
Breath after death: Remembering George Floyd
Like Emmett Till and the Tulsa Race Massacre. Like Fred Hampton. Like Amadou Diallo. Like Breonna Taylor.
George Floyd died, and we cried and raged. Momentarily, we changed until the memories faded.
Promises were made, but they were just band-aids to cover our pain and shame, to carry us over as we slid back into the reigns of what it means to make America great again. There was no racial reckoning, it was a beckoning, a calling to inch closer to progress. Five years later, what do we see: regress.
Five years ago, I stood at the intersection of 38th Street and Chicago Avenue in South Minneapolis where Floyd was murdered, where former Minneapolis Police officer Derek Chauvin knelt on Floyd's neck for 9 minutes and 29 seconds. His call for his mother — both a meditation and prayer — were his dying words and an incantation to heal.
Advertisement
Instead of healing, we're reeling. We live in an American chapter that seeks to destroy truth and uphold supremacy. Anything that mentions race, gender, or orientation is being targeted. To acknowledge racism, in our government's eyes, is to be anti-American.
Advertisement
'When you look at the movement after George Floyd's murder and the movement to re-elect Donald Trump, what does it say about us that we have not answered the charge to wipe out racism,' says Michael Curry, NAACP board member and CEO of the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers. 'We have let the movement for justice and equality get co-opted and called reverse discrimination.'
To remember police brutality was always woven into the fiber of American practices is to also recall backlash comes with every uprising.
Reconstruction. Jim Crow. The Civil Rights Movement. Reverse redlining and racist lending. Racism, the remix.
'People don't want to see the truth anymore, because it's traumatizing,' Curry said. 'It's more comfortable when we don't have to reconcile with the fact that someone would have that much hatred in their heart.'
Police
The Justice Department dropped consent decrees in Minneapolis and in Louisville, Kentucky, where Breonna Taylor was killed in her home. Will Worcester and it's
Hodan Hashi was 13-years-old when
Advertisement
Now, she, like me, like so many, is weary. We live in the back-and-forth of hope and heartbreak when we take account of the pain we carry and pass on, even as we fight to change things.
'At the federal level, we are in more danger than we were five years ago,' she says. 'I was told if I do well in school, get a degree, get a career, and check all of the boxes, I was told we would be fine. Now, I am 26. I did that. I have a career, I'm stable. But I'm also constantly in a state of survival. How do you feel safe when it feels like your very existence is under attack at all times?'
Five years ago, at Floyd's funeral, tears welled as the Rev. Al Sharpton spoke about our suffering.
'The reason we could never be who we wanted to be and dreamed of being is you kept your knee on our neck,' Sharpton said of America.
In a country where our Justice Department's civil rights division is focusing less on racism and equity and more on destroying diversity, fighting against brutality and injustice requires a masterclass in navigating gaslighting and violence. We have a president who falsely claims DEI efforts hurt white people, disappears immigrants and citizens, and is defunding education, the arts, and humanities in order to reshape culture in his image.
Safety doesn't live here.
Ron Harris was chief resilience officer of Minneapolis when I met him the day of Floyd's funeral. Since then, he ran for Congress and led the Kamala Harris-Tim Walz campaign in Minnesota. When Donald Trump won, he needed to rest.
Advertisement
'People are exhausted. We need to train up the next generation of leaders. A choir can carry a single note for an hour because there are enough people to compensate for those who need to catch their breath.'
Now, he's a strategic consultant. Organizers pushed for accountability and did the work, he says. But we have to build movements that are sustainable outside of federal dollars,
'We need resources that can't be taken away with the stroke of a pen and the change of an agenda,' he says. 'What gives me hope is often times when the pendulum swings this far the other way, it is evidence of a reaction to progress. In these moments, leaders are born.'
For Hashi, hope is found in community.
'I feel like I have people I can talk to and go to for support. That's what I try to hold on to, the people that keep me going.'
The people
. We must remember one another in our shared humanity and in the need to protect our personhood.
'Mama, I'm through,' Floyd called. He reached for the memory of her love and support. He wasn't just through, he was a through line connecting us to past, present, and promises to still be kept.
Hope lies in memory of the folks we fight to remember, the people we work to be remembered by, and and for everyone, we pray, to never become an American goodbye.
Advertisement
Jeneé Osterheldt can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Anti-immigrant leader quits Dutch cabinet, toppling government
Officials from other parties in the coalition said they were prepared for negotiations over the immigration plan and accused Wilders of ditching the coalition to avoid responsibility for tough government decisions, including potential budget cuts needed to increase defense spending. Advertisement Wilders, who is known for anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim views, has led the Euroskeptic right-wing political movement in the Netherlands for nearly two decades and was found guilty by a Dutch court in 2016 of insulting an ethnic group. The PVV scored a shocking first-place finish in the 2023 parliamentary elections after the relatively abrupt resignation of Mark Rutte, the longest-serving prime minister in the country's history. Rutte is now secretary general of NATO. Wilders, however, was unable to claim the position of prime minister as part of coalition talks, showing resistance even by other conservative parties to back him personally given his controversial views, often criticized as extremist. As a result, the PVV's power in the Netherlands has been constrained. Still, the PVV's victory demonstrated the increasing appeal across Europe of nationalist, anti-immigrant parties. Advertisement In the Netherlands on Tuesday, critics of Wilders accused him of putting his party's political interests ahead of the needs of the country. Analysts said the country faced a period of uncertainty in the days ahead. 'Wilders has plunged the Netherlands into another round of political chaos,' said Mujtaba Rahman, managing director for Europe at the Eurasia Group. 'The Dutch parliament can try to find a new majority or else there will be early elections. But the immediate outlook is one of chaos and uncertainty.' The country has been in turmoil since Rutte resigned in 2023 after his coalition failed to pass comprehensive immigration legislation. The collapse of the Rutte government demonstrated 'how sensitive of an issue immigration is politically,' said Armida van Rij, head of the Europe program at Chatham House. The position of prime minister went to former spy chief Dick Schoof, whom Wilders backed. But Schoof has made it clear he would act independently from Wilders. In the 11 months that the coalition government has been in power, PVV was unable to push forward its immigration agenda, and the party has been losing support. 'Wilders wanted the government to collapse as the support for his [party] continues to drop in the polls,' van Rij said. Wilders presented his immigration plan just weeks ahead of the Netherlands hosting the annual NATO leaders' summit in The Hague on June 24 and 25. Van Rij said Wilders may have planned to 'use this as leverage to force his coalition partners back to the negotiating table, knowing that having a caretaker government would not be a good look nor useful to advance key policy positions.' Advertisement To advance his immigration plan, Wilders had demanded that the three other ruling parties - the centrist New Social Contract (NSC); the center-right People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD); and the right-wing, populist Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB) - reopen the coalition agreement they negotiated, and 'VVD, NSC, and BBB were not willing to do this,' van Rij said. Now, the more likely outcome is a snap election, she said. Leaders of the coalition parties hammered Wilders for his decision on Tuesday. BBB President Caroline van der Plas said in a statement that many of Wilders's desired changes were on the table and had the necessary support - 'it's just a matter of doing it.' 'Anyone who stops now will hand the Netherlands over to the left on a silver platter,' she said. VVD President Dilan Yesilgozaccused Wilders of putting 'his own interests above the interests of our country' by 'walking away … in a time of unprecedented uncertainty.' 'This wasn't about migration. Everything that could be done, we were already going to do,' she added, blaming the inaction on 'blundering' by Wilders's party. NSC leader Nicolien van Vroonhoven called Wilders 'irresponsible' and said, 'we could have achieved a lot - especially when it comes to stricter migration policies.'


New York Times
15 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Rescinds Biden Policy Requiring Hospitals to Provide Emergency Abortions
The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it had revoked a Biden administration requirement that hospitals provide emergency abortions to women whose health is in peril, including in states where abortion is restricted or banned. The move by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, a branch of the department led by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., was not a surprise. But it added to growing confusion around emergency care and abortions since June 2022, when the Supreme Court rescinded the national right to abortion by overturning Roe v. Wade. 'It basically gives a bright green light to hospitals in red states to turn away pregnant women who are in peril,' Lawrence O. Gostin, a health law expert at Georgetown University, said of the Trump administration's move. The administration did not explicitly tell hospitals that they were free to turn away women seeking abortions in medical emergencies. Its policy statement said hospitals would still be subject to a federal law requiring them to provide reproductive health care in emergency situations. But it did not explain exactly what that meant. Mr. Gostin and other experts said the murky policy could have dire consequences for pregnant women by discouraging doctors from performing emergency abortions in states where abortions are banned or restricted. 'We've already seen since the overturn of Roe that uncertainty and confusion tends to mean physicians are unwilling to intervene, and the more unwilling physicians are to intervene, the more risk there is in pregnancy,' said Mary Ziegler, a professor at the University of California-Davis and a historian of the American abortion debate. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


E&E News
23 minutes ago
- E&E News
Interior axes 18 rules tied to mining, geothermal energy
The Interior Department on Tuesday scrapped 18 federal rules tied to both geothermal energy and exploring for and digging up minerals on public lands including wilderness areas. The agency touted the move as an advancement of President Donald Trump's strategy to achieve 'energy independence,' calling the Bureau of Land Management regulations 'obsolete or redundant.' Scrapping the rules 'embodies our dedication to removing bureaucratic red tape that hinders American innovation and energy production,' Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement. But conservation groups blasted the announcement, accusing the Trump administration of moving to dismantle important safeguards while ramping up calls for more domestic mining across public lands. Advertisement 'This is another attempt by the Trump administration to break down the crucial regulations that protect our environment,' said Patrick Donnelly, Great Basin director at the Center for Biological Diversity. 'The normal process would be for rule rescission to go through a notice and public comment process. Instead this appears to be a unilateral move.'