
Bishop: Church vote a missed chance to show abuse victims their pain is heard
The Church of England cannot hide behind the complexities of moving to fully independent safeguarding and must realise the 'nation is watching', a leading bishop has said.
Bishop Joanne Grenfell, the Church's safeguarding lead, had put forward a motion to the General Synod for a new model which would have seen all Church-employed safeguarding officers transferred to a new independent body.
But members instead voted overwhelmingly for a less independent option, which will see diocesan and cathedral officers remaining with their current Church employers while most national staff move to a new outside body.
I'm really disappointed, as were many, that Synod missed the opportunity to send an unequivocal message to victims and survivors and the wider nation that we hear their pain and concerns
Bishop Joanne Grenfell
Representatives of survivors branded the outcome a 'punch in the gut' for victims of abuse and said it showed the Church had decided to 'keep it in the family'.
Ms Grenfell told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: 'I'm really disappointed, as were many, that Synod missed the opportunity to send an unequivocal message to victims and survivors and the wider nation that we hear their pain and concerns.'
She said the option chosen for the set-up of an independent scrutiny body 'is actually quite a big step forward in itself but we need to do that further work around operational independence, and I'm really committed to doing that'.
Bishop of Blackburn Philip North, who proposed the amendment to endorse the less independent option while work was done to see if the other one was 'legally deliverable', described the latter as 'eye-wateringly complex' and said it could take years to implement.
Ms Grenfell said while she understands concerns some might have had about the complexities of transferring peoples' jobs, that is not something the Church can 'hide behind'.
She told Today: 'I understand that people had concerns about the challenge of bringing staff from 85 different bodies, cathedrals and diocese into one.
'And we knew that that was going to be complex, but we did believe it was possible, and we promised to come back with the further detail on that, which we will now do.
'I don't think we can hide behind those complex structures. That's just not good enough for victims and survivors. So yeah, we're complex, but we need to change, and that means changing our structures.'
The bishop said victims and survivors of abuse – some of whom had gathered outside the venue ahead of Tuesday's debate urging Synod members to vote for fully independent safeguarding – felt they had not been listened to.
She said while members had 'heard the complexity of doing this, and they wanted further assurance about the governance responsibilities around that', they had not 'heard strongly enough that the nation is watching and that victims and survivors say that this is what they need to restore trust and confidence'.
Andrew Graystone, a long-time advocate for abuse survivors, accused the Church of 'shocking arrogance' and said the Synod had 'voted for a measure that will leave the power of bishops completely unchanged and unchallenged'.
The Survivors Trust group said: 'Public trust in the Church to effectively safeguarding children has been totally lost.
'Church leaders must reconsider their approach and take immediate steps toward genuine, independent safeguarding reform.
'The protection of children and vulnerable adults should not be left in the hands of those who have historically failed them.'
Following the vote, Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell said he was 'disappointed', having backed the more independent model.
The Church has been plagued by safeguarding controversies over the years, with a damning report into serial abuser and Christian camp leader John Smyth leading to the resignation of Justin Welby as Archbishop of Canterbury.
Mr Cottrell, who has taken on most of that role's responsibilities temporarily, has also faced calls to quit over failures in handling abuse cases, and admitted this week the Church has 'failed greatly' on safeguarding.
The process to find a new Archbishop of Canterbury – the most senior bishop in the Church of England – is under way, with a public consultation launched last week.
The Church has said the consultation 'is an opportunity to gather the views of a wide range of people from across England and the Anglican Communion on the gifts, qualities and skills needed' for the role.
Ms Grenfell said there is 'a huge amount to think through' before the 106th appointment to the role.
She said: 'I think this is a really painful and necessary time of reckoning. I said in a debate earlier in the week that we're ministering as a broken church. I still think that's true. I also see what's improved.
'I mean, I've got really great safeguarding colleagues who I really trust. This isn't about them. Their work is good. It's about the bigger structures around it.
'And I think that there's a huge amount to think through before we appoint a new Archbishop of Canterbury, about what that looks like and about the kind of culture change.'
It is expected there could be an announcement on a new archbishop by autumn.
:: Anyone affected can visit www.thesurvivorstrust.org or call a free, confidential helpline on 0808 801 0818.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ITV News
18 hours ago
- ITV News
Kendall tells MPs she'll press ahead with welfare cuts, despite fierce opposition from backbenchers
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has told concerned MPs she'll press ahead with planned welfare cuts, despite fierce opposition from many backbenchers. Responding to a letter from the Work and Pensions Committee urging her to delay the changes, Kendall wrote "we will not avoid or delay the decisive action needed to transform the system". MPs on the committee had said there needs to be a pause in implementing the reforms while the government carry out a full impact assessment. But Kendall insisted there will be no delay, because the bill needs final sign off from Parliament by November this year for the changes to be in effect from 2026. The government plans to make it harder for disabled people to claim Personal Independence Payments (Pip), and to freeze universal credit incapacity benefits for existing claimants, while cutting them by 50% for new claimants. The reforms are expected to save £5bn from the ballooning welfare budget, but critics warn the move will push vulnerable people into poverty. ITV News revealed the details of the letter from the Work and Pensions Committee last month. The cross-party group of MPs, led by Labour MP Debbie Abrahams, said that alongside a comprehensive impact assessment, disabled people must also be consulted before MPs are asked to vote on the reforms. After hearing from a series of experts, the group warned of possible unintended consequences. The letter warned: "The legislative changes might not incentivise work as the government hopes, but rather push people deeper into poverty, worsen health, especially in more deprived areas, and move people further away from the labour market." Abrahams told ITV News that she understood the financial strain facing the government, and the need to reform welfare to support disabled people into work. But she also cited expert evidence that cutting benefits could increase the risk of suicides. Chancellor Rachel Reeves also confirmed on Thursday that the government is "not going to be changing" the planned cuts, despite speculation they could be softened. The U-turn on winter fuel and reports the government could be poised to lift the two-child benefit sparked hope from backbenchers the government could be more likely to change course on welfare. But in an interview on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, Reeves insisted: "No, we're not going to be changing that. It is important that we reform the way the welfare state works, so that there is a welfare state there for people.' But the rebellion among backbench Labour MPs doesn't seem to be abating. "I don't think they're listening to us on welfare reform at all", one MP said. "The government just aren't taking the size of this rebellion seriously", said another. "The free school meals and winter fuel allowance announcement and signals on the two child benefit cap are great, but not cutting it when it comes to the welfare changes." Cat Eccles, Labour MP for Stourbridge said she was "disappointed" by Kendall's response to the letter from Debbie Abrahams, accusing her of a "tunnel-vision approach of rushing forward" to get the plans signed off by parliament by November. "Many are rightfully concerned that ignoring this will push some of our most vulnerable in society into unnecessary poverty and hardship. "The response from the Secretary of State appears to ignore this evidence-based advice entirely, focusing rather on a tunnel-vision approach of rushing forward to gain Royal Assent by November this year, so these reforms can be implemented for 2026/27." She called on Kendall to "reconsider" her response, insisting: "Our welfare system must be a safety net to catch and support those who need it. "Do not pursue reckless changes that result in the holes of that net widening, with more of our most vulnerable falling through." There are reports up to 170 Labour MPs have raised concerns about the cuts with the government. ITV News understands that includes some senior backbenchers who work as Parliamentary Private Secretaries (PPS) to ministers, and even one junior minister. The legislation needed to bring in the changes is due to be introduced to Parliament on Monday 16th June, with a vote expected in the week of the 30th June. It's unclear exactly how many MPs will vote against the plans, but it's likely to be the biggest rebellion of Starmer's premiership. The government's own impact assessment on the reforms estimates that that in 2029-30,


Glasgow Times
a day ago
- Glasgow Times
Lord Brittan's widow says closure of police misconduct probe ‘undermines trust'
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said last week it had stopped the investigation into former Met deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse after a 'large volume of relevant material was recently disclosed to the IOPC by the Metropolitan Police'. Mr Rodhouse was due to face a disciplinary hearing for potentially breaching police professional standards of behaviour for honesty and integrity and discreditable conduct. An investigation into former Met deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse has been dropped by the police watchdog (PA) The allegations centred around comments made to the media in March 2016 concerning his beliefs about the honesty of two witnesses to Operation Midland – a Met investigation into allegations of non-recent sexual abuse. They also involved remarks he is alleged to have subsequently made to former High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques, who had been commissioned to carry out an independent review of the handling of Operation Midland in August 2016. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lady Diana Brittan said she had hoped the investigation would bring a sense of 'closure'. She said: 'My husband was a high-profile individual, but at every level of society there are people who are falsely accused, and for them (also) it's the ruining of reputation, it's the anxiety that goes with it. 'I feel that it would have at least put a closure, to use that odd word, on the whole episode if somebody had been held to account, either for misconduct, or even for incompetence.' Operation Midland was launched off the back of lurid and false allegations made by fantasist Carl Beech – later jailed for 18 years for what a judge called 'cruel and callous' lies. The Metropolitan Police's 16-month investigation into fake claims of a VIP paedophile ring saw raids on the homes of Lord Brittan, as well as D-Day veteran Lord Bramall and ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor. Operation Midland was launched off the back of lurid and false allegations made by fantasist Carl Beech (CPS/PA) The probe ended in 2016 without a single arrest after Beech made a series of baseless allegations, including of three murders. The force was heavily criticised for believing Beech too readily despite inconsistencies in his evidence, including naming witnesses who did not exist. The IOPC said there was 'no evidence' within the material provided from the Met that there was 'any inappropriate motivation in Mr Rodhouse's comments to the media' or which 'supports that he made those remarks during Sir Richard's review'. Mr Rodhouse said the allegations made against him were 'ill-founded and incorrect'. Mr Proctor said he was 'appalled' by the 'disgraceful decision' not to proceed, adding he would be writing to Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to 'demand a meeting and an explanation'. Lady Brittan said she felt her husband's legacy had been permanently tarnished by the episode, telling the BBC: 'What I really feel very sorry about is the fact that my husband was a great public servant. 'When he died, his obituaries referred to all of this.' Leon and Diana Brittan in 2013 (John Stillwell/PA) In response to Lady Brittan's comments, an IOPC spokesperson said: 'Our recent decision does not change our finding that – by failing to follow Sir Richard Henrique's recommendation to investigate the witnesses in his independent review of the Met's handling of Op Midland – the Met's service was unacceptable and its subsequent reviews concluding no investigation was needed were flawed. 'During our investigation we reported a potential crime to the Met, which is being actively investigated by another force.'

South Wales Argus
a day ago
- South Wales Argus
Lord Brittan's widow says closure of police misconduct probe ‘undermines trust'
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said last week it had stopped the investigation into former Met deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse after a 'large volume of relevant material was recently disclosed to the IOPC by the Metropolitan Police'. Mr Rodhouse was due to face a disciplinary hearing for potentially breaching police professional standards of behaviour for honesty and integrity and discreditable conduct. An investigation into former Met deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse has been dropped by the police watchdog (PA) The allegations centred around comments made to the media in March 2016 concerning his beliefs about the honesty of two witnesses to Operation Midland – a Met investigation into allegations of non-recent sexual abuse. They also involved remarks he is alleged to have subsequently made to former High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques, who had been commissioned to carry out an independent review of the handling of Operation Midland in August 2016. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lady Diana Brittan said she had hoped the investigation would bring a sense of 'closure'. She said: 'My husband was a high-profile individual, but at every level of society there are people who are falsely accused, and for them (also) it's the ruining of reputation, it's the anxiety that goes with it. 'I feel that it would have at least put a closure, to use that odd word, on the whole episode if somebody had been held to account, either for misconduct, or even for incompetence.' Operation Midland was launched off the back of lurid and false allegations made by fantasist Carl Beech – later jailed for 18 years for what a judge called 'cruel and callous' lies. The Metropolitan Police's 16-month investigation into fake claims of a VIP paedophile ring saw raids on the homes of Lord Brittan, as well as D-Day veteran Lord Bramall and ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor. Operation Midland was launched off the back of lurid and false allegations made by fantasist Carl Beech (CPS/PA) The probe ended in 2016 without a single arrest after Beech made a series of baseless allegations, including of three murders. The force was heavily criticised for believing Beech too readily despite inconsistencies in his evidence, including naming witnesses who did not exist. The IOPC said there was 'no evidence' within the material provided from the Met that there was 'any inappropriate motivation in Mr Rodhouse's comments to the media' or which 'supports that he made those remarks during Sir Richard's review'. Mr Rodhouse said the allegations made against him were 'ill-founded and incorrect'. Mr Proctor said he was 'appalled' by the 'disgraceful decision' not to proceed, adding he would be writing to Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to 'demand a meeting and an explanation'. Lady Brittan said she felt her husband's legacy had been permanently tarnished by the episode, telling the BBC: 'What I really feel very sorry about is the fact that my husband was a great public servant. 'When he died, his obituaries referred to all of this.' Leon and Diana Brittan in 2013 (John Stillwell/PA) In response to Lady Brittan's comments, an IOPC spokesperson said: 'Our recent decision does not change our finding that – by failing to follow Sir Richard Henrique's recommendation to investigate the witnesses in his independent review of the Met's handling of Op Midland – the Met's service was unacceptable and its subsequent reviews concluding no investigation was needed were flawed. 'During our investigation we reported a potential crime to the Met, which is being actively investigated by another force.'