No refund for couple sick on five-star holiday as Tui says they may have eaten too much
No refund for couple sick on five-star holiday as Tui says they may have eaten too much
David and Julia Lofts say their 10-day trip to a five-star resort in Cape Verde was ruined by diarrhea and vomiting hours after enjoying salmon, salad, and a mojito at the hotel restaurant
David and Julia Lofts says their dream holiday was ruined by illness
(Image: Kennedy News/Julia Lofts )
A couple claim their romantic 5-star holiday was ruined by horrific 'food poisoning' - only for TUI to refuse a refund as they could not prove they had not simply 'overindulged'. David and Julia Lofts jetted off to the five-star resort in Cape Verde for a 10-day holiday to celebrate his 65th birthday in January.
But the couple said they started experiencing sickness and diarrhoea three hours after eating at one of the hotel's restaurants - and claim to have only eaten within the hotel prior to becoming ill. Julia says they spent the entire night on the toilet and had to ask other hotel guests for help the next morning, as their room phone was reportedly not working.
The 52-year-old said the couple had to be taken to the local medical centre in an ambulance and had to use wheelchairs as stomach aches left them unable to walk. The couple reportedly had emergency treatment with IV fluids and were given anti- diarrhoea and anti-sickness tablets, forking out £713 on medical bills
But when they raised this with the resort manager, Julia claims he dismissed the complaints as he said they were the only ones affected.anti-diarrhoea.
The couple say they had to use wheelchairs as their stomach aches left them unable to walk
(Image: Kennedy News/Julia Lofts )
Article continues below
After returning home on January 23, Julia said she researched the hotel on social media and found other holidaymakers reporting they had food poisoning at the resort. TUI responded to their complaint by saying the food poisoning could not be proven without a stool sample or photos showing they were ill - which Julia believes is preposterous as they were so poorly.
The holiday giant also told them there was 'no causal link' between their symptoms and any action from the hotel. TUI said people can get ill for many reasons on holiday and suggested that it could have been due to the climate, humidity, 'stress' or even 'overindulgence'.
Julia, from Royal Tunbridge Wells, said: "It was a really nice restaurant on the beach, we had salmon, some basic salads and one mojito each. We went to bed and I started being sick. My husband started being sick soon after and we spent all night vomiting. We couldn't sleep because we just went back and forth to the toilet, it was horrendous. "In the morning I had to walk outside and knock on people's doors to ask for help because the phone wasn't working. An English-speaking couple stopped and went to reception for us. They called an ambulance and got wheelchairs. We couldn't walk at all from the pain, it was awful. We had to pay over £700 to get an IV emergency treatment and medication. "We made complaints to management and they said they expected more people to be ill in order to do something about it. That was quite shocking to hear. The manager took no responsibility and said it doesn't happen very often. When we came home, I investigated online and found a whole group on Facebook with similar situations. "I sent a complaint to TUI and they refused to deal with it all together. They said it could have been stress, overindulgence - and that was just taking the mick. They said we should have provided stool samples. At what point would we do that? You can't have solid evidence at that time. "They asked if we took any pictures. I wasn't going to take pictures of me sitting on the toilet and throwing up. When they got back suggesting it could be anything, it was like emotional abuse. To suggest the experience is not true or that we're making it up was very hard to hear. We don't drink too much, we don't eat too much, we exercise, we look after ourselves." The couple said they had to cancel their planned activities such as scuba-diving and snorkelling as they were too ill, while they were nervous to eat at the resort and had to fork out money on eating out. Although David felt better after the treatment, Julia claims her symptoms lasted up until her return to the UK. After experiencing diarrhoea for seven days after the holiday, Julia said she went to her GP where she was given the all clear, but it took her two more weeks to recover. Julia said: "We were nervous to eat there after and had to go out and spend extra money on taxis and restaurants. We had to cancel our plans, we couldn't go scuba diving or snorkelling. It just properly ruined the holiday. It's not cheap, it's quite a lot of money, we don't earn that much and then all the money we spent at the medical centre. "It's really disappointing, I try not to be upset about this but it was heartbreaking. It was a special occasion, it's his 65th, it's a big day. It's something we were looking forward to, it's a huge holiday for us. I still had diarrhoea seven days after that and went to the GP surgery. Thankfully there was no salmonella and I had to buy some probiotic drinks. "All of that was taken away. It wasn't just a few days ruined, for me it took a month to get better. We went to an all inclusive hotel to be safe and protected. I would never go anywhere with TUI again. If anything goes wrong you're on your own." TUI confirmed their customer service team had been in direct contact with the customer but they were unable to help as the customer has not been able to provide any evidence of the cause of illness.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Expanding missile threats and airspace closures are straining airlines
NEW DELHI, June 4 (Reuters) - Proliferating conflict zones are an increasing burden on airline operations and profitability, executives say, as carriers grapple with missiles and drones, airspace closures, location spoofing and the shoot-down of another passenger flight. Airlines are racking up costs and losing market share from cancelled flights and expensive re-routings, often at short notice. The aviation industry, which prides itself on its safety performance, is investing more in data and security planning. "Flight planning in this kind of environment is extremely difficult … The airline industry thrives on predictability, and the absence of this will always drive greater cost," said Guy Murray, who leads aviation security at European carrier TUI Airline ( opens new tab. With increasing airspace closures around Russia and Ukraine, throughout the Middle East, between India and Pakistan and in parts of Africa, airlines are left with fewer route options. "Compared to five years ago, more than half of the countries being overflown on a typical Europe-Asia flight would now need to be carefully reviewed before each flight," said Mark Zee, founder of OPSGROUP, a membership-based organisation that shares flight risk information. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the Middle East since October 2023 led to commercial aviation sharing the skies with short-notice barrages of drones and missiles across major flight paths – some of which were reportedly close enough to be seen by pilots and passengers. Russian airports, including in Moscow, are now regularly shut down for brief periods due to drone activity, while interference with navigation systems, known as GPS spoofing or jamming, is surging around political fault lines worldwide. When hostilities broke out between India and Pakistan last month, the neighbours blocked each other's aircraft from their respective airspace. "Airspace should not be used as a retaliatory tool, but it is," Nick Careen, International Air Transport Association (IATA) senior vice president for operations, safety and security, told reporters at the airline body's annual meeting in New Delhi on Tuesday. Isidre Porqueras, chief operating officer at Indian carrier IndiGo ( opens new tab, said the recent diversions were undoing efforts to reduce emissions and increase airline efficiencies. Finances aside, civil aviation's worst-case scenario is a plane being hit, accidentally or intentionally, by weaponry. In December, an Azerbaijan Airlines flight crashed in Kazakhstan, killing 38 people. The plane was accidentally shot down by Russian air defences, according to Azerbaijan's president and Reuters sources. In October, a cargo plane was shot down in Sudan, killing five people. Six commercial aircraft have been shot down, with three near-misses since 2001, according to aviation risk consultancy Osprey Flight Solutions. Governments need to share information more effectively to keep civil aviation secure as conflict zones proliferate, IATA Director General Willie Walsh said this week. Safety statistics used by the commercial aviation industry show a steady decline in accidents over the past two decades, but these do not include security-related incidents such as being hit by weaponry. IATA said in February that accidents and incidents related to conflict zones were a top concern for aviation safety requiring urgent global coordination. Each airline decides where to travel based on a patchwork of government notices, security advisers, and information-sharing between carriers and states, leading to divergent policies. The closure of Russian airspace to most Western carriers since the outbreak of war in Ukraine in 2022 put them at a cost disadvantage compared to airlines from places like China, India and the Middle East that continue to take shorter northern routes that need less fuel and fewer crew. Shifting risk calculations mean Singapore Airlines' ( opens new tab flight SQ326 from Singapore to Amsterdam has used three different routes into Europe in just over a year, Flightradar24 tracking data shows. When reciprocal missile and drone attacks broke out between Iran and Israel in April 2024, it started crossing previously avoided Afghanistan instead of Iran. Last month, its route shifted again to avoid Pakistan's airspace as conflict escalated between India and Pakistan. Flight SQ326 now reaches Europe via the Persian Gulf and Iraq. Singapore Airlines did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Pilots and flight attendants are also worried about how the patchwork of shifting risk might impact their safety. "IATA says airlines should decide if it's safe to fly over conflict zones, not regulators. But history shows commercial pressures can cloud those decisions," said Paul Reuter, vice president of the European Cockpit Association, which represents pilots. Flight crew typically have the right to refuse a trip due to concerns about airspace, whether over weather or conflict zones, IATA security head Careen said. "Most airlines, in fact, I would say the vast majority of them, do not want crew on an aircraft if they don't feel comfortable flying," he said.
The National
41 minutes ago
- The National
NHS must be protected from politicians who seek privatisation
They now have issues with the complexity of the tax systems. Reform UK are playing on this angst. With both of these issues visible now, Reform UK PLC are positioning themselves as the 'cutting the red tape' party. This is the party with the same leader that formed Ukip and told us that the EU was robbing us and stopping us doing what we wanted and need to do to unleash our industry, enterprise and become a global entity. This is the same party that morphed into Leave and Brexit then Reform UK. By most accounts, Brexit has been a disaster and has cost our UK economy some £100 billion each year since leaving the EU. Most people view these huge numbers as 'interesting but they don't really affect me'. What we all need to be aware of is that the Reform Party and unfortunately the UK Labour Party also have eyes on privatising the NHS, but what does this mean for us, the not-so-wealthy? First, you will need to understand the term deductible. Private health insurance is a bit like insuring your car. If you insure your car, you will be asked where you live and you will be asked what you are willing to pay out of your own pocket if you make a claim against the insurance policy. If you make a claim, the next year's premium could/probably will increase. This is a deductible. If you need heart surgery in the US, it can be $200,000 to $300,000. I have seen a quote that a UK heart operation could cost £78,000, and a new hip could cost £15,000, as examples. If you took on a deductible of 20% then you must pay this before the surgery. For a hip operation, it would be £3000 before the surgeon even starts, and you will still need to pay the monthly direct debit. For a heart operation, the deductible grows to £16,000. This is very costly for most people. This is what Nigel Farage's party, and possibly Wes Streeting of the UK Labour Party, want to implement if they get a chance. In the UK, we don't have people declaring themselves bankrupt, but the US reports 500,000 bankruptcies every year, when people cannot afford to pay the hospital bill the deductible did not cover. We need to support our NHS by not voting for parties that are intent on privatisation. Alistair Ballantyne Angus I MUST agree with John Baird's criticism of the SNP strategy (?) of trying to convince Labour voters to vote SNP in order to keep Reform out. It's misplaced effort and draws attention to Reform. Where's independence in the campaign? Has it been mentioned? This is reminiscent of Sturgeon's Brexit campaign efforts, trying to persuade the English to vote against leaving the EU. It seems the only people who talk about independence these days are the Unionists. The SNP having morphed into a devolution party, with independence only held out like a fly paper to catch voters. Too many MSPs seem comfortable with the Holyrood set-up and are unwilling to upset the apple cart. Or should that be gravy train? Drew Reid Falkirk THE letter from Jim Stamper, in Friday's National was like a breath of fresh air on the independence debate. Jim's observations and interpretations are spot on, when in relation to the petition, number PE2135 currently on the Scottish Parliament website, he points out, 'this would clearly increase the democratic rights of the people of Scotland to make decisions on how their country is run, including the rights to hold referendums'. The power to accept this petition, and to put it into Scots law, is in the hands of the Scottish Parliament. The Tories want to reject it which they have made clear, but what do the SNP and the other 'independence-supporting' MSPs intend to do? Could they possibly reject the demand to give the Scottish people their full UN human rights entitlement? If they did this to curry favour with the UK Government, could they still pretend to be independence supporters? Paddy McCarthy Beith, North Ayrshire IAIN Wilson (Letters, June 2) writes that the Scottish Parliament should prioritise debating homelessness and the NHS, over its own toilets, and I completely agree. But the 'debate' about access to toilets last month was actually questions to Christine Grahame MSP, as representative of the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body (SPCB). It took less than 15 minutes, tacked on to the end of the day's other parliamentary business, at 5pm. No other business was delayed or affected at all. SPCB questions happen from time to time – they take up in total far less than 1% of parliamentary chamber time. They are the way that MSPs oversee the effective operation of the Parliament as an organisation, and especially the welfare of their staff. No business or other organisation can afford to neglect those things, and it seems reasonable, in fact necessary, to me for MSPs to spend that very small amount of time ensuring they are done properly. Tim Hopkins Edinburgh IT is whispered that Reform UK are looking for a Scottish leader. They expect to do well in the coming by-election and have high hopes for 2026 Holyrood elections. This may be exactly what Douglas Ross is up to. He has been acting up in Holyrood for a few months now. Getting his face out there? John Dunn via
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
UK boost as TUI launches new flights from tiny airport to European hotspot
After witnessing its passenger numbers plummet, a struggling UK airport is bolstering its offerings after launching a new TUI flight which will whizz passengers over to a popular EU island once a week A tiny UK airport is slated for a much-needed boost after unveiling an exciting new route to an insatiably popular EU island. Last month (Tuesday, May 27) TUI 's inaugural full flight took off from Southampton Airport and whizzed passengers over to the sunniest and largest hotspot in the Balearics, Palma De Mallorca. It marks the first departure to the Spanish city in 15 years, and coincides with the highly-anticipated Marella Cruises' summer program. Southampton Airport only handled 863,000 passengers last year, falling short of its 1.1 million forecast. It marks a harsh decline since pre-pandemic levels, when the hub welcomed more than 1.7 million passengers annually. However, the new flight - which will operate weekly until the end of September - may give the airport the boost it so desperately needs. "Our passengers were hugely excited when the return of TUI was first announced last year," said Gavin Williams of Southampton Airport. "It was fantastic to see our passengers on the first service which provides an exciting new travel opportunity for the Central South region. We look forward to welcoming more passengers on this flight as we continue to expand and enhance our travel options." TUI's Karen Switzer also welcomed the news, stating the airline was 'extremely excited' for Brits to be reconnected with the 'vibrant corner of the world that is Palma'. "We understand how important it is for customers to have access to flights from their local airports, and this latest addition brings the number of regional airports that TUI Airways fly from to 24," she added. TUI's Southampton to Palma flight, which takes two hours and 15 minutes, departs every Tuesday throughout the summer months at 2pm, landing in sunny Spain at 5.15pm - just in time for your evening meal. On the return, passengers will leave Palma at 10.55am and arrive home at 12.10pm. If you're flexible with dates, you can grab return fares for as little as £90 in July. Palma has a range of accommodation types to suit all kinds of budgets. For example, a week's stay (Tuesday, July 1-8) at the New Art Hostel - Albergue Juvenil will only set you back £715. This is based on two people staying in a Male-only dorm. However, if you're after a week of pure luxury, check out Hotel Be Live Adults Only Marivent. The beachside hotel boasts outdoor swimming pools, a gym, Finnish sauna, and breakfast buffet. A double room costs £1,475 on the exact same nights. *Prices based on Skyscanner and listings at the time of writing. Marella Cruises sailings will include Mediterranean itineraries aboard Marella Discovery, 'Cosmopolitan Classics' departing from Palma, Majorca and calling at Cagliari, Sardinia, Naples (for Pompeii and Capri), Italy, Piombino (for Siena and Pisa), Italy, Villefranche (for Monaco and Nice, France, Palamos, Spain and finishing up once again in Palma.
