logo
Fifth of academics do not feel free to teach controversial topics, survey shows

Fifth of academics do not feel free to teach controversial topics, survey shows

Independent8 hours ago

One in five academics on both sides of the political spectrum do not feel free to teach controversial topics, a survey has found as England's higher education watchdog issued guidance on how institutions can protect freedom of speech.
The Office for Students (OfS) gave examples of how universities and colleges should respond to scenarios surrounding freedom of speech in its guidance published on Thursday, including around protests, investigating staff and student complaints and ensuring speakers are not stopped from expressing their ideas or opinions.
It comes as the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, passed under the previous Conservative government in 2023, imposes a duty on institutions to secure and promote freedom of speech so long as it is lawful – a duty which comes into force in August.
In its guidance, the OfS said: 'Higher education providers and constituent institutions should have a high tolerance for all kinds of lawful speech.
'There should be a very strong presumption in favour of permitting lawful speech.'
The guidance stated:
– Academic staff should not be constrained or pressured in their teaching to endorse or reject particular value judgements.– Policies that regulate protests and demonstrations should not restrict these activities because they express or support a particular viewpoint so long as it is legal.– Institutions should not encourage students or staff to report others over lawful expression of a particular point of view.– The starting point of investigating any complaint relating to speech should be that lawful speech will not be punished because of a viewpoint that it expresses.– Providers must take steps to secure freedom of speech for visiting speakers. A speaker who has been invited to speak should not be stopped from doing so on the grounds of their ideas or opinions.
The OfS made clear that it 'will not protect Holocaust denial'.
The guidance was published alongside a survey, conducted on behalf of the watchdog by YouGov, which revealed a fifth of academics (21%) feel 'not very free' or 'not at all free' to discuss challenging or controversial topics in their teaching, with almost a quarter (24%) of those citing fear of physical attack.
The percentage of those who do not feel free to teach controversial topics rises to a third for academics from ethnic minority backgrounds while female academics are more likely than their male counterparts to say they do not feel free discussing such topics in their teaching, research, speaking engagements or on social media.
The survey, undertaken by 1,234 respondents between March 15 and April 19 last year, also showed that the most common topic academics feel restricted in discussing is sex and gender, followed by race and racism.
Twenty-eight per cent of participants said their university has become less tolerant of a range of viewpoints during their tenure.
Just under half (46%) think their university would prioritise freedom of speech over not causing offence, while two-thirds (67%) believe their university would prioritise staff and/or students feeling safe over freedom of speech.
Arif Ahmed, director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at the OfS, said: 'The core mission of universities and colleges is the pursuit of knowledge. Free speech and academic freedom are fundamental to this purpose.
'Students need to know that they can freely share lawful views and opinions, and be prepared to hear a range of views as part of their studies. This includes things that they may find uncomfortable or shocking.
'By being exposed to a diversity of academic thought, students will develop their analytical and critical thinking skills.'
OfS chairman Professor Edward Peck, told MPs earlier this year that the watchdog's role in defending freedom of speech on campuses is 'absolutely crucial'.
' Universities, colleges and other providers should be places where ideas can be explored, examined, challenged, or disagreement can be facilitated. Where new viewpoints can be discovered,' he said.
'It's crucial – without that I don't think we'd have a university sector which would be the envy of the world as it is now. So that's my starting point.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Refugee welcomes safety of Carlisle after fleeing Kenya
Refugee welcomes safety of Carlisle after fleeing Kenya

BBC News

time18 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Refugee welcomes safety of Carlisle after fleeing Kenya

A Kenyan woman who fled her home country because she says she was being persecuted over her sexuality is calling for a greater understanding of the difficulties faced by Waggah came to the UK in 2022 as she feared being arrested and having her child taken from her, having been outed in a country where homosexuality is Waggah, a former government official, is now happily settled in Carlisle but said initial doubts from some people about how genuine her need was made her feel "unwanted".She said seeking refuge was "not a bed of roses", but the UK has allowed her to create "a safe life" with her son. Speaking to BBC Radio Cumbria as part of Refugee Week, which is running until Sunday, she explained the consequences of being outed by someone close to her were for homosexuality can range from fines to imprisonment, while in some cases people have been to the UK on a visitor's visa, she immediately sought asylum through the Home Office and spent several months living in hostel-style accommodation in Warrington before being given 24-hours' notice that she was being moved to her old life, she said: "My life was beautiful. I had everything figured out career-wise, education-wise, family-wise. I was working at the Ministry of the Interior and I had my child."I had to take off because of persecution. Life became unbearable. "The only way out was to seek refuge where human rights are upheld - a safe environment."It took a series of events for me to decide I had to leave." 'Swimming with sharks' Her young son remained with family members in Kenya while Ms Waggah went through the application early 2024 she was notified she had been granted leave to remain in the UK for a period of five years and they are now the difficulty of being split up from her family was not the only obstacle she says she faced, as other asylum seekers viewed her sexuality negatively due to their cultural beliefs while some people in the UK were opposed to immigration. "When I got here, I realised there's actually so much negativity around seeking refuge," she said."People think it's not genuine. That created stress. You feel really unwanted."It felt like being thrown in the ocean, swimming with sharks."We are coming here because you are part of the few enjoying human rights - something we see as a luxury where we come from."It's not a bed of roses. We are not coming to grab anything. "I've been trying to integrate into the community and create a good life for me and the people around me."Help came from various support organisations she contacted, including those helping members of the LGBTQ well as the shop she runs in Carlisle's Botchergate area, she chairs Cumberland Sanctuary Network, a group helping people seeking asylum and hoping to one day be able to return to Kenya, should their laws around homosexuality change, she is now settled in Cumbria."I pray for a day when human rights will be upheld [in Kenya], but I've created a safe life here and Carlisle is my home." Follow BBC Cumbria on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

Europe and Iran will try diplomacy as US weighs joining fight with Israel
Europe and Iran will try diplomacy as US weighs joining fight with Israel

Rhyl Journal

time23 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Europe and Iran will try diplomacy as US weighs joining fight with Israel

The news comes as Israeli airstrikes target Iran's nuclear and military sites and Iran fires back. Europe's push for diplomacy is in sharp contrast to messages from Washington, with US president Donald Trump openly weighing bombing Iran and calling for the unconditional surrender of the Iranian leadership. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi will travel to Geneva for the meetings on Friday, the state-run IRNA news agency reported. European diplomats, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, confirmed the meetings. 'All sides must show restraint, refrain from taking steps which lead to further escalation in the region, and return to diplomacy,' a joint statement issued on Wednesday by France, Germany, the UK and the EU read. The three European countries, commonly referred to as the E3, played an important role in the negotiations over the original 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. But they have repeatedly threatened to reinstate sanctions that were lifted under the deal if Iran does not improve its co-operation with the UN nuclear watchdog. The meeting in Geneva could also provide the three European nations with a unique opportunity to reach out to Iran in what is going to be the first face-to-face meeting between western officials and Tehran since the start of the conflict a week ago. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy is flying to Washington on Thursday to meet US secretary of state Marco Rubio. The US may want to use the UK-controlled base on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean in a potential strike on Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordo but is not believed to have requested to do so yet. 'The EU will continue to contribute to all diplomatic efforts to reduce tensions and to find a lasting solution to the Iranian nuclear issue, which can only be through a negotiated deal,' Anouar El Anouni, a spokesperson for the European Commission, said. 'This is why, an intense outreach activity involving all relevant sides is currently under way to preserve room for diplomacy and create the conditions for a negotiated solution to the Iranian nuclear issue.' Germany's foreign minister has underlined European countries' willingness to talk to Iran about a solution to its nuclear programme, but says there needs to be movement from Tehran. Johann Wadephul said on Wednesday that the three European countries, which were part of Iran's 2015 nuclear agreement, 'still stand ready to negotiate on a solution'. But he added: 'Iran must now move urgently. Iran must take confidence-building and verifiable measures – for example, in that the leadership in Tehran makes it credible that it is not striving for a nuclear weapon.' French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on Thursday that France and Europeans partners were ready to 'resume negotiations' with Iran. Mr Barrot did not confirm the Geneva meeting. The Iranian authorities' message was 'relatively clear: there is a willingness to resume talks, including with the United States, provided that a ceasefire can be reached', Mr Barrot said in a news conference in Paris. 'On our side, there is a willingness to resume negotiations, provided that these negotiations can lead to lasting, substantial steps backward by Iran regarding its nuclear programme, its ballistic programme and its activities to destabilise the region,' Mr Barrot said. Mr Trump has given increasingly pointed warnings about the US joining Israel in striking at Tehran's nuclear programme even as Iran's leader warned anew that the United States would be greeted with stiff retaliation if it attacks. A US official said on Wednesday there were no plans for US involvement in nuclear talks set between senior European diplomats and Iran in Geneva, although that could change. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, also noted that the Europeans have been wanting to play a role in the negotiations for months but have been held back by the US. That position, the official said, may be changing as the hostilities intensify.

Notting Hill Carnival crush risk made me frightened, says Khan
Notting Hill Carnival crush risk made me frightened, says Khan

BBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Notting Hill Carnival crush risk made me frightened, says Khan

The risk of a crowd crush at Notting Hill Carnival "made me frightened", London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan at mayor's question time, he said Carnival had become a "victim of its own success" with it now attracting about two million people across the August bank holiday has backed a call from the event's organisers for urgent funding from the government to help pay for additional public safety measures. The government said it would respond to the request "in due course".Susan Hall, Conservative group leader at City Hall, said the festival was a "disaster waiting to happen", adding: "I think there comes a time when it isn't down to money. It's down to the situation." In his letter to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, which was leaked to the BBC on Wednesday, Carnival chair Ian Comfort said the future of the event could be in doubt without the additional funding to improve crowd an independent public safety review which had been commissioned by Carnival organisers, Sir Sadiq said a "funding gap" had opened due to the added costs of implementing its recommendations. He told the London Assembly: "The carnival has been going since 1966, organised by the community, the second biggest street festival in the world."[At] City Hall, we've been supporting the carnival in my last nine years as mayor in terms of funding for safety and security. We fund the carnival safety and security, to the tune of about £1,000,000."The mayor said the current level of funding currently given by City Hall, Kensington and Chelsea Council and Westminster Council was the "maximum we can financially, and so we would need the government to step in". He said he shared concerns raised by the Metropolitan Police around the risks of "crushing at certain pinch points"."I've seen images of some of the crowds at some parts of the day and watching that made me frightened," the mayor said the UK has expertise in crowd management following the events such as the 1989 Hillsborough tragedy and that any recommendations to reduce such risks at Notting Hill Carnival needed to be implemented. Ms Hall, a former Tory mayoral candidate, questioned whether the government should "fund an event that two people died at last year".Cher Maximen was fatally stabbed in front of her three-year-old daughter at the 2024 event and chef Mussie Imnetu was murdered close to the carnival route. The Met has previously said the measures it takes to manage the crowd limits the ability of police officers to focus on crime prevention. Rachel Alexander, who has performed at Notting Hill Carnival since 2008, called for the funding to be granted."If the government truly values the cultural and economic impact of Carnival then they should invest in its foundation," she told BBC added that while last year was among her best "on the road in terms of crowd control", it can depend on the band and if they could afford "top notch security". "Overall, the event needs better infrastructure to crowd control," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store