logo
Best intentions of Georgia 2022 behavioral health insurance law fall short with slow implementation

Best intentions of Georgia 2022 behavioral health insurance law fall short with slow implementation

Yahoo03-03-2025

Rome Republican state Rep. Katie Dempsey has filed a bill that aims to close the gaps in enforcement of Georgia's 2022 landmark mental health law. Dempsey is seen here presenting her bill in committee Thursday. Jill Nolin/Georgia Recorder
State leaders celebrated three years ago when they passed a bipartisan measure designed to step up enforcement of a federal law that requires health insurers treat mental health and substance abuse services the same as physical care.
But more than two years after that law took effect, lawmakers and advocates are voicing frustration with the state of enforcement of behavioral health parity rules passed in 2022 that were intended to improve access to care in Georgia.
'It's fine to pass legislation, but if the legislation just stays on the books and is not implemented, we don't help anybody,' Eve Byrd, director of the mental health program at the Carter Center, said at a recent press conference at the state Capitol.
Former first lady Rosalynn Carter, who died in late 2023, was a major champion of behavioral health parity. Byrd said the Carter Center remains committed to seeing 'full implementation' of Georgia's law, which she called national model legislation.
The Atlanta-based center has launched public awareness campaigns in Albany, Savannah and Atlanta to help people understand their rights and what they should expect from the health insurer.
But Byrd and others are calling on the state to do its part to hold insurers accountable when these companies throw up roadblocks for receiving mental health and substance abuse treatment services.
Under the law, deductibles, co-pays or limits on the number of visits or days of hospitalization should be the same for mental and physical services.
'People are dying. People are not getting the care they need,' Byrd said.
So far, the state is receiving few complaints about suspected parity violations, but advocates say that may have more to do with low awareness about the care patients are entitled to, an online complaint portal that can be difficult to navigate, and the state's slow ramp up of enforcement provisions.
Need to report a parity violation?
If you have private insurance, you can file a complaint here.
If your insurance is through Medicaid, complaints can be filed here.
'That's part of the problem is we don't even know. The data is not clear as to what insurers are doing well and what insurers are not doing well,' Byrd said. 'So, you can't really point fingers or implement penalties. So that is a real first step.'
Laura Colbert, executive director of Georgians for a Healthy Future, which is a patient advocacy organization, described the implementation of the 2022 law as 'uneven' at a parity day event in mid-February.
Colbert said the insurers' reports to the state are not demonstrating compliance with the law, adding that the reports on private insurance coverage vary in quality. She said the reports on coverage through Medicaid are better, partly because the state Department of Community Health uses a standardized template for reporting.
'For parity to become so real, the onus is on insurance companies. The other portions of this law are very important for holding them accountable, because they certainly will not police themselves, but insurance companies should be doing the work of parity,' Colbert said.
But she said state agencies are 'important accountability partners.' Insurance Commissioner John King, whose office oversees private insurance plans, and the state Department of Community Health, which administers the state's Medicaid program, are the main agencies tasked with making the 2022 law a reality.
How to enforce parity rules in Georgia was the focus of the final negotiations over the landmark bill three years ago, says Rep. Mary Margaret Oliver, a Decatur Democrat who was a co-sponsor. She's among the lawmakers pushing this year for more 'enforcement muscle.'
'We have it on paper, but our enforcement processes are working in hit and miss and not satisfactory to my opinion,' Oliver said.
Oliver said even with the scant data there is evidence of insurance barriers in place for behavioral health treatment in Georgia that are not in place for physical care, such as unequal rules for requiring providers to get approval from an insurer before prescribing medication.
There's a proposal on the move this legislative session that aims to close the gaps in enforcement.
'This is a measure to actually strengthen the oversight of mental health insurance coverage in Georgia by holding insurers accountable for parity compliance,' said Rome Republican state Rep. Katie Dempsey, who is sponsoring the bill and who chairs the House budget subcommittee for human services.
'This bill is a significant step forward, ensuring that mental health care is treated equally to physical health care with the insurance system in Georgia,' she said.
The bill would create a formal mechanism to review and address complaints through a proposed parity compliance review panel, and it would require health care providers to report suspected violations by health insurers.
'This mandatory reporting of mental health parity violations is so very important for us to get the data that we need to understand what we are meeting, how close we are to that threshold, and then how to get there as well,' she said.
Kevin Tanner, who is the commissioner of the state Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, said Wednesday that he thinks leaning on providers to help report violations – rather than waiting on the patient to submit a complaint – will help the state get a better handle on enforcement.
'I think part of the challenge is individuals may not even know that there may be a parity violation, they may not know that they've not received a service that under the law they should be receiving,' Tanner said. 'So I think that's a part of the challenge, because there's not been a lot of violations reported.'
If violations are found, the panel will recommend punitive actions to King, who is elected, and the appointed commissioner of community health, Russel Carlson.
The panel would be able to receive and evaluate complaints reported by the providers, and it would also be empowered to analyze reports from health insurers and to request information regarding potential parity violations, including determinations of 'medical necessity.'
And the panel would also be tasked with creating and reviewing 'culturally and linguistically sensitive' educational materials about behavioral health parity for consumers and health care providers.
If funding is made available later, the panel would be assisted by staffers.
The panel would be attached to the existing Behavioral Health Coordinating Council within the state Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities. The bill would also add the insurance commissioner to the council.
Dempsey's bill includes recommendations that were included in the latest report from the Behavioral Health Reform and Innovation Commission, which was a big driver behind the 2022 law.
'We support this bill very much, but we should not have to be here for this bill,' Jeff Breedlove with the Georgia Council for Recovery said to lawmakers Thursday.
'Families across Georgia, working class families who do not have the time or the money, are encountering roadblock after roadblock, hurdle after hurdle to save a life,' he said. 'So, every day we delay, every other meeting we have to go to, in the world we understand we get it, but for working class families, it's Russian roulette with the life of their loved one.'
Dempsey's bill was voted out of committee last week. It has until this Thursday, which is Crossover Day, to pass the full House to have the smoothest path to the governor's desk. The legislative session ends April 4.
An attempt to reach King for comment through his office was not successful.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program
Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Anti-DEI group targets Geisinger College of Health Sciences over program

SCRANTON — A national anti-DEI group has targeted the Geisinger College of Health Sciences with recent filings of discrimination complaints. Virginia-based Do No Harm purported in news releases in March and June that it filed separate complaints with two federal agencies against the college, citing as discriminatory its federally funded Center of Excellence for Diversity and Inclusion and a summer program that aimed to help students from Black, Hispanic or Native American communities that are underrepresented in the medical field transition into medical school. The Do No Harm discrimination complaints come amid President Donald Trump's efforts to dismantle DEI, or diversity, equity and inclusion, programs in the public and private sectors. Trump issued executive orders in the first week of his second term targeting DEI initiatives. 'Geisinger College of Health Sciences did a thorough review of our programs after the presidential executive orders were issued to ensure compliance. The pre-matriculation program referenced in the (Do No Harm) complaint ended in 2024 and is no longer active,' Geisinger CHS said in a statement. Do No Harm is labeled by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an 'anti-LGBTQ+ hate group.' Critics of the SPLC say it's politically biased and its definition of hate group is overly broad. Do No Harm first filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on March 19 against Geisinger CHS, according to a news release posted on the Do No Harm website. A member of Do No Harm then filed a similar complaint June 5 with the U.S. Department of Education, because Geisinger 'did not learn its lesson' from the initial complaint filed with HHS, the advocacy organization announced in another news release. The Times-Tribune could not verify that the complaints were filed with both departments, and whether either agency investigated the allegations or took any actions. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Education through separate representatives said they do not confirm the existence of complaints. Do No Harm, established in April 2022, claims it has 17,000 members, including doctors, nurses, physicians and concerned citizens, and cites its mission as safeguarding health care from ideological threats. 'Do No Harm seeks to highlight and counteract divisive trends in medicine, such as 'Diversity, Equity and Inclusion' and youth-focused gender ideology,' the organization's website says. According to the SPLC, Do No Harm in 2024 filed eight lawsuits challenging programs such as scholarships and fellowships for marginalized people. 'The group claims that the practice of nonprofit organizations like the American Association of University Women to provide fellowships to students of color and LGBTQ+ students — groups historically underrepresented in academia and medicine — harms patients by requiring medical schools to accept or fund unqualified candidates. According to the group, the case was dismissed 'after AAUW agreed to drop the racial criteria in the fellowship's selection process,'' the SPLC website says. According to the website of Geisinger College of Health Sciences, it is the research and education arm of the Geisinger health system. Established in 2022, the college unifies the Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger School of Nursing, Geisinger School of Graduate Education, graduate medical education, Center for Faculty and Professional Development and more. * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) * Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Show Caption 1 of 3 Geisinger College of Medicine in Scranton on Monday, June 9, 2025. (REBECCA PARTICKA/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER) Expand

New law brings managed care to people with intellectual disabilities
New law brings managed care to people with intellectual disabilities

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New law brings managed care to people with intellectual disabilities

Gov. Ron DeSantis, left, and House Speaker Daniel Perez, right. (Photos by Jay Waagmeester/Florida Phoenix) Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday signed into law priority legislation for House Speaker Daniel Perez that addresses how people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) receive health care. There were fears in the IDD advocacy community that DeSantis was going to veto the bill but he signed HB 1103 into law without any ceremony or a press conference. He acted three days after receiving it and while the House and Senate met in an extended session to craft the next state budget. Jim DeBeaugrine, a former Agency for Persons with Disabilities (APD) director and now a lobbyist, praised language that requires the agency to make public information about the number of people served in the Medicaid waiver program known as iBudget, plus the number of individuals on the waiting list, broken down by the counties in which they live. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Federal Medicaid law provides coverage for health care services to cure or ameliorate diseases but generally doesn't cover services that won't. Specific to IDD, Medicaid covers the costs of institutional care but not of home- and community-based services that, if provided, can help people with IDD live outside of institutions. Former Gov. Jeb Bush applied for a Medicaid waiver to provide these services to people with IDD. Eligible diagnoses include disorders or syndromes attributable to intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, autism, spina bifida, Down syndrome, Phelan-McDermid syndrome, or Prader-Willi syndrome so long as the disorder manifested itself before the age 18. But the program is underfunded and has had lengthy waiting lists on which sometimes people have lingered for more than a decade. The Legislature has required APD to provide it with information about the program but while the information was once easily publicly available, the DeSantis administration stopped posting it online. The bill requires the information to be made public again. 'You know, APD has gotten hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars over the last several years. And I think it'll help to hold the agency accountable. And it's good for the public, particularly the advocacy community, to understand what happens with those dollars, how many people we're funding, whether the dollars are being spent for services,' DeBeaugrine told the Florida Phoenix Tuesday. 'You know, the rub on all of this is that the agency used to publish that data without the law telling them to. But since they stopped, I believe this is a positive step towards re-establishing accountability and transparency.' The law also involves a Medicaid managed-care pilot program launched at the behest of then-House Speaker-Designate, now speaker, Perez in 2023. The pilot was designed to care for up to 600 individuals and was approved for Medicaid regions D and I, which serve Hillsborough, Polk, Manatee, Hardee, Highlands, Miami-Dade, and Monroe counties. The state received federal approval for the pilot in February 2024. The Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) issued a competitive procurement for the pilot with two vendors, Florida Community Care and Simply Healthcare Plans Inc., vying for the contract. AHCA eventually awarded the contract to Florida Community Care. Three hundred and fifty eight people were enrolled in the pilot program as of May 5. During testimony before the House Health and Human Services Committee in February, Carol Gormley, vice president for government affairs for Independent Living Systems, attributed the slow start-up to administrative barriers on APD's part. Independent Living Systems is the parent company of Florida Community Care. The new law lifts the 600-person cap on the pilot program on Oct. 1, expanding enrollment statewide for qualifying disabled people on the Medicaid iBudget wait list. There are 21,000 plus people on the waitlist, according to a legislative analysis. In a statement to the Florida Phoenix Tuesday, Gormley lauded DeSantis and the Legislature for their 'commitment to expanding and improving services for persons with disabilities. 'We look forward to the opportunity to extend the comprehensive benefits offered through the pilot program to families who choose to participate,' she said. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

NIH Director Struggles To Defend His Own Plan To Slash $18 Billion In Medical Research
NIH Director Struggles To Defend His Own Plan To Slash $18 Billion In Medical Research

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

NIH Director Struggles To Defend His Own Plan To Slash $18 Billion In Medical Research

WASHINGTON ― National Institutes of Health director Jayanta Bhattacharya got a cool reception from Democratic and Republican senators on Tuesday as he defended his agency's budget request for 2026, which would slash billions in cutting-edge biomedical research on cancer, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes and other health conditions. NIH is considered the crown jewel of American science and the global leader in biomedical research and innovation. Senators in both parties are proud of its success and of their own roles in boosting its funding over the years in support of medical breakthroughs. So Bhattacharya had to know his budget request would land with a thud as he presented it to a Senate appropriations subcommittee. He kept trying to square two things that didn't make sense: that Trump is committed to preserving America's role as the leader in biomedical research, and that his proposed $18 billion in cuts to the agency next year ― or 40% of its entire budget ― won't hamper that. Senators didn't buy it. At times, Bhattacharya didn't seem to want to defend it, either. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who chairs the full Senate Appropriations Committee, called the administration's proposed cuts to NIH 'so disturbing.' 'It would undo years of congressional investment in NIH, and it would delay or stop effective treatments and cures from being developed for diseases,' Collins said. 'We also risk falling behind China and other countries that are increasing their investment in biomedical research.' In particular, she asked why the administration is calling for the cutting of funding by 40% for the National Institutes of Aging, which funds most Alzheimer's research, when it's been successfully developing breakthrough drugs and blood tests. Bhattacharya, without defending his own proposed cuts, said 'the intention' of the Trump administration is to lead the world in biomedical research, suggesting Congress could make a counteroffer and potentially propose more spending. 'The budget is a collaborative effort between the Congress and the administration,' he said. Collins simply replied, 'We look forward to working with you to remedy these problems and the deficiencies in the budget.' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the appropriations panel, ripped the administration's 'catastrophic' cuts to NIH to date. She said Trump has so far forced out nearly 5,000 employees, prevented nearly $3 billion in grants from being awarded, and terminated nearly 2,500 grants totaling almost $5 billion for life-saving research. 'The Trump administration is already systematically dismantling the American biomedical research enterprise that is the envy of the world, throwing away billions in economic activity in every one of our states,' Murray fumed. 'This budget proposal would effectively forfeit our leadership in research innovation and competitiveness to China.' She tangled with Bhattacharya over one of dozens of clinical trials that have been halted due to frozen NIH funds: a 23-year research effort to develop an HIV vaccine. Scientists there are on 'the cusp of a functional cure for HIV,' she said, and now 6,000 people in that trial have been cut off from treatment. Bhattacharya jumped in to say he is 'absolutely committed' to supporting research on HIV. 'But you did terminate the HIV research at Fred Hutch that, again, was on the cusp of a treatment for 6,000 patients nationwide,' Murray replied, referring to the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. 'You did do that,' she said, as they talked over each other. 'I'd have to get back to you on that,' said Bhattacharya. 'You did do that,' she repeated. After more back and forth, the NIH director said again, 'The budget request is a work of negotiation between Congress and the administration.' Minutes later, he said it yet again, as Murray pressed for details on how many fewer clinical trials there would be next year because of the Trump administration's proposed cuts. 'I'll say this,' Bhattacharya declared. 'The budget itself is a negotiation between Congress and the administration.' He said it several other times, too. In fact, it became clear this was the NIH director's go-to line for defending his own devastating budget request. It simultaneously allowed him to stand by his bosses ― Trump, and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ― while not exactly arguing in support of its specific cuts. 'President Trump has committed that the U.S. be the leading nation in biomedicine in the 21st century,' he said at one point. 'I entirely support that goal.' 'Well, I do too, but it's hard to understand how we're going to get there when the budget slashes funding,' replied Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.). 'Particularly in critical areas of research where our most critical competitor, the Chinese, are increasing funding in those areas and we're slashing the budgets.' Bhattacharya didn't respond. It's possible he may not have agreed with some of his own budget's cuts. Bhattacharya certainly had a hand in crafting his agency's budget, but so did other officials at the White House and the Department of Health and Human Services. Before becoming NIH director in April, Bhattacharya was a professor of medicine, economics and health research policy at Stanford University. He knows how vital and highly esteemed NIH is, worldwide. Why not put it on Congress to save it? 'You say this is a collaborative effort, and you're absolutely right, and I encourage Congress to exert its authorities,' said Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas). 'If Congress were to provide additional dollars above and beyond the president's budget request, how would we as a committee and how would you as NIH recommend for us to prioritize that spending?' Bhattacharya said he's focused on the 'real health needs' of Americans, like diabetes and cancer, and on the 'need to think big' for advancing science. 'Again, the budget, it's a collaborative effort,' he said. 'But I think it's going to be important that we address the real problems in science and the real needs of the American people with whatever budget comes out. That's my job.' Moran redirected Bhattacharya back to the need for more funding at NIH. 'I assume that means we need more resources,' said the Republican senator. 'And that you would put them to good use. Is that accurate?' 'That's my job,' replied the NIH director.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store