MPs vote to decriminalise women ending their own pregnancies in step towards abortion reform
A HISTORIC vote to decriminalise women terminating their own pregnancies has been passed by MPs.
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill was supported, with MPs voting 379 to 137, majority 242.
3
3
The Gower MP said it will remove the threat of "investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment" of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy.
A push for change came after she saw how women had been proved by cops over suspected illegal abortions.
MPs passed an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill with a majority of 242.
Under current law in England and Wales, abortion is allowed up to the first 24 weeks of pregnancy - and beyond that in certain circumstances.
However, abortion is still considered a criminal offence under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929 - and it has to be approved by two doctors.
The result of the vote has not become official law as of yet.
But it has been added to the government's flagship Crime and Policing Bill that is making its way through parliament.
It will then become law once that bill receives royal assent.
During the Bill's report stage, Ms Antoniazzi assured her colleagues the current 24-week limit would remain and that abortions would still require the approval and signatures of two doctors.
Fellow Labour MP Stella Creasy said she faced "unforgivable abuse" outside Parliament ahead of the vote.
The Labour MP also maintained that healthcare professionals "acting outside the law and abusive partners using violence or poisoning to end a pregnancy would still be criminalised, as they are now".
On issues such as abortion, MPs usually have free votes, meaning they take their own view rather than deciding along party lines.
During a Westminster Hall debate earlier this month, justice minister Alex Davies-Jones said the Government is neutral on decriminalisation and that it is an issue for Parliament to decide upon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Will new school rules help cut violence in the classroom?
The best time to teach a child not to throw a chair in a classroom is not as it is being projected across the what an educational psychologist told me last week as we discussed how teachers should respond to disruptive behaviour in people in education agree building positive relationships is the key to preventing violence in schools but teachers say they also need to be able to use "consequences" as the past few months I've spoken to dozens of teachers who say the balance between "nurture" and consequences has been no-one wants to have a chair thrown at them. In response to concerns from teachers, the Scottish government has now published guidance for schools on how to deal with violent and aggressive behaviour from the Conservatives dismissed it as "waffle", saying it gives no clear instructions on when and how to exclude violent or disruptive pupils. What's the problem? Karen Simpson taught in a primary school in Inverness for 14 years but in 2018 she quit to become a said she loved the job but there was a "gradual" erosion of a teacher's ability to use boundaries that made it impossible to maintain story chimes with the stories of so many leaving the profession because the classroom behaviour has become too difficult, too overwhelming. Parents too have told me their children are too nervous to go to school. They say their kids are traumatised by the disruptive behaviour of other pupils who have repeatedly got away with swearing or violence and faced no boundaries. Some call for a return to the days of corporal punishment in schools, when unruly children were disciplined by "the tawse".It was outlawed in the 1980s in Scotland, for very good reasons, but some think the pendulum has swung too far with many councils focusing on the principles of "nurture". What does the new guidance say? For low-level disruptive behaviour the guidance suggests a range of include offering children "an alternative activity to the rest of the class that allows the child to regulate their emotions or behaviour" or asking the pupil to "take a break for a short time". The guidance also suggests access to learning support for pupils struggling to regulate their behaviour. But teachers have told me there is already not enough learning support in different levels of difficult behaviour the appendix to the guidelines suggests different staged children who are being violent one consequence is to give them a laminated piece of paper with bullet points reminding them how to behave and step away. Other inventions include keeping the child in school but taking them to a different area to allow them to calm down. What about exclusions from school? For years there has been a presumption against removing kids from at Edinburgh University found that being expelled from school massively impacts young people's life chances in all the worst dramatically cut its exclusions as did many other local in recent times teachers have been expressing growing concerns about some local authorities and schools misinterpreting the nurture principles by removing all or any her foreword to the guidance, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said exclusion should only be used as a "last resort".The guidance says exclusion can be used in response to violence or anti-social behaviour, saying this measure can "allow matters to calm, time for planning, meeting with parents etc". What was the reaction to the guidelines? Teachers' unions have broadly welcomed the new guidelines but the EIS said they won't solve the behavioural problems in schools without significantly more resources and staff to support Secretary Jenny Gilruth said they will empower teachers in the face of rising levels of disruption and emotional dysregulation. However, Tory education spokesman Miles Briggs said they were a pathetic response to the epidemic of violence in Scottish said: "Teachers are still being given no clear rules on when and how they can exclude violent or disruptive pupils."Jenny Gilruth only mentions it as a last resort. Instead teachers are being fed waffle about eye-contact, hand signals and merits."These are utterly insufficient for dealing with the extreme behaviour that we've seen recently in classrooms up and down the country."Rather than clear rules, this document is full of Holyrood blob buzzwords about multi-agency processes, positivity and inclusion."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Kristi Noem is ‘alert and recovering' after trip to hospital over allergic reaction, official says
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
No value for money from the office created by Rachel Reeves
T hink of three projects most in need of a value-for-money test and this trio are hard to beat: that blank cheque on wheels known as HS2; the Sizewell C nuke, nicely located on a Suffolk flood plain; and the Royal Navy's Dreadnought-class submarines, the biggest defence project presently under way. So how's this for a turn-up from the Office for Value for Money (OVfM)? It won't be reviewing any of them. No, as its chairman David Goldstone has just told the National Audit Office (NAO) chief, Gareth Davies, over five pages of total blather: 'In line with our principle not to duplicate the work of others we did not review HS2, Sizewell C and Dreadnought, as they are already subject to extensive [scrutiny]'. How convenient is that? Among her budget triumphs, the OVfM was invented by Rachel Reeves to 'root out waste and inefficiency' and 'help us realise the benefits from every pound of public spending'.
