Invasive fish competition returns with anglers making 'Reel Rewards'
Anglers in Maryland are once again uniting to put a stop to an invasive fish species while also reeling in a few bucks along the way.
The "Reel Rewards" program, launched in 2024 by a coalition of local conservation groups, pays fishermen $30 for every snakehead, blue and flathead they catch in the Baltimore harbor.
"Invasive fish species threaten the Baltimore Harbor ecosystem, economy, and native species," the group's website says.
"Invasive snakehead, blue catfish, and flathead catfish prey on and compete for resources with native species that are important to anglers and businesses," the site also notes.
Anglers can catch up to a maximum of 15 fish heads or bodies per week — and it does not matter whether the fish is caught on land or by boat.
Snakeheads have scales similar to a boa or python, giving meaning to their name.
They can be found at the bottom of shallow, slow-moving, weedy waters, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS).
The fish have large mouths full of pointed teeth, according to FWS.
Snakeheads vary in size, but generally range from stretching a few inches to over three feet long, according to New York Invasive Species.
The program asks that all fishermen adhere to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources fishing regulations and have proper licenses.
Fox News Digital reached out to the Environmental Justice Journalism Initiative for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference 2025 left unspoken what Alaskans truly value
The Canning River, seen here in 2018, flows from the Brooks Range into the Beaufort Sea along the western edge of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. (Photo by Lisa Hupp/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) At the conclusion of the 2025 Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference much attention was given to profitability of fossil fuels, while far less was said about the meaning of 'sustainability' itself. In fact, both Alaskans and the principles of sustainability were notably absent from the conference's central themes and many of its attendees. From the outset, the federal government's priority appeared to be reassuring foreign interests of the United States' continued ability to sell off Alaska piece by piece. Conference organizers, led by Gov. Mike Dunleavy appeared eager as regulatory protections continue to be rolled back by the Trump administration. Federal officials, including U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin, expressed strong support for the further weakening of environmental safeguards to unilaterally advance long-contested development projects across Alaska. Many attendees represented corporate interests excited to profit from new extraction opportunities or potential buyers, watching to see if the administration follows through on promises to mine Alaska's oil, gas, and critical minerals. These companies appeared enthusiastic to exploit the land with minimal oversight and a lack of local consent. The audience was left with a misleading impression of Alaskan support. At the center of ongoing and proposed projects, such as Red Dog mine, Graphite One, and Ambler Road, was the largest item for sale: a natural gas reservoir on the North Slope. The proposed Alaska liquid natural gas pipeline, currently led by the Alaska Gasoline Development Corp. and New York-based Glenfarne Group LLC, would extract natural gas from subsurface carbon and transport it 800 miles south to Nikiski for export. The estimated almost $40 billion project promises only temporary jobs and infrastructure. Environmentally, natural gas poses risks similar to coal and oil. It is composed primarily of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Inevitable gas leaks during extraction and transportation can release up to 10% of methane before combustion, with the remainder ultimately emitted as carbon dioxide. These outcomes reflect outdated, combustion-based energy models. Regarding Alaska's wildlife and people, cabinet members seemed to dismiss concerns after brief visits, suggesting the animals are happy and that communities would benefit from further resource development despite evidence to the contrary. The 'resource curse' is a paradox that explains the economic dynamics of regions rich in natural resources, but limited in democratic representation. Extraction projects often introduce new workers, housing, and other infrastructure at great cost to local communities. Despite generating profits for corporate sponsors, these projects typically result in a net loss for the public. Workers are imported from out of state, while profits are exported. Local towns are then responsible for maintaining infrastructure without receiving corresponding benefits like revenue to support housing, health care or affordable energy. As finite resources are exhausted, companies maintain profit margins while community returns diminish. Once operations end, communities are often left with environmental damage and abandoned development, economically and socially worse off than before. Alaska's economy remains heavily reliant on oil and gas. As existing operations decrease in yield, public education and health care routinely face budgetary cuts. The natural gas reserve would only provide exports for a few decades, but its development would cause irreparable environmental damage, and leave Alaska facing another energy crisis within a generation. Why Gov. Dunleavy labeled this conference 'sustainable' remains unclear. It is unrealistic to claim the pipeline would benefit any of the roughly 190 communities beyond the Railbelt. While the state invests in LNG exports, rural towns reliant on diesel will face rising costs and health issues, including cancer risks. Regardless of one's stance on oil and gas, Chris Wright, the U.S. Secretary of Energy, himself stated: 'Energy… it's about people and math.' However, his equation solves for profit, while Alaska's equation for energy must begin and end with the voices and needs of the people. Scientists attending the summit this week in an official capacity were restricted to framing oil and gas as the primary development priority. This narrowed the conversation and sidelined discussions around advances in technology such as solar, wind, hydroelectric, and geothermal energy. Still, a handful of sustainability advocates attended as guests, business owners, protesters, and speakers. One speaker, Lesil McGuire, senior advisor with New Energy Alaska, an advocacy coalition that promotes renewable energy noted, 'Solar arrays can be propped up in a number of weeks.' As of 2020 solar energy has become cheaper to install and maintain than fossil fuels. Alaska needs energy infrastructure tailored to its unique environment, focused on long-term self reliance through renewable sources. Current examples include solar installations in the Northwest Arctic Borough, microgrid cooperatives, and heat pump incentives in Southeast Alaska. A cursory glance shows Alaska's capacity for renewable energy that could be faster to build and more cost effective than the LNG pipeline. In reality the conference didn't need to be held in Alaska, as Alaskans themselves played a minimal role. Led by Gov. Dunleavy, the 'Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference 2025' resembled government-backed promotion of the oil and gas industry and signaled extraction projects could move forward without oversight and regardless of local stakeholder's needs or opposition. International representatives seemed to be promised fuel for import, and out-of-state corporations appeared to be invited to profit at the expense of Alaska's environment. Renewable energy has been viable for decades and continues to become more efficient. Given a voice and a seat at the table, many Alaskans and Americans would likely favor local, self-sufficient renewables for lower prices and long-term reliability. Natural gas in Alaska will run out in this lifetime, do nothing to reduce costs in the majority of Alaskan communities, and may cause permanent harm to the environment. The United States and Alaska are not in need of a technological revolution in fossil fuels, but an information revolution in renewable energy. It is vitally important that all Alaskan voices are heard. Alaska values pristine wilderness, supports true sustainability, and is not for sale.
Yahoo
28-05-2025
- Yahoo
Conservation Equity Management and Ironwood Resource Advisors Announce Historic Approval of First Eastern Black Rail Conservation Bank in U.S.
GALVESTON, Texas, May 28, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Conservation Equity Management (CEM) and Ironwood Resource Advisors, LLC are proud to announce the establishment of the first-ever Eastern Black Rail Conservation Bank (EBRCB), approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). The Eastern Black Rail—a small, elusive marsh bird—has suffered a population decline of more than 90% due to habitat loss and coastal flooding. Once widespread along the eastern United States, the species was listed as Threatened under the Endangered Species Act in 2020. Its survival now depends on the protection and restoration of coastal marshes and inland wetlands. Strategically located in Brazoria County, Texas, just 35 miles from downtown Houston and 15 miles from Galveston Island, CEM will restore and permanently conserve 500 acres of coastal prairie habitat vital to the species' recovery. The bank will generate mitigation credits by reestablishing previously degraded habitat, offering developers and industry a streamlined, USFWS-approved compensatory mitigation solution for unavoidable impacts on Eastern Black Rail habitat across the Upper Texas Coast—including the Greater Houston area, Galveston, Beaumont, Port Arthur, Freeport, Baytown, and Port Lavaca. Kyle Bass, Co-Founder of CEM, stated:"We continue to unite capitalism and conservation to create mutually beneficial outcomes. It is an honor to be the first conservation organization permitted to establish and protect habitat for the Eastern Black Rail." Terry Anderson, Co-Founder of CEM, added:"This initiative permanently protects hundreds of acres of irreplaceable Gulf Coast habitat, supporting both the Eastern Black Rail's survival and the long-term stability of coastal ecosystems." This milestone was achieved through collaboration with a wide network of stakeholders, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Protection Agency, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Texas Parks & Wildlife Foundation, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and the Galveston Bay Foundation. About Conservation Equity Management (CEM)Founded by Kyle Bass and Terry Anderson, CEM is a Texas-based private equity firm focused on high-impact conservation investments that deliver measurable environmental, social, and financial returns. Learn more at Media ContactSteele SchottenheimerManaging Director – Investor Relationsss@ | 214-347-8045https:// Credit Sales ContactTroy MadrigalPrincipal – Ironwood Resource Advisorstroy@ | 281-795-1469http:// View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Conservation Equity Management, LP
Yahoo
07-05-2025
- Yahoo
Daines proposes expanding federal funds for some public land projects
May 7—Montana's senators are backing efforts to extend a $2 billion pot of funding for maintenance projects on public lands. The America the Beautiful Act aims to reduce some of the $40 billion worth of deferred maintenance costs federal land agencies currently face by reauthorizing and expanding the Legacy Restoration Fund established through the Great American Outdoors Act in 2020. The fund directs revenues the federal government receives for energy development projects towards road and infrastructure repairs on public lands. "The America the Beautiful Act will fund crucial projects and address maintenance backlogs, so that people can get outside and enjoy the natural beauty we're lucky to have here in the U.S.," said Montana Republican Sen. Steve Daines at a May 1 press conference. Daines introduced the America the Beautiful Act alongside Sen. Angus King, I-ME. Half a dozen other lawmakers from both sides of the aisle, including Montana's junior Republican senator, Tim Sheehy, have signed on as bill sponsors. Under the America the Beautiful Act, annual allocations through the Legacy Restoration Fund would increase from $1.9 billion to $2 billion a year through 2033. Of those funds, 70% go to the National Park Service, the agency with the largest amount of deferred maintenance costs. The U.S. Forest Service receives 15% of the annual funds, and the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Bureau of Indian Education each receive 5%. The American the Beautiful Act introduces slight modifications to this selection criteria by adding prioritization for projects that provide at least a 15% match in funds. The bill also allows for funds to be used on any U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands. Currently, the agency can only apply funds to projects on national wildlife refuges. Many of the country's largest conservation organizations have rallied behind the bill. The Kalispell Chamber, Glacier Park Land Owners, Glacier National Park Conservancy and the Flathead County Board of Commissioners also provided statements of support referencing the $52.7 million the fund has contributed towards maintenance projects in Glacier National Park. The three projects the park financed with Legacy Restoration Funds include ongoing repairs to the 9.3-mile section of the Going-to-the-Sun Road that runs alongside McDonald Lake and updates to wastewater and water distribution systems in the Swiftcurrent area and at park headquarters. Another $20 million has been designated from the fund for lands in Montana administered by the Bureau of Land Management. President Donald Trump described the Great American Outdoors Act as "truly landmark legislation" during his first presidency and lauded the bipartisan partnership that brought the bill to his desk, but the America the Beautiful Act comes at a time of large-scale federal funding cuts. Among the line items in the Trump Administration's proposed budget plan is a $73 million reduction in the National Park Service's annual construction budget. While the document suggests the president may continue to support the use of Restoration Legacy Funds for construction projects in national parks, it also points toward potential changes in how these funds are allocated. "The Biden administration wasted federal funding on construction projects at sites that are more appropriately managed at the local level ... The president's deregulatory agenda will ensure that the Great American Outdoors Act funding for construction would go further than ever," the budget states. The America the Beautiful Act was referred to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. A hearing has yet to be scheduled. Reporter Hailey Smalley may be reached at 758-4433 or hsmalley@
