logo
Sergey Brin on our world possibly existing within 'a stack of simulations.'

Sergey Brin on our world possibly existing within 'a stack of simulations.'

The Verge21-05-2025

The last question during the AI fireside chat at I/O 2025 was an invitation to make headlines, and the Google co-founder did his best, saying... something about reality and our existence. Listen in for yourself.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-Biden adviser calls Jean-Pierre ‘kinda dumb,' deletes tweet, says she's not a ‘genius-level Black woman'
Ex-Biden adviser calls Jean-Pierre ‘kinda dumb,' deletes tweet, says she's not a ‘genius-level Black woman'

Fox News

time21 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Ex-Biden adviser calls Jean-Pierre ‘kinda dumb,' deletes tweet, says she's not a ‘genius-level Black woman'

As criticism mounts from within Biden's world against former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and her new book, one ex-aide lambasted the now-Independent ombudswoman as "kinda dumb" — a tweet he deleted but later stood by. Timothy Wu, now a Columbia Law professor, was former President Joe Biden's "architect" of antitrust policy whose faculty bio claims he also coined the progressive term "net neutrality" in 2002. In a now-deleted tweet, Wu wrote: "from a [White House] staff perspective, the real problem with Karine Jean-Pierre was that she was kinda dumb." "[She had n]o interest in understanding harder topics. Just gave random incoherent answers on policy," Wu added in the trashed tweet. The X account "I work with my word" replied to the original tweet, calling it "pretty racist," and the tweet was later deleted, but the reply remained. Below the reply, Wu added a new line of commentary, saying the Biden White House was "full of genius-level Black women. [Jean-Pierre] was not one of them." In response to another X user asking Wu whether Trump White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt understands executive policy, the professor said a good ombudsperson will "meet with policy staff and try and understand what the administration is doing and why." Fox News Digital reached out to Wu via his Columbia faculty office, where he has taught since 2006. The former Biden adviser was also a Democratic primary candidate for New York's lieutenant governorship in 2014, and also worked in the Obama administration and at the Federal Trade Commission. Jean-Pierre announced Wednesday that she left the Democratic Party and has become an Independent while revealing her upcoming book: "Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines." She was mocked and criticized by several people in Biden's orbit besides Wu, including one who said, "I wouldn't ignore what Karine has to say, but it's not an account in which much weight will be invested — just like her briefings." "At noon on that day [that Biden left office], I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes. We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically," Jean-Pierre said of her new Independent streak.

Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial, Cassie Ventura's friend Bryana Bongolan to testify
Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial, Cassie Ventura's friend Bryana Bongolan to testify

CNN

time24 minutes ago

  • CNN

Live updates: Sean ‘Diddy' Combs trial, Cassie Ventura's friend Bryana Bongolan to testify

Update: Date: Title: Court is back from lunch Content: Judge Arun Subramanian is on the bench. The jury is entering now. Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey said they intend to call Enrique Santos to the stand before Jane. Update: Date: Title: Judge warns Combs could be excluded from courtroom for repeatedly nodding at jury during Bongolan's testimony Content: Judge Arun Subramanian warned the defense that Sean 'Diddy' Combs could be excluded from the courtroom if he continues to attempt to interact with the jury. The judge said he saw Combs on two different occasions during Bryana Bongolan's testimony, looking at the jury and 'nodding vigorously.' Combs was previously seen nodding during the testimony of George Kaplan, his former assistant. Subramanian said he already warned the defense that Combs can't be making any facial expressions or attempts to have any interaction with or influence the jury. 'I could not have been any clearer in terms of what I said,' the judge said. 'Well, there was a line of questioning when your client was nodding vigorously and looking at the jury,' Subramanian said. During a sidebar, the judge said he saw Combs doing it a second time. 'I looked and I saw your client looking at the jury and nodding vigorously.' 'It is absolutely unacceptable,' Subramanian said. He asked defense attorney Marc Agnifilo, 'Is it going to happen again?' Agnifilo assured him it wouldn't. 'It cannot happen again,' the judge said. And if it does, Subramanian said he'll let the government make an application to give the jury an instruction on the issue and will consider more severe measures, such as excluding Combs from the courtroom. Update: Date: Title: This is what it takes to prove racketeering conspiracy Content: Prosecutors have charged Sean 'Diddy' Combs with racketeering conspiracy and are currently laying out their case on how the music mogul's conduct meets the criteria for the charge. Combs has pleaded not guilty to the racketeering charge as well as sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. If convicted on all counts, he could face up to life in prison. What is racketeering? Racketeering is 'not a specific crime — it's a way of thinking about and prosecuting a variety of crimes,' attorney G. Robert Blakey told CNN. Racketeering means engaging in an illegal scheme. It's used in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, known as RICO, to describe 35 offenses, including kidnapping, murder, bribery, arson and extortion. Prosecutors must prove a pattern involving at least two instances of racketeering activity to convict someone under the law. RICO criteria: According to the US Justice Department, to convict someone of racketeering, prosecutors must prove five different criteria: The minimum sentence for racketeering varies by jurisdiction and severity of the crime. Convicted racketeers can also face fines. Prosecutors in Combs' case are using witness testimony, like from Cassie Ventura, Bryana Bongolan and 'Mia,' to prove RICO charges against him. Legal analysts have said witness testimony is key to proving the various aspects of the RICO charge against Combs, including establishing the workings of a criminal enterprise and coercion. Other cases: The federal government has used racketeering to go after a dozen college athletic figures and test administrators in the largest college admissions scandal ever prosecuted, former President Donald Trump and musicians like R. Kelly and Young Thug. Update: Date: Title: The jury is taking a short break. Catch up on what has happened in court so far Content: Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Cassie Ventura's who is testifying under an immunity order, completed her testimony this morning. Enrique Santos is expected to be called to the stand when the jury returns from break. Here's what she testified this morning: Update: Date: Title: "I care about justice," Bongolan says, when questioned on her motives for accusing Combs Content: The defense briefly addressed Bryana Bongolan one more time before her testimony concluded, with attorney Nicole Westmoreland asking if her lawsuit against Combs is Bongolan's 'opportunity to become a millionaire.' 'I can't agree with that,' Bongolan said. Westmoreland pointed out that Bongolan is seeking $10 million in her civil lawsuit and asked if Bongolan cared about becoming a millionaire. 'I care about justice,' Bongolan said. She is now off the stand and court is going to a break. The jury was dismissed until 1:30 p.m. ET. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan testifies she's certain Combs held her on balcony Content: Assistant US Attorney Madison Smyser asked Bryana Bongolan if she had testified truthfully to the best of her recollection about the alleged incident with Sean 'Diddy' Combs on Cassie Ventura's balcony. Bongolan said yes and acknowledged she doesn't remember every single detail, but said she'll never forget some parts of that altercation. Bongolan said she was terrified in that moment and said, 'I will never forget him holding me on that balcony.' Smyser also asked Bongolan, 'Do you yourself know the exact date of when the balcony incident occurred?' 'No,' Bongolan said. 'Why do you not know that exact date?' 'Because it was a while ago,' Bongolan said. In closing the redirect examination, Smyser asked Bongolan, 'Regardless of the exact date, do you have any doubt that Mr Combs held you up on that balcony on the 17th floor?' 'I have no doubt,' Bongolan said. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan says Ventura asked to name her in lawsuit before filing Content: Assistant US Attorney Madison Smyser is beginning redirect. Bryana Bongolan testified that she and Cassie Ventura had only one conversation about Ventura's lawsuit before it was filed in November 2023. Ventura asked Bongolan if she could name her in the complaint in connection with the balcony incident, according to Bongolan. Bongolan said she did not know what information would be included in Ventura's suit. Bongolan said that at some point after Ventura's lawsuit was filed, she told Ventura that some details about the balcony incident were incorrect. Bongolan testified that during that conversation, she told Ventura 'exactly what happened to me.' Update: Date: Title: Defense asks Bongolan directly if she's lying to the jury before wrapping up cross-examination Content: Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland asked Bryana Bongolan to confirm that 'Mr. Combs did not cause you the injuries that you showed us that we saw on your phone with the metadata from September 26, 2016.' 'I can't agree with you,' Bongolan said. In her final question, Westmoreland pressed further, saying: 'You came in here and you lied to the ladies and gentlemen of the jury.' 'I can't agree with you,' Bongolan replied once again. Westmoreland's cross examination is over. Update: Date: Title: Combs' attorney questions Bongolan's timeline of alleged balcony incident Content: Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland suggested the alleged balcony incident couldn't have happened when Bryana Bongolan says it did because Sean 'Diddy' Combs was traveling on the East Coast to perform in the Bad Boy Family Reunion Tour and Cassie Ventura was with him. Combs performed in Newark, New Jersey, on September 25 2016, Westmoreland said, and Combs and Ventura went to an event in New York City on September 26. In her testimony, Bongolan linked the alleged balcony altercation to a photo of a bruise on her leg that she said was taken hours after the incident. According to metadata from Bongolan's phone, the photo was taken on the morning of September 26. Westmoreland also showed the jury records for 'Frank Black' from the Trump International Hotel in New York City, which included dining receipts for September 25 and 26, 2016. Records from the Trump Hotel stay showed the check-in date was September 24, 2016, and the check-out date was September 29, 2016. 'You agree that one person can't be in two places at the same time,' Westmoreland asked. Bongolan responded, 'In theory, yeah,' and 'I can't answer that one.' Update: Date: Title: Combs messaged Bongolan about friends stopping each other from making mistakes while high Content: Sean 'Diddy' Combs sent Bryana Bongolan a message saying that friends should try to stop each other from making mistakes when they get high together. 'If you're gonna do k with her at least have her back,' Combs wrote, according to the message read aloud in court. Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland asked Bongolan if she believed Combs wanted her to stop using so many drugs with Cassie Ventura. 'I can't speak for him,' Bongolan said. Update: Date: Title: Defense questions why Bongolan maintained contact with Ventura and Combs after alleged attack Content: The defense is pressing Bryana Bongolan over her continued friendship with Cassie Ventura and proximity to Sean 'Diddy' Combs in the time after he allegedly held her over a 17-story balcony in 2016. Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland pointed out that in the weeks following the alleged attack, Bongolan texted Ventura offering to get Combs a hoodie. 'We were trying to be cool,' Bongolan said. According to text messages from October 9, 2016, between Ventura and Bongolan, she also agreed to sleep over at Ventura's apartment about two weeks after the balcony incident took place, according to her testimony. 'Isn't it true that you continued to hang out with Mr. Combs and you continued to spend the night at Ms. Ventura's house because Mr. Combs did not cause you those injuries?' Westmoreland asked Bongolan. 'Part of that statement is correct and part of that statement I can't agree with,' Bongolan replied. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan says she kept her distance from Combs after alleged incident Content: Bryana Bongolan testified that she continued to see Sean 'Diddy' Combs occasionally after the balcony incident in late September 2016. Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland asked if she was afraid to be around Combs. 'I kept my distance,' Bongolan said. Bongolan confirmed that she went to one of Combs' concerts on October 4, 2016. 'I don't think I was around him most of the time,' she said. She also confirmed that she went to a club that Combs rented out the following day, on October 5. Westmoreland asked if she wore her neck brace to the private party. 'I probably should have but didn't,' Bongolan said. Update: Date: Title: Defense presses Bongolan on whether Cassie Ventura saw balcony incident Content: Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland asked Bryana Bongolan if her longtime friend Cassie Ventura witnessed the moment Sean 'Diddy' Combs allegedly dangled her over a balcony, which has been central to Bongolan's testimony in Combs' federal criminal trial. Bongolan said she heard Ventura's voice during the incident, but said she couldn't speak for her. Westmoreland suggested Bongolan had told prosecutors several times that Ventura saw the incident. 'I spoke to them, but again, I don't recall,' Bongolan said. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan shown texts with drug photos she sent Ventura after alleged threat from Combs Content: Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland showed Bryana Bongolan texts with photos of drugs that Bongolan sent to Cassie Ventura in the month after she alleges Sean 'Diddy' Combs threatened her at a photoshoot in April 2016. Bongolan testified that the images she sent Ventura appear to be drugs, but said she isn't sure what type. Bongolan confirmed that she and Ventura continued their friendship as usual at the time, despite the alleged threats from Combs. Update: Date: Title: Bongolan is back on the stand Content: Bryana Bongolan, a longtime friend of Cassie Ventura, is on the stand. The jury is entering now. Defense attorney Nicole Westmoreland is continuing cross-examination. Update: Date: Title: Judge questions relevance of Bongolan's alleged balcony incident in Combs case Content: Judge Arun Subramanian asked the prosecution why Bryana Bongolan's alleged balcony incident is relevant to the charges against Sean 'Diddy' Combs in the indictment. Assistant US Attorney Christy Slavik said the incident with Bongolan in Cassie Ventura's apartment shows the jury how Combs' violence extended beyond Ventura to other people close to her, which helps prove Combs' alleged coercion of Ventura. Bongolan's testimony will continue shortly. Update: Date: Title: Combs accuser expected to read text messages aloud in court during her closely watched testimony Content: Jane, one of Sean 'Diddy' Combs' accusers who is testifying under a pseudonym, will read text message conversations aloud in the courtroom when she takes the stand, prosecutors said this morning. The discussion arose as a group of media outlets argued for access to the exhibits admitted into evidence during Jane's testimony. As of now, the judge has said no exhibits will be shown to the public in the courtroom and the prosecution will eventually release the exhibits to the press. While Judge Arun Subramanian denied the media application, Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey said she'll have Jane read text messages aloud, so they'll be heard in open court and captured on the record in the daily transcript. When to expect Jane on the stand: The defense's cross-examination of Bryana Bongolan, a longtime friend of Cassie Ventura, is expected to continue this morning. Prosecutors have said they'll call Enrique Santos next. His time on the stand is expected to be short, and afterward, Jane's closely watched testimony is expected to begin. Update: Date: Title: Balcony incident testimony shows "mob-like behavior" prosecutors need to prove case, legal expert says Content: A woman's testimony that Sean 'Diddy' Combs' dangled her over a 17-story balcony demonstrated the 'mob-like behavior' that prosecutors need to prove racketeering conspiracy, former federal prosecutor Alyse Adamson said today. Bryana Bongolan testified yesterday that Combs held her over a balcony and threw her onto balcony furniture in September 2016. The incident was previously mentioned in a civil suit filed by Bongolan against Combs in November 2024. 'I think it's extremely impactful, if the jury ultimately believes it,' Adamson said on 'CNN This Morning with Audie Cornish.' 'That's mob-like behavior,' Adamson said. 'And that's what prosecutors need' to prove the racketeering conspiracy aspect of the case. 'He needs to be behaving in a pattern of abuse, threats, and violence. That's the theme.' Adamson said it was notable that Bongolan was not an intimate partner of Combs. 'I think the prosecution scored points eliciting this testimony, but now we're going to see how she holds up on cross,' Adamson said. Bongolan is set to return to the stand for more cross-examination at 11 a.m. today. Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges that include racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. If convicted on all counts, he could face up to life in prison. Adamson noted 'it only takes one juror' for there to be a hung jury. 'The defense seems to be extremely strategic in how they are doing things,' Adamson said. 'Sometimes the strategy isn't always, 'Well, let's just get a straight acquittal.' … Sometimes we need to be more surgical, more strategic' and focus on jurors who are 'feeling our narrative.' Update: Date: Title: This is a recap of what happened in court yesterday Content: A forensic video expert and a woman who said Sean 'Diddy' Combs dangled her over a balcony took the stand yesterday in the hip-hop mogul's federal criminal trial. Here's what we learned in testimony Wednesday: Hotel surveillance video was not manually altered, expert says Woman says Combs held her over a balcony Bongolan talks threats and drug use Update: Date: Title: Here's who has taken the stand so far in the Combs' trial Content: Bryana Bongolan, a longterm friend of Cassie Ventura, and a forensic audio and video editor took the stand yesterday in the criminal trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Bongolan is expected to testify again this morning. Here's a look at who else has taken the stand:

AI ROI Isn't Just Dollars: How To Measure Intangible Wins
AI ROI Isn't Just Dollars: How To Measure Intangible Wins

Forbes

time31 minutes ago

  • Forbes

AI ROI Isn't Just Dollars: How To Measure Intangible Wins

Companies are investing millions in AI, but the biggest returns might be faster decisions, happier ... More teams and smarter workflows. Enterprises are pouring billions into AI. Retail companies alone plan to spend $33.2 million annually on AI initiatives, according to a 2025 IBM survey. But while some are already reporting wins — and others are still waiting for returns — industry experts say too many are asking the wrong question: Is AI making us richer? Instead, they say, the better question might be: Is it making us better? That shift in mindset is becoming essential today. Because, as more businesses deploy AI across their operations, the most valuable results aren't always the ones that show up in quarterly earnings. Sometimes the clearest wins come in faster decisions, smarter workflows and more satisfied employees. It's only natural for companies to prioritize financial gains when measuring the ROI on their AI investments. But according to experts like Adrienne Uthe, managing principal at Kronus Intelligence Group, that's not all that matters. 'Organizations can simply move much faster than ever before. Everyone can develop their own MVPs while solving problems at unprecedented speed. Junior workers gain more experience in a short period thanks to a healthy collaboration with their AI-driven sidekicks,' Uthe told me in an interview. Her argument is that like no other time in human history, professionals now have tools at their disposal that could make them more productive than ever. And there's real-world proof to support Uthe's claims. Consider the National Bank of Australia that, since it began using Microsoft 365 copilot, has drastically reduced the time spent on analyzing millions of security event logs. This increased efficiency has freed up valuable time for the company's engineers who can now apply their expertise to other pressing matters. The trend also aligns with a 2024 survey by PwC, which revealed over 80% of employees believe that the continuous use of generative AI tools will make them more efficient at work. And it's not just about doing more work faster. Companies like Elvee — which uses AI to help contact center agencies address employee attrition, retain top performers and recapture revenue — have also been at the backend of enabling employee performance with AI. In one particular example, Raz Dar, founder and CEO of Elvee, noted how their platform helped a manager notice that a top-performing contact center agent was quietly planning to quit. 'On the surface, it looked like everything was fine. The employee was a top performer. But the manager was shocked to see that the system showed the employee was at a high risk of leaving,' Dar said excitedly. The early alert gave the company time to intervene, rework the agent's schedule, and keep a key team member. No revenue changed hands, but something just as valuable happened: culture was preserved. And that, more than any dashboard metric, is what real AI ROI can look like. For Dar, this is another real-world pointer to the intangible but really powerful benefits of AI. He calls it 'culture-shaping AI,' emphasizing AI's role in helping to set the tone for employee performance and motivation across organizations. As more businesses begin to consider the impact of AI on their daily operations, it makes sense to spotlight the parameters to judge the value of the returns. When CEOs aren't thinking about monetary gains, they can consider other crucial things like employee satisfaction, customer feedback and even ethical concerns. 'Companies should track decision quality through accuracy rates, speed improvements, and confidence levels across key business processes. The best approach measures decision reversal rates and compares predicted versus actual outcomes. Focus on simple metrics that show whether AI-influenced decisions are actually better decisions,' said Brig Barker, managing principal at Kronus Intelligence Group. Uthe added that companies should focus on three areas: how fast decisions get made, how well information flows through the organization and how quickly teams can respond to market changes. 'If your workers say they enjoy greater satisfaction working with AI than before when they worked with it, then it means you're doing something right.' But employees aren't the only stakeholders AI affects. Customers matter, too, in the grand scheme of measuring AI ROI. How the users of an AI-powered product perceive it is crucial in determining whether it deserves to remain available or get pulled off the market. Seasoned customer experience expert Shep Hyken claims that more customers are feeling relaxed with the use of AI in service delivery. For instance, AI chatbots have become more popular in the last few years, enabling businesses to handle large volumes of customer complaints at a quicker pace than human support staff. In fact, the momentum of AI-powered customer support is so high that Hyken's annual CX survey showed 63% of U.S. customers expect more companies to adopt AI chatbots and other forms of automated customer support. In 2021, only 21% of respondents shared this sentiment. While the story of Klarna — which replaced 700 roles with AI chatbots in 2024 but quietly started rehiring for the same roles this year because its customers preferred human support — may cast a shadow over Hyken's claims, the forecast for AI in customer support looks good. Still, for companies whose clients don't speak highly of their AI deployment, it might be time to rethink their strategy and try again. AI ROI isn't just about cost savings or new revenue streams. It's about what changes — and improves — when AI becomes part of how a company works. While financial return may be the headline metric, especially when companies have poured significant capital into AI, it's not the only one that matters. Businesses must first decide why they're investing in AI — and only then decide what success actually looks like. If your AI investments end up making your employees work better and feel more satisfied, or they make your customers happier, or they make you, as a business leader, more efficient, then that's certainly a win. And as Dar said, 'these intangible wins often have tangible impact, even on finance. That's a win-win situation.' Uthe prescribes that companies should focus on decision speed, execution velocity and how fast teams can turn ideas into reality. She added that they must also track the time from problem identification to solution deployment, measure how AI amplifies their best people's capabilities and spread that performance across the organization. 'The goal,' she said 'should be to increase organizational acceleration.' Dar cautioned that replacing human agents with AI can backfire if you're not careful, explaining that many employees get spooked when they hear their company is piloting AI. But ironically, he noted that the best AI models need those same employees to train the system and handle the nuanced, emotional conversations AI can't. 'Retention is key if you want your AI to succeed,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store