UK smoking ban risks breaching post-Brexit deal, ex-Tory justice secretary warns
Keir Starmer 's flagship smoking ban risks breaching a key post-Brexit deal with the European Union and is 'heading straight for the courts', a former Tory justice secretary has warned.
Robert Buckland says he was initially supportive of the plans, which will see Britain ban smoking for an entire generation.
But now he says the government 'must hit pause' or risk a legal car crash.
Under the plans anyone currently aged 15 or younger will never be able to buy cigarettes legally, as the UK slowly becomes a smoke-free country.
The idea was launched with great fanfare by Rishi Sunak, but enthusiastically backed by Labour when the Tories were kicked out of power last summer.
But now Sir Robert warns the policy risks breaching another key piece of legislation signed by Mr Sunak, the Windsor Framework with the EU.
It is designed to deal with the post-Brexit problem about what to do at Northern Ireland 's border, the scene of many atrocities during the Troubles.
There were fears that Brexit could make the land border between NI and the Republic of Ireland a so-called 'hard border' again, with checkpoints that risked becoming the focus of future attacks.
In a bid to avoid that the UK and the EU agreed a system under which, when it comes to goods, NI aligns with EU laws.
Sir Robert warns that EU law therefore requires that tobacco remain legal for adults over 18 in NI.
But the new Bill would criminalise its sale to anyone born after 2008 across the UK, including in NI.
Sir Robert says the disconnect means the Bill, in its current form, is on a collision course with international law and ministers are sleepwalking into a constitutional and legal car crash.
'If the Bill applies in Northern Ireland, we breach EU law. If it doesn't, we fracture the UK's internal market. Either way, we're in breach of the treaty we signed just last year,' he said.
He added: 'The Windsor Framework is not political window dressing, it's international law. And if Parliament pushes ahead with this Bill as-is, we are heading straight for the courts.
'Northern Ireland's courts have already shown they will strike down UK laws that conflict with the Framework. That is not theoretical, it's real, it's recent, and it's relevant.
'The government must hit pause. Either negotiate an exemption… or remove Northern Ireland from the scope of the Bill. Anything else is reckless.'
'The right to buy legal goods like tobacco is protected under the Windsor Framework and the Good Friday Agreement. Strip that away, and the government is staring down the barrel of a serious legal defeat.'
The Department of Health has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
23 minutes ago
- The National
Ignore Reform UK's anti-net zero agenda if you want Scotland to thrive
The logic of what we call net zero is now challenged regularly and one political party is even determined to scrap it. That would, of course, be strategically inept, both economically and environmentally, but I'm worried it's a view that's gaining momentum. Yes, I'm well aware that Scotland's greenhouse gas contribution to global climate change is miniscule and that if we achieved net zero tomorrow it would make little or no difference to global warming. But that really isn't the point. Achieving net zero is a worthy goal for an enlightened country such as Scotland but, more importantly, it's a huge economic and industrial opportunity. READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: Keir Starmer's in an historic mess. There's only one person to blame Yes, I also know we've been saying that for probably 20 years or more now and that the reality is that we've managed to achieve relatively little particularly in terms of exportable renewables technology manufacturing. Lots of talk about potential but little action. The great plan to reindustrialise Scotland on the back of renewables was frankly never going to happen in any meaningful way while we remain under the malign influence of the UK's economic and political ideology and its built-in aversion to investment in manufacturing. Anyway, that's a subject for another day. The real problems with net zero and the just transition are those directly affecting consumers, both domestic and industrial, as well as society generally. And the biggest of these is the impact on the cost of living. Energy prices across the UK are considerably higher than in Europe and that's making life extremely difficult for everyone. Why that's the case is not simply due to the development of renewables as some would have us believe but a messy combination of issues related to the energy mix, how the market operates, infrastructure problems, some poorly thought through policy decisions and privatisation, which necessitated much of this. Instead of basing the electricity price on an average of all its energy sources the UK foolishly adopted a 'marginal pricing' system, where the highest cost generator needed to meet demand sets the price for all electricity. That is very often natural gas, the price of which is easily impacted by events outside the UK – for example, the war in Ukraine and the fact Israel has just bombed one of the world's biggest gas fields in Iran. Gas also accounts for a large proportion of home heating and perhaps as high as 75-80% of people still use it. No great surprise really because it suits the majority of our housing stock, which suffers from much higher levels of heat loss than those in Europe and particularly Scandinavia. We also have limited gas storage now due to commercial decisions related to financial viability so can't buy it in when it's cheap for use when demand is high. A nationalised industry would have been able to take a different approach. Critically, consumers also have to pick up the tab for policy costs which will include environmental taxes and renewable energy subsidies. In Europe, some states pick up these costs rather than the consumer. READ MORE: The RTS switch-off is a national blunder, but rural Scotland will pay the price Rather like the English water industry, the privatisation of energy has also led to weak regulation and made it more difficult for government to influence the market without it backfiring. Remember in France in 2022 the government told the majority state-owned company EDF to restrict price increases to 4% in order to protect consumers. Here, no such restrictions were able to be imposed and were unlikely anyway because the presumption here is the protection of shareholders not consumers. But the fact remains that without gas there is currently no mechanism for backing up a 100% renewables-dependent energy system which by its very nature suffers from being vulnerable to periods of low or even zero generation due to the lack of wind or solar energy or what the Germans call 'Dunkelflaute'. The UK Government's partial answer to the 'marginal cost' problem is to build more nuclear power stations. At a time when Westminster is insisting it has to prepare the UK for war, this strikes me as a quite bizarre idea. Nuclear power stations make great targets. You don't even have to hit the reactors, just the substations, switchgear and pylons that sit next to it. That apart, nuclear power station building is renowned for not sticking to a budget or being completed on schedule. Sizewell C is reportedly already some £25 billion over budget and five years late. The Sizewell C construction site in January (Image: Mike Page) As its costs increase then so will the cost of electricity it generates and, if as expected, it exceeds the cost of electricity from wind or solar will it then become the marker for the 'marginal cost' figure used to calculate electricity prices instead of gas? A reminder also that the battery storage systems you see popping up now all over Scotland are not aimed at providing energy security and resilience for consumers but at ensuring grid stability. So when it's claimed that this battery system is enough to power 10,000 homes it's simply a means of comparison. In any event, most of those systems couldn't possibly power those houses for more than a few hours at best. Pointless when some storms have knocked out power supplies for a week or more. Add in the huge numbers of pylons we're being asked to accept, the cost and disruption of fitting that heat pump – if you can afford it – and the insistence that you must at some point buy a battery electric vehicle whether you want one or not and it's easy to see why people are miffed and why some politicians are feeding on that discontent. Government needs to slow down, listen to the people and have a rethink because things are getting out of control. Nobody would resent a pause in the process and for example, a reassessment of the role of the oil and gas industry. And that pause wouldn't make a blind bit of difference because as I said, our impact on climate change is almost imperceptible.
Glasgow Times
23 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Government announces concessions to welfare bill after talks
A letter from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall to MPs said adjustments to universal credit would also see incomes protected. The announcement comes after crisis talks with backbenchers, with some 126 MPs within the party signing an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. Sir Keir Starmer's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. A spokesperson for Number 10 said: 'We have listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system. 'This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it by putting it on a sustainable footing, provide dignity for those unable to work, supports those who can and reduce anxiety for those currently in the system. 'Our reforms are underpinned by Labour values and our determination to deliver the change the country voted for last year.' The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. In her letter, the Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety. 'We will ensure that all of those currently receiving PIP will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only. 'Secondly, we will adjust the pathway of Universal Credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element – and any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria – have their incomes fully protected in real terms.' She said a ministerial review would ensure the benefit is 'fair and fit for the future' and will be a 'coproduction' with disabled people, organisations which represent them and MPs. 'These important reforms are rooted in Labour values, and we want to get them right,' she said. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall (PA) The change in Pip payments would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. If the legislation clears its first hurdle on Tuesday, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' tabled by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. She said: 'This is a good deal. It is massive changes to ensure the most vulnerable people are protected… and, crucially, involving disabled people themselves in the design of future benefit changes.' While the concessions look set to reassure some of those who had been leading the rebellion, other MPs remained opposed before the announcement. Speaking to the PA news agency before the concessions were revealed, Rachel Maskell said: 'As the Government is seeking to reform the system, they should protect all disabled people until they have completed their co-produced consultation and co-produced implementation. 'I cannot vote for something that will have such a significant impact … as disabled people are not involved, it is just a backroom deal.' One MP said that ministers would need to 'go back to the drawing board' to make the Bill acceptable. Another said they expected the legislation would get through second reading if the Government conceded the key sticking points relating to existing Pip claimants, the health element of universal credit and a policy consultation. 'It would need to be in the Bill, not just a commitment,' they said. Speaking in the Commons on Wednesday, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to reflect 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He insisted there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' There was a mixed reaction among charities to the prospect of concessions. Learning disability charity Mencap said the news would be a 'huge relief to thousands of people living in fear of what the future holds'. 'It is the right thing to do and sends a clear message – cutting disability benefits is not a fair way to mend the black hole in the public purse,' director of strategy Jackie O'Sullivan said. But the MS Society urged rebels to hold firm and block the Bill, insisting any Government offer to water down the reforms would amount to 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster'. Head of campaigns at the charity, Charlotte Gill, said: 'We urge MPs not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions. 'The only way to avoid a catastrophe today and in the future is to stop the cuts altogether by halting the Bill in its tracks.' The Tories described concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs, Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'
Powys County Times
24 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Government announces concessions to welfare bill after talks
People who currently receive the personal independence payment (Pip) will continue to do so after the Government made concessions to Labour rebels on controversial welfare reforms. A letter from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall to MPs said adjustments to universal credit would also see incomes protected. The announcement comes after crisis talks with backbenchers, with some 126 MPs within the party signing an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks. Sir Keir Starmer's Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has its second reading on Tuesday, the first opportunity for MPs to support or reject it. A spokesperson for Number 10 said: 'We have listened to MPs who support the principle of reform but are worried about the pace of change for those already supported by the system. 'This package will preserve the social security system for those who need it by putting it on a sustainable footing, provide dignity for those unable to work, supports those who can and reduce anxiety for those currently in the system. 'Our reforms are underpinned by Labour values and our determination to deliver the change the country voted for last year.' The Government's original package restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limited the sickness-related element of universal credit. Existing claimants were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes. In her letter, the Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We recognise the proposed changes have been a source of uncertainty and anxiety. 'We will ensure that all of those currently receiving PIP will stay within the current system. The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only. 'Secondly, we will adjust the pathway of Universal Credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element – and any new claimant meeting the severe conditions criteria – have their incomes fully protected in real terms.' She said a ministerial review would ensure the benefit is 'fair and fit for the future' and will be a 'coproduction' with disabled people, organisations which represent them and MPs. 'These important reforms are rooted in Labour values, and we want to get them right,' she said. The change in Pip payments would protect some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment. If the legislation clears its first hurdle on Tuesday, it will then face a few hours' examination by all MPs the following week – rather than days or weeks in front of a committee tasked with looking at the Bill. The so-called 'reasoned amendment' tabled by Treasury select committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier had argued that disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed. She said: 'This is a good deal. It is massive changes to ensure the most vulnerable people are protected… and, crucially, involving disabled people themselves in the design of future benefit changes.' While the concessions look set to reassure some of those who had been leading the rebellion, other MPs remained opposed before the announcement. Speaking to the PA news agency before the concessions were revealed, Rachel Maskell said: 'As the Government is seeking to reform the system, they should protect all disabled people until they have completed their co-produced consultation and co-produced implementation. 'I cannot vote for something that will have such a significant impact … as disabled people are not involved, it is just a backroom deal.' One MP said that ministers would need to 'go back to the drawing board' to make the Bill acceptable. Another said they expected the legislation would get through second reading if the Government conceded the key sticking points relating to existing Pip claimants, the health element of universal credit and a policy consultation. 'It would need to be in the Bill, not just a commitment,' they said. Speaking in the Commons on Wednesday, Sir Keir told MPs he wanted the reforms to reflect 'Labour values of fairness' and that discussions about the changes would continue over the coming days. He insisted there was 'consensus across the House on the urgent need for reform' of the 'broken' welfare system. 'I know colleagues across the House are eager to start fixing that, and so am I, and that all colleagues want to get this right, and so do I,' he said. 'We want to see reform implemented with Labour values of fairness. 'That conversation will continue in the coming days, so we can begin making change together on Tuesday.' There was a mixed reaction among charities to the prospect of concessions. Learning disability charity Mencap said the news would be a 'huge relief to thousands of people living in fear of what the future holds'. 'It is the right thing to do and sends a clear message – cutting disability benefits is not a fair way to mend the black hole in the public purse,' director of strategy Jackie O'Sullivan said. But the MS Society urged rebels to hold firm and block the Bill, insisting any Government offer to water down the reforms would amount to 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster'. Head of campaigns at the charity, Charlotte Gill, said: 'We urge MPs not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions. 'The only way to avoid a catastrophe today and in the future is to stop the cuts altogether by halting the Bill in its tracks.' The Tories described concessions as 'the latest in a growing list of screeching U-turns' from the Government. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Under pressure from his own MPs, Starmer has made another completely unfunded spending commitment. 'Labour's welfare chaos will cost hardworking taxpayers. 'We can't afford Labour.'
