Trump brokered ceasefire agreement in contact with Israel, Iran, White House official says
WASHINGTON, June 23 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump brokered a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Iran on Monday in a call to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and with Trump's team in contact with Iranian officials, a senior White House official said.
The official, providing details of the ceasefire on condition of anonymity, said Israel agreed to the ceasefire so long as Iran does not launch fresh attacks. Iran signaled it would abide by the agreement, the official said.
In direct and indirect contact with the Iranians were U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, the official said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
22 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israel-Iran live: Trump claims a 'total ceasefire' has been agreed - but new missiles launched
Explosions have been heard in Tel Aviv overnight - plunging the US president's claims of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran into doubt. Iran's foreign minister has thanked "our brave Armed Forces who remain ready to defend our dear country until their last drop of blood".
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Apocalyptic Iranian 'messiah' theory 'proves the country CANNOT be allowed nuclear weapons': PETER VAN ONSELEN on the deranged belief system of Iran's ayatollahs
It is concerning when any country has nuclear weapons - but it's a threat the world has learned to manage. There's a basic assumption that most nuclear-armed countries refrain from using atomic bombs out of self-preservation. That is, if they fired nuclear warheads, their country would be destroyed. Defence experts call this 'Mutually Assured Destruction'. But what if a state doesn't fear destruction? What if it welcomes it, viewing it as a gateway to divine salvation? That's long been the concern with Iran. And it's not an exaggerated risk. Iran's nuclear ambitions don't exist in a vacuum. They sit within a broader ideological framework that includes what's known as millenarianism: the belief that the world is heading for a final, transformative clash between good and evil. Years ago, as a university academic, I supervised an honours student whose thesis examined millenarianism. It opened my eyes to its impact on politics in the Middle East. In Shia Islam, millenarianism is tied to the return of the Mahdi, or the Hidden Imam. He is a messianic figure who will emerge in an era of chaos to establish a just Islamic order. This isn't just background noise, by the way. Former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad openly embraced this worldview. During his presidency, he not only referred to the Mahdi in speeches, including at the United Nations no less, but his government poured funds into religious preparations for the Mahdi's return. Ahmadinejad believed the apocalypse wasn't to be avoided but welcomed - even hastened. Road upgrades to Jamkaran, home of the mosque linked to the Mahdi's reappearance, were budgeted as national infrastructure. The line between religion and state planning was deliberately blurred. While not every Iranian leader is a millenarian, enough are, and the political system gives them real influence. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which would almost certainly be in control of any Iranian nuclear arsenal were that to eventuate, has leaders who parrot similarly apocalyptic language. General Hossein Salami, the head of the IRGC - before he was recently killed by Israeli strikes - had repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map. He described Israel as a 'cancerous tumour' that must be 'destroyed'. There's not a lot of room to move with such rhetoric. It can't be treated as a metaphorical flourish. It is a statement of intent, rooted in a belief that conflict with Israel is religiously sacred. This is why Israel acts the way it does - from targeted assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists to cyber sabotage and the recent airstrikes in Iran. The moves by the US and Israel this past fortnight aren't just about national defence. They're about preventing the unimaginable: a nuclear-armed state run by people who don't fear a true Armageddon. The US under Trump hit three separate nuclear-linked sites, facilities buried deep underground, because no other country has the capability to strike those types of bunkers effectively. The message was clear: diplomacy has its limits when dealing with a state like Iran, which in many ways is a much more dangerous actor than somewhere like North Korea precisely because of its millenarian tendencies. While Iran has always claimed its nuclear program is civilian, about energy not weapons, that claim doesn't pass the sniff test. Places like Fordow, the nuclear fortress buried under mountains, were deliberately shielded from airstrikes precisely because it's not an energy enrichment site. It's designed for survivability in the event of war, which only makes sense if the goal is to build a weapon, not a civilian reactor. The US has now apparently taken care of that. Iran getting the bomb poses other risks. If it was armed with nuclear weapons, we would see nuclear proliferation across the Middle East. If Iran got the bomb, Saudi Arabia would want one (it has said as much), and potentially, so would Turkey. Egypt might seek to build one too. Some in the West forget, or wilfully ignore, that Iran is not the underdog in the Middle East. It is the regional bully. Far from being a besieged victim of aggression Iran is the primary source of destabilisation right across the region. As a Shia theocracy in a predominantly Sunni region Iran's rise is deeply feared by Sunni Arab states. Its nuclear ambitions are seen as part of its ideological mission to reshape the Middle East in its image. It's a revolutionary regime, where parts of the leadership believe global chaos isn't to be avoided, it's to be embraced, because it brings the end times closer. If that doesn't justify aggressive containment measures, what does?
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Israel-Iran conflict disrupts Middle East flights
Airlines have cancelled or rerouted flights to and from the Middle East, as the conflict between Israel and Iran Doha airport, a critical hub in the region, halted operations on Monday, after Iran fired missiles at a US military base in the country, in what it said was retaliation for American strikes against its nuclear sites over the Dubai airport, the world's busiest air terminal, flights were temporarily paused, with officials warning passengers to expect further delays and cancellationsUS President Donald Trump has announced a "complete and total" ceasefire between Israel and Iran on social media but both countries have yet to confirm it. More than a dozen airlines have cancelled flights to parts of the region after tension mounted in recent India said it was stopping all operations to the Middle East and flights to North America's east coast and Airlines announced the cancellation of flights from Tokyo to Doha. Rob Liddle, a member of BBC staff stranded in Doha en route to Dhaka in Bangladesh, said late on Monday that hundreds of grounded passengers were trying to get food or bedding down in the airport lounge while they waited to hear when flights would resume. Aviation consultant Tim Atkinson said situations like this tended to upend the rules, with a knock-on impact on ordinary passengers and crew who would now be stuck in Doha temporarily."The closure of Qatar airspace will cause enormous disruption, not just to flights," he said."There is a fundamental interconnected nature of air travel. So when disruption begins, it spreads almost like wildfire."In recent years the Gulf region has become one of the world's most important flight airports in Dubai and Doha commonly see nearly 400,000 travellers pass through on a daily 80,000 passengers travel through the UAE's other air hub, Abu Dhabi, every many, these airports are a stopover point for longhaul flights between Europe and Asia or Australia. These airspace closures and cancellations are likely to cause significant immediate disruption, with a knock-on impact across and beyond the region, according to aviation expert John Strickland."Delays to flights because of following longer routings means more cost to the airlines because they are burning more fuel." Mr Strickland said."It can lead to an airline saying an aircraft is not available when it should be, and in particular crew, because crew are limited by legal rest requirements."Russian and Ukrainian airspace has already been closed to most airlines due to the conflict there, diverting even more flights to the Middle East, where they were now being "squeezed" into even smaller spaces, he conflict in the Middle East has already led to the closure of huge swathes of crucial airspace. Since Israel launched its offensive, commercial flights have avoided flying over Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and 1,400 flights pass through this key corridor between Asia and Europe - but they now either have to fly north over Turkey or south over Saudi Arabia.
