Organization of American Historians votes to condemn Israeli 'scholasticide' in Gaza
The largest professional society for the teaching and study of American history has overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning Israel's "scholasticide" in Gaza.
The prestigious Organization of American Historians (OAH), which publishes the Journal of American History, passed the resolution on Saturday 8 April at an OAH business meeting in Chicago.
A decisive majority of 104 members voted for the motion - with only 25 opposing it.
The Israeli military has bombed and mostly destroyed all 12 universities in Gaza and hundreds of primary and secondary schools.
More than 200 heritage sites, including mosques, churches and libraries, have been destroyed.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
In October, the Ministry of Education in Gaza reported that 400 teachers and other educational professionals had been killed, alongside more than 10,000 students.
The resolution, submitted by Historians for Peace and Democracy, argues that Israel's "scholasticide in Gaza has made it impossible to practice history and eradicated its practitioners".
It further "condemns the Israeli violence in Gaza that has resulted in the scholasticide," urges a permanent ceasefire and commits the OAH to forming a "volunteer committee to work with other organizations in rebuilding Gaza's educational infrastructure".
'The Trump administration hates them'
Maragret Power, a retired professor at Illinois Institute of Technology and co-chair of Historians for Peace and Democracy, said that "opposing the ruthless genocide Israel has waged, and the US government has financed, against the people of Gaza is a moral imperative".
"The OAH is the organisation of historians that study US history," she told Middle East Eye on Sunday.
"It and the American Historical Association (AHA) are the two most important organisations of historians in the US. Their members include the most important historians in the US as well as some globally.
"Let's just say the Trump administration hates them both."
Brown University could become fifth university to lose federal funding Read More »
In January, the AHA also passed a resolution condemning Israel's "scholasticide" in Gaza.
But the resolution was later vetoed by the group's executive council, which said it "lies outside the scope of the association's mission and purpose".
The OAH vote comes amid an unprecedented crackdown on displays of support for the Palestinians in American universities.
The State Department has cancelled visas for hundreds of people connected to campus pro-Palestine protests.
In an announcement on 10 March, the Department of Education published a list of 60 universities that are 'presently under investigation for Title VI violations relating to antisemitic harassment and discrimination'.
In March, Columbia University became the first university to lose some federal funding when the Trump administration slashed $400m in federal funds.
'Fear and compliance'
On 1 April, the Trump administration suspended several dozen research grants totaling $210m to Princeton University as part of an ongoing investigation into antisemitism on campus.
Princeton president Christopher Eisgruber said in a message on 1 April to the university community, 'The full rationale for this action is not yet clear.'
Meanwhile, on 31 March, the government told Harvard University it would review nearly $9bn in multi-year grant commitments to the university as part of an investigation over "antisemitism".
'Fear and compliance have become the order of the day in many of our colleges and universities'
- Professor Margaret Power
The review will include more than $255.6m in current contracts and $8.7bn in grants spread over multiple years.
Harvard University has also been given a set of conditions that it must meet - including a mask ban and removal of diversity, equity and inclusion programmes - to receive federal money.
Human rights advocates and academic experts have condemned the moves as an assault on freedom of speech and academic freedom.
"Fear and compliance have become the order of the day in many of our colleges and universities," said Power.
"Hoping to appease the unappeasable, administrators have failed their students and faculty and their mission to defend free speech and free thought. Many have practiced anticipatory obedience, a strategy that is doomed to fail.
Power added: "This resolution offers an alternative path, one that affirms our commitment to Palestinian educators and students, and their right to learn, teach, and research, as well as ours."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
38 minutes ago
- The National
Israel launches 'pre-emptive strike' on Iran
Israel launched a 'pre-emptive strike' on Iran in the early hours of Friday, according to the Israeli Defence Minister. Israel Katz said that following the strike, 'a missile and drone attack against the State of Israel and its civilian population is expected in the immediate future'. He said schools would be closed in the country on Friday Explosions were heard north-east of Iran's capital Tehran, state-run Nour News reported. It added that the reasons for the explosions were not immediately clear. Videos and photos posted on social media showed plumes of smoke rising from several locations. The US denied involvement in the strike on Iran. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defence," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. "President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners." He also warned Tehran not to take action against the US. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel," Mr Rubio said. Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, said in a post on X before reports of the strike: 'At our Embassy in Jerusalem and closely following the situation. We will remain here all night. 'Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!'' Israel has repeatedly warned it could attack Iranian nuclear plants, particularly if US-Iran talks on a deal to put limits on Tehran's nuclear programme were to collapse. US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that a potential attack by Israel 'looks like it's something that could very well happen'. Tehran on Wednesday had threatened to hit US military bases in the region if conflict breaks out, and if it were attacked over its nuclear programme. Further fuelling tension, Iran on Thursday said it has built and will activate a third nuclear enrichment plant, after the UN's atomic watchdog agency censured Tehran for failing to comply with non-proliferation obligations meant to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Israel's disconnection with allies and partners has rarely been clearer
Tuesday's decision by the UK to impose sanctions on two ultra-nationalist Israeli ministers means Britain has joined Australia, New Zealand, Canada and Norway in taking the extraordinary step of introducing travel bans and financial restrictions on members of an ostensibly friendly government to these countries. Perhaps even more extraordinary was the response from one of the ministers concerned. A statement issued by the office of Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich the same day confirmed that Israel cancelled a waiver that allowed the country's banks to work with Palestinian ones. Instead of retaliating against the UK directly, Mr Smotrich instead authorised a move that threatens to paralyse Palestinian financial institutions. Such intransigence – and its deeply embedded position within the current Israeli government – explains why more and more of the country's allies and trade partners are losing patience and taking action. Tuesday's sanctions are the latest example of Israel's increasing isolation and the substantial diplomatic and political cost it is paying for its war of collective punishment in Gaza and continuing military occupation of Palestinian land. The fact that Mr Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir are determined opponents of a just political settlement of the conflict also highlights the disconnection between Israel's current leadership and most of the international community. Next week, hundreds of diplomats will gather in New York for a UN summit on the two-state solution, co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. Israel's leadership has already said it will not attend; that is its choice, but it is a poor one. Determinedly opposing the majority of international opinion – that is in favour of an equitable settlement – puts the onus on Israel to provide a realistic alternative that does not involve further displacement or other illegal policies. If it cannot, then it will be clear that Israel, which is currently led by a divided and precarious coalition with an uncertain future, is on a collision course with the international community, one that may even try the patience of a much more capricious and transactional White House. The coming UN summit must be bold and ambitious, holding fast to the overall framework of a solution that most of the international community supports: an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the return of the remaining Israeli hostages, the release of Palestinian detainees as well as a process that leads to Palestinian freedom coupled with security guarantees for Israel. Sanctions on individual Israeli ministers are a statement that the country needs to think hard about where it is headed It is a source of frustration that the case for this position has to be made time and again. Arab nations have already said they are ready to play their part, as was made clear in the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative. Last September, while speaking on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said 57 Muslim and Arab countries were 'willing to guarantee the security of Israel in the context of Israel ending the occupation' and allowing for the emergence of a Palestinian state. However, what the world is witnessing right now on the streets of the West Bank and in the rubble of Gaza is what the absence of a peace process looks like. More partners of Israel are making it clear that this situation is simply unsustainable. Sanctions on individual Israeli ministers are a statement that the country needs to think hard about where it is headed.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
UN adopts resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, aid access and release of hostages
The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution on Thursday calling for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, days after the US vetoed a similar measure in the Security Council. A total of 149 countries voted in favour while 12, including the US, Israel and Argentina, opposed the resolution. And 19 countries abstained. The resolution, presented by Spain, demands the release of all hostages held by Hamas, the return of Palestinian prisoners detained by Israel, and the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. It underscored the need for accountability to ensure Israel's adherence to international law but stopped short of explicitly calling for sanctions. In addition, it 'strongly condemned any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and the unlawful denial of humanitarian access', and further stressed the obligation to avoid depriving Gaza's civilians of basic survival needs, 'including by wilfully impeding relief supplies and access'. Before the resolution's passage, Palestinian ambassador Riyad Mansour declared the measure's language to be the 'strongest to date' but stressed that words must now turn into decisive action. 'Israel's continuing defiance of international law, UN resolutions and global condemnation demands an immediate response,' Mr Mansour said. He urged member states to stamp their national authority: 'Use the tools available to you, each and every one of you. 'No arms, no money, no trade to support the oppression, ethnic cleansing and land theft against Palestinians." While General Assembly resolutions are non-binding, they serve as a significant indicator of global opinion. Previous UN calls to end the war between Israel and Hamas have gone unheeded. Unlike the Security Council, where permanent members such as the US have the power of veto, the General Assembly operates on a majority vote. There has been increasing international pressure over the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where thousands have been killed and millions face severe shortages of food, water and medical supplies. With the vote taking place days before an international conference at the UN aimed at reviving two-state negotiations, the text also reiterated the General Assembly's 'unwavering commitment to the two-state solution … where two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, live side by side in peace and security". The vote comes more than 77 years after the General Assembly's 1947 resolution partitioned British-ruled Palestine into Arab and Jewish states. Israel declared independence in 1948, sparking a war with neighbouring Arab nations, while Palestinian statehood remains unrealised. The US is now urging countries to boycott next week's UN conference, co-sponsored by France and Saudi Arabia. When asked by The National about Israel's attendance in next week's summit, Israel's UN envoy Danny Danon said 'absolutely not". "We will not take part in this conference," he said. 'I was very happy to see that the United States decided also not to participate in this circus." Mr Danon also took aim at French President Emmanuel Macron. 'When Mr Macron arrives at the UN, I will ask him if he has solved all the problems in France and Europe. If he thinks coming here and pushing this conference will actually be constructive, it's not constructive.' He also criticised the resolution for not demanding the immediate release of the 55 hostages still being held, not condemning Hamas 'for the atrocities' it committed on October 7, and not holding the militant group accountable. In October 2023, the General Assembly called for an immediate humanitarian truce in Gaza, with 120 votes in favour. By December 2023, support grew significantly, as 153 countries voted to demand an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. Later that month the assembly increased its call, adopting a resolution, with 158 votes in favour, demanding an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire.
