What's common between Sam Altman, the ChatGPT founder and Sundar Pichai, the man behind Google's success? Both went to...
Sam Altman and Sundar Pichai- PTI image
Sam Altman vs Sundar Pichai: Two of the most popular names that are often taken with high respect in the technology world today are Open AI CEO Sam Altman and Google CEO Sundar Pichai. Both Sam Altman and Google CEO Sundar Pichai have earned fame in the technology world for their respective innovations in the technology world. While Sam Altman built a chatbot named ChatGPT, Sundar Pichai built a browser that reached almost every phone and laptop named Google Chrome. However, do you know that both the tech leaders share a common point in their academic lives. What's common between Sam Altman and Sundar Pichai?
As per media reports, both Sam Altman and Sundar Pichai attended Stanford University, a key commonality in their careers. For those unversed, commonly referred to as Stanford University, is a private research university in Stanford, California, United States. The university is also known as the Hogwarts of Silicon Valley, is famous for producing technology stalwarts. Who are Sam Altman and Sundar Pichai?
Sam Altman is a Stanford dropout who went on to co-found Y Combinator and later become the CEO of OpenAI, a company that transformed the Artificial Intelligence world with the launch of ChatGPT.
On the other hand, Sundar Pichai belongs from a modest family of Chennai, India. He earned advanced degrees (MS and MBA) after studying engineering. Sundar progressed through Google—from leading Chrome's development to becoming CEO of Google and eventually Alphabet. OpenAI continues to be overseen and controlled by nonprofit: Sam Altman
Sam Altman-run OpenAI will continue to be overseen and controlled by the nonprofit and its 'for profit LLC' will transition to a public benefit corporation (PBC), giving the nonprofit better resources to support several benefits, the company has announced.
OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit, and is today overseen and controlled by that nonprofit.
'Going forward, it will continue to be overseen and controlled by that nonprofit. Our for-profit LLC, which has been under the nonprofit since 2019, will transition to a Public Benefit Corporation (PBC)–a purpose-driven company structure that has to consider the interests of both shareholders and the mission,' the ChatGPT maker said in a statement.
(With inputs from agencies)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Work smart to win 2029 polls: Naidu to TDP cadre
Vijayawada: Telugu Desam Party (TDP) supremo and Chief Minister Nara Chandrababu Naidu on Sunday exhorted his party leaders and cadre to not only work hard but also work smart as 'winning 2029 elections is my plan'. Addressing TDP's ministers, MPs, MLAs, leaders and others at the party office here on Sunday as part of 'Suparipalana - Tholi Adugu' (The First Step in Good Governance) campaign, Naidu stressed that TDP should remain in power beyond 2029 to continue development. Citing Singapore's example of prolonged single-party rule, he claimed that the state would have been on a rapid development path had TDP won in 2019. The Chief Minister further said that the state would aim to become a national innovation hub backed by industry and welfare synergy. According to him, the state government signed several investment-related MoUs that would generate 8.5 lakh jobs. Global corporates such as Google, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), LG Electronics, and ArcelorMittal are among those who will be investing in the state. "Investors believe in Andhra Pradesh's stability and potential," said Naidu, highlighting Cognizant Technology Solutions, Jindal Group, and others setting up units in Rayalaseema and North Andhra regions. Naidu stated that growth would be achieved in backward areas through aerospace, defence, and food processing units, ensuring job creation and equitable regional industrial development across multiple sectors. On the 'First Step in Good Governance' campaign marking the first anniversary of the NDA government in Andhra Pradesh, he urged party leaders and cadre to actively engage with the public for a month and showcase the state government's welfare and development initiatives implemented in the last one year. The Chief Minister stressed the importance of effective communication. "The government has undertaken numerous positive initiatives in the last year. These must be explained to the people," he asserted. According to him, the party prepared an action plan for a month-long, door-to-door campaign involving party leadership and cadres to disseminate information about the government's achievements. Naidu also urged leaders to be accessible to the public, stating, "the more accessible you are to the people, the more they will support you. Working is one thing; being available to the public is another." He also called for accountability, stating, "let's be accountable to the people. If there are mistakes, let's correct them." Naidu said that he was conducting various surveys to gather real-time information from the ground and assess the performance of MPs and MLAs. 'Only those who work hard will get positions,' he said. Naidu accused the YSR Congress of running deliberate smear campaigns, citing fabricated stories around murders, attacks, and false allegations on governance. He instructed party leaders to counter these narratives boldly, stressing that while highlighting welfare work is vital, exposing the opposition's alleged conspiracy-driven propaganda is equally important.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Ctrl + Alt + Escape: The 14-Hour Dilemma
The Karnataka government recently proposed amendments that could impact the workforce behind the IT capital of India. The proposal allows for up to 12-hour workdays, inclusive of overtime. The government has cited 'ease of doing business' as one of the reasons and clarified that it won't override the 48-hours-per-week limit that already exists. But IT unions have complained that it could be tantamount to 'modern slavery', diminish work-life balance, and cause mental agony and stress. What do I think of the entire issue? Honestly, as I get older, I realise that it isn't necessary to have opinions on everything. I don't belong to the IT world and have never really had a steady desk job in the last two decades. I make my living as a writer, far removed from the worlds of salaries, appraisals and hikes. So, I don't intend to 'IT-splain' my point on behalf of my IT brethren and sisterhood. At the same time, I can't feign ignorance of the anxiety-filled state of affairs in the IT domain. ChatGPT and AI – futuristic, sci-fi boons for writers like me – are a huge threat to traditional IT jobs. There is the threat of global layoffs. A potential World War III is simmering as we speak, and might soon engulf the world. These are all legit fears lurking in the world we inhabit. Then, there's the issue of traffic that citizens of Bengaluru have to uniquely endure. If working hours are pushed to 12 hours and the average commute takes 2 hours, that's 14 hours of a day engulfed in work. And it's not like we get to enjoy premium commuting services to help us rejuvenate ourselves and prepare for the day. There's the honking, the dust, and the diabetes-inducing sweetness of RJs that one must endure. In such a scenario, what can employees do? Some forces – governance, policy, and rules – are above our social jurisdiction. When nothing works, we have each other as human beings. The IT industry brothers and sisters must come up with innovative ways to battle this scenario. The only way the Bengaluru IT crowd can fight back is by doing what they do best – building apps through innovation. Start selling office chairs with inbuilt massage facilities. Create an underground carpooling service for sleep-deprived coders. So that when we go home, we have people who understand our plight – a shoulder to cry on, an ear to vent to. HR-approved 'self-therapy' sessions that are basically nap sessions approved by the employer. Take a leaf from our brothers who drive autos and taxis. They are constantly speaking to each other on the phone so that they can stay awake, and have a friend to navigate the tricky lanes of life together. Create a self-help group of people who call each other during work hours so you can walk about in the office, pretending to be 'on a call'. To quote a certain Mr. Guevara – 'Revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall.' Of course, Mr. Guevara had no idea that the word 'apple' would signify an electronics giant. But greater miracles have occurred in human history. In fact, one occurred a few weeks ago when the entire city came out to celebrate! To paraphrase (and twist) a famous quote – 'First, they came for the Testers, and I said nothing. Then they came for the UI/UX team, and I said nothing. Then they came for the scrum masters, and I said nothing. Finally, they came for me during my one-hour 'billable' lunch – and there was nobody left to speak for me.' (The writer's views are personal)
Economic Times
8 hours ago
- Economic Times
Does ChatGPT suffer from hallucinations? OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admits surprise over users' blind trust in AI
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has expressed surprise at the high level of trust people place in ChatGPT, despite its known tendency to "hallucinate" or fabricate information. Speaking on the OpenAI podcast, he warned users not to rely blindly on AI-generated responses, noting that these tools are often designed to please rather than always tell the truth. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trusting the Tool That Admits It Lies? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads When Intelligence Misleads A Wake-Up Call from the Inside In a world increasingly shaped by artificial intelligence, a startling statement from one of AI's foremost leaders has triggered fresh debate around our trust in machines. Sam Altman , CEO of OpenAI and the face behind ChatGPT, has admitted that even he is surprised by the degree of faith people place in generative AI tools—despite their very human-like revelation came during a recent episode of the OpenAI podcast , where Altman openly acknowledged, 'People have a very high degree of trust in ChatGPT, which is interesting because AI hallucinates. It should be the tech that you don't trust that much.' His remarks, first reported by Complex, have added fuel to the ongoing discourse around artificial intelligence and its real-world comments arrive at a time when AI is embedded in virtually every aspect of daily life—from phones and personal assistants to corporate software and academic tools. Yet his warning is rooted in a key flaw of current language models : AI parlance, hallucinations refer to moments when a model like ChatGPT fabricates information. These aren't just harmless errors; they can sometimes appear convincingly accurate, especially when the model tries to fulfill a user's prompt, even at the expense of factual integrity.'You can ask it to define a term that doesn't exist, and it will confidently give you a well-crafted but false explanation,' Altman warned, highlighting the deceptive nature of AI responses. This is not an isolated issue—OpenAI has in the past rolled out updates to mitigate what some have termed the tool's 'sycophantic tendencies,' where it tends to agree with users or generate agreeable but incorrect makes hallucinations particularly dangerous is their subtlety. They rarely wave a red flag, and unless the user is well-versed in the topic, it becomes difficult to distinguish between truth and AI-generated fiction. That ambiguity is at the heart of Altman's caution.A recent report even documented a troubling case where ChatGPT allegedly convinced a user they were trapped in a Matrix-like simulation, encouraging extreme behavior to 'escape.' Though rare and often anecdotal, such instances demonstrate the psychological sway these tools can wield when used without critical Altman's candid reflection is more than a passing remark—it's a wake-up call. Coming from the very creator of one of the world's most trusted AI platforms, it reframes the conversation about how we use and trust machine-generated also raises a broader question: In our rush to embrace AI as a problem-solving oracle, are we overlooking its imperfections?Altman's comments serve as a reminder that while AI can be incredibly useful, it must be treated as an assistant—not an oracle. Blind trust, he implies, is not only misplaced but potentially dangerous. As generative AI continues to evolve, so must our skepticism.
