
Mexicans will elect a new judiciary June 1. A look at some of the candidates
MEXICO CITY — What do an activist searching for missing Mexicans, an attorney who once represented a drug lord and a university professor trying out TikTok have in common?
They are all campaigning for positions in Mexico's first judicial election on June 1.
More than 2,600 contenders are vying for 881 positions from Mexico's Supreme Court down to district courts across the country. In 2027, another election is planned to elect 800 more judicial positions.
Those on the June 1 ballots won a lottery after being screened by committees made up of people from the three branches of government. In order to qualify, they had to have a law degree, at least five years of professional practice, write an essay and collect letters of recommendation from friends and colleagues.
Foreign governments, including the United States, and civil society organizations in Mexico criticized the change, warning that it would lead to a politicization of the judiciary and weaken its independence.
Electing judges was former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador's way to root out corruption. Make them accountable to the people, he said. The contentious reform's passage was among the last major acts of his presidency last September.
Here are some of the candidates:
Age: 41
What's she known for? She is among the hundreds of Mexicans searching for a missing relative, in her case a brother who disappeared in 2014.
Candidate for: District judge in the western state of Sinaloa.
Quiroa's experience has been different to most other candidates' in that she's more accustomed to being on the victims' side.
After her brother disappeared in the northern border state of Tamaulipas, Quiroa began searching and eventually founded a collective called 'March 10' for the day he vanished.
She quickly realized there was little legal help available to help searchers like herself, so she left her engineering career and began to study law while continuing her search.
Quiroa gained notoriety a couple years ago when she proposed criminal groups consider a peace treaty to make it safer to search for the missing and she began selling a 'Searcher Barbie' to raise money for her group's activities.
Late last year, she decided to return to her native Sinaloa state to compete to be a judge.
Quiroa knows the risks of being a judge in the violent state, home to a powerful cartel of the same name, but she said that there need to be more judges who empathize with those searching for missing loved ones.
'If I become a judge, I'm not going to send legal documents and wait for authorities to answer when they feel like it,' Quiroa said. 'I'm going to go out and look for the missing people.'
Age: 40
What's he known for? He went viral as 'Justice Pork Rinds.'
Candidate for: Supreme Court.
Until the campaign started, Guerrero wasn't well-known outside of Mexico's National Autonomous University, where he has taught classes for more than a decade. He had also led Mexico City's public records agency and worked at the capital's electoral court.
But it was a homemade TikTok video that took off and launched Guerrero's campaign. In it, a student hands him a platter of a typical pork rind dish. Playing on the turn of phrase, he says he's 'more prepared than a pork rind' to be a Supreme Court justice, before rolling into his qualifications.
Some grumps accused him of turning the race into a circus, but Guerrero said that his attempt at humor was far less harmful than having a corrupt justice on the highest court.
'You have to be colloquial sometimes in your use of language,' he said, accepting that he has tried to run a 'disruptive' campaign.
If elected, Guerrero said that he would push to have the court hold hearings around Mexico to have more contact with people.
Age: 51
What's she known for? She represented drug kingpin Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán in 2016.
Candidate for: Criminal court judge in northern state of Chihuahua.
Nine years ago, Silvia Delgado García was a member of Sinaloa cartel leader Guzmán's legal team when he was temporarily held in a prison in Ciudad Juarez before being extradited to the United States. He was eventually tried, convicted and sentenced to life in prison in the U.S.
She's still marked by the case.
Some critics of electing judges, and a human rights litigation group called Defensorxs, have labeled Delgado García 'high risk,' because 'she defends alleged drug traffickers.'
The group has also identified 17 other candidates that way for being prosecuted, being members of investigated organizations, for alleged human rights violations and deals with criminal groups.
'Everyone has a right to an effective defense,' Delgado García said about her decision to represent Guzmán.
She notes that she only helped at one hearing where the power went out, and her job was to visit him in the Ciudad Juarez prison where he was being held.
'If they give me a client of that magnitude, in terms of resume that's going to help me,' she said.
As a candidate, she highlights that she has been a litigator for 18 years and has a passion for criminal law.
'I am a citizen who believes in the law, and I am extremely prepared to carry out the job and I aim to be impartial in the decisions I hand down.'
Age: 30
What's he known for? He's a young lawyer at the Supreme Court who spends his free time campaigning in Mexico City's central square.
Candidate for: An administrative judge for two of Mexico City's boroughs.
Every afternoon, Monday to Thursday, Tapia Maltos finishes work at Mexico's Supreme Court where he has worked for 11 years and walks next door to Mexico City's sprawling central square. There, he sets up a small stand from which he hangs three papers on which he has handwritten his name, the position he seeks, his social platform handle and his ID number for the ballot.
Even though he frequently goes unnoticed by the multitude of street vendors, tourists and workers crossing the square each day, Tapia Maltos dressed in white shirt, tie and dark slacks, occasionally draws the attention of those curious enough to stop and read his papers. Some then ask how they can vote.
The simplicity of his campaign is its most noteworthy characteristic.
'I'm not trying to make a big production with videos, no dancing or anything like that ... Because what I'm trying to do is get to know people in an appropriate way.'
He has worked for years behind the scenes inside the Supreme Court in preparing decisions. Now, thanks to the new judicial election, he says that he has found a way to achieve his dream of being a judge and bring new blood to a judiciary long criticized as corrupt.
____
Follow AP's coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Congress's Remittance Tax Will Increase The Cost Of Staying In Mexico
Crispin Agustin Mendoza is mayor of Alcozauca in Mexico. He's also a builder of dream houses for Mexicans presently living and working in the United States, but who plan to return to Mexico. In his words to the New York Times, 'I build their dream houses. That means I depend strictly on the U.S. economy.' Stop and think about that for a bit. Specifically contemplate Mendoza's explanation of how he makes money while thinking about the proposed 3.5% tax on remittances stuffed away in the 'Big, Beautiful' bill. Assuming what's challenging, that banks and other financial institutions could become tax collectors in addition to financial intermediaries, would it be worth it? For one, a 3.5 % tax is significant. Since it is, it's inevitable that producers rich, poor and in-between will strive to get around the tax. In other words, instead of moving their money in the safest way possible, it's no reach to say that markets of the underground kind will form to meet the needs (and sometimes thieve from) of those for whom 3.5% is a substantial, double-tax on their earnings. And there's more. Think again of Mayor Mendoza in Alcozauca, and what drives his business: Mexicans working in the U.S., but who aim to get back to Mexico. Think about it alongside the popular narrative about immigrants from south of the border crossing into the U.S. to vote in the U.S. and allegedly change the makeup of our nation. It's more realistic to say that Mexicans come to the U.S. to work, and in the process boost our economy while paying taxes, all with a goal to get back to Mexico. Call the remittance tax a tax on the return of Mexicans to Mexico. Which unearths an implied truth in the proposed remittance tax. Another popular excuse for keeping workers from south of the U.S. out of the U.S. has to do with welfare and other benefits offered by local, state and national governments. Opponents of immigration are prone to say that the existence of the welfare state makes the inflow of workers from Central America a non-starter. The mere proposal of a remittance tax rejects the notion. Really, why would Congress propose such a tax unless the money earned and subsequently remitted by immigrants were substantial? As evidenced by over $60 billion worth of remittances to Mexico in 2023 alone, the primary occupation of immigrants from south of the border is work. Considering the $60 billion again, and its outsize impact on consumption in Mexico, stop and think about how many citizens in Mexico can afford to live there exactly due to the productive nature of their relatives in the United States. Unknown is whether Republicans eager to levy such a large tax on tens of billions worth of remittances are doing so while aware of the implications. With so many claiming a desire to keep the borders empty and to limit the inflow of greater numbers of desperate people from the south, have they stopped to consider what this tax, or more realistically, what this penalty on remittances will mean for those not presently living and working in the U.S.? As Republicans have long noted correctly, economic activity takes place on the margin. If Republicans raise the cost of remitting money outside the U.S., they'll lower the cost of migrating to the U.S. all the while increasing the relative desperation to get to the U.S. It's just a comment that one of the world's cruelest taxes is also one of its most foolish.

Associated Press
6 hours ago
- Associated Press
A bid for bail by former New Jersey US Sen. Menendez is rejected by appeals court as prison looms
NEW YORK (AP) — A bid for bail by former U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez while he appeals his bribery conviction was rejected Wednesday by a federal appeals court, a week before the veteran New Jersey politician is scheduled to report to prison. Menendez, 71, was convicted last July of selling his clout for bribes. FBI agents who searched his home three years ago found $480,000, some of it stuffed inside boots and jacket pockets, gold bars worth an estimated $150,000 and a luxury convertible in the garage. Prosecutors said that in exchange, Menendez performed corrupt favors for the New Jersey business owners. They said he tried to protect the men and associates from criminal investigations, helped two in business deals with foreign powers and met with Egyptian intelligence officials before helping that country access $300 million in U.S. military aid. Menendez, a Democrat, has insisted that he is innocent and is seeking to overturn his conviction. He is scheduled to surrender to federal prison authorities on Tuesday. A three-judge panel on the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied his bail motion in a brief order issued Wednesday. The decision did not include a rationale, but it said one of the three judges would have granted the motion. An email seeking comment was sent to his attorneys. Menendez, who once served as chair of the influential Senate Foreign Relations Committee, resigned his seat a month after his conviction. He had been in the Senate since 2006. Two business owners also were convicted last year along with Menendez. His wife, Nadine Menendez, was convicted in April of teaming up with her husband to accept bribes from the business owners. Her trial was delayed after she was diagnosed with breast cancer and required surgery. Her sentencing has been set for Sept. 11.


Washington Post
6 hours ago
- Washington Post
Bruce Springsteen's Berlin concert echoes with history and a stark warning
BERLIN — Veteran rock star Bruce Springsteen , a high-profile critic of President Donald Trump, slammed the U.S. administration as 'corrupt, incompetent and treasonous' during a concert Wednesday in Berlin. He was addressing tens of thousands of fans at a stadium built for the 1936 Olympic Games that still bears the scars of World War II and contains relics from the country's dark Nazi past.