logo
Maine must prepare for storms and climate change, lawmakers told

Maine must prepare for storms and climate change, lawmakers told

Yahoo28-02-2025

Feb. 28—Last year's back-to-back winter storms whalloped Lincoln County, washing out roads in Boothbay and Bremen, collapsing wharves in Southport and Bristol, smashing the bell tower at Pemaquid Point, and leaving thousands of people in the dark for up to a week.
"While impactful, last winter's storms are not unique," said Emily Rabbe, executive director of the Lincoln County Regional Planning Commission. "Lincoln County has been experiencing stronger and more frequent flooding, winter storms, and wind events for the past several years."
Since then, the commission has helped write 26 grants for more than $5 million in local and regional resiliency projects. The communities know how to become more resilient, but they need help to do it, Rabbe said Thursday at a legislative hearing on a $34.5 million storm and climate resiliency package.
Introduced by Gov. Janet Mills, the bipartisan bill would create a $15 million grant program to help Maine residents prepare their homes for storms, increase state funding for disaster relief and preparedness, and create a $10 million revolving loan fund to help communities qualify for federal disaster relief.
The legislation, LD 1, adopts recommendations in the first report of the Infrastructure Rebuilding and Resilience Commission that Mills created last year following a series of winter storms that killed four people and caused an estimated $90 million in damage to Maine's public infrastructure.
The proposal would be funded by existing fees collected from insurance companies, most of whom are from out of state, and not from the general fund of the state budget, according to Bob Carey, the state's insurance superintendent. As emergency legislation, it would take effect immediately upon enactment.
The legislation would provide $15 million in one-time funding to create a home resiliency program that would provide grants of up to $15,000 to Mainers to perform targeted improvements like strengthening roofs and flood-proofing basements to minimize storm damage and insurance losses.
The Bureau of Insurance has documented an increase in homeowners' insurance non-renewal notices, Carey told lawmakers. About 75% of the non-renewals are because of substandard roofs, he said. A $15,000 grant wouldn't cover the entire cost of a new roof, he said, but it would certainly help.
Participants would likely pay lower premiums, he said, while fewer roof claims may lower costs for all.
In other states with similar programs, including Alabama, Florida, and California, even people who do not qualify for resiliency grants have begun storm-proofing their properties. In Alabama, 10,000 people have fortified their roofs with state funds — but another 40,000 people who did not participate did the same.
"The spillover effect may be as important as the direct benefit of this program," Carey told lawmakers.
While the bill was generally applauded, some supporters urged lawmakers to give grant preference to low-income Mainers who can't afford improvements or to move out of harm's way, and to certify program contractors in all parts of Maine so even rural applicants can benefit from the program.
"A means test is critical to directing funds where they are most needed and can have the greatest impact to mitigating future risk," said Rebecca Graham, a legislative advocate at Maine Municipal Association, who submitted testimony but took no position on the bill.
Carey told lawmakers he supports a proposed amendment to offer tiered grant awards based on income or financial means. This type of structure is similar to the tiered grants provided by Efficiency Maine for heat pumps and other home improvements.
Some insurance industry representatives spoke out against the way the bill would be funded. While 70% of the fees that would be used to fund the program are collected from out-of-state agents and brokers, a lot of Maine insurance agents and brokers are also licensed in other states.
What happens if Florida and Massachusetts raise the licensing fees charged to Maine agents licensed in their state to fund their own storm and climate programs, asked Daniel Bernier, a lobbyist for the Maine Insurance Agents Association.
Local officials voiced support for the bill's investment of $10 million in the state disaster recovery fund to help municipalities seek federal disaster funds, improve emergency communication systems, and beef up staffing at the Maine Emergency Management Agency.
Old Orchard Beach Fire Chief John Gilboy said the record high tides and storm surge of the 2023-24 winter storms destroyed sand dunes, cut off whole areas of town, forced air boat rescues and evacuations of residents who had never been flooded before.
"We need to work towards improving infrastructure, making all communities more resilient as the storms we see are increasing in severity," Gilboy said. We need to "increase emergency communication, increase public awareness and education and increase the capabilities of public safety."
Small towns like Jay, which was hit by three federal disasters in 2023 that caused $4 million in damages, lack the staffing and financial reserves to respond and recover. Many must take out loans. Jay is still waiting for federal reimbursement for a $1.6 million storm recovery project, officials said.
'These FEMA disasters were among the most stressful periods of my tenure, which says a lot given that we've seen a paper mill explosion and ultimately the closure of two mills in Jay," said Jay Town Manager Shiloh LaFreniere. "Knowing that the state is there in support is huge."
The legislation would launch the Flood-Ready Maine Program to modernize data on flood risk and make it publicly available online, improve communication to communities, businesses and residents about flood risk, and work to increase the number of flood insurance policies in use in Maine.
Only 1.3% of Mainers participate in the national flood insurance program. The national average of 3.3%.
All property owners should know their property risks, but access to such address-level risk data has typically only been available to large insurers and those who subscribe to high-level forecasting services, said Cape Elizabeth real estate broker Julia Bassett Schwerin. This bill would change that.
"I know the value of the Maine coastline," Bassett Schwerin said. "It's up to all of us to understand the risk from flooding and other catastrophic damage and manage it to avoid having to recover and rebuild over and over and watch our insurance premiums soar."
Last year, Maine approved $60 million to help local communities and businesses recover from severe back-to-back-to-back winter storms, which the state said was the single largest investment in storm recovery in Maine history.
While the winter storms caused destructive river flooding, coastal properties and beaches also took a beating from storm surges and waves. And coastal storms are expected to become more destructive as sea levels continue to rise and reshape the Maine coast due to climate change.
The Gulf of Maine has risen about 7.5 inches over the last century, with about half of that happening since the 1990s. The Maine Climate Council projects seas will rise another 1.1 to 3.2 feet by 2050 and 3 to 9.3 feet by 2100, depending on how much we curb global emissions rates.
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What the public lands fight means for Maine
What the public lands fight means for Maine

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

What the public lands fight means for Maine

Maine is about as far away as you can get from the bulk of America's federal public lands, the vast majority of which are concentrated in a dozen states west of the Mississippi River — a result of the nation's history of westward expansion. Whereas states like Utah, Nevada and Alaska are each between 60 and 80 percent federal land, just 1.5 percent of Maine is federally managed. But Mainers have as much of a stake in the current political fight over the future of federal resources as anyone else. Public lands, waters and wildlife are part of our birthright as American citizens, a public domain that we all collectively own, regardless of our proximity. Over the last five months, the Trump administration has worked to slash funding for federal land management agencies and conservation programs; open up more public lands to fossil fuel drilling, mining and other extractive development; and lay off or force out thousands of park rangers and other civil servants. The words 'protect' and 'conserve' have been largely absent from the administration's vocabulary, as it prioritizes dismantling environmental safeguards in its quest for so-called 'energy dominance.' Meanwhile, Congress is considering federal land sales to help offset Trump's tax and spending cuts — a contentious proposal that House lawmakers ultimately yanked from that chamber's version of Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful' budget package, but that Senate Republicans resurrected this week. During a recent congressional hearing to outline the Trump administration's budget proposal for fiscal year 2026, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum invoked Maine and other East Coast states to argue that Western states with large amounts of federal land are at an economic disadvantage. 'We've got states in the East, including the 13 states that were part of the original colonies, none of them have more than 2 percent of federal land,' he said. 'I don't think any of them would stand up and say, 'We need more federal ownership in our states.'' Burgum's statement is both inaccurate — nine of the original 13 states have more than 2 percent federal land, with New Hampshire on top at 14 percent — and casts aside the history of the nation's East-to-West settlement. David Feinman, vice president of government affairs at the Conservation Lands Foundation, said it also seemed designed to pit regions of the country against each other. 'Americans across the political spectrum in every state support public land protections, whether it's Maine or Utah or anywhere else,' Feinman said. 'Regardless of the secretary's narratives, these lands do belong to everybody.' Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine), Feinman and others The Maine Monitor spoke to encouraged Mainers to pay close attention to the battle taking place in Washington, as it will likely impact everything from visits to national parks to our ability to stave off the worst impacts of climate change. 'It does impact all of us,' Pingree said. 'If there's one thing that the changing climate has taught us it's that we're all in this together, that overheating in one part of the country impacts another part of the country, that our weather is all impacted, that we need land to sequester carbon. There's just a whole variety of reasons that we need undeveloped lands in this country wherever it may be.' Pingree worries what the current turmoil inside the National Park Service and other federal agencies will mean not only for federally managed sites in Maine, including Acadia National Park and Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument, but parks, monuments and wildlife refuges around the country. Since Trump took office, NPS has lost 13 percent of its workforce, according to the National Parks Conservation Association, and the administration's budget proposal calls for slashing more than $1 billion from NPS next year, approximately one-third of its entire operating budget. Current staffing shortages have already created numerous operational issues and public safety concerns at America's national parks. 'It's a real crime what they've done to these precious jewels,' Pingree said. Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) echoed that sentiment during a budget hearing on Tuesday, telling Burgum 'it's hard for me to understand how gutting 'America's best idea' isn't America's worst idea.' Trump's agenda also threatens to stymie future conservation, outdoor recreation and forest protection efforts here at home. Among other things, Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, froze $68 million in funding for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Legacy Program, which focuses on protecting private forest lands through conservation easements and land acquisitions. The program is one of several funded through the Land and Water Conservation Fund, or LWCF, which uses offshore oil and gas drilling royalties to buy land and establish and protect parks, trails, wildlife refuges, forests and important wildlife habitat. In Maine, the FLP has been key to safeguarding more than 700,000 acres of forested land, according to the LWCF Coalition. As for LWCF as a whole, Trump's 2026 budget request proposes diverting $387 million from the fund to pay for deferred maintenance at the National Park Service and other federal land management agencies — a move that Amy Lindholm, director of federal affairs at the Appalachian Mountain Club and a national coordinator at the LWCF Coalition, said would 'rob Peter to pay Paul.' Over the last five decades, Maine has received more than $220 million in LWCF funding, which has helped boost protection for places like Acadia and the Appalachian National Scenic Trail as well as supported hundreds of conservation projects via state grants. 'It's really important that we have these tools fully funded, because there's always going to be developers with deep pockets who want to acquire pieces of land,' Lindholm said. 'We just have to balance that out a little bit with access for the local community and for growing and diversifying rural economies.' Andy Cutko, director of the Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands, said cuts to federal conservation funding could impede progress toward Maine's goal of conserving 30 percent of its land by 2030, part of Maine's four-year climate plan. 'Programs like the Land and Water Conservation Fund and Forest Legacy protect forests, strengthen the forest products sector, support rural communities, and expand outdoor recreation,' Cutko said in an email. 'They are vital tools for protecting the natural resources that are the essence of Maine.' In the absence of more public land — just 7 percent of Maine is owned by federal, state and local governments — a network of land trusts has become a model for conservation and for meeting the growing demand for outdoor access in the Pine Tree State. More than 80 land trusts have collectively safeguarded nearly three million acres, almost 15 percent of all land in the state, primarily through conservation easements on private land, according to a recent report from the Maine Land Trust Network. 'Apart from what's happening out West, the Maine model works,' said Jeff Romano, public policy director at Maine Coast Heritage Trust, which runs the Maine Land Trust Network. 'Hopefully we can push back some of these cuts to agencies and conservation programs because we do rely on that collaboration with those entities to do some good work here.' At the end of the day, public demand for open space and protecting nature isn't going anywhere, Lindholm said. 'Everybody loves the outdoors,' she said. 'It's the thing that brings people together across the political spectrum.'

Maine House gives initial approval to ban on untraceable 'ghost guns'
Maine House gives initial approval to ban on untraceable 'ghost guns'

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Maine House gives initial approval to ban on untraceable 'ghost guns'

Jun. 12—AUGUSTA — Lawmakers in the Maine House of Representatives gave initial approval Thursday to a bill prohibiting undetectable firearms and requiring serial numbers on firearms. The House advanced the bill on a 77-70 party-line vote, with Democrats in support and Republicans opposed. Similar bills have failed in previous Legislatures, but the latest push comes in the aftermath of the high-profile killing of a health care CEO in downtown Manhattan last year involving a so-called ghost gun. Ghost guns are untraceable firearms, often assembled at home or by mail-order kit, that are not marked with serial numbers. The bill advances to the Senate and also faces an additional House vote. And while the initial vote was in its favor, it also will need to compete with other bills for funding since it currently includes a fiscal note of $1.9 million over two years for new positions in the Maine State Police and Department of Public Safety, and associated technology costs. Rep. Sam Zager, D-Portland, the bill's sponsor, said during Thursday's floor debate that requiring serial numbers and prohibiting untraceable firearms is critical for enhancing public safety and giving law enforcement the ability to trace weapons used in crimes. "Passing LD 1126 will ensure our law enforcement agencies are fully equipped to investigate and trace guns found at crime scenes while upholding the constitutional rights of all Mainers," Zager said. Zager, a physician, said firearms are the leading cause of death for children and youth in the United States, and firearms contribute daily to the deaths of Americans across the country. Unserialized firearms are increasingly used by domestic terrorists and arms traffickers because they can't be traced, he said, while serial numbers are critical in helping law enforcement with investigations. "Each time a law enforcement officer in this state, and this country, performs a trace, they are essentially attesting to the notion that serialization aids in their investigation," Zager said. Federal law requires that firearms manufactured for sale in the United States have serial numbers stamped on them and it's a crime to obliterate or obscure a manufacturer's serial number. The U.S. Supreme Court also ruled in March to uphold Biden administration rules that guns built from at-home kits be treated like other firearms by requiring companies to add serial numbers, run background checks and verify that buyers are 21 or older. Still, the rise of the at-home kits and 3D printing to assemble firearms have made it easier for the rules to be skirted and for untraceable firearms to be circulated. Fifteen states have banned ghost guns, including Massachusetts and Rhode Island, according to gun safety organization Everytown for Gun Safety. "Recent advances in technology and materials have created a dangerous loophole," Zager said. "In Maine, law enforcement agencies are contending with an increasing prevalence of unserialized firearms ... assembled by individuals at home, not firearms manufacturers." The use of ghost guns in crimes has increased by more than 1,000% since 2017, according to a U.S. Department of Justice study released in 2023. One high-profile recent example was when 26-year-old Luigi Mangione allegedly used a ghost gun to kill UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. The bill would make it a Class C crime to manufacture or sell an untraceable firearm and a Class D crime to intentionally or knowingly possess an untraceable firearm. Firearms that meet a federal definition of curio or relic would be excluded. Rep. Jim White, R-Guilford, a firearms dealer and gun shop owner, was among Republican lawmakers who spoke against the proposal Thursday. White said that tracing firearms can be a complicated and lengthy process and a serial number is not a guarantee a crime will be solved or the owner of the weapon will be tracked down. "There is no protection given by serializing a firearm," White said. "All it is is a method to assist law enforcement in tracing the history of that firearm. And there's no guarantee of an outcome that's not a dead end." The ban on untraceable firearms was among several firearms bills lawmakers took up this spring. On Thursday, the House also rejected a bill to prohibit the possession of large-capacity ammunition feeding devices and a bill that would allow municipalities to prohibit firearms in municipal buildings and voting places. They gave initial approval to a bill to facilitate firearms hold agreements through which people could temporarily store their firearms with a gun shop. That bill was sponsored by Rep. Stephen Wood, R-Greene, but also gained the support of some Democrats Thursday. It was introduced with the intent of helping veterans and first responders going through a mental health crisis, though a similar Democrat-sponsored bill sought to facilitate the agreements for other groups, such as people selling their homes or those who have visiting family and thus wouldn't want firearms around. "I support this bill," said Rep. Adam Lee, D-Auburn. "I think it's a good bipartisan solution for folks who are in crisis and want to temporarily relinquish their firearms, but don't want to do so by court order. I think we should give every opportunity for those folks in crisis to avoid the potential devastating outcomes of remaining with those firearms." Copy the Story Link

Advocates make case for red flag ballot measure in last-minute legislative hearing
Advocates make case for red flag ballot measure in last-minute legislative hearing

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Advocates make case for red flag ballot measure in last-minute legislative hearing

Nacole Palmer (right), executive director of the Maine Gun Safety Coalition, sits with Arthur Barnard (center), who held a picture of his son, Lewiston shooting victim Arthur Strout, during a public hearing before the Maine Legislature's Judiciary Committee for a red flag citizen's initiative on June 11, 2025. (Photo by Eesha Pendharkar/ Maine Morning Star) Dozens of people gathered at the State House Wednesday to discuss stricter gun safety regulations that Mainers will be voting on this November. After a failed legislative attempt last year to implement a so-called 'red flag law' — which would allow courts to temporarily take guns away from people perceived as a threat by law enforcement or their family members — a citizen-led initiative collected more than 80,000 signatures to put a referendum question on the ballot for this year. But before the question goes to voters in November, the Legislature is required to hold a public hearing for the referendum: LD 1378. Wednesday's meeting came after Republicans repeatedly questioned why a public hearing was never scheduled for the proposal. After pleas from Republicans, last-minute hearing scheduled for red flag initiative Red flag laws, formally known as extreme risk protection orders, are active in twenty-one states, including four states in New England. Maine is the only state with a yellow flag law. The referendum proposes allowing a family member, household member or law enforcement officer to file a petition, along with an affidavit of facts, for an extreme risk protection order if someone is suspected of posing a significant danger of causing physical injury to themself or another person. That protection order would prohibit the person from purchasing, possessing or controlling a 'dangerous weapon.' A court would be required to schedule a hearing within 14 days of when the petition is filed. If the court finds the individual does pose a significant risk of causing physical injury, the court must issue an order prohibiting them from purchasing, possessing or receiving a dangerous weapon for up to one year. The person would need to immediately surrender any dangerous weapons in their possession to law enforcement. A person could request to have the order terminated if they can show evidence that they no longer pose a risk of physical harm. Conversely, an order can also be renewed for up to one additional year. At the hearing, about 30 speakers highlighted flaws in Maine's current 'yellow flag law,' which allows law enforcement to take guns away from people after a mental health evaluation. Family members of people who died in the October 2023 mass shooting in Lewiston as well as doctors, psychiatrists and school teachers all pointed to issues with the yellow flag law, arguing that stricter regulations could have helped prevent the shooting. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'I get regular calls from people who are desperate for help when a loved one or others are in crisis, who are dangerous and harmful firearms that are not getting help from the police. I have to explain to them that there's nothing that I can do as an individual on this kind of advocacy,' said Nacole Palmer, executive director of the Maine Gun Safety Coalition, which collected signatures for the citizen initiative. 'But there's something that we can all do together this November by passing this proven, life-saving law that empowers family members and will help keep our schools and communities safe,' she added. Mental health professionals and doctors from several national organizations said the current law's required mental health evaluation weakens it. 'Ultimately, family members know their loved ones best. They are first to notice when something is wrong and when someone they love is wrong,' said Madeleine DesFosses, speaking on behalf of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Maine Medical Association. 'We need to ensure that an efficient process is available, and that makes it easier to get dangerous weapons away from someone.' Critics of the bill included members of law enforcement, who said the yellow flag law is working well and that allowing courts to directly take away weapons makes enforcement of the red flag law more dangerous for law enforcement officers who have to confiscate them. Some opponents also argued that it's unconstitutional and lacks due process. If the referendum passes, it would not replace Maine's current law, but would be an additional tool police or the general public can use to temporarily confiscate weapons. But Lt. Michael Johnston of the Maine State Police argued that having two different avenues is unnecessary, since the current system is working well, as evidenced by the increase in frequency of use. Maine medical community backs proposed red flag law 'I think this is going to be a heightened risk of service for law enforcement and for the respondent,' Johnston said, testifying in opposition to the referendum. 'You get diminished returns if you have similar processes in place, people aren't sure which ones to take advantage of.' The public hearing included lengthy discussion on the effectiveness and barriers of the current law. Since the Lewiston shooting, the use of the yellow flag law has skyrocketed. Law enforcement used it more times in the first two months of this year than the first three years after its passing in 2020. So far, there have been 881 total applications, 800 of which were after the October 2023 shooting, according to Maine State Police. Johnston said he is only aware of two times that state police were unsuccessful in temporarily confiscating weapons under the yellow flag law rules. But that use remains high because the yellow flag law 'failed so spectacularly that 18 Mainers were slaughtered,' Palmer said. 'And the people of Maine, including our law enforcement, are so desperate to make sure that kind of thing doesn't happen again.' Johnston said 'Lewiston was a wake up call for everyone,' and that law enforcement is already focused on better training and implementation of the yellow flag law. Adding another tool that doesn't work as well to the tool chest, he said, 'can detract or diminish from what's already working.' Similar legislation was introduced last session, but it died without a vote in the full Senate or House of Representatives. That bill was sponsored by Sen. Rachel Talbot Ross (D-Cumberland), who at the time was speaker of the House. A lengthy budget debate on the last day of the session upended plans for the chambers to take it up. At the time, the measure was particularly popular among Maine's medical community which praised the proposal for its efforts to address the public health crisis of gun violence without stigmatizing mental illness. Like last year's proposal, the red flag bill heard Wednesday is up against the legislative clock. Though lawmakers are no longer beholden to the statutory adjournment date of June 18, given that they are technically in a special session, leaders have indicated they intend to stick with that deadline. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store