Russia says it plans to summon the German ambassador over alleged harassment of its journalists
MOSCOW, June 26 (Reuters) - Russia will summon the German ambassador soon to inform him of retaliatory measures in response to what it sees as the harassment of Russian journalists based in Germany, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said on Thursday.
Russia has clashed repeatedly with Germany over the issue, and expelled a German correspondent and cameraman last November in what it said was a symmetrical response to German moves against Russian state TV journalists.
Germany said the Russians' departure was linked to residence rules, and that Russian journalists can report freely in the country.
Zakharova said Germany was applying undue "pressure and harassment" against Russian journalists and their family members. She has previously spoken of passports being revoked and limits on journalists' freedom of movement.
Russia continues to accredit Western correspondents, although many left the country after Moscow in 2022 launched its full-scale war against Ukraine, which was followed by the passage of new censorship laws, and the 2023 arrest of U.S. reporter Evan Gershkovich on spying charges. Gershkovich, who denied the accusation, was freed in a prisoner swap last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Note to Starmer and the other sabre-rattlers. Why spend billions on weapons – soft power would keep us safe
'Toadying', 'slavish', 'cringe-worthy' were the words hurled at Nato's Mark Rutte for the praise he heaped on Donald Trump. But words cost nothing. Keir Starmer went further. He dug into his pocket and gave Trump $1.3bn for just 12 aeroplanes. He promised never to use them, or put any bombs in them, without orders from Washington. He might as well have enrolled in the United States Air Force. Starmer is engaged in a strategic shift in Britain's global stance – from soft power to hard. He has clearly received the notorious initial briefing that so moved Tony Blair and led him eventually to war in Iraq. It induced David Cameron to spend billions on aircraft carriers that he had intended to cancel. Now the government warns in its strategic review that Britain needs to prepare for the possibility of being attacked on its own soil. Perhaps Starmer agrees with Nato's Rutte that the British people 'better learn to speak Russian'. Russia has never, in its entire existence, tried to invade Britain. Yet to protect its interest a defence industry of vast public expense has sustained this belief. It has demanded we go to war if Russia so much as inches over its border, as if it abutted Norfolk. Clearly Britain needs to defend its cables and its electronic airwaves. It needs to guard its banks and its businesses from mischief. But no one is threatening it with invasion. With the end of the cold war in 1989, soft power should have been unleashed. Every conceivable tool should have been deployed to introduce Russia into the European community of nations. I was one of many westerners in the 1990s who would go to seminars and meetings with eager figures in Moscow's hierarchy. They were open-minded and democratic and desperate to open dialogues with the west. They sent their children to English schools and universities. Cultural exchange was intense. The same was happening, less openly, with China. It was a time of real hope. Yet the old dog-eared briefings were still being used. We were told we cannot be 'too safe'. Nato's belligerents declared their muscle by advancing to Russia's border. Barrier after barrier went up, as Russia reverted to its old conflicts with its bordering states. You could sense the west's defence pundits sinking thankfully back into their old ways. In his definition of soft power, the American academic Joseph Nye suggested that cooperation 'is always more effective than coercion … Values like democracy, human rights and individual opportunities are deeply seductive.' Soft power is about building friends and finding allies, rather than creating enemies. Britain, poised between Europe and the US and with English as a global language, was uniquely positioned for this task. Thirteen years ago, a global soft power index from the Institute for Government placed Britain as number one, above even that citadel of soft (as well as hard) power, the US. More recently, another index put it third after Germany and Japan. These are not trivial statistics. They measure the influence a country can be expected to exert in any conflict short of war. Today, the primary east-west power struggle beyond the Ukraine war is essentially soft. It illustrates the west's poor use of it. The isolation of Russia – economically, culturally and diplomatically – has not altered its aggression in Ukraine. What is has done is push Russia closer to China and the non-aligned Brics-plus nations across Asia, Africa and Latin America. China's soft power projection is enormous, from its belt-and-braces investment outreach to 50 cultural institutes due to open around the world. Starmer's response has been unbelievable. He wants to outbid Trump in slashing his chief soft power resource, overseas aid. He is making the biggest cut ever in Britain's aid programme, from 0.5 to 0.3% of gross national income. % He has continued to slash the BBC's World Service, the nation's outstanding global presence. With 320 million listeners in English and 41 other languages, it has been shrunk by 500 posts since 2022. I shall never forget a group of Chinese girls crowded, freezing, round a radio in the border city of Harbin, eagerly practising their English with the aid of the BBC. This outreach is equalled by England's education system. Since the turn of the century, it has become the start in life for millions, not just from Russia and China but from around the globe. About 390,000 non-EU students came to Britain last year, 19% down on 2023 and a level that is forecast to plunge in future. It must be in Britain's interest for them to keep coming. Soft power lies in contact – cultural, financial, academic and diplomatic. Opposition to a hostile regime emerges if not from its military then from its commercial and professional class. Ostracism merely drives that class into silence or exile. In Russia, opposition from those who used to influence Vladimir Putin and might restrain him has collapsed. In their place are the sabre-rattlers. Starmer appears to be one of them. Simon Jenkins is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Marine Le Pen says corruption case could block presidential run
Marine Le Pen has asked Jordan Bardella, her top lieutenant, to prepare to replace her as presidential candidate for the hard-right National Rally if the appeal court upholds a bar on her entering the 2027 election. The 56-year-old populist, who is far ahead in the polling in her planned fourth run for the French presidency, was acknowledging for the first time that her conviction in March for embezzling EU funds could block her path to the Élysée Palace. Her words were a boost for her 29-year-old protégé who was elected president of the party in 2022. It is also part of a shift she is making to broaden the Rally's appeal to the conservative voters whom it needs to win in 2027. Le Pen was barred from standing for public office for five years, but, amid an outcry, the justice authorities fast-tracked her appeal so the case will be retried from scratch next spring with a verdict expected about a year before the spring 2027 elections.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Why payments to pregnant schoolgirls is dividing Putin's pronatalists
President Putin is determined to reverse Russia's 'disastrous' population slump but the country's latest counter measure may be the most controversial yet — cash payments for schoolgirl pregnancies. Rules introduced in at least ten regions since March mean teenage mothers who are still at school will be given one-off payments of 100,000 roubles (£900) for their first birth. There is no minimum age requirement of the mother to receive the payments. The legal age of consent in Russia is 16. Critics are outraged at the promotion of risky and socially challenging births, while defenders of the initiative claim it is genuine aid to vulnerable young mothers. The measure is part of a package pushed forward under Putin, who is concerned by a new decline in the populace, which experts blame in part on his invasion of Ukraine. In recent years, Russia has increased financial incentives for new mothers, banned 'child-free propaganda' and placed restrictions on abortion and divorce as it battles to avert a demographic crisis. In tune with this pronatalist spirit, a popular reality show on Russian television recently changed its name from 'Pregnant at 16' to 'Mama at 16'. The payments are granted before birth, in some regions as early as the 12th week of pregnancy, in others after 22 weeks. The extension of payments to school-age mothers has angered some pro-Kremlin politicians and activists. 'When a child gives birth to another child it's not something to be encouraged; it's not a reason for pride or heroism,' Kseniya Goryachova, a Russian MP, told colleagues in parliament. If girls were made to think 'it doesn't matter how old you are, give birth, we'll pay' then, 'This is not care. This is very harmful propaganda,' Goryachova added. Experts warned the measure may simply be ineffective. John Ermisch, an emeritus professor of family demography at Oxford University, said that financial incentives to give birth usually did not have a long-term effect. 'You get a short spike, then a decline,' he told BBC News Russian. But Andrei Klychkov, the governor of Orel, one of the regions taking part in the trial, defended the payments, saying they should be seen not as rewards but as 'social support' for teenage girls 'in a difficult real-life situation' after getting pregnant. Political commentators say the Kremlin is pushing such policies because a falling population undermines Putin's muscular rhetoric about the country 'getting off its knees' and rising to meet its enemies. 'Putin understands that, in the world of tomorrow, Russia will be a territorial giant and population dwarf,' the analysts Ivan Krastev and Stephen Holmes concluded in a recent report. Russia's population plummeted from 148.6 million in 1993 to 142.7 million in 2009 as mortality rose and fertility rates dipped. Poverty, alcoholism, poor diet and accidents took their toll in the post-Soviet collapse, while many young Russians were financially unable to support raising a family. From 2009, the trend was bucked as relative prosperity increased with Russia's oil and gas boom, and by 2022 the population was back to 147 million. However, it has since fallen again, to an estimated 146.1 million this year. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers dying in Ukraine, an exodus of young people opposed to the war — or not keen to fight in it — and cuts to inward migration are thought to have added to the latest drop in population. Those factors seem to have offset the number of 'citizens' that Russia says it acquired when it annexed Crimea and parts of eastern Ukraine. • Janice Turner: Pronatalism will bring votes but not babies Meanwhile, birth rates are on the slide again. According to data released by Rosstat, the state statistics agency, 195,400 children were born in Russia during January and February 2025 — a 3 per cent drop compared to the same period in 2024. Last year, Russia recorded 1.2 million births, the lowest annual total since 1999. Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, has called the situation 'disastrous' and such statistics have prompted unusual suggestions from Russian officials desperate to stop the rot. In March, Yevgeny Rudenko, a councillor from the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia in Kaluga region, urged women to wear skimpy clothes in hot weather, and said that in the Seventies 'everyone wore mini-skirts, marriages were strong, and families were being created'. 'Because of modesty, women are getting married less often,' Rudenko added. 'Only gay men don't like women in mini-skirts.' In September, Yevgeny Shestopalov, a regional health minister, urged Russians to have sex during the working day. 'Being very busy at work is not a valid reason, but a lame excuse,' he said. 'You can engage in procreation during breaks, because life flies by too quickly.'
