Teeth Hurt? It Could Be Because Of A 500-Million-Year-Old Fish
Ever wondered why our teeth are so sensitive to pain or even just cold drinks? It might be because they first evolved for a very different purpose than chewing half a billion years ago, a study suggested Wednesday.
The exact origin of teeth -- and what they were for -- has long proved elusive to scientists.
Their evolutionary precursors are thought to be hard structures called odontodes which first appeared not in mouths but on the external armour of the earliest fish around 500 million years ago.
Even today, sharks, stingrays and catfish are covered in microscopic teeth that make their skin rough like sandpaper.
There are several theories for why these odontodes first appeared, including that they protected against predators, helped with movement through the water or stored minerals.
But the new study published in the journal Nature supports the hypothesis that they were originally used as sensory organs which transmitted sensations to nerves.
At first, the study's lead author Yara Haridy was not even trying to hunt down the origins of teeth.
Instead the postdoctoral researcher at the University of Chicago was probing another major question puzzling the field of palaeontology: what is the oldest fossil of an animal with a backbone?
Haridy asked museums across the United States to send her hundreds of vertebrate specimens -- some so small they could fit on the tip of a toothpick -- so she could analyse them using a CT scanner.
She began focusing on dentine, the inner layer of teeth that sends sensory information to nerves in the pulp.
THINGS GET FISHY
A fossil from the Cambrian period called Anatolepis seemed to be the answer she was looking for. Its exoskeleton has pores underneath the odontodes called tubules that could indicate they once contained dentine.
This has previously led paleontologists to believe that Anatolepis was the first known fish in history.
But when Haridy compared it to the other specimens she had scanned, she found that the tubules looked much more like sensory organs called sensilla of arthropods, a group of animals that includes crustaceans and insects.
The mighty Anatolepis was therefore demoted to the rank of an invertebrate.
For modern arthropods such as crabs, scorpions and spiders, sensilla are used to perceive temperature, vibration and even smell.
How little these features have changed over time suggests they have been serving these same functions for half a billion years.
The researchers said they found "striking" similarities between these features in Anatolepis and vertebrate fish from around 465 million years ago -- as well as some better-known fish.
"We performed experiments on modern fish that confirmed the presence of nerves in the outside teeth of catfish, sharks and skates," Haridy told AFP.
This shows that "tooth tissues of odontodes outside the mouth can be sensitive -- and perhaps the very first odontodes were as well," she added.
"Arthropods and early vertebrates independently evolved similar sensory solutions to the same biological and ecological problem."
Senior study author Neil Shubin, also from the University of Chicago, said that these primitive animals evolved in "a pretty intense predatory environment".
"Being able to sense the properties of the water around them would have been very important," Shubin said in a statement.
Haridy explained that over time, fish evolved jaws and "it became advantageous to have pointy structures" near their mouth.
"Little by little some fish with jaws had pointy odontodes at the edge of the mouth and then eventually some were directly in the mouth," she said.
"A toothache is actually an ancient sensory feature that may have helped our fishy ancestors survive!"
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
13 hours ago
- News18
Covid Virus's Bodyguard: How Pathogen Protects Itself While Replicating
Last Updated: US study highlights that disrupting this protective shield significantly reduces the virus's ability to spread, which could be key to developing more effective antiviral treatments Scientists from the Texas Biomedical Research Institute and the University of Chicago have made a significant breakthrough in understanding SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for Covid-19. Their collaborative efforts have identified a crucial self-protective mechanism that the virus uses within the human body, enabling it to replicate effectively and infect more cells. The study highlights that disrupting this protective shield significantly reduces the virus's ability to spread, emphasising its critical role in viral propagation. The research reveals that SARS-CoV-2 is not just an invading pathogen but a sophisticated entity that actively protects itself during the infection process. This newly discovered mechanism allows the virus to survive and multiply within host cells, bypassing the body's natural defences. Scientists observed a direct correlation: interference with this shielding process led to a significant drop in the viral infection rate. This finding, published in the journal Nature Communications, strongly suggests that understanding and potentially targeting this protective strategy could be key to developing more effective antiviral treatments. While the initial report does not delve into the specific molecular or cellular details of how this mechanism operates, its identification marks a pivotal moment in Covid-19 research. Scientists emphasise its profound importance in deciphering the intricate ways the virus spreads at a cellular level. Unravelling this protective shield could open new avenues for therapeutic intervention, potentially leading to drugs that disarm the virus's ability to protect itself, thereby limiting its replication and spread within an infected individual. This discovery holds promise for a more targeted approach to combating Covid-19. By understanding the virus's internal defences, researchers can work towards developing antiviral therapies that specifically dismantle this protective mechanism, rather than relying solely on broad-spectrum approaches. (With agency inputs) First Published: June 06, 2025, 18:46 IST
The Hindu
21 hours ago
- The Hindu
New hope for patients with less common breast cancer
Results from the study, presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Clinical Oncology, are expected to be submitted to regulators and could soon establish a new first-line therapy for people with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer -- the advanced stage of a form that comprises 15-20 percent of all breast cancer cases. HER2-positive cancers are fueled by an overactive HER2 gene, which makes too much of a protein called human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 that helps cancer cells grow and spread. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer that has spread to other parts of the body live around five years. "Seeing such a striking improvement was really impressive to us -- we were taking a standard and almost doubling how long patients could have their cancer controlled for," oncologist Sara Tolaney, chief of the breast oncology division at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, told AFP. The current standard of care, known as THP, combines chemotherapy with two antibodies that block growth signals from the HER2 protein. The new approach uses a drug called trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), an antibody attached to a chemotherapy drug. Smart bomb This "smart bomb" strategy allows the drug to target cancer cells directly. "You can bind to the cancer cell and dump all that chemo right into the cancer cells," explained Tolaney. "Some people call them smart bombs because they're delivering chemo in a targeted fashion -- which is how I think we're able to really increase efficacy so much." Common side effects included nausea, diarrhea and a low white blood cell count, with a less common effect involving lung scarring. T-DXd is already approved as a "second-line" option -- used when first-line treatments stop working. But in the new trial, it was given earlier, paired with another antibody, pertuzumab. In a global trial led by Tolaney, just under 400 patients were randomly assigned to receive T-DXd in combination with pertuzumab, thought to enhance its effects. A similar number received the standard THP regimen. A third group, who received T-DXd without pertuzumab, was also enrolled -- but those results haven't yet been reported. 44 percent risk reduction At a follow-up of 2.5 years, the T-DXd and pertuzumab combination reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 44 percent compared to standard care. Fifteen percent of patients in the T-DXd group saw their cancer disappear entirely, compared to 8.5 percent in the THP group. Because this was an interim analysis, the median progression-free survival -- meaning the point at which half the patients had seen their cancer return or worsen -- was 40.7 months with the new treatment, compared to 26.9 months with the standard, and could rise further as more data come in. Tolaney said the results would be submitted to regulators around the world, including the US Food and Drug Administration, and that future work would focus on optimising how long patients remain on the treatment, particularly those showing complete remission. "This represents a new first-line standard treatment option for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer," said Rebecca Dent, a breast cancer specialist at the National Cancer Center Singapore who was not involved in the study
India Today
a day ago
- India Today
Swarm of earthquakes hit Karachi: Is the great Himalayan earthquake coming?
In the last few days, Pakistan experienced a series of earthquakes especially in the areas near Karachi. The multiple tremors created panic among the locals and simultaneously raised questions about the high frequency of these than 20 smaller earthquakes, which have magnitudes of around 3 on the Richter scale, are not a matter of worry, but the question is whether these are warnings for a bigger earthquake in the is not just about Pakistan; geologically, even the adjacent Indian states are similar. Hence, another question that hits the mind is whether earthquakes near Karachi are a matter of worry for our did these quakes occur in Karachi? A series of low-intensity earthquakes, primarily in Karachi, Sindh, highlights the region's seismic vulnerability due to its location near the boundary of the Indian and Eurasian tectonic plates. Collisions of two tectonic plates drive frequent earthquakes in the region. (Photo: AFP) Karachi, one of the largest cities of Pakistan, was struck by almost two dozen earthquakes with magnitudes ranging from 2.5 to 3.6 between June 1 and June to seismological experts, quakes were driven by natural tectonic activity along the Indian-Eurasian plate boundary, specifically associated with the Landhi Fault Line in location at the convergence of these plates makes it prone to frequent seismic events, with Karachi typically experiencing lower-intensity quakes compared to the north of Pakistan. These "swarm earthquakes" indicate a seismic risk near Karachi, despite being seismologically less active than northern Landhi Fault Line's activity suggests local fault dynamics, potentially triggered by stress redistribution in the region's tectonic back-to-back earthquakes normal?Pakistan and the Indian part near the Himalayas are tectonically active and prone to seismic activity. Pakistan lies at the convergence of the Indian and Eurasian plates, with Sindh, Punjab, and Jammu and Kashmir on the Indian Plate, and Baluchistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Gilgit-Baltistan on the Eurasian of these two plates drive frequent earthquakes in the region, particularly at the fault lines of plates like the Landhi fault near Karachi. Geologists consider that these earthquakes can be viewed from two different points of Shahsank Shekhar, Professor of Geology at Delhi University, explains the phenomenon, "Normally, when multiple earthquakes of relatively lower frequencies come to an area, then two kinds of interpretation can be drawn. The first, small earthquakes are a good sign as the stress is being released slowly. But another interpretation says that there is a stored stress between the fault lines, and a bigger earthquake can result if that stress energy comes out in one go." Quakes were driven by natural tectonic activity along the Indian-Eurasian plate boundary. (Photo: Getty) What could be the possible reasons for swarm earthquakes?There are a variety of reasons for multiple earthquakes in any particular area. In addition to tectonic plate movements, fault networks and stress transfer, and aftershocks after a major earthquake, there could be other reasons as reasons include Fluid movement, like Magma or groundwater flowing through the Earth's crust. Regions near active volcanoes may experience earthquake swarms due to magma movement or volcanic unrest. For example, swarms often precede or accompany eruptions in places like Iceland or Hawaii. Some regions, like the Mediterranean or the Ring of Fire, are seismically active due to their location near multiple plate boundaries or fault between these faults can lead to clusters of earthquakes.
