for venice biennale 2026, US government now requires art to promote its ‘american values'
In the United States, Venice Art Biennale 2026 preparations began with an absence — no grant posting, no artist selection, and no official word. For those familiar with the complex process required to mount the United States Pavilion at the world's preeminent art exhibition, this silence was alarming. In his recent Vanity Fair column, journalist Nate Freeman follows the bureaucratic lapses and ideological shifts that brought the art world to the brink of believing the US might sit this one out for the first time since the Second World War.
Historically, the process begins at least eighteen months in advance with the opening of a grant application portal. By early spring 2025, with just twelve months to go, the portal had still not launched. Many in the museum world feared that the United States' Biennale submission was already impossible to mount. Veteran curators like Kathleen Ash-Milby, who co-commissioned artist Jeffrey Gibson's 2024 pavilion, shared concern that even if the portal were to open imminently, there would be no time left to plan, fundraise, and install a world-class exhibition in the Giardini.
Nate Freeman reported that behind the bureaucratic lag was a deeper unease tied to changes in the federal agencies responsible for the pavilion. The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA), head the State Department branch overseeing cultural exchange, remained without a permanent assistant secretary. Its interim leadership, now under Trump-aligned figure Darren Beattie, raised new concerns about the ideological criteria shaping this year's selection process. Historically apolitical on paper, the pavilion has now become a subtle battleground for defining what 'American values' in art might look like under a changing administration. Read More Croma furniture collection by Lagranja Design for Systemtronic
'the space in which to place me,' Jeffrey Gibson, US Pavilion, Venice Biennale 2024 | image © Timothy Schenck portal opens with new ideological requirements
When the portal finally went live — curiously just hours after Freeman's inquiries to the State Department on Wednesday, April 30th — the new guidelines revealed dramatic edits. Gone is the 2023 emphasis on 'equity and underserved communities.' In its place is a directive that chosen artists must 'advance international understanding of American values,' with language echoing policy preferences from Trump's first term. This shift signaled a narrowing of the selection pool and a sharp pivot from the expansive, inclusive mission that defined past pavilions — and once defined the American spirit.
Also new were stipulations for 'monitoring site visits,' suggesting close oversight of curatorial autonomy, alongside ambiguous definitions of what constitutes a 'non-political' project. Where previous language encouraged representing the diversity of American life, the updated text now states that applicants must not 'operate any programs promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion that violate any applicable anti-discrimination laws.' Freeman's reporting highlights how such language reshapes the international image the US intends to project.
With the application window's late opening, Nate Freeman suggests the process is running on adrenaline. Past curators are already warning that the shortened timeframe may preclude a nuanced or ambitious presentation. What should be an eighteen-month endeavor now risks becoming a rushed, reactive exhibition shaped more by political conditions than curatorial vision.
'the space in which to place me,' Jeffrey Gibson, US Pavilion, Venice Biennale 2024 | image © Timothy Schenck
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump budget bill would kill subsidies that made home solar mainstream
By Nichola Groom (Reuters) -A last-minute tweak to the Republican budget bill passed by Congress last month would immediately end subsidies for solar leasing companies that help make rooftop systems affordable to homeowners, likely leading to a massive drop in the pace of installations, according to industry representatives. President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill," now being taken up by the Republican-controlled Senate, would eliminate a 30% tax credit for solar leasing companies that charge homeowners a monthly fee for panels - one of numerous cuts directed at clean energy subsidies passed by former President Joe Biden. That provision, inserted shortly before the bill passed the House of Representatives on May 22, risks stifling a sector that buys American-made equipment, employs thousands of people and relieves strain on the grid, according to industry backers. "That's one of the harsher components of the one big, beautiful bill currently," said Gabe Rubio, a principal in the business incentives and tax credits practice at professional services firm BDO. Tax credits for homeowners who own their own rooftop systems would also be eliminated. The changes could result in as much as 40% less residential solar capacity being installed over the next five years, according to energy research firm Wood Mackenzie. Solar companies are lobbying the Senate to make changes to the bill before it becomes law. "America's home solar and storage industry is a powerful economic growth engine," Sunrun CEO Mary Powell said in a statement. "Senate Republicans now have an opportunity to advance the administration's energy independence agenda by amending this bill to keep American energy prices low and create well-paying U.S. manufacturing jobs." Trump campaigned on a promise to repeal the clean energy tax credits in Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, arguing they are expensive, unnecessary and harmful to business. Republican backers of the bill say the subsidy cuts would free up billions of dollars for other priorities. More than 5 million U.S. homes have solar panels, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association. LAST MINUTE CHANGE An earlier version of the bill had protected the credit for leased solar systems, but fiscal hawks including Representative Chip Roy of Texas have said publicly that they pressed for deeper cuts to clean energy credits at the eleventh hour. Roy's office did not respond to a request for comment. Solar leasing was pioneered two decades ago by companies including Sunrun and SolarCity, which is now owned by Elon Musk's company Tesla, and quickly became the primary way home solar panels were financed. Under the model, solar installers partner with financiers that own the rooftop panels and offset their federal tax bills by claiming the credit. Homeowners either pay a monthly fixed fee to lease the equipment or pay for the electricity the system generates under a power purchase agreement (PPA). In what some analysts have said could be a loophole, the House bill directly references leased systems but does not mention PPAs. About 44% of residential systems sold today are under such arrangements, according to EnergySage, an online solar marketplace. Solar installers say undermining the subsidies could have a ripple effect on U.S. manufacturers that supply them. Freedom Forever, a top privately-held installer based in Temecula, California, said in two years it has gone from using no U.S.-made equipment to now sourcing 85% of it from American facilities. That is thanks to another IRA subsidy that provides bonus 10% tax credits for using American-made equipment. "The administration wants to bring manufacturing back to the United States, and that's what our industry has been doing for the last two to three years," Freedom Forever CEO Brett Bouchy said.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump calls Germany's larger defence budget 'a positive thing'
US President Donald Trump on Thursday called Germany's increased defence spending "a positive thing" but expressed some reservations about a better financed German military. "I know that you're spending more money on defence now and quite a bit more money. That's a positive thing," Trump told Merz during a press briefing in the Oval Office on the occasion of Merz's inaugural visit. But Trump declined to comment on specific percentages, stating that he had not discussed this much with Merz so far. Trump did however point to historical concerns the United States has had about German rearmament, following the US victory, together with other allies, over Nazi Germany in World War II. "I'm not sure that General [Douglas] MacArthur would have said it's positive. You know, he wouldn't like it, but I sort of think it's good." The highly decorated US general commanded the South Pacific arena during World War II and was not responsible for combat operations in Europe. Still Trump said overall he considers the development to be the right one – "at least to a certain point. "There'll be a point where I'll say, Please don't arm anymore," he added, jokingly. Trump confirmed that he also intended to discuss the presence of tens of thousands of US troops in Germany with his German guest. He said this was also good for Germany's economy, as it involved well-paid soldiers. Trump added that the relationship with Germany is "very important." According to the US military's European Command (EUCOM), around 78,000 American soldiers are currently stationed in Europe, including approximately 37,000 in Germany. The number fluctuates regularly, depending on rotations and exercises in the region. Since the start of Russia's war against Ukraine, the figure has varied significantly.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Witkoff urges Hamas to accept ceasefire proposal
Earlier on Thursday, the bodies of Judith Weinstein Haggai and her husband, Gadi Haggai, were recovered by the military. They held Canadian and American citizenships. US Envoy Steve Witkoff on Thursday said that Hamas must accept the current ceasefire proposal to ensure the remaining hostages are returned. "Although those who were murdered can never be replaced, this closure is absolutely critical and a minimum of human dignity." The bodies of hostages Judith Weinstein Haggai and her husband, Gadi Haggai, were retrieved by the IDF in the early hours of Thursday morning in a special forces operation performed in collaboration with intelligence from the Shin Bet and the IDF, the military announced. They held American and Canadian citizenships. The Mujahideen Brigades kidnapped and held the bodies of the two in Gaza after they were murdered on October 7 in Kibbutz Nir Oz. Their deaths were determined in December 2023. IDF forces carried out the rescue operation under the Southern Command. The information that allowed their retrieval into Israeli territory was learned during an interrogation of a captured terrorist. Negotiations between Israel and Hamas, mediated by Egypt, Qatar, and the US, are ongoing despite significant gaps, a source familiar with the matter told The Jerusalem Post. Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, met with senior Hamas officials based in Doha. These officials emphasized that Hamas demands US guarantees that negotiations for a deal, including a ceasefire, will continue after the initial 60-day period, the source told the Post. Efforts are being made to reach new understandings with Hamas before Eid al-Adha, which begins on Friday. In Doha, Bishara Bahbah, an envoy of Steve Witkoff, continued to engage with senior Hamas officials. The mediators, Egypt, Qatar, and the US administration, are working to advance a deal or at least secure agreements between the parties despite the challenges. Jerusalem Post Staff and Yonah Jeremy Bob contributed to this report.
