News 5 investigates: Why is the Alabama child abuse registry easy to get on but hard to get off of?
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WKRG) — Did you know you may be on the child abuse registry and not even know it?
Baldwin County's first Safe Haven baby box blessed in Daphne
'I've had corporate professionals, all the way up to a medical doctor, come to me and say, 'I went to apply for this job, and they said I came up on this Child Abuse and Neglect Registry and I had no idea,' said attorney Jacy Fisher of Greg Varner Law Firm in Birmingham.
What's worse, family attorneys told News 5, is that it is way too easy to end up on it and nearly impossible to get off of it, even after a court decides you did nothing wrong.
But a new policy may offer a glimmer of hope to some people who, for years, have battled the bureaucracy of the Alabama Department of Human Resources to clear their reputation.
Candace and Joshua Odom are a young couple living outside Montgomery. They are the proud parents of two active boys; Knox is 6 years old and Jax is 4 years old.
But they had to fight to keep their family together because of a trip to the emergency room, when Knox was 18 months old.
Candace was five months pregnant with their second son when their pediatrician suggested that they start sleep training Knox.
But Knox would cry and cry and never seem to stop. Again, the Odom's consulted their pediatrician, but he advised them to stick with it.
One morning, when Josh went to wake Knox up, he made a horrifying discovery.
'I walked in the door, and he was picking himself up… and when he turned around…his whole face was purple, and he had dried blood on his face, and I didn't know exactly what happened,' said Josh. 'I kind of…my thoughts were racing…. I had a million thoughts running through my head. The only thing I could think of at the time was maybe he had hit his head on the crib railing because it was an oak crib.'
They rushed him to the local hospital, but as the day went by, Candace, who is a social worker, sensed that something was wrong.
'The staff treated us very coldly. Like for the full day, we didn't have any interactions with nursing staff…like nobody came into our room. It was just very odd,' she said.
She told her husband 'They think we hurt him.'
Later that evening, Candace got a call from a DHR worker.
'I can still hear my screams. How they sound and just having to walk out of the hospital because he was asleep….having to walk out of that hospital and tell him goodbye, not knowing if, or when, I was going to see him again,' said Candice.
8 of 15 arrested in Fairhope immigration enforcement operation had previous criminal histories: FBI
During the phone call, DHR stated that they had to leave their son's room, and they were barred from the hospital. If they couldn't find a relative to agree to take care of Knox immediately, he would go into foster care.
The Odom's called Joshua's mother, Melinda Odom, in panic. She agreed to take care of Knox on a full-time basis. That night started a five-month period where the couple was not allowed to see their son.
'He was a baby when he went into hospital and the next time we saw him… he was a little boy. We missed that whole transition' said Josh.
But before they were able to see Knox again, DHR tried to take their second son.
It was the grandmother, 'Mee-Mee,' who noticed that Knox was making peculiar movements, including banging his head on hard surfaces. Their attorney suggested that the grandmother install a video camera in his room.
'We had over twenty videos showing him banging his head into the crib repeatedly on his own…and it turned out that a physician who was an expert in Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnosed him with self-injurious behavior and pretty moderate ASD' said Fisher.
Josh and Candace paid for Knox to begin treatment for autism, while trying to regain custody. When Candace gave birth to their second son, Jax, DHR dug their heels in.
Candace describes what happened. 'I had just given birth. I was in the bathroom and the nurse comes in, 'Miss Odom, the DHR worker is here to see you.' You're in such a vulnerable position. She was like….'we're going to be filing an order to take Jax into custody.''
A family court judge denied that emergency pickup order.
DHR then filed another petition, with the same judge asking for full custody of Jax, claiming he was in imminent danger from his parents. The judge denied that too, demanding Jax immediately be returned.
The same judge would later return Knox home as well — nearly $100,000 later the family was reunited.
'The judge was very adamant in his order that he believed that those children needed to be returned to their parents and that DHR had really exceeded their discretion and their power in how they handled this case,' Fisher said.
Even though the judge cleared the parents of wrongdoing, Josh and Candace are still on the Child Abuse and Neglect Registry.
The Alabama Administrative Code states that 'a report of child abuse or neglect must be entered into the registry within three working days of an accusation of abuse.'
Escambia County storm damage: Tree crushes Brewton woman's home, flooded roadways, creeks
Attorney Alison Herlihy, of Herlihy Family Law, explained that people think that they will be automatically removed if they are cleared by a court or if DHR concludes in their investigation that you have done nothing wrong; however, that is not what happens.
'If you get reported to DHR, they have to investigate. If the investigation concludes that basically they think you are the perpetrator of the abuse, or neglect, then that finding will be 'indicated.' It's probably what most of us would call 'guilty' but that's not the word that they use,' said Herlihy. 'If they either think A) 'you didn't do it' or B) 'there is not enough evidence to say that you did it or not;' then the finding will be 'not indicated.' But regardless which finding it is, you are on the registry because you have been reported.'
She pointed out that anyone can accuse you of anything — 'a neighbor can be mad at you and report you.'
Both Herlihy and Fisher think that hundreds of people are on the registry and don't know it.
DHR's Deputy Commissioner of Children and Family Services, Karen Smith, won't discuss specific cases like the Odom's, citing confidentiality restrictions.
We asked Smith, 'do you think everyone who is on the registry, who has been indicated, deserves to be on that list?'
Smith answered, 'I do.'
We asked 'why?'
'Because there was an allegation of abuse, neglect or exploitation. Those individuals had an opportunity to interact with staff,' Smith said.
An administrative law judge overturned the staff decision to indicate Candace.
Because she is licensed to work with children and vulnerable adults, DHR's code allowed her to defend herself in a court hearing where she could present evidence as to why she shouldn't be marked as indicated on the registry.
Josh does not have a license to work with children. He works for the Alabama Department of Revenue, therefore, he wasn't given the same shot to clear himself.
'So, I can't volunteer for anything with children. So, like sports teams…coaching Little League baseball… obviously they would do a background check, and I would…well, I know they would see that I had been indicated for child abuse,' Josh said.
Josh's mother explained how it feels having her son on the registry. 'It is the most horrible thing. It haunts me. Joshua came from nothing. We've lived in a rural area for our whole life. He put himself through the University of Alabama, him, and Candace both did. Worked very hard. Got out, got a job and we all were so proud. Now they get to start their families and for him not to be able to be a full dad, it kills me.'
Candace still struggles to this day.
'I hope one day I can forgive these people, cause I don't want to carry this, but I'm still working on that,' she said.
'I would just like to see change in the whole system, especially, I don't see how someone can be put on a registry after being proven innocent in court. My whole life being in the United States of America, my whole life, I've heard we're free, born free and now, I question it. I don't think we're really free. I think we're free until something like this happens and I would just like to see more change and accountability,' Josh said.
News 5's investigative team went to Montgomery, where DHR told us that a policy change is coming. Effective June 14, anyone accused can request a hearing.
This is welcome news to Josh and Candace's attorney, Fisher.
'Any person who DHR finds responsible for abuse or neglect, even if they're not a caregiver or professional, is technically entitled to an administrative hearing,' Fisher said. 'But, here's how it works. Once you get the indication letter saying he's been indicated for abuse or neglect you have 10 days.'
Stephen Nodine withdrawing from Mobile mayor's race
We asked Fisher how she found out about the policy change.
'So, it was actually brought to my attention after you all interviewed Karen Smith that she claimed that the policy had changed and I think I found out the first week of May and I found an amendment deep, deep, in the inter-webs that was signed on April 30 that said that this new policy would go into effect June of 2025. But, I had not heard of it prior to that and none of my colleagues had heard of it either.'
News 5 asked DHR whether the policy change would help anyone who previously had not been entitled to a hearing in front of a judge.
'For people who did not get their due process, who did not get their day in court, who did not get to go before anyone and have their say, and for people to see them and them present their evidence,' said Fisher. 'Do you think they should be able to do that now? Should it be retroactive?'
Smith said that, 'if someone wants to have that conversation with us, we would be open to having that conversation and looking at the information, but I cannot guarantee you that it would be retroactive.'
We asked whether she believes it should be retroactive. 'I think it would probably depend on the situation,' Smith said.
Since Josh is still listed on the registry as 'indicated,' there is currently no way for him to be removed from it.
Anyone on the registry who is 'not indicated' can request to be taken off after five years if there have been no new complaints against them.
For, Candace, still on the registry, listed as 'not indicated,' she must wait three more years before she can attempt to be taken off the registry.
Family attorneys with whom we spoke are convinced there are hundreds of people on the registry who don't even know they're on it and were never given due process. Many of those people are surprised to find out they are on the registry when a background check discovers it during a job application, divorce, or custody battle.
At least for now, Josh will have to continue watching his sons play ball from a distance.
'I just have to watch from the sidelines and just try to help them as best as I can from there.'
If you believe you've been caught up in the system or treated unfairly by the government or in some other way, let us know.
Email your information to us.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
My mother-in-law is still driving despite a near miss. How can we stop her?
My mother-in-law is still driving. After a near miss a few months ago, we told her she was no longer to drive with our children in her car, and we were grateful that she immediately agreed – but also puzzled that she didn't consider stopping altogether. A year ago she developed cataracts and was told to stop driving. She coped well, using her free bus pass and walking, which she doesn't mind doing and knows is good for her health. However, when the cataract had been treated, the doctor told her she could drive again. Recently, her car insurance was renewed, and she paid a hefty sum that we felt would have been better spent on taxis. All her life my mother-in-law has been 'useful', and she is very proud that her four children have grown up to also be kind, helpful people. She continues to drive because it is useful, and she offers lifts to elderly friends which we fear is an accident waiting to happen. I love her dearly and would hate her to come to any harm. We live slightly farther away than her other children, who help her the most with finances and some practical things. We realise that if she stopped driving she might need more help, which we don't have the capacity to provide. However, we feel the risks to herself and the community outweigh any inconvenience to the wider family. Please give us a script we can use to express ourselves in a new way. Her other children continue to be dismissive of our concerns, and I don't know what to say to convince her that it's her turn to be looked after and chauffeured about by others. This has become an increasingly common problem. I remember some years ago, talking to psychotherapist Chris Mills about a friend's mum who had dementia and was no longer safe to drive. He said something I never forgot: 'If we were talking about a gun, no one would hesitate over taking it off her. Yet a car can also kill.' So I went to Mills again with your letter. 'Your request for a 'script' is the easy bit,' he said 'as it doesn't sound as if you've yet said to your mother-in-law words to the effect of, 'We don't believe your driving is safe any more, and we'd like you to give up your car now and use other ways of getting around, before someone gets hurt.' It is absolutely your business to say this, because it is your own concerns that you're reporting.' I'm not clear why you are taking this on, rather than your husband – why you have written this letter, not him Realising you are at the stage of life where you can no longer do things is a huge deal. So you're right to tread carefully. I would stress how much you care about her and the help she is still able to give you. 'But,' continued Mills, 'before going ahead with this, I'm not clear why you are taking this on, rather than your husband – why you have written this letter, not him. He is her son and his siblings' brother. There is usually someone in the family who is the 'canary' and sees things before others can. But might you run the risk of being cast as the over-fussy interfering in-law?' Related: My mother says she'll disinherit me unless I split with my partner. What should I do? Mills suggests your husband could contact her GP to request a reassessment of her driving ability. 'There's no guarantee that your mother-in-law or your husband's siblings will approve of any of this, but that shouldn't prevent him from doing what he believes is the right thing – ie in the absence of his mother's agreement, ensuring that the decision about her potentially dangerous driving is passed to the relevant authority.' In England and Wales, the DVLA issues licences and can revoke them or ask for medical confirmation that someone is fit to drive. You can also report your concerns to the DVLA via their website. Remember that this will be about so much more than just driving, so please reassure your mother-in-law about how much she is still needed. • Every week, Annalisa Barbieri addresses a personal problem sent in by a reader. If you would like advice from Annalisa, please send your problem to Annalisa regrets she cannot enter into personal correspondence. Submissions are subject to our terms and conditions. The latest series of Annalisa's podcast is available here. • Comments on this piece are pre-moderated to ensure the discussion remains on the topics raised by the article. Please be aware that there may be a short delay in comments appearing on the site.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Police Find Body Believed to Belong to Woman, 35, Who Went Missing 1 Day Prior: 'Heartbreaking'
A body has been recovered amid a search for a missing woman in northern England South Yorkshire Police said a body was found on Saturday, June 14, as authorities searched for a woman from Doncaster, identified only as 35-year-old Natalie Authorities said that while investigators have not formally identified the body, officers believe it to be Natalie, who was reported missing on Friday, June 13Police have found a body they believe to be a woman who was reported missing just one day ago. According to the South Yorkshire Police in England, a body was found on Saturday, June 14, as authorities searched for a woman from Doncaster — located about 60 miles east of Manchester — who was identified only as 35-year-old Natalie. "Officers searching for missing woman Natalie from Doncaster have sadly found a body today," police wrote in a statement on Facebook. Authorities said that while investigators have not formally identified the body, officers believe it to be the missing 35-year-old. "Her family have been informed, and our thoughts are with them and all of Natalie's friends and loved ones," police added in their statement. The Doncaster Free Press reported that police said Natalie was last seen on Friday, June 13, just before 12 p.m. local time. She was described as "White, 5ft 7ins with brown shoulder-length hair." Authorities said she was wearing glasses and all-black clothing and carrying a rucksack at the time of her disappearance. "Officers are becoming increasingly concerned for Natalie's welfare and want to speak to anybody who has seen her," police said when she was first reported missing, per the Free Press. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Members of the local community shared their condolences with the missing woman's loved ones on social media. "This is so sad," one person wrote on Facebook. "Sending love and deepest sympathy to her family and loved ones." "Heartbreaking," another person added. "RIP, young lady." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Funeral held for 3 children killed in alleged impaired driving crash
The Laviña-Galve family held a joint funeral in Scarborough on Saturday for three children killed last month in an alleged impaired driving crash on Highway 401. 15-year-old Ramone, 13-year-old Jace and six-year-old Mya — along with their mother, another sibling, and a family friend — were inside a van parked at a red light just after midnight in Etobicoke on May 18, when a man exiting Highway 401 lost control of his vehicle, crossed a raised median and crashed into them. People attending the service were asked to wear bright colours "in honour of the joy, light and love our children brought into our lives," according to an obituary posted online. Kristin Cruz, who said she was a friend of the children's mother, attended the funeral Saturday. She said they had grown apart in recent years but were close in childhood. "I've been hearing stories that they're a very happy family … They're good kids," she said. Robinhensman Robinet, who said he was a colleague of the children's mother, said the service was heartbreaking. He said he was "broken" when he heard about the devastating crash. "I couldn't sleep in the night. I myself have three children … I felt like these are my children," he said. The online obituary described the three children as treasured and beloved. Ramone was the "protective big brother, watching out for his siblings with care and compassion," it read. He enjoyed playing sports, including basketball and volleyball, and working out with his father. Jace was "his mom's helper, always lending a hand with his younger siblings," the obituary said. He also enjoyed playing basketball and served on his student council. Their sister, Mya, was an "intelligent ray of sunshine" who enjoyed collecting purses, dancing and singing, the obituary read. "She loved being surrounded by her 3 older brothers and was adored by them in turn," it read. The children are survived by their parents, their brother and a large extended family of grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins and "friends that are like family," the obituary read. A GoFundMe campaign set up to support the family through its loss has raised nearly $250,000 as of Saturday. Ethan Lehouillier of Georgetown, Ont., was arrested at the scene of the crash and now faces 12 charges, including three counts of impaired driving causing death. None of the charges have been tested in court.