Community service almost doubled
The number of community service hours carried out by offenders has almost doubled in a year, the chief probation officer has said.
Mike Cutland, from the Probation and After-Care Service, said community service orders led to the completion of more than 16,000 hours of unpaid work in 2024, worth more than £180,000 - up from 8,700 hours in 2023.
Community service orders are an alternative to a custodial sentence and give the person an opportunity to make amends for their offending.
Mr Cutland said he believed the rise in probation and community service orders meant the courts had "confidence" in the service's work.
The response to a Freedom of Information request revealed there were 76 probation orders and 124 community service orders in 2024, up from 67 and 113 in 2023 respectively.
The Government of Jersey website says offenders given probation orders work with supervising officers to change their behaviour.
Mr Cutland said: "We work very closely with the courts, we provide pre-sentence reports that advise them about a person's circumstances and then we make a recommendation of how we feel we can assist that person.
"If we see a rise in probation orders, I think and I hope it means that the courts feel they can have confidence in the service in supervising that person effectively."
In 2023 and 2024, the service found the main contributory factors for offending adults were alcohol misuse, emotional instability and relationship problems.
Mr Cutland said probation orders helped people reflect on their lifestyle choices and to "make some changes" to reduce their risk of reoffending.
"Nearly 80% of probation orders have been successfully completed and nearly 90% of community service orders," he said.
"We are really encouraged by those figures because what it shows is that we are having an impact on offending rates and we're helping people really to lead more law abiding lives."
He added the service was "not seeing any rise in re-conviction" and that rehabilitation was at the forefront of its work.
In 2023, the services' report said there was a high staff turn-over and recruitment difficulties.
Mr Cutland said government investment had since been supporting its services to hire and support trainee probation officers.
One of the charities that has benefitted from the unpaid work over the past five years is the Salvation Army.
It said the service had helped maintain its therapeutic gardens in Gorey which were used to support islanders with learning disabilities.
Richard Mann, co-leader of the organisation, said the support had "been a game changer for us".
"It's the community service support that we get that really makes that a sustainable and good project.
"The support they give has just transformed it, things like making the site more friendly for people with mobility issues.
"Whenever we need it, the support is always there and wanting to help."
Mr Mann said although the work was provided for free, it was always important to thank people for their work.
He said: "We want to show them that they're seen, they're valued and they're appreciated.
"Even though it's unpaid, it actually makes a difference to peoples' lives, so valuing everyone that supports our service is really important to us."
Follow BBC Jersey on X and Facebook. Send your story ideas to channel.islands@bbc.co.uk.
Grants of £5,000 to support community projects
Prisoner activity rises after recruitment drive
Jersey probation service suffers staff challenges
Probation and After-Care Service
Government of Jersey - Freedom of Information
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
I've been caught by Britain's most prolific speed camera – it makes the road no safer
When careful motorist Norman Tate received a letter of intended prosecution for speeding, he could hardly believe it. It told the grandfather, who had had a clean driving licence for more than a quarter of a century before the incident last year, that he'd been caught doing 45mph in a 30mph zone in his Ford Mondeo by a speed camera on a busy junction on the A38 in Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire. 'I'm a straight-up person. My immediate thought was, 'I'm a senior citizen and don't do 45mph in a 30mph area,'' says Tate, now 80. 'I might creep over the limit by a few miles an hour, but not by that much. So I thought I'd investigate.' The chartered civil engineer, with experience of road and bridge design, analysed the signage along that stretch of road. He's concluded that it is 'not fit for purpose' – and argues that motorists should be given better warnings that they are about to enter a 30mph area. It is a view that others who have been caught by that speed camera share – and there are plenty of them. In fact, the little yellow box mounted on a pole is so prolific that it is said to be the 'most lucrative' speed camera in the country, according to a Channel 5 documentary due to be broadcast tonight at 8pm. Speed Cameras: Are They Out to Get You? says that one camera caught 17,498 speeding offences in nine months from when it was installed in August 2023 – at an average rate of 72 per day and potentially costing motorists more than £1.6 million. So, what, you might well ask, is going on with this camera in a Nottinghamshire market town to make it ranked the most prolific – and some claim the sneakiest – in the country? And what happens to all the money it generates? When we visit Sutton-in-Ashfield to meet Tate, from nearby Chesterfield, Derbyshire, he explains how, as you approach the camera from junction 28 of the M1, first there is a 70mph speed limit that suddenly turns to 50mph – with an average-speed camera overhead – then it goes to 30mph about 100 yards from the crossroads where the camera is. There is a 30mph sign as you approach on the dual carriageway and a smaller sign warning of the camera ahead and reminding you it's 30mph. But, Tate says: 'When I started looking into the signage, it became apparent that if there's a high-sided vehicle on the inside lane, there's no way you can see the 30mph sign. There is nothing on the road itself to say it's 30mph. I think there should be. It's too easy to think you're still in the 50mph zone.' Norman Tate | From Speed Cameras: Are They Out to Get You?, courtesy of Lion Television (When we stopped by at a busy 4pm, motorists appeared to be driving carefully, but it was hard to tell whether it was carefully enough – the camera uses infra-red light technology, which means it doesn't flash.) The figures in the documentary come from a survey by Legal Expert, a personal injury, compensation and accident claim solicitor company. To obtain them, the firm made a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to all 43 police forces in England and Wales asking for the number of speeding fines issued in the 12 months to April 5 2024, and the top 20 spots where drivers have been caught speeding. Only 23 replied. If the 17,498 figure for the camera on the A38 in Sutton-in-Ashfield is annualised, it would be 23,331, putting it ahead of the second-placed speed camera, which was on the M25 between junctions 7 and 16 in Surrey (21,989 offences, at a daily average of 60). With speeding offences resulting in a £100 fine and three points on your licence (if they result in a fixed penalty notice and are not contested), that would mean that £2,333,100 worth of fines would have been threatened in a year, using the annualised figure for the A38 camera. A separate FOI request, not mentioned in the documentary, about the A38 speed camera was later made to Nottinghamshire Police by Gary Eyre, a heating engineer from Huthwaite, near Sutton-in-Ashfield. He found the reply 'flabbergasting': it said 41,675 motorists were punished for travelling in excess of the 30mph limit in the camera's first 20 months. 'I go into about 10 houses every day and everybody knows someone who's been done,' he said, explaining what prompted him to make the FOI request. That means at least £4.1 million worth of fines will have been threatened during that period. Nottinghamshire Police has stressed to The Telegraph that 47 per cent of those offences were resolved with speed awareness courses as an alternative to prosecution, so no fines will have been paid for those. 'I don't disagree with having speed cameras,' Tate says, 'and this one is there doing the job it should be doing and is designed to do – if the signage was correct. This is a very dangerous junction and the camera is trying to save people's lives. But if there's 23,000 people a year going through there at the wrong speed, there's something wrong – and that's the signage.' His attempts to argue his case saw him locked in what he called a 'David and Goliath' battle with the authorities. In the end, after first electing to go to trial, he pleaded guilty to his speeding offence, committed at 11.09am on February 1 last year. He did not contest the 45mph recorded by the camera but argued that the advance warning signs from the 50mph to the 30mph zone are 'inadequate' and called for a review of those signs. Magistrates gave him four points, fined him £360, and ordered him to pay a surcharge to victim services of £144 and £150 costs to the Crown Prosecution Service. In the documentary, Tate is featured with his friend Brian Staples, 76, a retired auto electrician from Papplewick, Nottinghamshire, who runs a classic car club. Staples is more dubious of the camera's intent, telling the documentary: 'They're taking those motorists to court and making them look as if they're bad drivers, and they're not. Friends that I know have been caught there are in their 80s – they're not speeding, they've just been caught out.' Staples also claims that some speed cameras are there just to collect money rather than to slow people down. Patrica Harvey, 68, a retired office accounts manager from Pinxton, Derbyshire, told The Telegraph that she has been caught speeding by the Sutton-in-Ashfield camera twice in a year, the second time around a fortnight ago. Both times, she said her speed was in the mid-30s mph. 'I was specifically looking for the sign the second time but didn't see it,' she said. 'I'm really very cautious about my speed. But one minute you're in 50mph, then it's 30mph. There's not enough signs telling you what's happening.' Judy Gascoigne, 66, a PA from Matlock, Derbyshire, was warned by a passenger in her car of the camera ahead and was trying to slow down when she was caught doing 36mph. 'I didn't see the signage,' she said. 'I did a speed awareness course and there were four or five others on it caught at the same camera.' Another motorist said: 'I got caught twice in the same week. When there's tree branches in the way and large vehicles, the signs are difficult to see.' From Speed Cameras: Are They Out to Get You?, courtesy of Lion Television The documentary also raises the question of what happens to the money from speed camera fines, making the point that it is common misconception that it goes to the council. In fact, it goes directly to central government, to the Treasury, and is used towards general spending rather than ring-fenced for specific areas. Motoring journalist and transport campaigner Quentin Willson told the documentary: 'If the public saw that the revenue raised from speeding fines made a visible difference, then perhaps the public would be more behind them.' It is an issue that West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner Simon Foster is campaigning on. He wants the money raised from speeding fines in his region to be spent on road safety schemes there. During a consultation in 2023, 93 per cent of the public agreed that money raised from fixed penalty fines should stay in the region. So far, however, his calls – to both this and the previous government – have not resulted in a change of policy. One argument against allowing the income from speed cameras to be retained locally is that it might incentivise regions to install cameras to make money. Nottinghamshire Police said around 37,000 vehicles go through the junction where the Sutton-in-Ashfield camera is every day, so only a very small percentage are exceeding the speed limit. There had been at least one fatal collision and a number of serious injury collisions in the years before the camera was installed. But there have been no fatal or serious injury collisions since it was installed and the rate of offences have reduced to around 60 a day. The force also said work to cut back foliage to ensure all signage was visible was done before the camera went live, and the 'unusual step' was taken of putting out proactive communication to inform people of the new camera. Insp Simon Allen, of Nottinghamshire Police, said: 'While the 30mph limit around this junction is not set by the police, it is in place for a very good reason – including the very large number of children who use the pedestrian crossings to get to and from school each day. 'Like all safety cameras in the UK, this unit is in place to reduce speed and prevent road traffic collisions – not to catch people speeding.' A Department for Transport spokesman said: 'Fines from speeding offences help fund essential public services including health care, transport and policing in the West Midlands and across the country. 'While we keep the motoring offences and their penalties under review, we don't currently have any plans to change this system.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Thousands of criminal cases collapsing every year
Thousands of criminal cases, including murders and rapes, are collapsing every year because of lost, damaged or missing evidence. More than 30,000 prosecutions in England and Wales collapsed between October 2020 and September last year, according to data from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) obtained under Freedom of Information laws. Some 70 homicides and more than 550 sexual offences were among the cases that the CPS ruled could not proceed because prosecutors did not have the necessary evidence to secure a conviction. They are recorded as E72 cases, which collapse because physical or digital evidence such as forensics and body camera footage has been lost, damaged or contaminated during storage. They can also include witness statements or pathology reports not being made available by police or key evidence not gathered from the crime scene. The reasons why cases have collapsed are not included in the data, obtained by the BBC. However the figures do suggest the number of cases that are recorded as an E72 is increasing, with a higher proportion of prosecutions failing to result in a conviction because of lost or missing evidence each year. In 2020, a total of 7,484 prosecutions collapsed because of lost, missing or damaged evidence. Last year, that had risen by nine per cent to 8,180. Former police officers told the BBC they were not surprised by the findings. 'It's [evidence] chucked all over the place,' one officer said. Another said: 'The amount of it is overwhelming … it's unsurprising it gets lost or damaged.' Prof Carole McCartney, a criminologist and expert in evidence retention, said the loss of the dedicated Forensic Science Service (FSS) in 2012 was one of the reasons behind the growing proportion of cases affected by unavailable evidence. Before 2012, all police forces could send exhibits that needed storing or analysing to the FSS, but the government-owned company was closed that year after making large losses. Since then, police forces have had to make their own arrangements to store evidence and contract private providers for forensic services. Prof McCartney said she had witnessed an officer pull out what he called a 'box of horrors' from underneath a desk, which contained various pieces of uncatalogued evidence including a plastic bag with a broken wine bottle in it and a car number-plate. All items held by the FSS from before 2012 were moved to a different facility, the National Forensics Archive, just outside Birmingham, that year, but that archive is for unsolved cases only and does not accept new items. The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) said police and the CPS worked together to ensure evidence was 'gathered and presented in a timely manner, bringing offenders to justice and ensuring victims are safeguarded'. It said the data obtained by the BBC referred to all evidence that was either missing or unavailable when a defendant was going to trial after being charged. This could include situations where police cannot find an expert witness or may not be able to obtain a required medical statement. The NPCC said: 'When evidential issues occur in a case, the CPS will raise this with police for any action deemed necessary and we will work together to ensure these are resolved wherever possible.' The results of a consultation by the Law Commission, which proposed re-establishing a national forensic service and making the mishandling of evidence a criminal offence in some circumstances, are set to go before Parliament next week. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Thousands of criminal cases collapsing due to missing or lost police evidence
Thousands of criminal cases - including some of the most serious violent and sexual offences - are collapsing every year because of lost, damaged or missing evidence, the BBC has found. More than 30,000 prosecutions in England and Wales collapsed between October 2020 and September 2024, data from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) reveals. They include 70 homicides and more than 550 sexual offences. Police chiefs say not all the cases relate to lost evidence and the figures include situations where officers may not be able to find an expert witness or get a medical statement. However, it follows a series of damning reports about how police forces are storing evidence. A Home Office spokesperson said: "We always expect forces to adhere to the National Police Chiefs' Council's (NPCC) guidance on storage and retention of evidence." A leading criminologist says the increase was largely "a resourcing issue" brought about by cuts to police forces throughout the 2010s. And ex-police officers told the BBC it was unsurprising and the amount of evidence they deal with is "overwhelming". When police forces build cases around defendants they hand a file to the CPS. But when the CPS cannot proceed to trial because police do not have the necessary evidence needed to secure a conviction - they record it in their data as an "E72". The BBC, alongside the University of Leicester, managed to obtain Freedom of Information (FOI) requests showing the number of E72s recorded between 2020 and 2024 at police forces in England and Wales. They can include: Physical evidence - including forensic evidence - being lost, damaged or contaminated during storage Digital evidence, such as victim interview footage or body camera footage, being lost Witness statements or pathology reports not being made available by police Key evidence not gathered from the crime scene The figures obtained by the BBC do not break down why cases have collapsed. However, the data does suggest the number of cases recorded as an E72 are increasing, with a higher proportion of prosecutions failing to result in a conviction because of lost or missing evidence each year. In 2020, a total of 7,484 prosecutions collapsed because of lost, missing or damaged evidence. In 2024, that had risen by 9%, to 8,180. When Kiera was just nine years old she gave an interview on camera to Lancashire Police describing the harrowing details of the sexual abuse she had been subjected to over several years. But a few months later, she says, police officers told her mother they had lost the recording. "It was really hard, because I sat there for hours and hours telling people what had happened to me and for that to be lost, I just thought like what's the point in doing it again?" said Kiera, now 19. "They did want me to do it again, but I just couldn't go through with it at the time." It wasn't until nine years later, when Kiera was an adult, that she felt strong enough to provide her evidence again. In October 2024, her perpetrators were jailed for almost 30 years for raping and sexually assaulting seven children, including her. "It can really affect someone's mental state. It's also not protecting other people because these people then don't get convicted of crimes." A Lancashire Police spokesperson apologised for the lost interview disc in her case, and said, since 2015, it had introduced new processes to prevent similar issues happening again. Responding to the BBC's findings, Katie Kempen, chief executive at independent charity Victim Support, said: "Police forces must ensure crimes are thoroughly investigated and evidence is handled appropriately and sensitively. "All victim-survivors deserve the opportunity to seek justice." Former police officers have told the BBC they are not surprised by the findings. "It's [evidence] chucked all over the place," said one former officer. "The amount of it is overwhelming… it's unsurprising it gets lost or damaged," another told the BBC. Professor Carole McCartney, a criminologist and expert in evidence retention believes the loss of the dedicated Forensic Science Service (FSS) in 2012 is one of the reasons behind the growing proportion of cases affected by unavailable evidence. Before 2012, all police forces could send exhibits that needed storing or analysing to the service, but the government-owned company was closed that year after making large losses. Since then, police forces have had to make their own evidence storage arrangements and contract private providers for forensic services. Prof McCartney said she had witnessed an officer pull out what he called a "box of horrors" from underneath a desk which contained various pieces of un-catalogued evidence including a plastic bag with a broken wine bottle in it and a car numberplate. All Items held by the FSS from before 2012 were moved to a different facility - the National Forensics Archive just outside of Birmingham - that year, but that archive is for unsolved cases only and does not accept new items. Exhibits in the archive were crucial in overturning the convictions of both Andrew Malkinson and Peter Sullivan. Its director Alison Fendley says that without a dedicated forensic service, police forces were currently suffering from a lack of resources and expertise at a local level. "Police forces have got lots of other things to do - archiving is not their day job and there's so much material coming and going it must be difficult to keep on top of," she says. Meanwhile, backlogs at courts, the growth in online crime and the increase in digital evidence such as body worn video are all adding to a growth in the amount of exhibits police have to keep. The NPCC said police and the CPS worked together to ensure evidence was "gathered and presented in a timely manner, bringing offenders to justice and ensuring victims are safeguarded". It said the data obtained by the BBC refers to all evidence that is either missing or unavailable when a defendant is going to trial after being charged. And this could include situations where police cannot find an expert witness or may not be able to obtain a required medical statement. A number of recent reports have raised serious concerns about police storage of evidence. In 2022, His Majesty's inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS) found police forces were "struggling to meet the demands placed on it by the digital age" as a result of the fast growth in digital evidence. The University of Leicester's study into police retention of investigative materials, found three quarters of lawyers it surveyed had worked on a criminal conviction where evidence had been lost, destroyed or contaminated. Almost half claimed this had happened on multiple occasions. And Baroness Casey's 2023 review into the culture of the Metropolitan Police found officers having to contend with "over-stuffed, dilapidated or broken fridges and freezers containing evidence including the rape kits of victims". It found an "overworked and inexperienced workforce" lacked the "infrastructure and specialism" for dealing with sexual offences, which existed before a specialist unit was disbanded in 2019. The BBC study found around one in 20 prosecutions by the Met had been dropped as a result of missing evidence between 2020 and 2024. By comparison around one in 50 were dropped across England and Wales. The Met said the number included situations where police could not find an expert witness or were not able to obtain a required medical statement and to suggest it was simply down to lost evidence was misleading. It acknowledged that on "a rare number of occasions" evidence is misplaced, adding: "We continue to make improvements to our recording systems to minimise this risk." The NPCC said: "When evidential issues occur in a case, the CPS will raise this with police for any action deemed necessary and we will work together to ensure these are resolved wherever possible." The results of a consultation by the Law Commission, which proposed re-establishing a national forensic service and making the mishandling of evidence a criminal offence in some circumstances, are set to go before Parliament next week. Additional reporting by Catherine Heuston and Claire Jones.
