aimed at developing, implementing and maintaining CDL programs. As is the case with all competitive grant programs now being run by the Trump administration, including infrastructure grants, the latest round of CDLPI grants eliminates the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) and climate change requirements mandated under the Biden administration – what Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy refers to as 'woke' and 'Green New Scam' mandates. 'Previously, recipients of this critical safety grant were forced to prioritize climate change and DEI agendas alongside core safety objectives,' FMCSA by eliminating DEI, the agency asserts, 'taxpayer dollars are now fully dedicated to genuine safety improvements, appropriate accountability, and real, measurable outcomes. Potential applicants are instructed to thoroughly review the reformed application guidelines to align with these necessary and refocused priorities.' CDLPI grants help states strengthen compliance with federal safety regulations and enhance the integrity of the National Commercial Driver's License Program, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation. The program 'focuses on the concept that each driver has only one driving record and only one licensing document, commonly referred to as 'One Driver — One License — One Record.'' The National CDL Program also requires states to conduct knowledge and skills testing before issuing a commercial learner's permit and/or a CDL, to maintain a complete and accurate driver history record for anyone who obtains either document, and to impose driver disqualifications as required by be considered for a CDLPI grant, applicants should specify performance goals related to the project. Performance goals for successful CDLPI grant award projects may include, among others: Sustained compliance with rulemakings: Activities that support a state's implementation of federal CDL regulatory requirements, such as medical certification, Drug & Alcohol Clearinghouse, and entry-level driver training requirements. Timely driver history record (DHR) actions: Activities to issue disqualifications, suspensions and downgrades in a timely manner to CLP and CDL holders and post to their DHR, which will allow unsafe drivers to be removed from service. Data quality, accuracy and completeness: Activities that address a state's accuracy and completeness of DHRs, including all conviction and disqualification data, medical certifications, entry-level driver training verification, and knowledge and skills testing information. Innovative approaches to improving CDL issues: Activities that provide a novel technique or approach (program design, use of technology assets, etc.) to benefit national CDL safety and/or improve state driver license agencies' (SDLA) CDL safety data quality, which may include research projects and pilot testing new approaches to improving compliance. Human trafficking recognition, prevention and reporting: Activities that deter and reduce commercial truck-based human trafficking-related activities, and increase human trafficking awareness and training for SDLA, judiciary, and law enforcement staff and other industry stakeholders. Increased testing rates and integrity: Activities that increase a state's capacity for testing and issuing CDLs, including using new technology to ensure that CDL knowledge and skills testing integrity is maintained. Cost savings: Activities that reduce costs for SDLAs through the increased use of automated systems. Reduction in fraudulent CDL activities: Activities that increase the effectiveness of fraud prevention related to driving, medical credentials, skills testing operations and license issuance. Complete proposals must be submitted electronically by July 7. FreightWaves spotlight: CDL issues FMCSA makes up to $90M available in FY2025 grants Trump administration wants to cut FMCSA workforce by 7% Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher. The post FMCSA eliminates DEI rules for $89M in CDL grants appeared first on FreightWaves.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Dems Get Bonus Hearing on Crypto Market Structure, Assail Trump Conflicts
WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. President Donald Trump's crypto ventures were once again under the microscope during a House Financial Services Committee hearing that otherwise saw legal experts express worries about how regulators might police digital assets under a market structure bill. The committee held a "minority day" hearing — meaning the witnesses were primarily picked by the Democrats, the current minority party in the House — on Friday, letting lawmakers ask questions more targeted on concerns they have with the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, the Republican-led market structure legislation that will receive a markup vote next week. Maxine Waters, the ranking Democrat on the committee who'd demanding this extracurricular hearing after the panel met earlier in the week on the same topic, pointed to Trump's various crypto efforts in her opening statement, saying her goal was to stop Trump from profiting off of his crypto ventures to the extent he has been. "What I'm opposed to in this act … is the crooked president of the United States of America, who's decided to use the office of the presidency to enhance his access to profits," Waters said. Republicans focused on a different tack: "Currently, there is no federal framework for non-security digital assets," Committee Chair French Hill said in his own opening statement, a stance echoed by his colleagues Bryan Steil and Warren Davidson. They contend that Democrats and the administration of former President Joe Biden allowed years to pass in which they failed to protect consumers by offering no rules to oversee crypto. Crypto has driven an ideological wedge into the Democratic Party on Capitol Hill, with many Democrats — typically skewing toward the younger members — supporting the advancement of digital assets legislation despite the direction of their leadership. Most of the Democrats attending this bonus hearing on the Clarity Act were in the crypto-critical camp, though Representative Jim Himes, a Connecticut Democrat, has supported crypto bills in the past and questioned witnesses at the hearing about his concerns that the bill may include loopholes that could allow financial firms to dodge oversight. Himes, a yes vote on last year's predecessor to the Clarity Act — the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act, or FIT21 — said some of the provisions in the new effort may allow for a carveout that can be abused by certain types of issuers under Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. The Clarity Act itself is more complicated than it needs to be and does not address some of the cybersecurity risks posed to the cryptocurrency industry, said Carole House, a former White House adviser who is now a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council GeoEconomics Center. She pointed to recent crypto hacks, including crypto exchange ByBit, as an example. Amanda Fischer, policy director at Better Markets, a Washington group advocating for financial policies that favor the public, said her bigger issue was with the exceptions that exist for companies to seek regulation under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rather than the Securities and Exchange Commission, saying that it might provide loopholes for issuers or other crypto companies that otherwise would be regulated under the SEC and be subject to securities registration and reporting requirements. But as has been seen in other recent hearings, Trump's crypto ties again reappeared as the star of the show. Bart Naylor, a policy expert at Public Citizen and a former investigator for the Senate Banking Committee, said he believes Trump is specifically soliciting gifts through his memecoin and selling favors through actions like his memecoin dinner or by terminating SEC lawsuits against companies which donated money to him. White House officials have routinely denied Trump is exhibiting a conflict of interests in his pursuit of digital assets business gains. Waters had staged a walkout last month from what was meant to be a joint hearing of this and the House Agriculture Committee on crypto policy, though industry insiders were careful to note that not all the panel's Democrats followed Waters' departure.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump seeks to weaken Senator Lindsey Graham's devastating Russia sanctions bill
The administration of US President Donald Trump has urged Republican Senator Lindsey Graham to soften sanctions against Russia in the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, which has strong bipartisan support in the Senate. Source: The Wall Street Journal, as reported by European Pravda Details: The Wall Street Journal reports that White House officials recently contacted Graham's office pressing for changes to the bill's sanctions provisions. Aides to the senator, who asked to remain anonymous, said that among other things, the Trump administration proposed adding provisions to the draft that would allow the US president to decide whom or what to sanction. The White House also suggested replacing the word "shall" with "may" throughout the bill, removing the mandatory nature of the sanctions, the WSJ reported. Graham's team expressed frustration, arguing that diluting the mandatory sanctions would render the bill ineffective and noting that Trump already has discretionary powers to impose sanctions. Previously: Senators Lindsey Graham (Republican) and Richard Blumenthal (Democrat), supported by 82 co-sponsors, introduced the bill to impose economic sanctions on Russia for obstructing ceasefire efforts in its war of aggression against Ukraine, particularly by imposing a 500% tariff on goods imported from countries that purchase Russian oil. The bill also has bipartisan support in the House of Representatives, where a companion bill has 33 co-sponsors. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump would make the final decision on any potential tightening of sanctions against Russia. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!