Elon Musk Is Stepping Down from DOGE — Here's What's Next
For months, Elon Musk played an unusually hands-on role in one of the federal government's most controversial experiments: the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Created with the promise of slashing waste and 'running America like a business,' the initiative gave Musk sweeping authority over everything from agency budgets to personnel decisions. Now, after just 130 days, he's walking away — well, sort of.
In a pre-taped CBS interview that aired Sunday night, Musk confirmed his departure — but not before taking a swipe at a Trump-backed budget bill and, for the first time, admitting he doesn't always agree with the administration he's been helping to shape.
The fallout was fast: Within 24 hours of the revelation, he was out at DOGE, off the advisory roster, and back to defending himself on multiple legal fronts. But even as the White House insists the billionaire is still 'a friend to the president,' questions remain: What pushed Musk out? What happens to DOGE without him? We took a closer look.
One of the more buzzed-about moments in the sit-down came when Musk opened up — somewhat reluctantly — about his differences with the Trump administration. Even though he said he'd rather not go there, he admitted that while he's on board with 'much of what the administration does,' they don't always see eye to eye. 'There are things that I don't entirely agree with,' he said.
He added that speaking out is tricky. 'It creates a bone of contention,' he explained. 'I'm a little stuck in a bind, where I'm like, well, I don't wanna, you know, speak up against the administration, but I also don't wanna take responsibility for everything this administration's doing,' he said.
But that wasn't even the comment that really got him in hot water.
What apparently did? Musk took a jab at the House Republicans' recent budget bill — the one Trump had labeled the 'big, beautiful bill.' Musk didn't hold back: 'I think a bill can be big, or it can be beautiful — but I don't know if it can be both,' he said, adding that it was just his 'personal opinion.'
That remark seemed to hit a nerve. CBS reported that the clip of Musk's criticism made its way all the way to the White House, and within 24 hours, Musk announced he was done with his role in the Trump administration. No more DOGE, no more government advisory role.
Officially, he said his 130-day stint as an advisor had simply run its course. But up until that point, he'd been saying he still planned to contribute part-time. So, make of that what you will.
Not exactly. On Elon Musk's final day as a special government employee, Donald Trump dismissed the idea of a real departure, telling reporters Musk 'is not really leaving' and would still drop by the White House from time to time because DOGE is his 'baby.'
Privately, an unnamed advisor echoed that sentiment, telling CBS that Musk would 'continue to be a friend to the president' and describing him as an ongoing 'adviser.'
At DOGE, Musk launched an aggressive cost-cutting campaign that quickly drew scrutiny. Over four months, DOGE carried out sweeping cuts across the federal government: 250,000 workers were fired or bought out, and funding for key climate agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration was slashed.
The initiative claims it saved $160 billion, but a report from the nonpartisan Partnership for Public Service warns those savings could cost taxpayers $135 billion this fiscal year alone. Adding to the pressure, legal challenges are mounting. Just last week, a federal judge allowed a case questioning Musk's and DOGE's authority within the federal government to proceed. Several more suits are still pending.
Now, Musk appears to be turning his attention back to his business empire. Tesla's profits have plunged 71 percent, and his net worth has dropped by $100 billion. In his CBS interview, he complained that what was 'starting to happen' was 'a bit unfair,' adding that DOGE 'became the whipping boy for everything.'
During his time in government, Musk has faced violent threats, forced re-hirings, clashes with Cabinet officials, and reports of drug use. According to The New York Times, he reportedly told people he was using ketamine so heavily during the 2024 presidential election that it was affecting his bladder. He was also believed to have taken Ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms, and reportedly carried a daily medication box with about 20 pills, including some marked as Adderall.
Musk denied the report alleging he used illegal drugs during last year's campaign, calling the newspaper's claims false. He has previously stated that he holds a prescription for ketamine.
The White House has similarly dismissed the reports. When asked on Friday whether Musk's alleged drug use was a concern, Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller responded, 'The drugs that we're concerned about are the drugs running across the southern border.'
Musk first dodged a question about his drug use during a bizarre farewell appearance with Trump in the Oval Office on Friday, where he showed up with a black eye — something he said resulted from roughhousing with his 4-year-old son.
It doesn't look like DOGE is going away anytime soon. Following Musk's departure, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the initiative will continue under the direction of remaining staff.
Still, without the tech mogul at the helm, DOGE may become a quieter, more conventional operation. The chaos, spectacle, and headlines Musk brought to the project could give way to a more bureaucratic approach, efficient or not. Whether that shift helps or hinders DOGE's impact remains to be seen.
Either way, DOGE is entering a new chapter — one that may look very different from the last.
The post Elon Musk Is Stepping Down from DOGE — Here's What's Next appeared first on Katie Couric Media.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
Tariffs Make the World Poorer and More Perilous
President Trump's on-again-off-again tariffs have disrupted the global trading system and caused whiplash for businesses and consumers. He has vacillated mightily, announcing tariffs on imports from practically every U.S. trading partner and then pausing or rolling some back. Legal challenges have added to the turmoil. No matter where the tariffs eventually settle, they will have repercussions that go far beyond trade. Raising tariffs, or at least the constant looming threat of that happening, undermines trade and weakens economic links that stabilize international relations. By shredding rules that have governed trade and by disregarding free trade agreements, Mr. Trump has undercut the entire international rules-based order. This includes ignoring the rules of the World Trade Organization, hindering its work and threatening to abandon it. Denying low-income countries with growing young work forces the opportunity to develop their economies through trade could lead to a surge of migrants that will put pressure on the countries that receive them. A retreat from free trade will hurt consumers worldwide through higher prices and more limited choices, raising the prospect of political discontent in their countries. Whatever their ostensible objectives, the Trump tariffs will make the world a poorer and more perilous place. A full-scale retreat from global trade is unlikely, but international commerce is already shifting in ways that can deepen geopolitical fissures. Business interests have long kept relationships between rivals on an even keel. In the past two decades, for instance, U.S.-China frictions have been smoothed by the eagerness of American companies to sell their products and services to China's rapidly growing middle class and to use Chinese suppliers. American investors keen to gain access to China's financial markets played a similar role. When China manipulated its currency during the 2000s to gain a competitive advantage for its exports, the presence of U.S. commercial interests ensured that the United States did not take punitive action. For China, the benefits from opening up to American businesses and investors pushed Beijing, for a while, at least, to align its own economy with U.S. free market principles. It eased restrictions on investments flowing into and out of the country, and even took steps to reduce government intervention in foreign exchange and other financial markets. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
UPI
16 minutes ago
- UPI
Trump issues travel ban from 12 countries; 7 nations restricted
President Donald Trump holds a press conference in the Oval Office at the White House on Friday. Onv Wednesday, he issued a travel ban on 12 countries and limited ones for seven others. Photo by Francis Chung/UPI | License Photo June 4 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump on Wednesday issued a proclamation to "fully restrict and limit" entry of people from 12 foreign countries starting at 12:01 EDT Monday. Citing national security concerns, Trump issued the ban on nationals from Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Also, he partially restricted and limited entry from seven countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Of the 19 named nations, 10 are in Africa. "These restrictions distinguish between, but apply to both, the entry of immigrants and nonimmigrants," the order states about the two designations," the proclamation reads. There are exceptions for lawful permanent residents, existing visa holders, certain visa categories and individuals whose entry serves US national interests. Later Wednesday, he posted a video on Truth Social announcing the bans. "The list is subject to revision based on whether material improvements are made," Trump said. "And likewise new countries can be added as threats emerge around the world, but we will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm and nothing will stop us from keeping America safe." The proclamation reads: "As President, I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people. I remain committed to engaging with those countries willing to cooperate to improve information-sharing and identity-management procedures, and to address both terrorism-related and public-safety risks. Nationals of some countries also pose significant risks of overstaying their visas in the United States, which increases burdens on immigration and law enforcement components of the United States, and often exacerbates other risks related to national security and public safety." White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson wrote on X: "President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm. These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information." On his first day in office on Jan. 20, Trump signed an executive order that it is the policy of the United States to "protect its citizens from aliens who intend to commit terrorist attacks, threaten our national security, espouse hateful ideology, or otherwise exploit the immigration laws for malevolent purposes." Secretary of State Marco Rubio was ordered to compile a list of countries "for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries." The proclamation said: "Some of the countries with inadequacies face significant challenges to reform efforts. Others have made important improvements to their protocols and procedures, and I commend them for these efforts. But until countries with identified inadequacies address them, members of my Cabinet have recommended certain conditional restrictions and limitations." CNN reported Trump decided to sign the proclamation after the antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colo., though the system didn't come to the United States from the restricted countries. Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, of Colorado Springs, has been charged with a federal hate crime and he is facing 16 state counts of attempted murder on Monday. Soliman, an Egyptian national who spent time in Kuwait, entered California in August 2022 on a B2 visa that expired in February 2023 and his asylum claim was pending. Alex Nowrasteh, who works for Cato Institute, a nonpartisan and independent public policy research organization, said the threat of foreign-born terrorists is rare. "A single terrorist from those countries murdered one person in an attack on US soil: Emanuel Kidega Samson from Sudan, who committed an attack motivated by anti-white animus in 2017," Nowrasteh wrote. The annual chance of being murdered by a terrorist from one of the banned countries from 1975 to the end of 2024 was about 1 in 13.9 billion per year." He also noted that travelers and immigrants from the 12 banned countries have a nationwide incarceration rate of 370 per 100,000 in 2023 for the 18-54 aged population, which 70 percent below that of native-born Americans. The data came from the U.S. Census and American Community Survey Data. During his first term, Trump banned travel by citizens of predominantly Muslim countries, including Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. Amid legal challenges, it was modified and upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018. When President Joe Biden took office in 2021, he repealed it.
Hamilton Spectator
22 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
New German leader plans to discuss Ukraine and trade with Trump in Oval Office visit
WASHINGTON (AP) — Germany's new leader is meeting President Donald Trump in Washington on Thursday as he works to keep the U.S. on board with Western support for Ukraine, help defuse trade tensions that pose a risk to Europe's biggest economy and further bolster his country's long-criticized military spending. Trump and Chancellor Friedrich Merz have spoken several times by phone, either bilaterally or with other European leaders, since Merz took office on May 6. German officials say the two leaders have started to build a 'decent' relationship, with Merz wanting to avoid the antagonism that defined Trump's relationship with one of his predecessors, Angela Merkel , in Trump's first term. The 69-year-old Merz is a conservative former rival of Merkel's who took over her party after she retired from politics. Merz also comes to office with an extensive business background — something that could align him with Trump. A White House official said topics that Trump is likely to raise with Merz include Germany's defense spending, trade, Ukraine and what the official called 'democratic backsliding,' saying the administration's view is that shared values such as freedom of speech have deteriorated in Germany and the country should reverse course. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to preview the discussions. Merz will want to avoid an Oval Office showdown of the kind that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa experienced in recent months. Asked about the risk of a White House blow-up, Merz spokesperson Stefan Kornelius said on Monday that the chancellor is 'well-prepared' for the meeting and that he and Trump have 'built up a decent relationship, at least by phone' and via text messaging. Keeping Ukraine's Western backers together Merz has thrown himself into diplomacy on Ukraine, traveling to Kyiv with fellow European leaders days after taking office and receiving Zelenskyy in Berlin last week. He has thanked Trump for his support for an unconditional ceasefire while rejecting the idea of 'dictated peace' or the 'subjugation' of Ukraine and advocating for more sanctions against Russia. The White House official said Trump on Thursday will stress that direct peace talks must continue. In their first phone call since Merz became chancellor, Trump said he would support the efforts of Germany and other European countries to achieve peace, according to a readout from the German government. Merz also said last month that 'it is of paramount importance that the political West not let itself be divided, so I will continue to make every effort to produce the greatest possible unity between the European and American partners.' Under Merz's immediate predecessor, Olaf Scholz, Germany became the second-biggest supplier of military aid to Ukraine after the United States. Merz has vowed to keep up the support and last week pledged to help Ukraine develop its own long-range missile systems that would be free of any range limits. Military spending At home, Merz's government is intensifying a drive that Scholz started to bolster the German military after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In Trump's first term, Berlin was a target of his ire for failing to meet the current NATO target of spending 2% of gross domestic product on defense, and Trump is now demanding at least 5% from allies. The White House official said the upcoming NATO summit in the Netherlands later this month is a 'good opportunity' for Germany to commit to meeting that 5% mark. Scholz set up a 100 billion euro ($115 billion) special fund to modernize Germany's armed forces — called the Bundeswehr — which had suffered from years of neglect. Germany has met the 2% target thanks to the fund, but it will be used up in 2027. Merz has said that 'the government will in the future provide all the financing the Bundeswehr needs to become the strongest conventional army in Europe.' He has endorsed a plan for all allies to aim to spend 3.5% of GDP on their defense budgets by 2032, plus an extra 1.5% on potentially defense-related things like infrastructure. Germany's economy and tariffs Another top priority for Merz is to get Germany's economy , Europe's biggest, moving again after it shrank the past two years. He wants to make it a 'locomotive of growth,' but Trump's tariff threats are a potential obstacle for a country whose exports have been a key strength. At present, the economy is forecast to stagnate in 2025. Germany exported $160 billion worth of goods to the U.S. last year, according to the Census Bureau. That was about $85 billion more than what the U.S. sent to Germany, a trade deficit that Trump wants to erase. The U.S. president has specifically gone after the German auto sector, which includes major brands such as Audi, BMW, Mercedes Benz, Porsche and Volkswagen. Americans bought $36 billion worth of cars, trucks and auto parts from Germany last year, while the Germans purchased $10.2 billion worth of vehicles and parts from the U.S. Trump's 25% tariff on autos and parts is specifically designed to increase the cost of German-made automobiles in hopes of causing them to move their factories to the U.S., even though many of the companies already have plants in the U.S. with Volkswagen in Tennessee, BMW in South Carolina and Mercedes-Benz in Alabama and South Carolina. There's only so much Merz can achieve on his view that tariffs 'benefit no one and damage everyone' while in Washington, as trade negotiations are a matter for the European Union's executive commission. Trump recently delayed a planned 50% tariff on goods coming from the European Union, which would have otherwise gone into effect this month. Far-right tensions One source of strain in recent months is a speech Vice President JD Vance gave in Munich shortly before Germany's election in February, in which he lectured European leaders about the state of democracy on the continent and said there is no place for 'firewalls.' That term is frequently used to describe mainstream German parties' refusal to work with the far-right Alternative for Germany , which finished second in the election and is now the biggest opposition party. Merz criticized the comments. He told ARD television last month that it isn't the place of a U.S. vice president 'to say something like that to us in Germany; I wouldn't do it in America, either.' ___ Moulson reported from Berlin. Associated Press writer Josh Boak in Washington contributed to this report. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
