
Scotland must have a referendum on assisted dying
In a similar dynamic, it will soon become socially unacceptable to seek end of life care. That is what inevitably will happen. Everyone should seriously think about that. Is this what happens when politicians of a certain ideology gain control of the legislature? Was this proposal in any manifesto? Is the decision really democratic? Surely an issue of this nature and seriousness should have been subject to a much more rigorous test? A referendum on the issue should perhaps have been called so that the people can decide following full rigour and debate.
Hopefully those who are for assisted suicide or are unsure could be persuaded in the right direction when all the ramifications are put before them. Once this issue comes back to Holyrood, can MSPs at least please consider a referendum in Scotland?
Gerard Quinn, Bishopbriggs.
Read more letters
Why SNP could not favour Falkirk
I note that the foreign owner of Alexander Dennis claims that the Scottish Government (SG) is not helping his business ("FM told he 'did nothing' over bus jobs", The Herald, June 20). This is despite the Scottish taxpayer having handed out £90 million worth of loans in order to assist him in that endeavour. He seems to think that the SG should go further and direct any orders for buses to his Falkirk base in order to keep it afloat.
Unfortunately the SG is not a procuring agency. It merely provides finance for a net zero emissions bus fund from which the bus companies can draw money when ordering buses. Under Scottish Public Finance Manual rules the SG can provide the finance, but it cannot become involved in the actual procurement process. This is to avoid accusations of favouring one company over another for political reasons. Ministers can still say they would like to see a Scottish company get the order, but they can't get involved in that decision.
By contrast Manchester City Council runs its own buses and as such it is therefore free to choose where to place any bus orders. Indeed Andy Burnham's administration ordered 116 buses from China before opting to add a further 160 from Falkirk. That's somewhat surprising given that Mr Burnham was claiming to be a strong supporter of the Falkirk plant only last week.
You could argue that the SG could simply make it a stipulation to buy Scottish as a condition of any funding provision. But that would have put it in breach of both the UK Internal Market and the World Trade Organisation rules which prohibit discriminating on the grounds of nationality when awarding a contract which has public funding.
In any case most bus companies in Scotland are privately owned. As such they have a legal duty to their shareholders to procure buses in a way that benefits the former rather than politicians. Lothian Buses is one exception as it is publicly owned. However when it buys buses it is governed by local authority "best value" rules which means it is obliged to buy from the company which represents best value for the local taxpayer.
These rules were first set out in the 2003 Scottish Local Government Act which was enacted by a Scottish Labour First Minister. It's somewhat ironic therefore to find Anas Sarwar now demanding that the SG find a means to bypass the very rules that his own party introduced.
Robert Menzies, Falkirk.
Excluding pupils the best option
Rebecca McQuillan reports that the NASUWT welcomes Scottish Government guidance on behaviour in schools, since this prescribes "an escalating set of consequences including things like detention and, when absolutely necessary, exclusion" ("If Scots classrooms are in chaos, teachers need the option of excluding worst-behaved pupils", The Herald, June 19.)
I remember when in Rothesay Academy in the late 1970s, a girl who was guilty of persistent truancy had to suffer an escalating set of consequences. First she had to write "lines". ("Ah quite like dain' them.") Then came detention, which no doubt prevented her from playing solo flute at the chamber orchestra rehearsals.
These measures having failed to affect any improvement in behaviour, she was finally excluded from school. I'll bet that made her think twice about playing truant again.
Robin Dow, Rothesay.
Fergus Ewing (Image: PA)
An example for Fergus Ewing
I refer to the plans of Fergus Ewing to run as an independent candidate for Inverness and Nairn at the next elections for Holyrood ("Veteran MSP Ewing makes Branchform jibe at SNP after independent election bid", The Herald June 23). He has felt that at times he has not been able to balance the needs of his constituents with those of the SNP.
I would take this opportunity to wish him the same success as The Herald's occasional correspondent Dennis Canavan with regard to standing as an independent for the Scottish Parliament. Mr Canavan was of course an MP from 1974 to 1999. He was rejected as an official Labour candidate for the 1999 elections to Holyrood. However, undaunted, he stood as an independent and was as a result expelled from the Labour Party. He secured almost 55% of the vote in the 1999 election, the highest of any MSP in that election. He retired as an MSP before the 2007 elections.
Mr Canavan served his constituents well and their esteem was clearly confirmed when he chose to stand as an independent.
I believe that Fergus Ewing will succeed with his intention of being elected as an independent. The Scottish Parliament would be a lesser place without him. I have no doubt he applied his mind to what his mum might have thought.
Ian W Thomson, Lenzie.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
25 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Fake Scottish tea fraudster who scammed luxury hotels out of £500k jailed for three years
Thomas Robinson, 55, conned his high-profile clients out of over £500,000. A fake tea fraudster who conned luxury hotels and retailers into buying 'Scottish-grown' tea and made more than £550,000 has been jailed for three-and-a-half years. Thomas Robinson, 55, was locked up at Stirling Sheriff Court on Wednesday. The crook, of Dunkeld, made more than half a million pound from the scam, where he told clients including Edinburgh's Balmoral Hotel that he grew the tea plants at his Perthshire estate. However, in reality, Robinson bought the tea from wholesalers in Italy for €3 before repackaging the plants and reselling them to retailers for five times the original cost. Robinson's web of lies were laid bare during his trial. The court heard how Robinson pretended to customers he had used innovative growing techniques - including a biodegradable polymer - to cultivate premium Camellia Sinensis tea plants. He then fraudulently sold the plants to high-profile clients in the hospitality sector, including Edinburgh's Balmoral Hotel and the Dorchester Hotel in London, as well as retailers between January 2014 and February 2019. He also told prospective growers, clients and the wider public that he had sold the tea to Kensington Palace. Robinson even claimed his tea was a favourite of the late Queen Elizabeth. His scheme was unravelled following an investigation by Food Standards Scotland into his activities. It discovered he was actually importing the plants for three Euros each – around £2.50 - and was collecting them from a mailbox in Glasgow. He was then selling them for £12.50 each while insisting to clients and retailers that they were a sound financial investment. Robinson also fabricated his academic status by falsely claiming he had qualifications in agronomy and agriculture and had obtained awards for his tea from industry bodies. The jury found him guilty of two charges of being concerned in a fraudulent scheme. He will now be subject to confiscation proceedings under Proceeds of Crime legislation to recover monies illegally obtained. Ron McNaughton, Head of the Scottish Food Crime and Incidents Unit (SFCIU) at Food Standards Scotland, said: 'We welcome today's sentencing as a clear signal that food fraud is a serious crime with serious consequences. 'A three-and-a-half year custodial sentence reflects the scale and impact of Mr Robinson's deception. His actions caused real financial and reputational harm to individuals, businesses and a developing sector of genuine Scottish tea producers. 'This outcome is the result of a complex and painstaking investigation involving a dedicated team at FSS and the cooperation of partner agencies and key witnesses. 'It demonstrates that those who set out to mislead consumers and defraud businesses will be held accountable. 'Food fraud undermines consumer trust and damages the integrity of Scotland's globally respected food and drink sector. We remain committed to detecting and disrupting criminal activity of this nature.'

South Wales Argus
27 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Fraudster who conned luxury brands into buying fake Scottish tea jailed
Thomas Robinson, 55, claimed to have cultivated the tea at his Perthshire estate using innovative techniques, but in reality it was bought from wholesalers and grown outside of Scotland. Operating under the business name The Wee Tea Plantation, Robinson fraudulently sold the tea to high-profile clients in the hospitality sector between January 2014 and February 2019. Representatives of the Balmoral Hotel, the Dorchester Hotel and a company acting on behalf of Fortnum & Mason were among those tricked by the fraudster, who had claimed to have sold tea to customers including Kensington Palace. A Food Standards Scotland (FSS) investigation found Robinson also misled genuine Scottish tea growers by selling them plants under the false pretence they were a unique, locally-grown variety. On May 25, he was found guilty of two counts of fraud to a value of almost £553,000 after a trial at Falkirk Sheriff Court, which followed an investigation by FSS. Robinson, also known as Tam O'Braan and Thomas O'Brien, tried to bolster his credibility by fabricating academic qualifications and industry awards. On Wednesday, Robinson was sentenced at Stirling Sheriff Court. Hours earlier, his lawyer withdrew from the case. Representing himself, Robinson begged for 'compassion' as he appeared by videolink from HMP Low Moss, wearing a green sweatshirt. Sheriff Keith O'Mahony refused a bid to defer sentence and said it was in the public interest that it went ahead, as Robinson was 'articulate' enough to represent himself. Tea plants growing on Thomas Robinson's estate (COPFS/PA) Robinson, who told the court he has four children and attends church, claimed he awoke every morning in his cell plagued with guilt about the 'reputational damage' caused to genuine Scottish tea growers. 'I've had time to wrestle with this over sleepless nights, coming to realise how wrong and stupid I've been,' he told the court. 'The damage this has on all concerned, the stigma of misleading others… I should have been much more transparent and owned up to the situation. Hubris and arrogance made me believe I did my best. 'The method by which you could grow tea in Scotland, something I was told you couldn't do… I didn't know the best, I didn't act as I should have. I go to church, I'm perfectly aware that a sin is not only to do something, but also not to do the right thing. 'The shame of that hangs over me every morning every time I wake up in my cell. Central to that guilt I'm responsible for reputational damage of those involved and reputational damage of growing tea in Scotland. 'It was a scheme I received support from the Scottish Government. I solemnly hope my actions have not detracted from the success which can be achieved for people who want to grow tea in Scotland. I can only offer my sincere apologies if my actions have besmirched that capability.' He told the court he had experienced 'suicidal emotions' due to guilt and had been 'too ashamed to explain' to his four children. Robinson claimed he would not reoffend and had learnt from his actions, 'not only from shock of my conviction but truthful acceptance of what I have done'. He added: 'I solemnly would ask that the above is taken into consideration not as an excuse but an acceptance of the serious nature of my actions and inactions, and I throw myself on the mercy of the court for your compassion.' Sheriff O'Mahony said the jury had 'generally rejected' Robinson's evidence, and the charges spanned five years and totalled £552,988. He added: 'By any measure these convictions must be regarded as significant. Mr O'Brien demonstrated significant planning, he was persistent, he repeatedly made false statements. 'These charges are not victimless, witness after witness gave evidence and said they would not have had the transaction if they had known. They were convinced on false pretences to hand over significant sums of money.' Robinson put his head in his hands as the three-and-a-half year sentence was handed down. Helen Nisbet, procurator fiscal for Tayside, Central and Fife, said: 'Individuals, businesses, and genuine Scottish tea growers suffered financial and reputational harm as a consequence of Robinson's deceit. 'But thanks to partnership working between Food Standards Scotland, Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, he has been brought to account for his crimes. 'We are committed to tackling financial crime of this kind.' Ron McNaughton, of FSS, said: 'We welcome today's sentencing as a clear signal that food fraud is a serious crime with serious consequences. 'A three-and-a-half year custodial sentence reflects the scale and impact of Mr Robinson's deception. His actions caused real financial and reputational harm to individuals, businesses and a developing sector of genuine Scottish tea producers. 'This outcome is the result of a complex and painstaking investigation involving a dedicated team at FSS and the co-operation of partner agencies and key witnesses. 'It demonstrates that those who set out to mislead consumers and defraud businesses will be held accountable. 'Food fraud undermines consumer trust and damages the integrity of Scotland's globally respected food and drink sector. We remain committed to detecting and disrupting criminal activity of this nature.'

Western Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Fraudster who conned luxury brands into buying fake Scottish tea jailed
Thomas Robinson, 55, claimed to have cultivated the tea at his Perthshire estate using innovative techniques, but in reality it was bought from wholesalers and grown outside of Scotland. Operating under the business name The Wee Tea Plantation, Robinson fraudulently sold the tea to high-profile clients in the hospitality sector between January 2014 and February 2019. Representatives of the Balmoral Hotel, the Dorchester Hotel and a company acting on behalf of Fortnum & Mason were among those tricked by the fraudster, who had claimed to have sold tea to customers including Kensington Palace. A Food Standards Scotland (FSS) investigation found Robinson also misled genuine Scottish tea growers by selling them plants under the false pretence they were a unique, locally-grown variety. On May 25, he was found guilty of two counts of fraud to a value of almost £553,000 after a trial at Falkirk Sheriff Court, which followed an investigation by FSS. Robinson, also known as Tam O'Braan and Thomas O'Brien, tried to bolster his credibility by fabricating academic qualifications and industry awards. On Wednesday, Robinson was sentenced at Stirling Sheriff Court. Hours earlier, his lawyer withdrew from the case. Representing himself, Robinson begged for 'compassion' as he appeared by videolink from HMP Low Moss, wearing a green sweatshirt. Sheriff Keith O'Mahony refused a bid to defer sentence and said it was in the public interest that it went ahead, as Robinson was 'articulate' enough to represent himself. Tea plants growing on Thomas Robinson's estate (COPFS/PA) Robinson, who told the court he has four children and attends church, claimed he awoke every morning in his cell plagued with guilt about the 'reputational damage' caused to genuine Scottish tea growers. 'I've had time to wrestle with this over sleepless nights, coming to realise how wrong and stupid I've been,' he told the court. 'The damage this has on all concerned, the stigma of misleading others… I should have been much more transparent and owned up to the situation. Hubris and arrogance made me believe I did my best. 'The method by which you could grow tea in Scotland, something I was told you couldn't do… I didn't know the best, I didn't act as I should have. I go to church, I'm perfectly aware that a sin is not only to do something, but also not to do the right thing. 'The shame of that hangs over me every morning every time I wake up in my cell. Central to that guilt I'm responsible for reputational damage of those involved and reputational damage of growing tea in Scotland. 'It was a scheme I received support from the Scottish Government. I solemnly hope my actions have not detracted from the success which can be achieved for people who want to grow tea in Scotland. I can only offer my sincere apologies if my actions have besmirched that capability.' He told the court he had experienced 'suicidal emotions' due to guilt and had been 'too ashamed to explain' to his four children. Robinson claimed he would not reoffend and had learnt from his actions, 'not only from shock of my conviction but truthful acceptance of what I have done'. He added: 'I solemnly would ask that the above is taken into consideration not as an excuse but an acceptance of the serious nature of my actions and inactions, and I throw myself on the mercy of the court for your compassion.' Sheriff O'Mahony said the jury had 'generally rejected' Robinson's evidence, and the charges spanned five years and totalled £552,988. He added: 'By any measure these convictions must be regarded as significant. Mr O'Brien demonstrated significant planning, he was persistent, he repeatedly made false statements. 'These charges are not victimless, witness after witness gave evidence and said they would not have had the transaction if they had known. They were convinced on false pretences to hand over significant sums of money.' Robinson put his head in his hands as the three-and-a-half year sentence was handed down. Helen Nisbet, procurator fiscal for Tayside, Central and Fife, said: 'Individuals, businesses, and genuine Scottish tea growers suffered financial and reputational harm as a consequence of Robinson's deceit. 'But thanks to partnership working between Food Standards Scotland, Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, he has been brought to account for his crimes. 'We are committed to tackling financial crime of this kind.' Ron McNaughton, of FSS, said: 'We welcome today's sentencing as a clear signal that food fraud is a serious crime with serious consequences. 'A three-and-a-half year custodial sentence reflects the scale and impact of Mr Robinson's deception. His actions caused real financial and reputational harm to individuals, businesses and a developing sector of genuine Scottish tea producers. 'This outcome is the result of a complex and painstaking investigation involving a dedicated team at FSS and the co-operation of partner agencies and key witnesses. 'It demonstrates that those who set out to mislead consumers and defraud businesses will be held accountable. 'Food fraud undermines consumer trust and damages the integrity of Scotland's globally respected food and drink sector. We remain committed to detecting and disrupting criminal activity of this nature.'