Australia's first wind farm to be shut down
Australia's first commercial wind farm is set to be decommissioned, as the company who owns it reveals it is no longer 'financially viable'.
Renewable energy company Pacific Blue announced the Codrington wind farm, located near Port Fairy in southwest Victoria, is set to be decommissioned, as it is 'approaching the end of its technical life'.
'At this stage, Pacific Blue is not pursuing a repowering option for Codrington,' a statement from the company said. The Codrington Farm is 'approaching the end of its technical life'. NewsWire/Nadir Kinani Credit: News Corp Australia
'The site's grid connection would require significant upgrades and today's turbine siting requirements would preclude the installation of latest generation turbines which can have an output of over five times that of Codrington's current turbines.
'The company's analysis considered the limitations of space on the site and necessary upgrades to modernise the grid equipment, ultimately resolving that a new project at Codrington is not financially viable for this location.'
The wind farm has been in operation for 25 years, and was officially opened by former Victorian Premier Steve Bracks in July 2001.
The Codrington site was described by Pacific Blue as 'close to perfect', as it was placed to receive the full force of winds blowing off the Southern Ocean.
Each year, the wind farm generated enough electricity to supply the equivalent of 10,000 Victorian homes and prevented 49,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions – the equivalent of taking more than 17,000 cars off the roads, according to Pacific Blue. Codrington wind farm is located near Port Fairy in southwest Victoria. Supplied Credit: News Corp Australia
More than $9m was injected into the regional economy during construction and development and about 30 jobs were created with local companies contracted to install roads, foundations, towers, transformers and cabling to make the farm operational.
Pacific Blue said they were 'deeply committed' to engaging with the communities surrounding Codrington and in southwest Victoria throughout the decommissioning process.
'The company also needs to account for the needs and preferences of the site's landholders, whom it has successfully partnered with for over 25 years,' a statement said.
'Pacific Blue is grateful for their continued support on this project.'
Pacific Blue also said it is exploring how the 14 wind turbines, which have a hub height of 50m and blade tip height of 81m, could be recycled.
'The company is focused on delivering a thorough, respectful, and industry-leading decommissioning of Codrington Wind Farm, which includes exploring recycling options for as much of the site's infrastructure as possible while upholding safety and environmental expectations,' a statement said.
The company confirmed the turbines will be dismantled by crane. The wind farm turbines will be dismantled by crane. Supplied. Credit: News Limited Pacific Blue is engaging with industry leaders to explore how best to recycle the blades. NewsWire/Nadir Kinani Credit: News Corp Australia
The company is engaging with industry leaders to explore how best to recycle the blades, with options successfully executed overseas in the past including transforming them into surf boards and 'glamping pods'.
Last year, Queensland MP Mick de Brenni was spotted wearing sneakers made from recycled wind turbine blades.
In a statement, Pacific Blue revealed broader community and stakeholder engagement was planned for the second half of 2025.
Permit conditions require the decommissioning to be completed within 12 months of the wind farm ceasing to generate electricity.
Pacific Blue operates wind farms, hydro plants and solar farms across Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and NSW.
Codrington's decommission prompted calls to the Federal government from the Smart Energy Council to mandate a national product stewardship scheme so 'smart energy solutions don't become tomorrow's waste crisis'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Whitlam-esque': Zoe McKenzie blasts Labor's divisive tax hike on super accounts, slams Tasmanian opposition for triggering early election
Victorian Liberal MP Zoe McKenzie has lambasted Labor for continuing to advance its plan to hike taxes on superannuation accounts and impose levies on unrealised gains whilst hammering the Tasmanian opposition for sending punters to a winter election. Labor's plan to raise taxes on superannuation accounts over $3 million to 30 per cent and to target unrealised capital gains has sent shockwaves throughout the political and business arena, with financial doyens accusing the government of discarding decades of precedent. The Coalition was previously in talks with the Albanese government to revise certain elements of the legislation, chiefly the concept of taxing unrealised gains, however shadow Treasurer Ted O'Brien officially confirmed on Thursday the LNP would oppose the bill. Yet, former Reserve Bank board members Donald McGauchie and Roger Corbett, in addition to a litany of major Liberal Party donors, have pressed the Coalition to remain at the negotiating table and to secure what it deems crucial exemptions for illiquid assets including farms and small businesses. Ms McKenzie, an outspoken moderate who holds one of the Liberal's last outer-suburban seats, railed against the policy, but did not address if the Coalition would resume talks with Labor to modify the legislation. 'I think this is a terrible piece of policy and a terrible precedent for the future, Labor is effectively saying that they will tax money in your pocket, and you do not yet have this money,' she told Sky News on Saturday. The Member for Flinders echoed criticism from industry magnates in relation to the controversial concept of taxing unrealised gains, stating, 'you may have it in the future, you may not have it in the future, but you will be taxed on it'. 'You may incur a loss in the figure, and you won't get that tax back and that's the principle that we must fight here, because once it's started, it could go anywhere,' indicating that the tax could be extended to a range of other assets including real estate and stocks. 'This is a devilish tax and should be fought by the Coalition parties most stridently, this government is very good at speaking liberal-light in terms of their economic narrative, but it is utterly Whitlam-esque in terms of its impact on the Australian economy'. While the Coalition has vowed to fight the legislation, the bill is expected to pass both houses of parliament unopposed, with the Greens joining with Labor in the Senate despite lobbying for the policy to be levied on those with super accounts over $2 million. 'The point is they're going after money no one yet has, these are paper profits, these are family businesses, these are farms held in super funds that people may well have to liquidate just to pass a putative profit that may not exist when finally realised in years to come," Ms McKenzie said. 'They will need the Greens support in the Senate and as you know, the Greens are pushing to lower that threshold from three million to two million. So, it gives the Australian people a very clear indication of what might happen when Labor and the Greens run the show for the next three years'. The shadow assistant minister then turned her attention to the ongoing political chaos in Tasmania. Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion in parliament on Thursday, with the speaker casting the deciding vote, resulting in the state heading to it's second election in as little as 14 months. Ms McKenzie savaged Tasmanian Labor leader Dean Winter for sending the state to a snap winter poll and argued the opposition parties had collectively torpedoed a popularly elected government. 'I think the Tasmanian people would be very disappointed with what's happened this week, basically holding an elected government hostage, so it looks like they will be going back to a mid-winter election. We've all done them and they're horrendous," she said. 'I'm sure the people of Tasmania will not be grateful for being dragged back to the polls so soon after a federal election and indeed just 14 months after a state election." Tasmanians will have to wait until next Tuesday to find out when they will return to the polls, with the parliament scrambling to draft emergency legislation to fund government services of which are due to be tabled on the same day. Independent MPs including Craig Garland have called on the beleaguered Premier to resign, with Mr Rockliff guaranteeing he would not sell off state-owned assets to pay down debt if he won the election, of which served as a key factor in sparking the political row.
Sydney Morning Herald
13 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The 85 times Melbourne home sellers wanted more money than they told you
At least 85 Melbourne home sellers set their reserve price higher than the top of the advertised price range on their properties in 2024 – sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars more, analysis of auctions attended or contacted by this masthead in a year-long auction tracking project shows. The practice is not illegal, but experts say it causes frustration and mistrust among buyers and discredits the real estate industry. Analysis shows it is routine even in a weak housing market and more than two years after the Victorian government launched a $3.8 million taskforce to crack down on underquoting. It can also leave buyers paying for building and pest inspections for homes they never had a chance of buying. Agents in Victoria must list properties for sale with a single price or a quoted price range, which must be based on their estimated selling price for the home or what they know the seller is willing to accept for a property. In an auction, the amount a seller will accept is known as a reserve price. It is common for sellers to decide on a reserve on auction day. If an agent knows the reserve during the sale campaign, they must not advertise the home with a guide lower than that price. The analysis tracked 337 auctions over the course of 2024, often seven to eight a week, chosen because they were likely to be interesting and competitive. Price guide, vendor expectations and sale price were recorded. Although property sale prices are public on settlement, there is no public database of reserve prices, which leaves it to agents to choose whether to disclose this. The biggest gap between a price guide and a reserve at an auction recorded by this masthead was $460,000 for a prestige Toorak sale. In Avondale Heights, a vendor's reserve was $165,000 above the top of the guide and another in Doncaster East was $100,000 over.
The Age
13 hours ago
- The Age
The 85 times Melbourne home sellers wanted more money than they told you
At least 85 Melbourne home sellers set their reserve price higher than the top of the advertised price range on their properties in 2024 – sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars more, analysis of auctions attended or contacted by this masthead in a year-long auction tracking project shows. The practice is not illegal, but experts say it causes frustration and mistrust among buyers and discredits the real estate industry. Analysis shows it is routine even in a weak housing market and more than two years after the Victorian government launched a $3.8 million taskforce to crack down on underquoting. It can also leave buyers paying for building and pest inspections for homes they never had a chance of buying. Agents in Victoria must list properties for sale with a single price or a quoted price range, which must be based on their estimated selling price for the home or what they know the seller is willing to accept for a property. In an auction, the amount a seller will accept is known as a reserve price. It is common for sellers to decide on a reserve on auction day. If an agent knows the reserve during the sale campaign, they must not advertise the home with a guide lower than that price. The analysis tracked 337 auctions over the course of 2024, often seven to eight a week, chosen because they were likely to be interesting and competitive. Price guide, vendor expectations and sale price were recorded. Although property sale prices are public on settlement, there is no public database of reserve prices, which leaves it to agents to choose whether to disclose this. The biggest gap between a price guide and a reserve at an auction recorded by this masthead was $460,000 for a prestige Toorak sale. In Avondale Heights, a vendor's reserve was $165,000 above the top of the guide and another in Doncaster East was $100,000 over.
