SpaceX launches 10th batch of 'proliferated architecture' spy satellites for US government (video)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
SpaceX lofted yet another batch of next-gen spy satellites for the U.S. National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) this morning (April 20).
A Falcon 9 rocket lifted off from California's foggy Vandenberg Space Force Base today at 8:29 a.m. EDT (1229 GMT; 5:29 a.m. local California time), on a mission the NRO called NROL-145.
NROL-145 was the 10th launch in support of NRO's "proliferated architecture," a new network consisting of many cost-effective small satellites rather than a few highly capable, but expensive, ones.
"Having hundreds of small satellites on orbit is invaluable to the NRO's mission," NRO Director Chris Scolese said in a press kit about the proliferated architecture network, which you can find here.
"They will provide greater revisit rates, increased coverage, more timely delivery of information — and ultimately help us deliver more of what our customers need even faster," Scolese added.
Everything appeared to go well today; the Falcon 9's first stage landed on a drone ship in the Pacific Ocean about eight minutes after launch as planned. It was the 12th launch and touchdown for this particular booster, according to SpaceX.
Related: SpaceX launches next-gen US spy satellites on 100th Falcon 9 flight of the year (video, photos)
Related stories:
— SpaceX: Facts about Elon Musk's private spaceflight company
— SpaceX launches classified spy satellite for US military, lands rocket
— SpaceX launches US spy satellite, lands rocket in flawless Easter flight
SpaceX ended its livestream today just after booster landing, at the NRO's request; we got no views from the Falcon 9's upper stage or info about the payloads. That's not surprising; the NRO tends to be pretty tight-lipped about its spacecraft and their activities.
But the proliferated architecture craft are believed to be modified versions of SpaceX's Starlink internet satellites, with some high-tech spy gear attached.
The first proliferated architecture mission launched in May 2024. All 10 of them have flown on Falcon 9 rockets from Vandenberg.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
The global impact of Trump vs. Musk
With help from Anthony Adragna and Aaron Mak Could Elon Musk's online slapfight with President Donald Trump put a dent in his global telecom ambitions? Musk's satellite broadband company Starlink has reaped massive gains since he became 'first buddy' to Trump. Numerous countries have cut red tape to approve Starlink this year, some reportedly under pressure from Trump's State Department. In some cases, countries appeared to be giving Starlink a green light in order to ingratiate themselves with the White House. Vietnam approved the service in February. In early May, the Democratic Republic of Congo granted Starlink a license. Later that month, South Africa eased laws that required telecom companies to provide 30 percent equity to groups that were historically marginalized — which could allow Starlink to start service without meeting the requirement. Now, Musk's feud with Trump raises the question of how Starlink will fare in future negotiations. Will countries feel the need to let it in? Will Trump go to bat for the company? 'When trade officials or when governments sit down for negotiations, you think about what horses you have to trade,' said a former Starlink executive, granted anonymity to speak freely. 'I don't even know if Starlink is a horse anymore.' Since Trump took office, a number of countries have granted licenses to Starlink, including India on Friday. The State Department reportedly pressed some of those countries, like Gambia and Cameroon, to approve the service. (As of late March, Starlink said it had coverage in 130 countries or territories.) Caleb Henry, director of research at the consulting firm Quilty Space, said U.S. diplomacy had helped Starlink get traction in hard-to-reach places. 'Starlink has already received market access in the easiest countries and the mid-tier countries,' he said. 'What's left is the hard countries. That's where the State Department gets involved.' Henry and other telecommunications veterans who spoke to DFD said this wasn't necessarily unusual: The State Department often lobbies for U.S. companies, and in that sense, Starlink was enjoying the same support that Boeing or the satellite companies Iridium and Globalstar have received in the past. Blair Levin, a telecoms expert who served in senior roles at the Federal Communications Commission under Democratic administrations, said he has seen an unconventional element in the State Department's discussions over Starlink: They're tying in the White House's tariff policy as well. Consider the case of Lesotho. According to The Washington Post, the landlocked African country was hunting for a way out of 50 percent tariffs announced by Trump. Then in April this year it granted Starlink a license. According to the Post, the State Department noted that development in an internal memo: 'As the government of Lesotho negotiates a trade deal with the United States, it hopes that licensing Starlink demonstrates goodwill and intent to welcome U.S. businesses.' The State Department did not confirm or deny the report, but said, 'Any patriotic American should want to see an American company's success on the global stage, especially over compromised Chinese competitors.' The embassy of Lesotho did not respond immediately to questions about the report. Said Levin: 'Embassies often represent the interests of U.S.-based companies. That's not unusual. But to tie tariff negotiations to certain companies, that's very unusual.' Satellite policy expert Ruth Pritchard-Kelly concurred. 'I can't say I've ever seen a country begging the U.S. not to do something catastrophic, saying 'look, we've even licensed your best friend's satellite service, please don't impose tariffs on us,'' she said. So what now? If Musk remains on the outs with Trump, he could become a global liability for the company, Pritchard-Kelly said: 'If Lesotho is actually worried about the U.S. imposing tariffs on them, then aligning themselves with this tech, which is currently run by someone who is persona non grata to Trump, could be a problem.' So far, the Musk-Trump feud has largely played out online, and Trump has not followed up on his threats to cancel the government's SpaceX contracts. But Trump has other buttons he could push to make Musk's life hard, said Pritchard-Kelly. One is withdrawing Starlink's license to operate in space. 'It's never happened, but I think if Trump really wanted to rattle Musk he would say, 'I'm going to pull your license,'' she said. The former Starlink executive said the State Department — and the government more broadly — could also pose subtle obstacles to the company, such as by slow-rolling approvals or giving less weight to Starlink's comments on federal policy. 'There are other disadvantages that could come to Starlink or other Musk companies just because they're no longer considered a favored son,' the person said. In the longer term, Musk's falling out with Trump is likely to spur other countries to keep investing in their own systems, according to satellite analyst Tim Farrar. On Friday, top lawmakers in the European Parliament wrote to Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, asking her to set aside €60B for space – including the EU's IRIS2 satellite communications network. 'You're going to have people who want to see IRIS2 going forward taking advantage of the risk of Musk threatening he could just decommission things at random,' Farrar said. But it will be 'years, if ever' before rival internet services have the muscle to match Starlink's 7,000-plus satellites, he said, even as Chinese companies and Amazon's Project Kuiper race to launch their own constellations. 'The State Department has to promote U.S. satellite interests over Chinese satellite interests,' Farrar added. 'For the time being, Starlink's the only game in town.' Vance Talks AI and Data In an hour-and-a-half-long appearance on comedian Theo Von's podcast over the weekend, Vice President JD Vance got into some heady tech topics. Von, whose 4 million YouTube subscribers have made him a fixture of online bro culture, tends to be skeptical of both Big Tech and Big Government. So it might be natural that Vance took an anti-establishment line on AI laws and data collection. On AI: Vance talked about the Republicans' proposal for a 10-year moratorium preventing states from regulating AI — an idea that, to many people's surprise, surfaced in the House reconciliation bill and made it to the Senate. He was skeptical of its chances on procedural grounds ('To be honest with you, I don't think that's going to make it in the final bill'), and then channeled his inner law student by laying out the populist case for both sides of the moratorium debate. Explaining why he might be in favor, Vance suggested the moratorium could stop liberal bias from infecting AI systems: 'You basically have a federal regulation that prevents, like, California from having a super progressive set of regulations on artificial intelligence.' On the other side, Vance cited the ELVIS Act, which Tennessee's Republican legislature passed in March prohibiting the unauthorized use of AI to replicate singers' voices. Vance said it was reasonable to want to protect the likes of Taylor Swift and Robert Plant from having AI coopt their voices to generate new songs — an explanation that both Swifties and Led Heads might find convincing. On data collection, Vance advocated for more regulations, calling out iPads for tracking users' reading behaviors. He also made an intriguing reference to a national security briefing he reviewed, after quickly checking with a staffer to ensure that the info wasn't classified. 'Let's say you're reading a story from some random newspaper and you hover on a particular paragraph, your iPad is collecting that information on you … that is the stuff that really freaks me out,' he said. The particular data collection technique that Vance was referencing is unclear — the Vice President's office did not respond to DFD's inquiry by deadline. Apple also did not respond to DFD's question about the brief and how iPads track user activity. Vance was responding to Von's question about the administration's contracts with Palantir to help implement a March executive order for more data sharing between agencies. Vance – whose mentors include Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel – described the order as connecting pre-existing databases, rather than enabling additional data collection. 'We've got to live in reality and the government's already got this information,' he said. 'We just need to make sure they don't misuse it.' UK'S BIG AI BET With much of the tech world descending on the U.K. for London Tech Week, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is doubling down on his plans to work 'in partnership' with businesses to harness the power of artificial intelligence for social good, POLITICO's Joseph Bambridge and Tom Bristow report. That commitment comes as the U.K. government prepares for a spending review this week that will set out its fiscal plans for the rest of this parliament. A government AI action plan released in January previously vowed to 'mainline' the technology throughout public services. Starmer said there is a responsibility to 'harness this unprecedented opportunity and to use it to improve the lives of working people.' 'Britain is once again, after years of chaos, a stable partner for investors that believes the future should be shaped by our democratic values, and that in this volatile world, is unequivocally, unashamedly, defiantly even, open for business,' the prime minister said Monday. Tech luminaries like Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis mingled with Starmer at his country residence over the weekend. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Never tell me the Odds,' Blue Origin set to launch New Glenn this summer, attempt landing
Blue Origin's multi-stage New Glenn rocket launched once in January, and the Space Coast has waited ever since for the second liftoff of the rocket which could become a main competitor to SpaceX. Blue Origin CEO Dave Limp posted to X (formerly Twitter) that the company's rocket, originally set to launch again in late spring, will now blast off no earlier than August. The company will once again attempt to land and recover the rocket's first stage, also called a booster. "New Glenn's second mission will take place NET August 15th. Following in the footsteps of our first booster, we've chosen the name 'Never Tell Me The Odds' for Tail 2," wrote Limp. "One of our key mission objectives will be to land and recover the booster. This will take a little bit of luck and a lot of excellent execution." Getting New Glenn operational will bring Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin into the orbital payload marketplace, which is currently dominated by Elon Musk's SpaceX. If Blue Origin can achieve reusability with the rocket's booster, that would bring launch costs down drastically. Like SpaceX, Blue Origin will land the booster on a sea faring vessel; Blue Origin's ship is named Jacklyn for Bezos' mother. To date, SpaceX is the only company which has successfully demonstrated reusability in a multiple stage rocket; its Falcon 9 boosters land on a regular basis. Blue Origin has successfully landed its single stage suborbital New Shepard rocket, which launches paying customers out of Texas, but was not so fortunate with the January attempt of the multiple-stage New Glenn out of Florida. When is the next Florida rocket launch? Is there a launch today? Upcoming SpaceX, Axiom, ULA rocket launch schedule at Cape Canaveral Back in January, the 321-foot-tall New Glenn rocket barreled off Cape Canaveral Launch Complex 36. While the upper stage successfully sent the payload to orbit, the company had high hopes of landing the booster on Jacklyn. Instead, Jacklyn sailed back to Port Canaveral empty. That lost booster? It was named "So You're Telling Me There's a Chance." After the failed landing, Limp acknowledged it was an ambitious goal for the first launch. In fact, it took competitor SpaceX years to successfully land a Falcon 9 booster. Once operational, New Glenn will be Blue Origin's workhorse rocket. Future payloads include the NASA EscaPADE mission to Mars. The rocket will also launch Amazon's Project Kuiper internet satellites, which are a competitor to SpaceX's Starlink. The August launch announcement is timely. This coming Friday, June 13, will see the second launch of the Kuiper internet constellation atop a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket. Brooke Edwards is a Space Reporter for Florida Today. Contact her at bedwards@ or on X: @brookeofstars. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Blue Origin's New Glenn to launch late summer, attempt booster landing
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
There's an infinite amount of energy locked in the vacuum of space-time. Could we ever use it?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. There may be an infinite amount of energy locked in the vacuum of space-time. So could we ever harness this energy for anything useful? The idea of vacuum energy comes from quantum field theory, which is a marriage of quantum mechanics with Einstein's theory of special relativity. In quantum field theory, particles are not really what we think they are. Instead, they are better represented as fields, which are quantum entities that span all of space and time. When a localized patch of the field gets sufficient energy and starts traveling, we identify it as a particle. But the real fundamental object is the field itself. In quantum mechanics, any system has a defined set of energies, like the energies that an electron can have in its orbital shells around an atomic nucleus. Similarly, the quantum fields have energies associated with them at every point in space. Any finite volume, like an empty box, contains an infinite number of geometric points, so this means there's an infinite amount of energy in that volume. This happens even when the fields are in their lowest energy state possible, also known as the zero-point state or the ground state. This is the state with no extra energy added to it, no extra vibrations, no extra excitations whatsoever — just the lowest possible ground state, below which there is nothing. But due to the fundamental uncertainties of quantum mechanics, even this ground state has an energy associated with it, so you still run into an infinite amount of energy. However, we can't extract energy out of the vacuum and use it to do work. That's because whatever its value is, it is the lowest energy state possible for the universe. To get work done, you have to transfer energy from one state to another. But if you could somehow "pull" energy out of the vacuum, there would be no place to put it, because no matter what you do, you are still surrounded by a vacuum. It's like drawing water out of the bottom of a dry well: There's nothing left to give. Another way to look at it that is completely compatible with the field portrait is via the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which states that you can never know both the energy of a particle and the duration of its existence with a perfect degree of precision. This means that at the ground state or zero-point state of the universe, particles can temporarily pop into existence, "borrowing" energy from the vacuum, as long as they disappear in a short enough time to return that energy back. If you were to pluck out one of these particles and make it permanent, that would violate the Heisenberg uncertainty principle because you borrowed energy from the ground state without giving it back in time. These particles are known as virtual particles. They are the manifestation of all the fundamental energies of the quantum fields that permeate space-time. RELATED STORIES —Here's how the universe could end in a 'false vacuum decay' —Is the vacuum of space truly empty? —10 mind-boggling things you should know about quantum physics The bottom line is that no matter what the zero-point energy is, it's the background of the universe on top of which all of physics takes place. Just as you can't go lower than the ground floor of a building with no basement, you can't get lower than the ground state of the universe — so there's nothing for you to extract, and there's no way to leverage that into useful applications of energy. So, unfortunately, any work you do in the universe will have to be done the old-fashioned way.
