Campaigners take step in legal action over toilet guidance after gender ruling
Good Law Project (GLP) said on Friday that it had sent a pre-action letter to the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) over the guidance, which it said 'authorises and approves unlawful discrimination'.
GLP and the individuals – two of whom are trans and one of whom is intersex – have also sent the letter to the women and equalities minister, Bridget Phillipson, and said that they had asked for a response within seven days.
It follows the Supreme Court ruling in April that said the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex, following a challenge against the Scottish Government by campaign group For Women Scotland.
It is deeply unkind, far removed from the national mood of mutual respect and live and let live, and is unlawful to boot. Jolyom Maugham KC, Good Law Project
The EHRC issued interim guidance following the judgment that said trans women 'should not be permitted to use the women's facilities' in workplaces or public-facing services like shops and hospitals, with the same applying for trans men using men's toilets.
But GLP said on Friday that the guidance is 'wrong in law' and the definition of gender in the Equality Act 2010 'does not read across' to legislation governing use of toilets, to which 'the normal legal meaning of those words, which include lived gender, continues to apply'.
Jolyon Maugham KC, the founder and executive director of GLP, said: 'The stark and needlessly cruel position adopted by the Government and the EHRC humiliates trans people by forcing them to use the wrong toilets and obliges them to reveal deeply personal information about their gender to complete strangers just to take a wee.
'It is deeply unkind, far removed from the national mood of mutual respect and live and let live, and is unlawful to boot.'
The Supreme Court challenge was brought by campaign group For Women Scotland against the Scottish government (Lucy North/PA)
GLP also said that if the EHRC guidance is correct in law, it breaches the UK's obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998.
The commission said it issued its interim guidance last month as 'many people have questions about the judgment and what it means for them'.
But it also said that trans people 'should not be put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use'.
It added that it would undertake a public consultation on how the judgment should be reflected in a more detailed code of conduct, which it aimed to finalise for ministerial approval by June.
In the pre-action letter, GLP said that the claim related to the guidance 'purporting to set out, inter alia, that employers and providers of services which are open to the public are legally required to prohibit trans people from using the toilets in their acquired gender'.
The notion that the judgment puts beyond debate that trans women must be excluded from women's toilets in workplaces and services open to the public and trans men must be excluded from men's toilets is an extraordinary – and legally erroneous – position to have taken. Good Law Project's Pre-Action Letter
It continued that it believed that the guidance 'evidently represents what the commission regards as the indisputable legal consequences' of the judgment, and that the impact of the guidance 'should not be underestimated'.
It said: 'This proposed challenge is not to an 'interim' position, but guidance on an interpretation of the law which the commission has made clear is not up for discussion in the forthcoming consultation.
'The notion that the judgment puts beyond debate that trans women must be excluded from women's toilets in workplaces and services open to the public and trans men must be excluded from men's toilets is an extraordinary – and legally erroneous – position to have taken.
'The claimants will be challenging that guidance on the basis that it is irrational and/or wrong in law.'
A Government spokesperson said: 'We do not comment on ongoing legal proceedings.
'The UK Supreme Court has ruled on the For Women for Scotland case with a unanimous opinion.
'We will consider the updated draft code of practice from the EHRC once it has been submitted and, importantly, engage with them to ensure it provides the certainty and clarity service providers and businesses need, in line with the Supreme Court ruling.'
A spokesperson for the EHRC said: 'We are unable to comment on any threat of legal action at this stage.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
42 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Zia Yusuf quits Reform UK after 'dumb' burka ban question
The shock resignation comes on the day Reform hopes to cause an shock in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election. John Swinney has repeatedly described the contest as a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. READ MORE Mr Yusuf gave no formal reason for his departure. He tweeted: 'Eleven months ago I became chairman of Reform. I have worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30%, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time.' 11 months ago I became Chairman of Reform. I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30%, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and… — Zia Yusuf (@ZiaYusufUK) June 5, 2025 His exit came just hours after a criticised Sarah Pochin, the newly elected Reform MP for Runcorn and Helsby, over her call to ban the burka. Using her first appearance at Prime Minister's Questions, Ms Pochin called for full-face coverings to be outlawed — a move widely criticised and swiftly disowned by the party. Mr Yusuf said he had not been consulted and branded the question dumb. Responding to a user on X, he said: 'Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it was not policy. Busy with other stuff.' He added: 'I do think it is dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself would not do.' The row follows a tense few days for Reform UK, which is facing accusations of Islamophobia and race-baiting. At a press conference in Aberdeen on Monday, party leader Nigel Farage pointed to Mr Yusuf — 'Scottish-born, but comes from parents who come from the Indian subcontinent' — as evidence that Reform UK is not a racist party. Mr Farage had been responding to criticism of a campaign video that edited a 2022 speech by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar to suggest he pledged to 'prioritise' the Pakistani community — a phrase Mr Sarwar did not use. Defending the video, Mr Farage claimed the MSP had a 'record of obsession' with race. 'We do not talk about race at all,' he said. He continued: 'We think everybody should be treated equally. We object, very strongly, to the segmentation of people into different types. 'I think that speech he gave was sectarian in its very nature — 'we are the South Asian community, we are going to take over the country and take over the world'. 'We believe what he said was a form of sectarian politics and we do not like it one little bit.' Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice said the party 'would not be where we are today' without the efforts of Zia Yusuf, who has quit as chairman. Mr Tice said: 'I wish to add my huge thanks to Zia for all his hard work and major help in securing such progress and success over the last 11 months. 'We would not be where we are today without him.' Reform leader Nigel Farage said: 'I am genuinely sorry that Zia Yusuf has decided to stand down as Reform UK Chairman. 'As I said just last week, he was a huge factor in our success on May 1 and is an enormously talented person. 'Politics can be a highly pressured and difficult game and Zia has clearly had enough. He is a loss to us and public life.' A Labour spokesperson said: 'Nigel Farage could fit all of his MPs in the back of a cab, yet he can't stop them fighting among themselves. 'Reform only guarantees more Liz Truss-style chaos. Their £80 billion of unfunded commitments would lead to economic meltdown and put up everyone's mortgage and bills. They're just not credible.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Expert weighs in on Nigel Farage funding for Scotland comments
The Reform UK leader sparked outrage when he suggested axing the Barnett formula during a press conference in Aberdeen earlier this week. Dr Neil McGarvey, a top politics lecturer at Strathclyde University, told The National that Farage's comments suggested the Reform UK leader had not thought 'deeply' about the constitutional question. He said: 'I don't think Farage has thought it through very coherently, if I'm being honest. 'I would actually struggle to label Farage a Unionist; he's not really thought in any way deeply about the Union and the implications of what he's said for the Union.' READ MORE: Douglas Ross accused of 'bullying witnesses' in key Holyrood committee While the Barnett formula is often taken to mean the whole process by which Holyrood is funded, it is only one part, explained McGarvey, with the baseline block grant making up the largest part. The Barnett formula, devised in the 1970s before the first Scottish devolution referendum, is used to calculate how much money Scotland gets as a proportion of UK spending in devolved areas. (Image: PA) McGarvey, who has written about right-wing politics in Scotland and the Union, said that he would describe Farage as holding a 'One Britain philosophy', which he defined as an 'English-stroke-British nationalist approach to governance, that we should all be governed as one'. The academic argued that because of The Vow – a last-ditch attempt to shore up No votes in the 2014 referendum, which included a pledge to keep the Barnett formula while bringing in more powers – both sides in the referendum had cast their ballots for different kinds of constitutional change. He said: 'You could say, from an SNP perspective, if you reopen the whole debate about Barnett, you're reopening the constitutional debate.' READ MORE: Britain was 'extension of Scotland', suggest medieval texts uncovered by historian And McGarvey argued that Farage may find unlikely bedfellows in the SNP over his comments about the Barnett formula, which saw the Reform UK leader saying that Holyrood should be 'able to raise a bit more of its own revenue'. He said this put Farage in similar territory to those in the SNP who would argue for the Scottish Parliament to have 'full fiscal autonomy', which would see it given complete control over tax and public spending short of full independence. Farage's comments were met with outrage not only from pro-independence parties but from the Conservatives, who said his argument amounted to wanting to scrap what they call the 'Union dividend'.
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Reform chairman QUITS & says helping Farage become PM is ‘not a good use of my time'
Insiders said that the chairman had felt 'shafted' into running the party's DOGE efficiency unit WALKS OUT Reform chairman QUITS & says helping Farage become PM is 'not a good use of my time' REFORM was plunged into a chaotic civil war last night after its chairman Zia Yusuf announced he's quitting the party. Mr Yusuf announced on social media that after 11 months in the job 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time'. Advertisement 2 Reform chairman Zia Yusuf announced he's quitting the party Credit: PA Insiders said that the chairman had felt 'shafted' into running the party's DOGE efficiency unit, aimed at slashing waste in local authorities. He also earlier on Thursday clashed with Reform's newest MP, Sarah Pochin, over the idea of a burqa ban. Mr Yusuf said: 'Eleven months ago I became Chairman of Reform. 'I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30 per cent, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. Advertisement Read More REFORMER REGRET I was excited to get Aldi's pilates machine but 1 issue has me returning it 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.' Mr Yusuf was seen as a rising star in the party and close ally of Nigel Farage. While not an MP, the entrepreneur fronted several of the parties press conferences. He worked as chairman in a voluntary capacity. Advertisement This comes after Farage earlier this week blasted "net stupid zero" for obliterating the UK's oil industry, ahead of a showdown Scottish by-election on tomorrow. The Reform chief drew battle lines against the SNP as he warned Scotland is "literally de-industrialising before our eyes". In Aberdeen Mr Farage slammed the nats, led by First Minister John Swinney, for sacrificing an entire industry and thousands of jobs at the alter of green diktats. He claimed neighbouring Norway is "laughing" as it watches ministers import Scandinavian fossil fuels while dismantling local industry. Advertisement Against the shouts of protesters, at a posh fish and chips restaurant the Reform leader said: "We can con ourselves as much as we like. "There will be more coal burned this year than ever before in the history of human kind. The same applies to oil and gas. 'Even the most adren proponent of net zero has to accept the world will still be using oil and gas up until 2050 and beyond. 'And yet we've decided to sacrifice this industry as a consensus around Net Zero has emerged.' Advertisement Mr Farage added that the fight to save oil and gas is "almost the next Brexit". He said: 'Believe me, the scales are falling from the eyes of the public when it comes to Net Zero. "They realise we are putting upon ourselves a massive cost, let alone the opportunity cost of what we're missing... 'When we closed down refineries.. and steelworks... all we're doing is exporting the emissions of CO2 with the goods then being shipped back to us. Advertisement 'The public are waking up to this." It comes ahead of a Hoylrood by-election in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse on Thursday, described by Reform Deputy Leader Richard Tice as an "absolute cat fight" with the SNP and Labour. Mr Farage acknowledged it would be an "earthquake" level shock if Reform's candidate wins the seat. But activists have reported being surprised at levels of support on the doorstep. Advertisement Mr Farage insisted the Reform "can replicate success in Scotland". 2 He said: "I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time' Credit: AFP More to follow... For the latest news on this story keep checking back at The Sun Online is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Advertisement Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.
