European ‘year of the Normans' reopens debate over Irish identity
Nine centuries after the Normans clanked ashore with swords and armour, Ireland is still wrestling with the question: what did they ever do for us?
A decision by the government this week to join a European cultural initiative called 2027 European year of the Normans has reopened a debate that goes to the core of Irish identity.
On the one hand, say historians, they built castles and cathedrals and enriched culture and literature; on the other, they dispossessed the native Gaels and paved the way to invasion and occupation.
Sinn Féin, the main opposition party, said the commemoration was offensive because it would honour William the Conqueror, England's first Norman king, and the subjugation inflicted by his successors.
'What will they think of next: a festival of Cromwell? A Famine Queen jubilee?' said the party's culture spokesperson, Aengus Ó Snodaigh, referencing Oliver Cromwell's bloody 17th-century conquests and Queen Victoria's reign during the 1840s famine.
'We Irish know well enough the legacy of William's successors invading and subjugating Ireland in the name of his English crown, with Strongbow ushering in the 900 years of occupation, with the north still under the descendants of William the Conqueror's crown.'
Strongbow was the nickname of Richard de Clare, the second Earl of Pembroke, who landed with an Anglo-Norman military force in 1170 and unleashed historical forces that in the 20th century partitioned the island and left Northern Ireland in the UK.
However, the Normans also intermarried with Gaels, bequeathed family names such as Burke, Griffith, FitzGerald, Lynch and Walsh, and became, in a celebrated phrase, 'more Irish than the Irish themselves'.
The heritage minister, James Browne, who on Tuesday obtained cabinet approval for participation in the trans-European initiative, said Sinn Féin was missing the point. Ireland's lands, laws, monuments and built environment bore Norman heritage, and participation in the initiative would recognise that history while boosting tourism, he said.
'The year of the Normans is being led by our neighbours in Normandy, France, and it is an important and essential collaboration and commemoration – any distortion of this work is really disappointing and careless,' said Browne – a Norman name. 'So let's ask: is Sinn Féin's position that they will boycott all events related to the year of the Normans?'
In addition to Ireland, the Normandy regional council has invited Britain, southern Italy, Norway and other countries and regions with Norman heritage to take part in the commemoration, which coincides with the millennium anniversary of William the Conqueror's birth.
Ó Snodaigh said: 'Marking the birth of a future English king is not for us, even if it was 1,000 years ago. Rather, we should always be remembering those great figures of Ireland's past who actually lived here and contributed positively to our island story.'
The row has prompted comparisons to the scene in Monty Python's Life of Brian when Judeans debate the benefits of Roman occupation.
Jane Ohlmeyer, a Trinity College Dublin historian who specialises in early modern Irish and British history, said the Norman invasion profoundly shaped the history of Ireland, especially in the south-east.
'Like it or not, the past is no longer in the past, it is in the present. It is critical that we use opportunities like this one to better understand the nature of the conquest and to reflect on its legacies,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
STEPHEN GLOVER: By not stopping the boats, Starmer is signing his political death warrant. But there IS one solution, if only he's brave enough
Let's assume Sir Keir Starmer wants to win the next election. Let's also assume he has no desire to be replaced as Prime Minister in the next year or so by Wes Streeting or or anyone else. He's a politician, after all, and politicians relish power – Starmer more than most, I would think. I also suggest that he's at least averagely intelligent, and should be able to weigh up the chances of any policy succeeding.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Ukraine and U.S. discuss how to make minerals fund operational by year-end
WASHINGTON, June 4 (Reuters) - Ukraine and the United States have discussed how to make a minerals fund operational by the end of the year and the fund's first meeting is expected in July, Ukraine's First Deputy Prime Minister, Yulia Svyrydenko, said in Washington on Wednesday. The agreement on developing Ukraine's mineral resources, heavily promoted by U.S. President Donald Trump, was signed by Svyrydenko in Washington in April after weeks of tough negotiations made the terms more favorable to Kyiv. Ukraine's parliament then ratified the deal. On Wednesday, Svyrydenko held meetings with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and the Development Finance Corporation, which would be a partner of the minerals fund, "and we discussed very concrete steps how to make this fund operational during this year," she told reporters. "So we plan to have the first board meeting of this fund in July and we will discuss what will be the seed capital to start operating this fund. And actually, too, we should adopt the investment strategy for this fund for the next few years." The negotiations leading to the clinching of the minerals fund deal followed a heated exchange at the White House between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy over how to work towards ending Ukraine's three-year-old war with Russia. The agreement was critical to Zelenskiy mending ties with Trump. The two men met briefly at the Vatican in April during the funeral of Pope Francis to help put their relations back on track.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Badenoch launches review into possible ECHR exit
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch is to set up a commission to examine whether the UK should withdraw from a series of international legal agreements and overturn some domestic legislation which she fears may be binding the hands of British the agreements being looked into is the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).Badenoch is expected to appoint Tory peer and former justice minister Lord Wolfson of Tredegar to chair the commission, which is expected to report by autumn, when the party meets for its annual month, the government announced plans to bring forward legislation to "clarify" the extent to which ECHR would impact UK immigration cases. The ECHR was established in 1950 and sets out the rights and freedoms people are entitled to in the 46 signatory treaty is a central part of UK human rights law and has been used to halt attempts to deport migrants who are deemed to be in the UK treaty was also recently cited in a case that allowed a Palestinian family the right to live in the UK, after they originally applied through a scheme designed for the Conservative leadership election, the ECHR became a key dividing line between candidates, with Badenoch telling her party leaving the treaty would not be a "silver bullet" to tackling nearest rival Robert Jenrick, now shadow justice secretary, argued his party would "die' unless it left the ECHR. But in February, Badenoch hardened her stance, claiming the UK would "probably have to leave" the treaty it continued to stop the government acting in the country's national interest. The impact of the ECHR on asylum claims and the deportation of foreign criminals will be examined as part of the Wolfson review, the BBC understands - as will the Refugee law such as the Climate Change Act, the Equality Act and the Human Rights Act are also likely to be looked party leadership is worried about what is seen as a creeping sense of "lawfare", which senior figures believe contributes to a feeling of stasis and a lack of ability for governments to make substantive month when the government set out its plans for tackling illegal immigration in a White Paper, ministers said they would bring forward legislation to "make it clear that Parliament needs to be able to control our borders and take back control on who comes to and stays in the UK".The White Paper specifically referred to Article 8 of the ECHR, the right to a family life, and said there was a need to "strike a balance between individual family rights and the wider public interest".Badenoch will set out her plans in a speech on Friday, just over a month on from local elections in England where the Conservatives were crushed – and a series of opinion polls where support for the party had tumbled into the Tories secured 24% of the vote in last year's general election, when they won the fewest seats in their is growing concern within the party about the resilience of support for Reform UK and the existential threat this poses to the Conservatives."It is a make or break summer," one former Conservative cabinet minister told me."We are a resilient brand but we have to stay alive. And that's far from certain at the moment." Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
