At Google I/O, the Company's AI Vision Finally Came Into Focus
Google's AI products don't feel like vaporware anymore. Instead, what Google showed at its I/O developers' conference last week was full AI maturation.
Google took its AI tech beyond fancy text and image editors to a technological reimagination. The era of searching via keywords is over. The interaction between humans and tech is moving away from binary Boolean logic toward linguistic intuition. The internet that Google helped build is about to change rapidly.
Back in 1998, Google's foundational mission statement was to "organise the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful." Under AI, the focus is changing from organization to automatic delivery. The 10-blue-links paradigm is getting the boot. Instead, technology can do the searching and informational synthesis for us, quite literally pushing those traditional blue links further down the page. At the same time, we've seen a rapid dropoff in website traffic across the internet, which some search engine experts are attributing to the increased prevalence of AI products across the web. Even Google executives see the drop in online search traffic to be an inevitability.
With the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, Google was caught flailing, resting on its safe online search business while OpenAI leapfrogged ahead. The sudden release of ChatGPT reportedly caused a "code red" within Google, where the company internally restructured around AI. With the majority of Google's revenue coming from ads sold against online search, a new player that could change how people find information online posed, and still poses, a threat. What followed was an arms race between Microsoft-backed OpenAI, creators of ChatGPT, and Google, with billions of dollars being spent, all in hopes of becoming people's default AI.
The two companies have been trading blows ever since, competing to produce the better text-, image-, code- and video-generation tools. With the AI market seeing valuations of $826 billion by 2030, according to Statista, there's a massive incentive for Big Tech giants to win these battles early. Since their original launches, ChatGPT has grown rapidly, climbing to 400 million active weekly users. Google's AI chatbot, Gemini, has also grown to 400 million active users across 200 countries and territories.
"Gemini is not just highly capable, it is becoming well-integrated across Google's hardware and software ecosystem," said Avi Greengart, president and lead analyst at Techsponential. "The keynote still managed to mix messages between AI that is ready today, coming soon or still science fiction for now. But Google is persistently improving not just the AI model sizes but also working to make AI more useful with tools like AI video editors, image generators that can handle text, and contextual awareness that can access your data in its responses."
It's a significant change from the tone of past Google I/Os. At Google's 2023 conference, Google was showing off how AI could help write emails or adjust photos. The idea was to use AI as a "good starting point" to help assist in your daily life.
The following year, Google had renamed its AI assistant Bard to Gemini and opened the valve a little more, showing off concepts of what an AI experience might look like with augmented reality glasses. Google also made publishers uncomfortable with the release of AI Overviews, a new box at the top of Google Search that would use AI to automatically answer questions for people, with a list of sources on the side, without needing to click on any of the traditional 10 blue links.
This year, however, there was a notable evolution. Traditional modes of interacting with the internet were entirely thrown out for AI, all in the pursuit of saving time and energy. Whereas last year, Google melded AI at the top of Search, this year, Google showed off AI Mode, a new tab at the top of Google that mixes Gemini with Google Search. In this mode, the 10 blue links are gone. It's a pure AI chat in natural human language. Online shopping removed some of the guesswork with a new Try On mode that uses your picture to create a 3D render of your body to approximate how clothes you're searching for online will look on you. Video calling and AI-powered glasses can now live-translate language, eliminating the need to learn a new tongue. And with a simple set of instructions, it's possible to code complex ideas without needing a degree in computer science.
"At I/O, Google just upped the game by systematically eliminating customer friction across search, shopping, communication and creative workflows to create seamless human experiences," said Eric Karofsky, founder of VectorHX, a customer experience strategy company. "However, AI adoption requires more than cool demos -- the real challenge for companies is how this will be implemented in practice, how processes will need to evolve, and how companies will measure the success of these fundamental shifts in human experience design."
As someone who's been covering Google's AI ambitions from the start, I'll be the first to tell you that the company's early forays were rocky. Google's AI chatbot would routinely get things wrong, often to the detriment of the company's stock price. It always seemed that the folks at OpenAI had the special sauce to make AI work. The last few months, however, have shown that Google has finally found its footing. Google's AI products are no longer thin condensation to obscure how far behind the company was. Instead, they're a thunderous storm shaking the foundation of the world as we once knew it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
China blasts US for its computer chip moves and for threatening student visas
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — China blasted the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus' reached during trade discussions in Geneva last month, the Commerce Ministry said in a statement. That referred to a China-U.S. joint statement in which the United States and China agreed to slash their massive recent tariffs, restarting stalled trade between the world's two biggest economies. But last month's de-escalation in President Donald Trump's trade wars did nothing to resolve underlying differences between Beijing and Washington and Monday's statement showed how easily such agreements can lead to further turbulence. The deal lasts 90 days, creating time for U.S. and Chinese negotiators to reach a more substantive agreement. But the pause also leaves tariffs higher than before Trump started ramping them up last month. And businesses and investors must contend with uncertainty about whether the truce will last. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop the 145% tax Trump imposed last month to 30%. China agreed to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10% from 125%. The Commerce Ministry said China held up its end of the deal, canceling or suspending tariffs and non-tariff measures taken against the U.S. 'reciprocal tariffs' following the agreement. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' while China has stood by its commitments, the statement said. It also threatened unspecified retaliation, saying China will 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' And in response to recent comments by Trump, it said of the U.S.: 'Instead of reflecting on itself, it has turned the tables and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts.' Trump stirred further controversy Friday, saying he will no longer be nice with China on trade, declaring in a social media post that the country had broken an agreement with the United States. Hours later, Trump said in the Oval Office that he will speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping and 'hopefully we'll work that out,' while still insisting China had violated the agreement. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' The Trump administration also stepped up the clash with China in other ways last week, announcing that it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. U.S. campuses host more than 275,000 students from China. Both countries are in a race to develop advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, with Washington seeking to curb China's access to the most advanced computer chips. China is also seeking to displace the U.S. as the leading power in the Asia-Pacific, including through gaining control over close U.S. partner and leading tech giant Taiwan.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not OK, computer: firms using AI to cut corners are playing with fire
The corporate world is agog. Ever since Eben Upton, the chief executive of Raspberry Pi, said he ran his annual results statement through AI before its publication, the talk has been of machines taking over the boardroom. The reaction to Upton's admission was astonishment. Raspberry Pi is stock market listed — these were its first full set of figures since flotation. They were eagerly awaited and, as with any quoted company, they were a closely guarded secret. Upton asked Claude, the AI bot designed by Amazon-funded Anthropic, to conduct a 'tone analysis'of the document, to say how it felt the microcomputer business was doing, on a scale of one to 100. Getting a so-so score, he set the computer to work. As the bot dialled up the language, the score improved. Too much, as it made his words seem breathlessly over the top. He made some improvements of his own, took out descriptions like 'exceptional' and reached an acceptable level. Eyebrows shot up on two counts. AI is a third-party, it's mechanical, susceptible to intrusion. It was not clear if he did but it is to be hoped Upton used a secure internal system. Then, there is the issue of the statement being entirely his — it is supposed to be his thoughts on the company's performance. Here he was, asking AI to look at what he planned to say. To be fair to Upton, he said in public what others may well be doing in private. Still, it was the most glaring instance yet of AI doing a boss's bidding. Others include a multinational senior executive freely saying he uses AI to draft his emails. An avatar of a CEO recently 'spoke' in a short video accompanying a stock exchange results announcement. Another corporate head told a tech conference how he uses AI to help prepare his speeches. While the software advances, the authorities stall. No regulation or guidance on AI's expansion and use is forthcoming. It is up to companies to make their own policies, not only to reap the benefits of AI but also to prevent a scandal and shareholder disaster. That is a worrying state of affairs. Specialist financial reporting and advisory consultancy Falcon Windsor teamed up with Insig AI, which delivers data infrastructure and AI-powered environmental, social and governance research tools, to look at the FTSE 350 companies. Their study, based on engagement with 40 firms and analysis of all FTSE 350 reports published from 2020 to 2024, revealed that generative AI use is multiplying across UK companies, often without any training, policy or oversight. They titled their report Your Precocious Intern, using the term to describe AI as useful but also a liability, the equivalent of someone who requires careful handling. While investors see the adoption of AI as inevitable and look forward to the advantages and efficiencies it could bring, they are increasingly alarmed about its implications for the truthfulness and authorship of corporate reporting. Everyone agrees that company reports and statements must remain the direct expression of management's thinking. Without rules and a common code, AI risks undermining the accuracy, authenticity and accountability that underpin trust in the stock markets. AI is moving so fast that there is only 'a short window of opportunity' to upskill and mitigate the risks it represents to the financial system. Their conclusion? 'Treat generative AI like a precocious intern: useful, quick, capable, but inexperienced, prone to overconfidence and should never be left unsupervised.' Claire Bodanis, a leading authority on UK corporate reporting and founder and director at Falcon Windsor, told The London Standard: 'If people use it unthinkingly, without proper training or guidelines, it could fatally undermine the accuracy and truthfulness of reporting.' Comments like these from two FTSE company secretaries should also be a warning. 'I think there are some real benefits in using generative AI as a summarising tool, and I'm quite keen to utilise it a bit more for efficiency if we can get comfortable with the accuracy of it,' said one. Another said: 'Would I be able hand on heart say that none of my contributors had used gen AI to provide the bit they've sent in? I have no idea.' Institutional investors are understandably afraid. As one told the researchers: 'I would be very wary about AI being used in forward[1]looking statements, or anything that is based around an opinion or a judgment.' Another said: 'I see generative AI as a flawed subordinate who's learning the ropes.' A third said: 'I feel very strongly that there should be a notification in the annual report if there's anything that has not been written by a human — there's no accountability through generative AI.' According to Bodanis, Raspberry Pi ought to act as a wake-up call. She asked: 'If a director gets AI to decide what is his or her opinion of their results based on what people are likely to think, then how is that honestly and truthfully their opinion?' History tells us, she said, what can happen. 'You think back to those stock market bubbles. Companies have to account to investors what they've done with their money and what they are going to do with it.' There must, said Bodanis, be 'a building of trust between a company and its shareholders'. One issue is the amount of material companies are obliged to produce. Annual reports that had grown to 80 pages, which felt huge, can reach 300 pages. That is because of the amount of non-financial reporting they must provide — on issues such as climate change, for example. If CEOs are using AI, it's difficult to decide what's true and what's not Claire Bodanis 'They are expected to use detail and opinion to create the truth of the state of the company,' said Bodanis. 'But if they are using AI, it is very difficult to decide what is true and what is not.' Just when corporate reporting is becoming 'ever more onerous and important', supplying all manner of information by law, along comes AI to make it easier. 'We should be using AI to do things humans can't do like crunch the numbers, not using it to do the things humans can do, like express opinions,' says Bodanis. A company report, she said, 'should be like looking the chairman in the eye and hearing it from them direct'. The slippery slope, too, is that distinction is lost. All company communications end up resembling each other — with the same wording and descriptions — when they are meant to be unique, coming straight from the top. The Financial Reporting Council, which regulates financial reporting and accounting, is dragging its heels, thinking about what to do about generative AI but so far not doing anything to police its rise. The FRC last got in touch with company boards about where it thought AI was heading in relation to results and reports some 18 months ago. That feels like a lifetime, such is AI's acceleration. As for companies uploading their sensitive figures to AI, Bodanis's point is succinct: 'AI has not signed an NDA. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
China blasts US for its computer chip moves and for threatening student visas
TAIPEI, Taiwan — China blasted the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus' reached during trade discussions in Geneva last month, the Commerce Ministry said in a statement.
