logo
Michiganders primed to say 'No Kings' this Saturday at statewide protests

Michiganders primed to say 'No Kings' this Saturday at statewide protests

Yahoo20 hours ago

Anti-Trump protesters holding their signs in demonstration at the Hannah Administration Building at MSU on March 28, 2025. Photo by Erick Diaz Veliz
From Ironwood in the western Upper Peninsula to Adrian, near the Ohio border, more than 70 'No Kings Day' protests against President Donald Trump are planned in Michigan this Saturday.
Included in that list are larger demonstrations set for Detroit, Flint, Grand Rapids, Lansing, and Kalamazoo, among more than 1,500 planned in cities across the nation to protest against 'authoritarian overreach and the gross abuse of power' which No Kings protest organizers say has been demonstrated by the Trump Administration.
The protests are timed to coincide with festivities scheduled in Washington D.C. to ostensibly celebrate the U.S. Army's 250th birthday, but also Trump's 79th birthday, with a military parade featuring nearly 7,000 soldiers, and 150 vehicles, including tanks and armored personnel carriers, as well as military flyovers from 50 aircraft.
Estimated to cost $45 million, the planned exhibition has drawn criticism as an ostentatious display at a time congressional Republicans have pushed through a budget plan that would gut federal safety net programs like Medicaid and food assistance, simultaneous to Trump's deployment of National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles over immigration protests.
'Rapid and widespread attacks against vulnerable members of our communities and those who voice political dissent, illegal and arbitrary arrests and deportations, antidemocratic acts of repression of free speech, and flagrant defiance of the courts demonstrate that the current administration stands in opposition to the founding principles of our nation,' organizers of Detroit's protest said in a statement.
Set to begin Saturday at 1 p.m. in Clark Park, Detroit's No Kings protest will feature U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Detroit), an outspoken critic of the Trump administration's mass deportation efforts and use of the military against civilian protestors in LA.
The Grand Rapids protest will start at 10 a.m in Ah-Nab-Awen Park, with speakers including City Commissioner Marshall Kilgore and Rev. Nathan Dannison of the Fountain Street Church.
'Local community organizations will have 'Take Action' stations providing attendees with specific actions to take,' organizers said in a release. 'This rally will also include family-friendly activities. We follow the principles of non-violence protests. Harassment and hate speech will not be tolerated.'
That same message was echoed earlier this week by state Rep. Laurie Pohutsky (D-Livonia), who along with state Rep. Carrie Rheingans (D-Ann Arbor), urged Michiganders to take part in the protests, but do so peacefully.
'Let me be crystal clear: We unequivocally condemn any violence. That has no place in our movement for peace and justice. Everyone should use their voice peacefully, but the Trump administration intentionally provoked the situation by sending a force of armed and armored agents to round up immigrant workers,' Pohutsky said.
Smaller municipalities are also holding protests, including in Republican-heavy areas like Livingston County, which has 'No Kings' protests planned at the Historic Courthouse in Downtown Howell and at the public amphitheatre adjacent to Brighton's Millpond.
The Brighton gathering will feature Michigan Democratic Party Chair Curtis Hertel and Ingham County Clerk Barb Byrum, a candidate for the Democratic nomination for Secretary of State.
Another of the larger No Kings protests is planned at the Michigan State Capitol in Lansing, which starts with a 'Kick Out the Clowns' rally at noon, followed by a sidewalk march around the Capitol and then a 'No Kings' carnival from 3-6 p.m.
'Participants are encouraged to bring signs and flags while they stand in solidarity against this abuse of taxpayer funds. Planned circus-themed activities will highlight the absurdity of the administration's self-aggrandizement and flagrant disregard for American laws and norms,' stated a release.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lori Falce: Los Angeles confrontations are becoming less about immigration than First Amendment
Lori Falce: Los Angeles confrontations are becoming less about immigration than First Amendment

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lori Falce: Los Angeles confrontations are becoming less about immigration than First Amendment

Jun. 13—The United States of America had barely taken its first breath as a nation governed by the Constitution when it was realized that changes were needed. While we will celebrate Independence Day on July 4 as the country's 249th birthday, that's a bit wrong. That was the day we declared ourselves separate from the British crown. It was 1789 when we became a functioning nation. That same year, James Madison began spelling out the finer points that had been missed in the broad strokes of the Constitution. It took two years to work through the process of making the changes. But finally, in 1791, the Bill of Rights became law. And while nine of them are truly rights, the First Amendment is a list of freedoms. In America, people have the right to religion, press, assembly, petition — all of which can be boiled down to an overarching banner of speech. It is obvious why this was so important to Madison and the other leaders of the fledgling nation. They used speech and assembly, petition and the press to conceive an idea of America, to give it life and to nurture it in its infancy. How would those founding fathers feel today? The National Guard has been sent into Los Angeles to quell protests over President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement. U.S. Marines have been mobilized. It comes over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom and local leaders. When U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., tried to ask questions at a news conference Thursday with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, he was forcibly removed and handcuffed. "We declare that due process and human dignity and respect are nonnegotiables, and we will not allow this administration to normalize cruelty or silence our resistance," the Rev. Jaime Edwards-Acton of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in Hollywood told the National Catholic Reporter. Journalists covering the protests and response have been injured in a way more in keeping with covering a war overseas. "A number of reports suggest the federal officers have indiscriminately used force or deployed munitions such as tear gas or pepper balls that caused significant injuries to journalists. In some cases, federal officers appear to have deliberately targeted journalists who were doing nothing more than their job covering the news," the Los Angeles Press Club wrote in a letter to Noem. The federal actions do the very first thing our leaders worried would happen if guidelines were not firmly established. They run roughshod over not only rights enshrined in the Constitution but every single freedom established in the First Amendment. It is important to remember that there is no protection for committing crime. Exercising a right to peaceable assembly is not the same as rioting. One cannot petition for redress of grievances by setting fire to a car. But by the same token, the federal government cannot protect the nation from its people by setting fire to the First Amendment. Lori Falce is the Tribune-Review community engagement editor and an opinion columnist. For more than 30 years, she has covered Pennsylvania politics, Penn State, crime and communities. She joined the Trib in 2018. She can be reached at lfalce@

Iran launches missiles, drones at Israel as Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites
Iran launches missiles, drones at Israel as Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Iran launches missiles, drones at Israel as Israel attacks Iran's nuclear sites

Warning sirens sounded across Israel on Friday and a military official told CBS News that dozens of Iranian ballistic missiles were en route to Israel. The country's population had been instructed to remain in bomb shelters until further notice. The apparent retaliatory action from Iran came after Israel has launched over 200 airstrikes on Iran — continuing a major operation that began overnight, Israel Defense Forces spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin said Friday. Israel's airstrikes are continuing, Defrin said. Israel first launched airstrikes on Iran early Friday and announced its operation was targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, scientists and senior military commanders. Tehran responded by launching more than 100 drones at Israel on Friday morning, Israel's military said. Defrin said earlier Friday that Israel's air defenses had worked to "intercept the threats." Later Friday, an Israeli military official told reporters that while the threat wasn't over, Israel had managed to intercept many of Iran's UAVs. "Throughout the day, we once again demonstrated our ability to remove threats in a coordinated, precise and daring manner," Defrin said Friday night. In a televised statement on Friday, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the Iranian Armed Forces would respond fiercely to the strikes and leave Israel "helpless." Shortly after the statement, the IDF confirmed that its fighter jets had "completed a strike on the Iranian regime's nuclear site in the Isfahan area." Ishafan is in central Iran. The strike "dismantled a facility for producing metallic uranium, infrastructure for reconverting enriched uranium, laboratories, and additional infrastructure," the IDF said. The U.S. was not involved in Israel's strikes, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, adding a warning that "Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel." President Trump said in a post Friday morning on his Truth Social media platform that he had given Iran "chance after chance" to make a deal with the U.S. on its nuclear program, but that despite his warnings to Tehran that the alternative would be "much worse" than anything seen before, "they just couldn't get it done." "There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end," Mr. Trump said. "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left." In a later post on Friday, Mr. Trump said he "gave Iran a 60 day ultimatum to 'make a deal.' They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!" Israel has intercepted virtually every Iranian weapon launched in previous large-scale attacks by the Islamic republic. The retaliatory action by Iran was long anticipated and well planned for, Defrin said. Iran's President Mahsoud Pezeshkian said Friday on Iranian TV that the country would "strongly take action" against Israel in response to the attacks, promising "a severe, wise and strong answer." "The Iranian nation and the country's officials will not remain silent in the face of this crime, and the legitimate and powerful response of the Islamic Republic of Iran will make the enemy regret its foolish act," he said. Israel says it destroyed Iran's air defenses, killed top commanders Earlier Friday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that the IDF had begun "Operation Rising Lion," with a massive wave of airstrikes against dozens of Iranian nuclear sites, military commanders and research scientists, saying the goal was to "roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival." Like Netanyahu, Defrin, the IDF spokesman, called the attack on Iran preemptive in a video statement delivered Friday, saying Israeli intelligence had uncovered an Iranian "plan to destroy Israel that has taken shape in recent years." He said that plan involved Iran "racing towards a nuclear bomb," working to double or triple its ballistic missile stockpile, and continuing to "finance, arm, and operate its proxies throughout the Middle East against the State of Israel." "I can confirm that the senior security leadership of the Iranian regime has been eliminated in the strike: the Iranian Chief of Staff, [Mohammad] Bagheri; the Commander of the Revolutionary Guards, [Hossein] Salami; and the Head of the Emergency Command, [Gholamali] Rashid," Defrin said, adding that other commanders had been killed and that Israeli would provide further updates. He said Israel had "targeted and struck the Iranian regime's aerial defense arrays." The IDF said its operation would continue for days, but that the first wave consisted of 200 Israeli fighter jets dropping "over 330 different munitions," to hit more than 100 targets in Iran. "The breadth and scale of these strikes — against senior Iranian officials and other military facilities in addition to nuclear sites — suggest this operation is intended to not just dissuade Iran from pursuing nuclear weapons, but also cripple any potential military response and even to destabilize the regime," Matthew Savill, Director of Military Sciences at the Royal United Services Institute, a British military think tank, said in a statement. "Israel has once again demonstrated its considerable conventional military superiority, and the size of the force allegedly assembled for this series of attacks represents the overwhelming bulk of their longer-range strike aircraft. They have the ability to conduct multiple such rounds of strikes, but operating for an extended duration over this considerable range will stretch even the Israeli Air Force." Savill said Iran's response "might be delayed or split into multiple phases, but their main weapon will be ballistic missiles, which have the best chance of inflicting damage on Israel, whereas drone and cruise missile attacks will face more extensive Israeli defenses. Israel operations have therefore targeted air defenses and ballistic missile sites to forestall this." Savill said that if Iran "believes the U.S. or others were involved" in the Israeli strike, then their retaliation could include targeting the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, and American air facilities in Qatar, "though both would widen the conflict to drag in others." NATO chief urges de-escalation, says nuclear clash "not close" Iranian state media said the Israeli strikes had hit several cities, including in the capital of Tehran and the city of Natanz, a key center for Iran's uranium enrichment program. The IDF said it struck Iran's uranium enrichment site in the Natanz area. "The underground area of the site was damaged," the IDF said in a statement. "This area contains a multi-story enrichment hall with centrifuges, electrical rooms, and additional supporting infrastructure. In addition, critical infrastructure enabling the site's continuous operation and the Iranian regime's ongoing efforts to obtain nuclear weapons were targeted." The United Nations' nuclear watchdog agency, the IAEA, said in a series of social media posts that its Director General, Rafael Grossi, had been in contact with Iranian authorities on Friday, who told him the country's highly-sensitive and highly-secured Fordo nuclear site "has not been impacted" by the Israeli strikes. Later Friday, Reuters reported that two explosions had been heard near the site and that state media said Iranian air defenses had shot down an Israeli drone near the facility. The IAEA also said Iran's "Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant had not been targeted and that no increase in radiation levels has been observed at the Natanz site." On Friday, during a visit to Sweden, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte told reporters that "this was a unilateral action by Israel. So I think it is crucial for many allies, including the United States, to work as we speak to de-escalate." Despite the ongoing attacks, Rutte said he believed the region was "not close" to a possible nuclear conflict. While there have been no claims that Iran has yet built a nuclear weapon, Israel is believed to have multiple warheads, though it has never formally confirmed nor denied its status as a nuclear-armed nation. Iranian officials quickly threatened retaliation to the attack, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei saying Israel "should await a harsh response." The IDF said in a statement before Iran's retaliatory strikes that it had prepared for "a campaign on the frontline and on the home front." Netanyahu said Israel's strikes against Iran, "will continue for as many days as it takes to remove this threat." Shortly after Israel's strikes, the U.S. Embassy in Israel ordered American personnel to shelter in place. A day beforehand, the Trump administration ordered non-emergency U.S. personnel to leave Iraq and allowed U.S. military family members to leave the Middle East voluntarily. Risk of an escalating regional conflict Israel has carried out strikes against Iranian proxies in recent years, while Iran has backed foes of Israel, including the militant group Hamas. In April of last year, Iran launched missiles and drones at Israel after a strike on Iran's consulate in Damascus was widely attributed to Israel, but the Israeli military intercepted the vast majority of the weapons. Six months later, Iran launched more missiles at Israel, which retaliated with strikes on Iranian sites. Friday's back-and-forth could escalate to be among the most severe clashes between Israel and Iran, which have been adversaries for decades. Mr. Trump warned earlier in the week that the strikes could snowball into a "massive" conflict. Farea Al-Muslimi, a research fellow at the Chatham House think tank, said in a statement Friday that the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen could play a role in the Iranian response to Israel. "With Iran currently weakened and humiliated, this marks the first time the Houthis will be called upon to repay decades of Iranian investment and support," Al-Muslimi predicted. "Following the killing of Hassan Nasrallah in Lebanon and the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, the Houthis have effectively become Iran's first line of defense against Israel — an increasingly central role." Al-Muslimi said the Houthi response could extend beyond retaliatory strikes on Israel itself. "Strikes in the Red Sea will likely resume, the ceasefire with the United States may unravel, and we shouldn't be surprised if Saudi Arabia and the UAE are dragged back into direct conflict in Yemen," Al-Muslimi said. "Attacks by the Houthis on U.S. military bases in the Gulf, the Horn of Africa, and naval forces at sea are also highly plausible." Fabian Hinz, an air warfare expert at London's International Institute of Strategic Studies, told the Associated Press that Iran's current capabilities are potentially "more threatening to the U.S. military than to Israel." Iran has a "huge arsenal" of shorter-range missiles, Hinz said, and there are a number of U.S. military bases in the region. He said Iran also has "lots of anti-ship capabilities." "Think of the Iranian shipping threat as similar in quality to the Houthi threat, but much larger in quantity," Hinz told the AP. Israeli attack casts doubt on fate of U.S.-Iran nuclear talks The Israeli strikes and Iranian counterattack came amid efforts by President Trump to strike a new deal with Iran to limit the country's nuclear ambitions — an idea Israel has long been dubious of. The U.S. and Iran were set to hold talks Sunday, multiple U.S. officials told CBS News. There was no immediate comment from any high-ranking Iranian officials that those plans would change after Israel's attack, but some reports in Iranian media outlets indicated Iran would likely no longer participate in the negotiations. "With Israel's actions, the sixth round of negotiations with the United States will probably not be held," Iranian lawmaker Aladdin Boroujerdi, a member of parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, said, according to Iranian media. Michal Ben-Gal, Seyed Bathaei, Jennifer Jacobs and Olivia Gazis contributed to this report. Video shows Air India plane crashing in Ahmedabad Air India plane crashes shortly after takeoff, carrying more than 240 people Remembering the Beach Boys' Brian Wilson

Democrats Push Republicans For Kristi Noem Testimony On Alex Padilla Incident
Democrats Push Republicans For Kristi Noem Testimony On Alex Padilla Incident

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats Push Republicans For Kristi Noem Testimony On Alex Padilla Incident

WASHINGTON – Democrats want Department of Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem to testify on Capitol Hill about the manhandling of Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.). Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and other House Democrats asked House Oversight Committee chair James Comer (R-Ky.) in a letter Friday 'to demand sworn testimony' from Noem, by subpoena if necessary, about the 'violent detention' of Padilla. Federal law enforcement officials forcibly removed Padilla from a Noem press conference in a federal building in Los Angeles on Thursday, with video showing agents pushing him to the floor and handcuffing him after he tried to interrupt Noem's remarks with a question. The Department of Homeland Security said shortly after the incident that Secret Service agents 'thought he was an attacker' and acted appropriately in response. Video showed Padilla identifying himself as a U.S. senator as he was pushed from the room. President Trump this week deployed the National Guard and Marines to California in response to violent protests, a significant break from the usual protocol in which presidents deploy troops in response to state requests. A federal judge said Trump's use of the National Guard was illegal, but an appeals court said it could continue while the case unfolds. 'We are not going away,' Noem said before Padilla's interruption. 'We are staying here to liberate the city from the socialists and the burdensome leadership that this governor and that this mayor have placed on this country and what they have tried to insert into the city.' Frost first demanded Noem's testimony during an oversight hearing on Thursday, which led to a testy back-and-forth on the dais and Comer eventually telling the Florida Democrat to 'shut up.' It's unlikely Comer will take Frost's suggestion; instead, Comer demanded information Friday from Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Gov. Gavin Newsom about their response to recent immigration raids and subsequent attacks on police. To Democrats, Padilla's arrest represented an escalation of the Trump administration's efforts to challenge Congress as a coequal branch of government and increase the power of the president. 'This shocking encounter adds to a litany of alarming moves by the Trump Administration to seize and abuse power, including by turning the military on the American people,' the Democrats wrote in their letter. 'The Trump Administration has mobilized the military to the streets of an American city, and any other city could be next. The Trump Administration has violently tackled, kneeled on, and handcuffed a sitting U.S. senator, and any other American could be next.' Congressional Republicans have mostly dismissed the Padilla melee as just another stunt by Democrats. Several House Democrats recently had a run-in with federal immigration officers at a facility in New Jersey, an incident that resulted in federal charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) for interfering with law enforcement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store