Deal Maker or Duped? Trump's Embrace of Putin Shows Few Results.
President Trump has described President Vladimir V. Putin as 'savvy' and 'genius' for invading Ukraine, while bragging about his 'very, very good relationship' with the autocratic Russian leader.
Mr. Trump has helped the Kremlin recast Ukraine as the villain rather than the victim in the war, and has publicly berated President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine in the Oval Office and blamed him for starting the conflict and undermining peace negotiations.
But four months into his term, Mr. Trump's preference for praising and excusing Mr. Putin has not stopped the bloodshed in a war he once bragged he would end in just 24 hours.
After weeks of Mr. Trump claiming he could leverage his relationship with the Russian leader to bring peace, Mr. Putin's continued aggression has prompted even Mr. Trump to question whether he has been strung along.
'We're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along or not and if he is we'll respond a little bit differently,' Mr. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday. 'I'm very disappointed at what happened, a couple of nights now where people were killed in the middle of what you would call a negotiation.'
After a call between the American and Russian leaders last week yielded no breakthroughs, Mr. Trump appeared ready to distance himself from negotiations altogether and said it would be up to Russia and Ukraine to stop the fighting.
Russia then, over the weekend, unleashed one of its largest aerial campaigns against Ukrainian civilian targets. That prompted Mr. Trump to describe Mr. Putin as 'absolutely CRAZY!' and to warn that Russia was 'playing with fire.' Mr. Putin's spokesman in turn dismissed Mr. Trump's comments as an 'emotional reaction.'
It is unclear that the friction signals a fundamental breach between Mr. Trump and the Russian president. Mr. Putin has been a central character in both of Mr. Trump's terms in office — Mr. Trump suggested in 2018 that he believed his Russian counterpart more than U.S. intelligence agencies about whether Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election — and Mr. Trump has often spoken admiringly of Mr. Putin.
And although Mr. Trump has hinted at the possibility that he could impose a new round of sanctions on Russia if Mr. Putin does not budge on peace talks, he has yet to take any action. Mr. Trump said on Wednesday that he was still intent on negotiating with Russia and he wanted to see how talks played out over the next two weeks.
'At this point we're working on President Putin and we'll see where we are,' Mr. Trump said.
But Mr. Trump is facing growing pressure to take a harder line. A chorus of foreign policy experts and members of Congress says it has seen enough to conclude Mr. Trump is the one getting duped.
Senate Republicans have increasingly called on Mr. Trump to ditch his friendly approach to Mr. Putin and impose penalties on Russia. Even Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, a close Trump ally leading a bipartisan push to place sanctions on Russia, has argued Mr. Putin is 'playing us all.'
'The president is the last one to figure out that Vladimir Putin doesn't want a peace deal, that he's playing for time, and he's been playing the president, and it's about time the president wakes up and understands that,' said Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee.
The White House declined to answer specific questions about how Mr. Trump would proceed with Mr. Putin or the effectiveness of his approach thus far.
'President Trump has been clear he wants to see a negotiated peace deal,' the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said in statement, which also cast blame on the Biden administration. 'President Trump has also smartly kept all options on the table.'
Until now, Mr. Trump's preferred option appeared to be enticing Mr. Putin. After publicly berating Mr. Zelensky, Mr. Trump sent a personal emissary to Moscow, Steve Witkoff, a real estate developer serving as his special envoy, to negotiate with Mr. Putin. Mr. Witkoff picked up Mr. Trump's rosy language, saying that he spent the meeting developing 'a friendship, a relationship' with Mr. Putin.
After his clash in the Oval Office with Mr. Trump, Mr. Zelensky has refrained from criticizing Mr. Trump's approach, making it difficult for the administration to use him as a scapegoat. Mr. Zelensky this week called for himself, Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin to have a three-way summit, something Mr. Trump said he was willing to participate in if necessary. For now, he said, the administration was focused on speaking with Mr. Putin.
At the same time, Mr. Trump has shown little willingness to send additional foreign aid or weapons to bolster Ukraine.
Mr. Trump at times has approached Mr. Putin as if they have a shared bond.
'Let me tell you, Putin went through a hell of a lot with me,' Mr. Trump said of the Russian president as he sat alongside Mr. Zelensky in the Oval Office, alluding to the investigations into whether the Trump campaign had colluded with what the intelligence agencies determined had been a Russian operation to tilt the 2016 election in Mr. Trump's favor.
This year, Mr. Trump dismantled the Justice Department effort to collect evidence of Russian war crimes in Ukraine for eventual prosecution in international courts.
The result is a more emboldened Mr. Putin with little incentive to end the war, according to foreign policy experts, an outcome they argue Mr. Trump should have been anticipated.
'It does sound like from his various comments that Trump is starting to understand what was clear from the beginning of all of this, which is Russia is the problem here,' said Richard Fontaine, who is the chief executive of the Center for a New American Security and a former Republican national security official. 'Russia is the obstacle, Russia is the reason this war started in the first place, not Ukraine.'
Senator Susan Collins, a Maine Republican who supports taking a more hard-line stance against Russia, welcomed Mr. Trump's 'acknowledgment that Vladimir Putin is a brutal dictator — a fact that Ukrainians have been living with every day since Russia's unprovoked invasion began.'
But Mr. Trump has made threats of economic penalties against Russia before, only to back off. Representative Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said Mr. Trump's recent comments about Mr. Putin represent a 'change of words, not a change of actions.'
'There are things he can do right now — sanctions is one, but also giving the Ukrainians what they need to defend themselves,' Mr. Meeks said. 'He's been played by Putin for a long time. He's been played by Putin from the very beginning.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The stock market is shifting its focus to the Fed from Trump: Morning Brief
President Trump's Truth Social posts aren't moving markets like they used to. At 8:04 a.m. ET Wednesday, the president posted on his social media platform, "OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME." A post like that would've moved markets a month ago, as stocks were swinging on any and every trade-related update from the president. But on Wednesday, futures tied to the major indexes barely budged after Trump's post. Instead, stocks found their direction from economic data. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy At 8:30 a.m. ET, a cooler-than-expected reading of consumer prices for May sent futures higher as investors amped up bets that the Federal Reserve could cut interest rates at least twice this year. This marked the latest sign that markets have moved on from President Trump's trade war dictating every move. Instead, the focus is shifting back to the Federal Reserve and the path of the US economy. "For some period of time, tariffs were the only thing that mattered," Truist co-CIO Keith Lerner told Yahoo Finance on Wednesday. "And I think we're finding out [on Wednesday] a lot of other factors matter." The unwind of peak trade policy uncertainty certainly served as a catalyst to bring markets off their lows in April. But as the S&P 500 (^GSPC) has moved back to near-all-time highs over the past two weeks, strategists like Piper Sandler chief investment strategist Michael Kantrowitz have been highlighting that trade policy updates don't pack the same "oomph" as they did weeks ago. Measures like Bloomberg's Trade Policy Uncertainty Index, for instance, are well off their recent highs. The new reality for investors is that tariffs are here to stay. While the estimated effective tariff rate has fallen from a peak around 25%, it's still hovering near 15%. Wall Street strategists aren't raising their price targets on hopes that the effective tariff rate will return to 2.5%, but are instead betting that the US economy will remain resilient through the tariffs. This puts the focus back on the Fed, the trajectory of economic data, and hopes for more rate cuts from the central bank. Recession calls have faded over the past month as data has shown a labor market that is cooling but not rapidly deteriorating and inflation pressures continue to ease. This pushes the biggest market question back to the central bank and whether it will be able to ease policy this year for "good reasons," like cooling inflation, rather than a worsening labor market. "Combined with the solid May jobs report, the CPI data reduce the chances of a nasty bout of stagflation," Bank of America US economist Stephen Juneau wrote in a note to clients on Wednesday. "That means a lower risk of 'bad' cuts (due to a collapse in the labor market) but increased probability of "good" cuts (solid labor market and slowing inflation)." Whether or not the market's suspicion that things could be looking better for the Fed will be put to the test when Fed Chair Jerome Powell takes the podium on June 18 following the central bank's next policy decision. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
7 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Most US adults say Trump's military parade is not a good use of money, a new poll finds
WASHINGTON (AP) — As Washington prepares for a military parade this weekend to honor the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, a new survey finds that U.S. adults are more likely to approve than disapprove of President Donald Trump's decision to hold the festivities, which officials have said will cost tens of millions of taxpayer dollars. But about 6 in 10 Americans also say that Saturday's parade is 'not a good use' of government money, including the vast majority of people, 78%, who neither approve nor disapprove of the parade overall, according to the poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. The survey found that about 4 in 10 U.S. adults 'somewhat' or 'strongly' approve of the parade, while about 3 in 10 'somewhat' or 'strongly' disapprove. About 3 in 10 neither approve nor disapprove. Carol Sue Quillen, 69, of Live Oak, Florida, said she sees the parade as a way to honor the country's service members, who she said include her late father — an Air Force test pilot killed on a helicopter training mission when she was a baby — and her son-in-law, who serves in the special forces. 'I don't necessarily think we appreciate our military as much as we should,' said Quillen, a retiree who described herself as a Trump supporter — although she said the Republican president's personality 'can be a bit overwhelming.' 'All branches should be celebrated for what they do,' Quillen said. 'That just boosts morale.' Featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, the celebration on Saturday, which also happens to be Trump's birthday, has grown extensively in scope and size since Army planners started working on a festival two years ago to mark the military branch's anniversary. Besides a military parade — which Trump had unsuccessfully pushed for during his first term — there will also be concerts, fireworks, NFL players, fitness competitions and displays all over the National Mall for daylong festivities. The Army expects as many as 200,000 people could attend and says putting on the celebration will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million. Most Republicans, around two-thirds, approve of the event, and a similar share sees it as a good use of money, but about one-third say it's not a good use of government funds. Democrats overwhelmingly say the parade is not a good use of public money, as do independents. And while about half of Democrats disapprove of the parade, about half of independents neither approve nor disapprove, suggesting that they may have heard less about it or have less strong feelings about it generally. Matt Wheeler, 40, called the display 'extremely wasteful' and 'a bit of a performance' that 'just sends a bad message' in terms of the overt military display. 'The only other time I can think about this, it's been in old throwbacks to the USSR or things you see out of North Korea,' said Wheeler, who works in nonprofit fundraising in Los Angeles and described himself as a lifelong Democrat. 'It's a direction this administration is inclined to move in that isn't in line with what I thought our country really was.' Sam Walters, 45, who works in restaurants in Fort Worth, Texas, described himself as a former conservative who now has more libertarian leanings. Walters, who voted for Trump in last year's election, said he appreciated that Trump had 'really kind of stuck to his guns' concerning many of the issues on which he campaigned, assessing his second term so far as 'a pretty good job.' But when it comes to the military parade, Walters said he was concerned about why so much additional funding was needed for military-adjacent activities, given the country's overall defense spending price tag. 'When they're getting hundreds of billions a year for funding, more than for anything else, it seems kind of hard to justify them spending extra for that,' Walters said, referencing the parade. Americans are generally divided on whether the government is devoting too much money to the military. About 3 in 10 say the government is spending 'too much' on the military, while a similar share says the government is spending 'too little.' About 4 in 10 say the government is spending 'about the right amount.' Those numbers are largely unchanged from an AP-NORC poll conducted in January. About 4 in 10 Americans approve of the way Trump is handling his job as president, which is unchanged from an AP-NORC poll conducted last month. Approval of his handling of immigration, at 46%, continues to be higher than approval of his handling of the economy or trade negotiations with other countries, which both landed at 38%. (The poll was conducted from June 5-9.) Andrew Thomsen, 31, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, said that he has voted for Trump in general elections and that he would 'generally approve' of the direction in which the country is headed. Thomsen, who works in education, said that, while he appreciates any intent of the parade and associated events 'to celebrate those who have given of themselves to the service of our protection,' he wasn't a fan of attempts to show off U.S. military might. 'If it is a march of rows and rows of members from our different branches while showboating our tanks, missile systems, and other equipment to show how strong we are, then I don't support that,' he said. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___
7 minutes ago
Innovation takes a backseat at small companies as tariffs become a full-time preoccupation
NEW YORK -- Toy robots that teach children to code. Sneakers made in America. Mold-resistant kitchen gadgets. The three items are among new products that have gotten stuck in the pipeline due to President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies, according to the brand founders behind the stalled items. They say that instead of fostering U.S. innovation, Trump's tariffs are stifling it with extra costs and unexpected work. At Learning Resources in Vernon Hills, Illinois, Made Plus in Annapolis, Maryland, and Dorai Home in Salt Lake City, research and development have taken a backseat to recalculating budgets, negotiating with vendors and tracking shipments in the shifting tariff environment. 'If we don't have enough cash to cover just the restocks of the things that we know we need, do we want to take a risk on this new thing when we don't know how well it will sell yet?' Dorai Home founder Kelsey O'Callaghan said. O'Callaghan started the eco-friendly home goods company with a stone bath mat and now offers about 50 kitchen and bathroom accessories, which are made in China with a non-toxic material that dries quickly. New launches are critical to increasing sales and attracting customers, she said. As Trump increased the tariff on Chinese goods to 20% and as high as 145% before reducing the import tax rate to 30% for 90 days, Dorai Home postponed introducing new merchandise. O'Callaghan said she had to lay off the CEO as well as the head of product development, who helped the company jump on new trends. 'I haven't really put the time or the emphasis on (innovation) because I'm covering too many other people's roles,' she said. The company paused shipments from China in early April but resumed some on a staggered basis after the president's rate reduction. On Wednesday, Trump touted progress in U.S.-China trade talks. With details still sketchy and a deal not finalized, entrepreneurs interviewed by The Associated Press said they viewed the tariffs war as an ongoing threat. The potential stunting of innovation follows an economic slowdown during the coronavirus pandemic, when companies also had to put projects on hold. Some experts think the on-again-off again tariffs may have more enduring consequences because they rewire markets and upend business strategies. 'When executive attention shifts from innovation to regulatory compliance, the innovation pipeline suffers. Companies end up optimizing for the political landscape rather than technological advancement,' economists J. Bradford Jensen, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and Scott J. Wallsten, president of the Technology Policy Institute think tank, wrote in an April blog post. Trump has argued that curtailing foreign imports with tariffs would help revive the nation's diminished manufacturing base. Analysts and various trade groups have warned that fractured trade ties and supply chains may depress R&D activity of U.S. tech and health care companies that rely on international partnerships or foreign suppliers. Small companies, which often drive the innovations that create jobs and economic growth, already are under strain. With fewer people on staff and tighter budgets compared to large corporations, entrepreneurs say they are spending more time on cutting costs, suspending or arranging orders, and deciding how much of their tariff-related costs to charge customers. That means they're spending less time thinking of their next big ideas. Schylling Inc., a Massachusetts company that produces modern versions of Lava lamps, Sea-Monkeys, My Little Pony and other nostalgic toys, has its products made in China. As part of its strategy to account for tariffs, the company put a group of employees on temporary unpaid leave last month to reduce expenses. Marketing director Beth Muehlenkamp said she and other furloughed workers typically would have been planning products for the final months of 2026. But Schylling isn't focusing on designing new products given the unstable trade outlook. 'It's really hard to focus on innovation and creativity when you're consumed with this day-to-day of how we're just going to balance the books and deal with the changing rates,' Muehlenkamp said. Even some companies that do their manufacturing in the U.S. are scaling back investments in new products. Made Plus, a Maryland company that makes athletic shoes at a small factory in the state capital, put a planned golf line on hold because two key components — a foam insole and the tread for the bottom of the shoe — currently are made in China, founder Alan Guyan said. The company customizes its shoes on demand and charges $145 to $200 a pair. The footwear is made from recycled plastic bottles with advanced knitting, 3D printing and computerized stitching techniques. It's looking into getting components from Vietnam instead of China. Embracing new technology is essential to restoring manufacturing capability in the U.S. and competing with Asia, Guyan said. But given ongoing trade frictions, he said he does not want to invest time or money evaluating the latest embroidery and knitting machines, which come from Germany, Italy, China and the U.S. 'We're just battening down the hatches a little bit and just hoping that there's enough influence in the community of footwear that it will somewhat change and get resolved and we can move forward,' he said of the tariff roller coaster. In contrast, many big companies are forging on. Google parent Alphabet confirmed late last month that it still planned to spend $75 billion on capital expenditures this year, with most of the money going toward artificial intelligence technology. Sonia Lapinsky, a managing director at consulting firm AlixPartners, has advised her clients to limit tariff discussions to a small group of executives and to keep their product creation cycles in motion. Businesses have an even greater imperative to come up with attention-grabbing innovations when consumers may be reluctant to open their wallets, she said. Yet smaller companies may struggle to wall off tariff discussions from the rest of the business. Learning Resources CEO Rick Woldenberg said that roughly 25% to 30% of the 350 employees at the educational toy company's headquarters, including product developers, are working at least part-time on tariff-related tasks. The company usually develops 250 different products a year and expects to get half that many off the drawing board for 2026, Woldenberg said. While exploring factories in countries besides China, he said, Learning Resources is delaying the next generation of its interactive robots that help children develop computer programming skills through games and other activities. The family-run business and Woldenberg's other toy business, hand2Mind, are locked in a legal battle with the Trump administration. The jointly owned companies filed a lawsuit accusing the president of exceeding his authority by invoking an emergency powers law to impose tariffs. A federal judge ruled in favor of the two companies last month, and the administration has appealed the decision. Woldenberg said he's ready to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. 'It's a win at the Supreme Court that we need,' he said. 'And so until then, there will be no certainty. Even then, if the government is bound and determined to keep us in an uncertain situation, they'll be able to do that.'
