Mexico votes in first judicial election amid concerns over rule of law
By Diego Oré
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Mexicans vote on Sunday in the country's first ever judicial elections, part of an overhaul of the nation's judiciary that critics warn could jeopardize the rule of law.
The vote will elect 2,600 judges and magistrates, including all Supreme Court justices, and is part of a reform pushed by former President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and his protege and successor President Claudia Sheinbaum.
Lopez Obrador and Sheinbaum say the election will root out corruption in a flawed judiciary dominated by an out-of-touch elite and instead allow people to decide who should be a judge.
But the run-up to the vote has been dominated by a scandal over some of the candidates, including a convicted drug smuggler and a former lawyer of drug kingpin Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman.
Opponents say the overhaul risks removing checks and balances on the ruling Morena party, by appointing judges friendly to their cause, and also allowing organized crime groups greater influence over the judicial system by running their own candidates.
Mexico joins Bolivia as the only countries worldwide to conduct judicial elections at the national level, though state-level judicial elections are common in the United States and some local Swiss judges are also elected.
Voters on Sunday will cast ballots for Mexico's nine Supreme Court judges, as well as for judges and magistrates across 19 of Mexico's 32 administrative divisions. More than 7,700 candidates are running for judicial posts.
Pollsters expect a poor turnout, in part due to opposition calls to boycott the vote, but also because of the complexity of the process and vast number of candidates to consider.
"In Mexico City we are going to vote for 50 candidates. If even discerning people with access to social media aren't checking the candidates, imagine the people who don't have this access," 22-year-old accounting student Maria Alejandra Mares told Reuters. "They're going to vote blind."
Voting is not mandatory in Mexico and there is no minimum turnout required to legitimize an election.
Just 37% of 1,000 people polled by Buendia & Marquez said they would come out to vote, compared to 61% who participated in the vote last June that elected President Sheinbaum.
CONCERNS AND BOYCOTTS
The right-wing PAN opposition party has called on supporters to boycott the election, branding it a "vulgar fraud," but Sheinbaum has vigorously defended her predecessor's reform and her party has sought to mobilize the grassroots vote.
"We call on you to participate, participate, participate," Sheinbaum told a press conference on Friday, saying this would help significantly improve the current judiciary. "Participating is the best way to transform a country."
Besides mandating the popular election of judges, the judicial reform, promoted last year by former President Lopez Obrador, also reduced the number of Supreme Court judges, shortened terms and eased some requirements such as minimum age and work experience.
The reform's approval by lawmakers last year knocked financial markets, sparked the United States to express concern about a weaker judicial system, and sparked a strike by the country's judicial workers.
"Mexico's justice system was far from perfect, and this new judicial system will not address its shortcomings," said Rodolfo Ramos, an analyst at Brazilian bank Bradesco BBI.
Ramos said "the real litmus test" would come when cases against a government action reach the Supreme Court.
Counting is expected to take two weeks, with the results out on June 15.
In 2027, another vote is scheduled to fill over 1,000 more judicial positions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
13 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Guatemalan court orders arrests of Colombian officials who led a UN anti-corruption mission
GUATEMALA CITY (AP) — A Guatemalan court ordered Monday the arrests of Colombia's attorney general and a former Colombian defense minister who led a U.N. anti-corruption mission in Guatemala. Guatemalan prosecutor Rafael Curruchiche, who himself has been sanctioned by the United States and other countries for allegedly interfering in corruption investigations, had requested that an appeals court issue the arrest orders for Colombia's top prosecutor Luz Adriana Camargo Garzón, who was the chief of investigations of the Guatemala mission, and Iván Velásquez, who had led the mission and later was Colombia's defense minister. Curruchiche said Camargo and Velásquez had committed illicit association during their investigation into bribes paid to Guatemalan officials by Brazilian construction giant Odebrecht. Along with former Guatemalan prosecutors working with the U.N. mission, Velásquez and Camargo were part of 'a criminal structure led by the former CICIG commissioner,' using the Spanish initials of the U.N. mission, Curruchiche alleged. Curruchiche had long ago focused his investigation on an agreement the anti-corruption prosecutors had signed with Odebrecht that would offer reduced penalties in exchange for the company's cooperation in the investigation. His boss, Prosecutor General Consuelo Porras, has also been sanctioned by the U.S. and other governments for blocking corruption investigations. Last week, a U.N. expert warned her office was using criminal law to pursue enemies. Velásquez responded via X after learning of the accusations. 'So now the corrupt Guatemalan attorney general and her prosecutor Curruchiche – designated as corrupt and sanctioned by the United States and the European Union – extend their persecution for Luz Adriana Camargo and me,' Velásquez wrote. 'My solidarity with the former officials and so many Guatemalan citizens who the Attorney General's Office has forced into exile.' Camargo did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Among those former Guatemalan prosecutors forced into exile was Juan Francisco Sandoval, who led the special prosecutor's office against impunity. Sandoval, who led the Odebrecht investigation with support from the U.N. mission and has been living in exile in the United States, said last month in a statement that Curruchiche's investigation was 'a sham and a manipulation strategy.' The U.N. mission operated in Guatemala from 2007 to 2019, when then-President Jimmy Morales decided to not renew its mandate, after it linked members of his family to a case. It had worked with Guatemalan prosecutors to take down criminal structures in the country, sending judges, prosecutors, other public officials, including former presidents to trial for corruption. ___ AP reporter Astrid Suarez in Bogota, Colombia contributed to this report.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sheinbaum calls Mexico's judicial election 'extraordinary' despite turnout of less than 13%
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum was effusive. "Marvelous, impressive " she told reporters Monday. "Extraordinary. ... A great success." The superlatives kept coming about Sunday's historic judicial elections — which Sheinbaum championed — but the president could not conceal a harsh reality: Only about 13% of 100 million eligible voters cast ballots in a vote that the president had labeled a key component of the ruling party's ongoing "transformation" of Mexican society. She and her allies had spent weeks urging people to vote. No one expected that Sunday's polling — which didn't include contenders for any national or statewide legislative posts — would approach the 61% turnout of last year's national elections. Sheinbaum won a landslide victory last year, and her Morena political bloc swept to huge majorities in both houses of Congress and in state houses and towns across the country. This was a festival of voter fraud, and they dare to say that the people rule. Jorge Romero, national leader of the National Action Party The turnout was more disappointing than even the the lowest pre-election turnout estimates of about 15%. Some election advocates had optimistically predicted as many as one-third of voters would make it to the polls. "Everything can be perfected," the president conceded. The lack of participation, experts said, can be attributed to many factors: it was an off-year election; the balloting process was new and extremely convoluted; the vast majority of more than 7,000 contenders for 881 federal judge positions — and for another 1,800 state jurist posts — were unknown. The election, while the brainchild of former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador — the founder of Morena and the mentor of Sheinbaum — was ostensibly nonpartisan. Would-be judges were not identified by political affiliation and were banned from receiving party funds. There were no massive rallies or advertisement blitzes in a contest that largely played out on social media. And it was the first time that Mexico had ever voted for judges, who have historically been appointed by expert panels or, in the case of the Supreme Court, the president. Mexico becomes the first nation in the world with an all-elected judiciary. 'The task was a very time-intensive one for voters, who had to learn about an outrageous number of candidates,' said Kenneth F. Greene, a professor of government at the University of Texas at Austin. "Nobody could possibly learn about all of them." Nonetheless, many political observers deemed Sunday's low turnout an embarrassing setback for a party that had seemed near invincible in its extraordinary march to power since its emergence less than a decade ago. Read more: Mexicans cast ballots for nation's judges in controversial, first-ever vote Government opponents reveled in a rare opportunity to mock Morena's legendary electoral prowess, labeling the vote "Black Sunday," and the end of judicial independence and of Mexico's system of checks and balances. "This was a festival of voter fraud, and they dare to say that the people rule," Jorge Romero, national leader of the center-right National Action Party, said at a news conference that featured images of empty voting booths and testimonies from citizens who didn't know which candidates to vote for. Writing in Reforma newspaper, columnist Denise Dresser archly compared the election to a long-planned gala that no one attends. "They rolled out the carpet, sent the invitations, mounted the chairs, designed the menu, [and] contracted with mariachis," Dresser wrote. "And, at the end, they were alone." Will all the complaints and the low turnout make any difference in the ultimate makeup of the judiciary? Many experts say no — despite the opposition's vow to file a complaint with the Organization of American States, a move that may be more symbolic than substantial. Final results won't be known for a week or two. But at the end, it seems likely that the official count will stand, and pro-Morena judges will take their seats in a system that Sheinbaum has assailed as corrupt and filled with nepotism. "It was always going to reinforce Morena and give President Sheinbaum even more power than she already has," said Greene, who was in Mexico City to observe the voting process. 'My strong guess is that Sheinbaum now dominates all three branches of government and is essentially able to pass whatever laws and constitutional reforms she wants. We're seeing a tremendous concentration of power in the presidency.' The most closely watched race is for the makeup of the new Supreme Court, which will have both fewer judges— nine, instead of the current 11 — and less authority to challenge legislative and presidential decisions. Only three sitting members opted to run for office. All three were appointees of López Obrador, who repeatedly clashed with the justices about his strong-arm efforts to reform electoral law and other initiatives. Read more: Mexico judicial elections: Government calls it essential reform. Critics say it's a farce Whether Mexico's new judges will be an improvement over the current judiciary remains to be seen. Many Mexicans clearly agree with the president's assertions that Mexico's judicial system was in need of an overhaul. But judges are only part of a justice system that has many flaws. Untouched in the judicial reform were other entities, notably district attorney's offices and local police, both notoriously corrupt. Both Sheinbaum and her predecessor have turned to the National Guard as the nation's go-to law enforcement agency. But National Guard troops have themselves been implicated in various recent scandals, including killing civilians and trafficking in black-market gasoline. The election "was a political humiliation," wrote Alejandro Monsivais-Carrillo, a political scientist at El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, on X. "But it doesn't matter much: Party control of public powers advances without retreat." Special correspondent Cecilia Sánchez Vidal contributed. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Los Angeles Times
4 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Sheinbaum calls judicial election ‘extraordinary,' despite turnout of less than 13%
MEXICO CITY — Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum was effusive.'Marvelous, impressive ' she told reporters Monday. 'Extraordinary. ... A great success.' The superlatives kept coming about Sunday's historic judicial elections—which Sheinbaum championed—but the president could not conceal a harsh reality: Only about 13% of 100 million eligible voters cast ballots in a vote that the president had labeled a key component of the ruling party's ongoing 'transformation' of Mexican society. She and her allies had spent weeks urging people to vote. No one expected that Sunday's polling — which didn't include contenders for any national or statewide legislative posts — would approach the 61% turnout of last year's national elections. Sheinbaum won a landslide victory last year, and her Morena political bloc swept to huge majorities in both houses of Congress and in state houses and towns across the country. The turnout was more disappointing than even the the lowest pre-election turnout estimates of about 15%. Some election advocates, more optimistic, had predicted as many as one-third of vogters would make it to the polls. 'Everything can be perfected,' the president conceded. The lack of participation, experts said, can be attributed to many factors: It was an off-year election, the balloting process was new and extremely convoluted, the vast majority of more than 7,000 contenders for 881 federal judge positions — and for another 1,800 state jurist posts — were unknown. The election, while the brainchild of former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador — the founder of Morena and the mentor of Sheinbaum — was ostensibly non-partisan. Would-be judges were not identified by political affiliation and were banned from receiving party funds. There were no massive rallies or advertisement blitzes in a contest that largely played out on social media. And it was the first time that Mexico had ever voted for judges, who have historically been appointed by expert panels or, in the case of the Supreme Court, the president. Mexico becomes the first nation in the world with an all-elected judiciary. 'The task was a very time-intensive one for voters, who had to learn about an outrageous number of candidates,' said Kenneth F. Greene, a professor of government at the University of Texas at Austin. 'Nobody could possibly learn about all of them.' Nonetheless, many political observers deemed Sunday's low turnout a embarrassing setback for a party that had seemed near invincible in its extraordinary march to power since its emergence less than a decade ago. Government opponents reveled in a rare opportunity to mock Morena's legendary electoral prowess, labeling the vote 'Black Sunday,' and the end of judicial independence and of Mexico's system of checks and balances. 'This was a festival of voter fraud, and they dare to say that the people rule,' Jorge Romero, national leader of the center-right National Action Party, said at a news conference that featured images of empty voting booths and testimonies from citizens who didn't know which candidates to vote for. Writing in Reforma newspaper, columnist Denise Dresser archly compared the election to a long-planned gala that no one attends. 'They rolled out the carpet, send the invitations, mounted the chairs, designed the menu, [and] contracted with mariachis,' Dresser wrote. 'And, at the end, they were alone.' Will all the complaints and the low turnout make any difference in the ultimate makeup of the judiciary? Many experts say no — despite the opposition's vow to file a complaint with the Organization of American States, a move that may be more symbolic than substantial. Final results won't be known for a week or two. But, at the end, it seems likely that the official count will stand, and pro-Morena judges will take their seats in a system that Sheinbaum has assailed as corrupt and filled with nepotism. 'It was always going to reinforce Morena and give President Sheinbaum even more power than she already has,' said Greene, who was in Mexico City to observe the voting process. 'My strong guess is that Sheinbaum now dominates all three branches of government and is essentially able to pass whatever laws and constitutional reforms she wants. We're seeing a tremendous concentration of power in the presidency.' The most closely watched race is for the makeup of the new Supreme Court, which will have both fewer judges— nine, instead of the current 11 — and less authority to challenge legislative and presidential decisions. Only three sitting members opted to run for office. All three were appointees of López Obrador, who repeatedly clashed with the justices about his strong-arm efforts to reform electoral law and other initiatives. Whether Mexico's new judges will be an improvement over the current judiciary remains to be seen. Many Mexicans clearly agree with the president's assertions that Mexico's judicial system was in need of an overhaul. But judges are only part of a justice system that has many flaws. Untouched in the judicial reform were other entities, notably district attorney's offices and local police, both notoriously corrupt. Both Sheinbaum and her predecessor have turned to the National Guard as the nation's go-to law enforcement agency. But National Guard troops have themselves been implicated in various recent scandals, including killing civilians and trafficking in black-market gasoline. The election 'was a political humiliation,' wrote Alejandro Monsivais-Carrillo, a political scientist at El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, on X. 'But it doesn't matter much: Party control of public powers advances without retreat.' Special correspondent Cecilia Sánchez Vidal contributed.
