Bangladesh: Khaleda Zia's backers demand new election
AP image
Tens of thousands of students and youths from a leading Bangladeshi political party rallied in the capital, Dhaka, on Wednesday, calling for a general election in December as discontent grows with the interim government appointed after the ouster of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in August.
Activists from three groups linked to the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, or BNP, headed by former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia gathered on the streets outside its party headquarters, under heightened security.
Wednesday's rally was held after weeks of political tensions after interim leader and Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus threatened to quit and the influential military chief publicly declared his support for an election in December.
Zia, who has been suffering from ill-health for several years, recently returned to Bangladesh after four months of medical treatment in London, putting further pressure on Bangladesh's interim government to call an election.
"We have come here to respond to the call for the unity of the young people. We want democracy, we want election. Next election should be held soon, not later than December," Jahangir Hossain, a student activist, told The Associated Press.
"We are united for democracy."
Hasina, Zia's archrival, has been in exile in India since she was toppled last year by a mass uprising. Her party, the Awami League, was also banned by the interim government.
The BNP's acting chairman, Tarique Rahman, Zia's elder son, addressed the rally later on Wednesday by video link from London, where he is in exile.
Detailing his party's future plans for youth and others, Rahman reiterated his call for the next elections to be held in December and asked his supporters to prepare.
"The polls must be held by December. It has to take place within December," he said.
The interim government has been shaken by a series of protests, including by civil servants, primary school teachers and employees at the national revenue service in recent weeks. Many, including New York-based Human Rights Watch, accuse the government of failures in prosecuting organized crime figures responsible for killing and injuring hundreds of people. The rights group in a statement this month blamed the interim administration for legislative initiatives that undermine fundamental freedoms,
Business bodies have also criticized Yunus over the weakness of the economy and labor unrest.
When Yunus came to power, he promised to make reforms in areas including the election law, women's rights and general administration, but the process has been slow and his critics believe he is using delaying tactics to remain in power.
The 10 months of rule under Yunus also marked a visible rise of influence by Islamists in the Muslim-majority country, which is governed largely by a secular constitution and legal system.
A fatigued military, which has been out of barracks since July last year to maintain law and order, is unhappy because of the delay in returning to democracy.
The BNP recently met with Yunus and reiterated its demand for an election in December, saying that if Yunus quits, the country will find an alternative leader. But Yunus' associates later said he was staying.
Yunus promised to hold an election by June 2026, depending on the extent of reforms it has undertaken. The BNP, which is hopeful of forming the next government with the absence of Hasina's Awami League, said the pace of implementation of reforms should not be an excuse to delay the election and argued that the reform is a continuous process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will you get a refund for Trump tariffs after federal court's ruling? Check details
What did the US court of International trade say? Live Events What happens now? Tariff refunds and Trump team's response (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US President Donald Trump on Thursday received temporary approval to continue collecting tariffs under emergency powers, just a day after a separate court ruled that he had exceeded his authority by imposing sweeping levies on foreign imports. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit allowed the April 2 tariffs to remain in place while the White House appeals the trade court's decision. The New York-based court said the US Constitution gave Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other nations, and that this was not superseded by the president's remit to safeguard the businesses and a group of states had challenged the tariffs that have shaken up the world economic order. Now that two federal courts have ruled that President Trump had overstepped his authority in ordering the tariffs, many have been asking one question: Will they get that money back?On Wednesday, a three-judge panel at the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not grant the president authority to impose his sweeping tariffs or bypass Congress' typical control over economic policy and commerce. The 1977 law was cited by Trump as justification for the majority of his tariffs, most notably those unveiled on "Liberation Day" in early April."The court does not read IEEPA to confer such unbounded authority and sets aside the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder," the ruling read. The decision, made after multiple lawsuits accusing the president of overstepping authority on trade matters, addresses the paused 'reciprocal' tariffs as well as the 10 percent baseline tariff applied worldwide. Additionally, the ruling stops the 'trafficking' tariffs that were imposed on China, Canada, and Mexico in response to the public health crisis linked to fentanyl and other illegal drugs entering the the ruling does not concern the tariffs on autos, auto parts, steel or aluminum, which were brought under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. It allows the president to limit imports of specific goods if these are considered a threat to national security."This will do tremendous damage to Trump's agenda. His whole second term seemed to be DOGE, deport, and (trade) deals," Todd Tucker, trade expert with the New York-based Roosevelt Institute think tank, posted to BlueSky on Thursday. "On trade, in particular, why would any country waste time negotiating to lower his tariffs if he can't impose them in the first place?"The administration has already appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, describing the CIT's ruling as a 'judicial coup.' Meanwhile, economists have highlighted alternative options for the president to pursue his trade agenda despite the court's the ruling is upheld, the administration may be required to refund billions of dollars in import duties that have already been collected. According to the Kobeissi Letter, approximately $10 billion in tariff revenue has been gathered since April 2, though an analysis by Newsweek using official Treasury Department data suggests the amount could be significantly Reinsch, former under secretary of commerce for export administration under the Clinton administration and president of the National Foreign Trade Council from 2001 to 2016, told Newsweek, 'I believe the court's order should prompt CBP to suspend the liquidation of entries moving forward. This would mean that if the ruling is ultimately upheld, importers could reclaim their payments.'Reinsch told Newsweek that, for goods already processed by customs authorities, importers may also be able to sue the administration."The CIT decision ruling the tariffs illegal and vacating them gives importers good grounds to do that," he said, "but the administration will probably resist."The Trump administration has acknowledged its responsibility to issue refunds for certain tariff charges if those duties are later reduced or rescinded. In late April, following a decision that some tariffs should not be cumulative or 'stacked,' Trump signed an executive order stating that the change would apply retroactively to specific tariffs. Refunds for those who had paid increased import taxes would be issued in accordance with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) procedures and applicable stance was also reflected in the administration's announcements regarding exemptions to the reciprocal tariffs. The CBP has since issued guidance outlining how importers can request refunds for duties paid on products that later became exempt or subject to lower tariffs. While importers—usually U.S. companies, though sometimes foreign exporters contractually responsible for duties—may qualify for refunds, William Reinsch told Newsweek that consumers are unlikely to benefit from the Court of International Trade's (CIT) ruling, even if they paid higher prices on imported goods in recent months.'The importers who paid the tariffs might be reimbursed, but they're not required to pass those savings on to consumers—although some might do so voluntarily,' Reinsch said. He added that he was skeptical any consumer-led lawsuits for damages would be successful.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US shuns foreign students? Hong Kong, China, Japan throw doors open
US doesn't want you? No problem, you're welcome in other countries! This is the message from universities worldwide offering a haven to students affected by President Donald Trump's tough measures on academic institutions. Top universities see a chance to woo global talent and boost their academic revenue as the United States pulls up its drawbridge. Hong Kong opens its doors The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) announced on Friday an 'open invitation' to foreign students studying at Harvard or holding confirmed offers. 'As a leading international institution ranked among the top universities globally, HKUST is extending this opportunity to ensure talented students can pursue their educational goals without disruption,' the university said. 'We will provide unconditional offers, streamlined admissions, and academic support to ensure a seamless transition for interested students.' Hong Kong's Chief Executive John Lee told lawmakers in Cantonese on Thursday: 'Hong Kong will provide full support to our universities, giving \[affected students] the best assistance if they wish to come to Hong Kong.' The city currently has 30,000 places for international students at its eight publicly funded universities. China steps in Xi'an Jiaotong University in China has appealed to students at Harvard, singled out in Trump's crackdown, to join them. 'We cordially invite international students from Harvard University to join our academic community. In these times of change, we are honoured to offer you a stable platform for your academic pursuits,' the university said. Opportunities in Japan Osaka University, ranked among Japan's top institutions, is offering tuition fee waivers, research grants, and help with travel arrangements for students and researchers at US institutions wanting to transfer. Japan's Kyoto University and Tokyo University are also exploring similar schemes. Jessica Turner, CEO of Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), a London-based analytics firm that ranks universities globally, said other leading universities in Europe and Asia-Pacific were moving to attract students left in limbo by US policies. 'Germany, France and Ireland are emerging as particularly attractive alternatives in Europe,' she said. 'New Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan, and mainland China are rising in profile.' Switching schools Chinese students have been particularly targeted in Trump's crackdown. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio pledged on Wednesday to 'aggressively' curb visas for Chinese students. More than 275,000 Chinese students are enrolled in US colleges, fuelling revenue for universities and providing a vital pipeline for tech companies. In 2023, international students – 54% from India and China – contributed more than $50 billion to the US economy, according to the US Department of Commerce. India's Ministry of External Affairs says around 330,000 Indian students were in the US in 2023-24, including roughly 788 at Harvard. The crackdown comes as many young people prepare to head to the US in August to secure accommodation and settle in before term begins. Saurabh Arora, founder and CEO of University Living, told Business Standard, 'The United States remains a top choice for Indian students, thanks to its world-class universities, research opportunities, and professional pathways. However, these developments may prompt families to more carefully weigh their options, especially those prioritising policy consistency and transparency.' Varun Singh, managing director at XIPHIAS Immigration, said, 'Indian students must have a backup plan. They can also apply to countries like Canada, the UK, or Australia to keep options open in case of last-minute disruptions.' Arora added, 'International students contribute more than just tuition. They bring global perspectives that enrich classrooms and research. According to our Indian Student Mobility Report 2024, Indian students are projected to spend $17.4 billion annually, including $10.1 billion on academic expenses alone.' Dai, 24, a Chinese student based in Chengdu, had planned to head to the US for her masters but is now weighing up an offer in Britain. 'The various policies (by the US government) were a slap in my face,' she said, speaking to Reuters on the condition of using only her surname. 'I'm thinking about my mental health and it's possible that I indeed change schools.' British and European Union students are also now more wary of applying to US universities, said Tom Moon, deputy head of consultancy at Oxbridge Applications, which helps students with their applications. Universities UK, which promotes British institutions, said it had seen an uptick in applications from US-based students but noted that it was too early to say if this would translate into more enrolments. Reputational risks Ella Rickets, an 18-year-old first-year student at Harvard from Canada, said she was worried about what might happen if Harvard's ability to enrol foreign students was revoked. 'Around the time I was applying to schools, the only university across the Atlantic I considered was Oxford... However, I realised that I would not be able to afford the international tuition and there was no sufficient scholarship or financial aid available,' she said. If forced to transfer, she would most likely apply to the University of Toronto, she told Reuters. QS said visits to its 'Study in America' online guide have dropped by 17.6% in the past year, with interest from India down by more than half. 'Measurable impacts on enrolment typically emerge within six to 18 months. Reputational effects, however, often linger far longer, particularly where visa uncertainty and shifting work rights play into perceptions of risk versus return,' Turner said. Caleb Thompson, a 20-year-old US student at Harvard who lives with eight international scholars, told Reuters, 'If America turns these brilliant and talented students away, they will find other places to work and study.'
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Spurned by Trump? Global universities now wooing foreign students as US administration ratchets up pressure
Universities around the world are stepping in to welcome students affected by US President Donald Trump's recent actions against academic institutions. They are aiming to attract students, researchers and part of the international education market that has long been a major source of revenue for the United States. Osaka University in Japan is offering support for those looking to move from US universities. This includes waiving tuition fees, providing research funding and helping with travel arrangements. 'We see this as a loss for all of humanity,' said Masaru Ishii, dean of the graduate school of medicine at Osaka University, according to Reuters. Other universities in Japan, including Kyoto and Tokyo, are also exploring similar offers. In China, Xi'an Jiaotong University is actively encouraging students from US institutions such as Harvard to consider transferring. It has promised simplified admissions and full support for those who move. Hong Kong's government has told its universities to attract skilled students and researchers from the US as well. The move comes after President Trump's administration made cuts to research funding, limited visas—especially for Chinese students and proposed higher taxes on top universities. Last week, the US government revoked Harvard University's ability to enrol foreign students, although a court later overturned that decision. According to Jessica Turner, head of London-based analytics company Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), other countries are quickly trying to fill the gap. 'Germany, France and Ireland are becoming more attractive options in Europe,' she told Reuters. 'In Asia-Pacific, students are also looking at New Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan and mainland China.' The crackdown has hit Chinese students particularly hard. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the government would 'aggressively' tighten visa rules for Chinese nationals. There are over 275,000 Chinese students currently enrolled in US universities. Their presence contributes significantly to university income and helps feed talent into US tech firms. In 2023, international students—mostly from India and China added more than $50 billion to the US economy, according to the US Department of Commerce. Many students are now rethinking their plans, just as the academic year nears. Dai, a 25-year-old student from Chengdu, told Reuters she may now choose to study in Britain instead of the US. 'The various policies (by the US government) were a slap in my face,' she said, asking to be identified only by her surname. 'I'm thinking about my mental health and it's possible that I indeed change schools.' Students from the UK and the European Union are also becoming more hesitant about studying in the United States. Tom Moon, deputy head of Oxbridge Applications, a consultancy that supports university applicants, said his firm had been contacted by international students in the US who want to transfer to Canada, the UK or Europe. He said a recent survey found that 54% of clients were now 'less likely' to study in the US compared to earlier in the year. British universities have reported more interest from students currently in the US, according to Universities UK, a group that promotes British institutions. But it's still too early to tell whether this will result in more actual enrolments. Some students, like 18-year-old Canadian Ella Ricketts, are worried about the financial cost of transferring. She currently studies at Harvard on a scholarship. 'When I applied, the only university I considered in Europe was Oxford,' she said. 'But I realised I wouldn't be able to afford the international fees and there weren't enough scholarships or aid available.' If she can't stay at Harvard, she said she would probably apply to the University of Toronto. Interest in US universities appears to be dropping. QS reported that visits to its 'Study in America' online guide had fallen by 17.6% over the past year, with interest from India down by more than half. 'Enrolment trends usually take six to 18 months to become clear,' Turner said. 'But reputational damage lasts longer, especially when students are unsure about visas and work opportunities.' Caleb Thompson, a 20-year-old Harvard student from the US, told Reuters that international students bring value to American universities. 'If America turns these brilliant and talented students away, they will find other places to work and study,' he said.
