logo
Running bureaucratic rapids

Running bureaucratic rapids

Yahoo11-05-2025

May 11—Nonprofit partners of the U.S. Forest Service have scrambled to avoid what some had feared might be a summer rafting free-for-all on coveted stretches of whitewater.
The federal hiring freeze combined with the on-again, off-again dismissals of probationary employees and about 5,000 workers opting to retire early or otherwise leave the Forest Service have left it short-staffed across the country. That includes the seasonal crews that work at put-ins for the Middle Fork of the Salmon River, the Main Salmon River and the Snake River in Hells Canyon — all of which require permits to float during the busy rafting season.
The people who work at put-ins, known as checkers, meet with permit holders prior to launching. They make sure each trip has the needed permits and give them a rundown of the rules and regulations. Other Forest Service employees work as river rangers and on-the-water patrols. They float the rivers, work with rafters, kayakers and others to make sure fragile resources are protected.
Dustin Aherin said without river checkers and patrols, it's possible the rivers could be flooded with unpermitted groups or that permitted groups, both private boaters and outfitted trips, could have exceeded caps on the number of people allowed per trip.
"There was a very real possibility of that," he said. "There was a moment in time when they didn't have any employees."
Aherin, of Lewiston and Salmon, owns Idaho River Adventures and is president of the Middle Fork Outfitters Association. During the chaos that followed the Trump administration's decision to dismiss probationary federal employees, his organization worked with the Idaho congressional delegation to lay the groundwork for a solution.
The Middle Fork Outfitters Association has been using the Trail Stewardship Act to help the Forest Service maintain the roads that provide access to Boundary Creek. The 2016 law allows holders of special use permits to use the money they are required to pay the Forest Service (3% of their gross profits) for trail maintenance and to care for other recreational infrastructure.
Before the act, outfitters would write a check to the federal government. Now they can write checks to contractors who perform maintenance work and then use the receipts to offset what they own the feds.
This summer, Aherin and other outfitters will divert the money they owe the Forest Service to the Selway Bitterroot Frank Church Foundation. In turn, the group will hire four people to work as checkers at put-ins and two to work on Forest Service river patrol crews.
"It is really in line with our mission, it's just not something we have done before," said Ryan Ghelfi, executive director of the foundation.
The group typically hires trail crews and wilderness rangers to help the agency care for the Selway-Bitterroot and Frank Church-River of No Return wilderness areas that overlay much of central Idaho's backcountry. Working on the river is new and so far a temporary part of the group's work.
Daily headlines, straight to your inboxRead it online first and stay up-to-date, delivered daily at 7 AM
Ghelfi said the people the foundation hires will work under the direction of the Forest Service and at least for now, it is just for this summer to help the agency deal with unexpected circumstances.
"The way things are right now, it's something our organization needed to be able to say yes to and we did."
Amy Baumer, a spokesperson for the Salmon-Challis National Forest, said the agreement builds on previous partnerships leveraging outfitter offsets authorized by the Trails Stewardship Act.
"We see the opportunity to collaborate with SBFC (Selway Bitterroot Frank Church Foundation) during this summer's boating season as a significant benefit to boaters and the river environment. More people (SBFC) to work alongside Forest Service river staff educating boaters, checking permits, promoting river ethics, and providing important fire and river information can only lead to a better boater experience this summer."
On the Snake River in Hells Canyon, Idaho Power Company employee Jared Farrens works at the Hells Canyon Creek put-in beneath Hells Canyon Dam to check in permit holders and give them an orientation of river rules. In the past, the Forest Service has covered weekends for Farrens. But given the agency's staffing problems, it looked like that wouldn't happen this year.
Idaho Power spokesperson Brad Bowlin said Discover Your Northwest stepped in and will hire people to work shifts not covered by Idaho Power.
The group, based in Seattle, operates retail shops within federal public land visitor centers and uses the income to fund and manage a grant program.
"They are planning to use those funds to hire seasonal employees and cover that gap left by the cuts to Forest Service recreation staff," said Bowlin.
Aherin said the creative partnerships might not save money but it shouldn't cost any more either and is a sign of the times.
"What we are doing is kind of in line with the current administration's desire to cut out burearcy. Nobody is saving money to do this and it's not costing anybody any more."
Barker may be contacted at ebarker@lmtribune.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal judge denies 2 bids to halt Oak Flat land transfer for copper mine
Federal judge denies 2 bids to halt Oak Flat land transfer for copper mine

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Federal judge denies 2 bids to halt Oak Flat land transfer for copper mine

A federal judge in Phoenix has denied two motions for preliminary injunctions that sought to halt a land swap that would transfer ownership of Oak Flat, a parcel of U.S. Forest land located 60 miles east of Phoenix, to a company that intends to open a huge copper mine. In a packed courtroom on June 6, U.S. District Judge Dominic W. Lanza heard arguments in two lawsuits seeking to stop the land exchange until the merits of the cases had been heard. The judge also heard from lawyers representing the U.S. Forest Service and Resolution Copper, who asserted that the law requires the government to transfer the federal property to the mining company within 60 days of the publication of a Final Environmental Impact Statement. The government's lawyers indicated that the environmental impact statement would be made available to the public on June 16, but officially published in the federal register on June 20, when the 60-day countdown would begin. The judge set a timeline for the cases after the government publishes the final environmental review. The two lawsuits challenged the environmental review of the land exchange and the value of the land being swapped to the government by Resolution Copper. One lawsuit was brought by the San Carlos Apache Tribe, a federally recognized tribe, and the other by the Inter Tribal Association of Arizona Inc. and a coalition of environmental and outdoor recreation groups including the Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Earthworks, the Center for Biological Diversity, Access Fund and the Sierra Club Grand Canyon chapter. In May, U.S. District Judge Steven Logan issued an injunction sought by the grassroots group Apache Stronghold to block the land swap. Logan ruled that the federal government could not issue the final environmental impact statement for the exchange, but that order was set to expire if the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Apache Stronghold's request for a review. On May 27, the high court said it would not hear the case. Critical minerals: Why can't the US mine and refine all its copper? What to know about new Trump order The land at the center of the dispute, Oak Flat, also known as Chi'chil Biłdagoteel, is considered sacred to the Apache and other Native peoples and the site of religious ceremonies. It is also a popular site for outdoor recreationists and habitat for rare desert species, like the endangered Arizona hedgehog cactus and ocelot. Beneath the land sits one of the largest copper deposits on the continent, according to Resolution Copper, whose method of underground mining would sink the land into a nearly two mile wide crater approximately 1,000 feet deep. Resolution Copper is a subsidiary of multinational mining companies BHP and Rio Tinto. Oak Flat has been at the center of ongoing debate over First Amendment religious rights, environmental conservation, mining reform and the green energy revolution since Congress authorized the land exchange in 2014. In exchange for about 5,000 acres of ecologically valuable properties around Arizona, Resolution Copper would gain ownership of Oak Flat to create one of the largest copper mines in the country. While Resolution Copper says the mine would create jobs and benefit the local and state economy, environmentalists say the huge copper mine would destroy the environment and deplete ground and surface water. In April, the Trump administration added the proposed Resolution Copper mine, along with nine other mining projects, to a priority list to increase the domestic production of critical minerals in accordance with an executive order issued in March. In May, the U.S. Supreme Court declined the hear the lawsuit brought by Apache Stronghold, despite dissents from Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas. The Apache Stronghold argued that their First Amendment rights to religious freedom were violated by the land exchange. John Leos covers environmental issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Send tips or questions to Environmental coverage on and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. Follow The Republic environmental reporting team at and @azcenvironment on Facebook and Instagram. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Federal judge denies bid to halt land swap for copper mine at Oak Flat

Federal judge denies 2 bids to halt Oak Flat land transfer for copper mine
Federal judge denies 2 bids to halt Oak Flat land transfer for copper mine

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Federal judge denies 2 bids to halt Oak Flat land transfer for copper mine

A federal judge in Phoenix has denied two motions for preliminary injunctions that sought to halt a land swap that would transfer ownership of Oak Flat, a parcel of U.S. Forest land located 60 miles east of Phoenix, to a company that intends to open a huge copper mine. In a packed courtroom on June 6, U.S. District Judge Dominic W. Lanza heard arguments in two lawsuits seeking to stop the land exchange until the merits of the cases had been heard. The judge also heard from lawyers representing the U.S. Forest Service and Resolution Copper, who asserted that the law requires the government to transfer the federal property to the mining company within 60 days of the publication of a Final Environmental Impact Statement. The government's lawyers indicated that the environmental impact statement would be made available to the public on June 16, but officially published in the federal register on June 20, when the 60-day countdown would begin. The judge set a timeline for the cases after the government publishes the final environmental review. The two lawsuits challenged the environmental review of the land exchange and the value of the land being swapped to the government by Resolution Copper. One lawsuit was brought by the San Carlos Apache Tribe, a federally recognized tribe, and the other by the Inter Tribal Association of Arizona Inc. and a coalition of environmental and outdoor recreation groups including the Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Earthworks, the Center for Biological Diversity, Access Fund and the Sierra Club Grand Canyon chapter. In May, U.S. District Judge Steven Logan issued an injunction sought by the grassroots group Apache Stronghold to block the land swap. Logan ruled that the federal government could not issue the final environmental impact statement for the exchange, but that order was set to expire if the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Apache Stronghold's request for a review. On May 27, the high court said it would not hear the case. Critical minerals: Why can't the US mine and refine all its copper? What to know about new Trump order The land at the center of the dispute, Oak Flat, also known as Chi'chil Biłdagoteel, is considered sacred to the Apache and other Native peoples and the site of religious ceremonies. It is also a popular site for outdoor recreationists and habitat for rare desert species, like the endangered Arizona hedgehog cactus and ocelot. Beneath the land sits one of the largest copper deposits on the continent, according to Resolution Copper, whose method of underground mining would sink the land into a nearly two mile wide crater approximately 1,000 feet deep. Resolution Copper is a subsidiary of multinational mining companies BHP and Rio Tinto. Oak Flat has been at the center of ongoing debate over First Amendment religious rights, environmental conservation, mining reform and the green energy revolution since Congress authorized the land exchange in 2014. In exchange for about 5,000 acres of ecologically valuable properties around Arizona, Resolution Copper would gain ownership of Oak Flat to create one of the largest copper mines in the country. While Resolution Copper says the mine would create jobs and benefit the local and state economy, environmentalists say the huge copper mine would destroy the environment and deplete ground and surface water. In April, the Trump administration added the proposed Resolution Copper mine, along with nine other mining projects, to a priority list to increase the domestic production of critical minerals in accordance with an executive order issued in March. In May, the U.S. Supreme Court declined the hear the lawsuit brought by Apache Stronghold, despite dissents from Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas. The Apache Stronghold argued that their First Amendment rights to religious freedom were violated by the land exchange. John Leos covers environmental issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Send tips or questions to Environmental coverage on and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. Follow The Republic environmental reporting team at and @azcenvironment on Facebook and Instagram. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Federal judge denies bid to halt land swap for copper mine at Oak Flat

Lessons in Forest Service regs await nominee
Lessons in Forest Service regs await nominee

E&E News

time5 days ago

  • E&E News

Lessons in Forest Service regs await nominee

The Trump administration's nominee to oversee the Forest Service may soon be faced with navigating the agency's environmental regulations from both sides: as an affected property owner and as the boss of the employees enforcing them. Mike Boren, the Trump administration's pick for undersecretary for natural resources and environment, will likely have to work through the Forest Service's environmental procedures to resolve a disagreement about a geothermal stream that one of his ranches in Idaho tapped for heating purposes, if he's confirmed by the Senate. That's the assessment of current and former Forest Service employees who described the rules to POLITICO's E&E News, granted anonymity because they're not authorized to speak with reporters or still work with the agency in other capacities. Advertisement The stream diversion is the latest in a series of dust-ups Boren has had with the Forest Service over land use, which isn't uncommon where large landowners in the West coexist with vast stretches of federal land. As much as two-thirds of land in Idaho is federal property, Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho) told the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee at Boren's nomination hearing Tuesday. Boren's situation became unusual, however, when President Donald Trump in January nominated him to a post that solely oversees the Forest Service. Boren's wealth also attracts attention, as he's a founder of a billion-dollar tech company. The water issue involves the West Pass Ranch, a Boren family property adjacent to the Sawtooth National Forest, which includes the Sawtooth National Recreation Area. The agency warned the ranch about a water diversion from a nearby geothermal stream on national forest system land, with a line running to the ranch property. A Forest Service law enforcement employee noticed it on a routine visit this spring, according to an employee closely familiar with the details. The Forest Service and USDA haven't responded to messages seeking comment on the specifics. The ranch has water rights and a water permit from the Idaho Department of Water Resources for a diversion, but current and former Forest Service employees said that they've seen no indication of an additional permit the Forest Service would typically require. These employees, as well as other people closely familiar with land use regulations involving national forests, said the agency can issue permits after the fact in such situations, possibly through a routine categorical exclusion from the National Environmental Policy Act and some public notice. The Forest Service would conduct a pared-back NEPA review to ensure that endangered species, for instance, aren't harmed, as well as to determine whether the land is of any cultural significance to local tribes, they said. 'A landowner can't just go onto national forest land and start digging things up,' said Ed Cannady, a retired backcountry manager on the Sawtooth who worked for the Forest Service for 31 years. He retired in 2019. While Cannady said he couldn't speak to the specifics of Boren's situation, he said the requirement to follow both federal and state permitting laws is clear. Water rights entitle property owners to 'reasonable access' to federal land, he said. The Idaho Department of Water Resources in 2023 approved a water permit for a groundwater diversion at the West Pass Ranch, according to records at the state agency. That permit, which is based on the ranch's decades-long water rights, also noted in the records, comes with several conditions including to monitor and report the volume of water taken. The permit describes the proposed work, including that the ranch 'shall install or construct a straight length of conduit or ditch suitable for installation of a device for measuring the entire flow of water being diverted in connection with this right.' A sign for the Ketchum Ranger Station stands in the Sawtooth National Forest. | Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images 'A license to run roughshod'? Boren, at his nomination hearing Tuesday, didn't address the specifics of the work that's caused disagreements. But he suggested that a heavy-handed approach at the Forest Service is to blame and that he favors negotiations that satisfy both sides when land-related disagreements arise with the agency. He also said he'd follow the advice of USDA ethics lawyers in determining whether he should recuse himself from Forest Service matters involving his or his family's property. The federal government, representing the public, has property rights just like private landowners, said Andy Stahl, executive director of Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, an Oregon environmental group. 'The only reason that water rights have any meaning on federal lands at all is because Congress has passed laws giving them meaning,' Stahl said in an email. 'But for those federal laws, the state's water rights scheme would be meaningless on federal lands.' He added, 'Federal laws respecting water rights do not give the holders of those rights a license to run roughshod over federal lands. Water rights holders have to obey the Forest Service's rules when it comes to using their conveyance rights, e.g., they have to get a special-use permit.' Cannady, the retired backcountry manager, said his greater concern is preserving the Sawtooth Valley's vast undeveloped stretches and its endangered species, which would rest in part on how Boren oversees the agency, if confirmed. Four federally protected fish populate the area, Cannady said, including chinook and sockeye salmon that swim hundreds of miles from the ocean to spawn — some of the longest stretches on Earth for salmon. Along the way, they travel through public and private land, including on the river that runs through Boren family property, he said. Many areas of the Sawtooth, including on the Sawtooth National Recreation Area administered by the Forest Service, are covered by easements that occupy or cross private property. Cannady said Boren is known locally to dislike easements, which have been at the root of some of his disagreements over the years, as with other property owners around national forests. The nominee also doesn't have much patience for public criticism, according to several people in the area. After residents complained publicly about a grassy airstrip he built on one of his ranches, he sued them for defamation. That case has bounced between courts, most recently awaiting resolution in an Idaho district court. Cannady said he worries Boren, in a position of public authority, may 'do great harm' to the Sawtooth if regulations are loosened or not enforced — and that he's a little reluctant to speak out about the nominee. 'Knowing his M.O., he might sue my ass because he's got billions of dollars, and I don't,' Cannady said. Contact this reporter on Signal at hellmarcman.49.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store