PM joins defamation suit hearing online
During a hearing of Rs10 billion defamation suit, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif claimed that PTI founder Imran Khan had made indirect slanderous remarks against him.
The District and Sessions court judge presided over the hearing, where PM Shehbaz Sharif joined the hearing through a video link.
During a cross-examination, PM Shehbaz Sharif said Imran Khan did not pronounce his name in the TV program but it is very clear that his baseless accusations were clearly aimed at him.
The PM said that the PTI founder had claimed in the program that former premier Nawaz Sharif offered him (Khan) a bribe of Rs10 billion through his brother. The PM said since he was the only living brother of the former premier when Imran leveled allegations, his reputation was hurt by Imran's slanderous remarks.
During the cross-examination, Shehbaz Sharif said he was not aware of any written defamation in the form of posters or pamphlets, adding the impacts of scandalous remarks broadcast by a TV channel are far more damaging than the printed materials.
During the hearing, PM Shehbaz Sharif's counsel objected over questions about audio recording of Justice (retd) Malik Qayum, arguing that his client was not bound to answer the question in the particular case.
During the hearing, PM Shehbaz Sharif's counsel argued that the Supreme Court and High Court had terminated IK's right to file a counterclaim.
IK's counsel argued that IK's right of defense has been terminated. However, no court has declared his counterclaim ineffective.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Newly built Jinnah Square collapses after heavy rain in Islamabad
Listen to article The newly inaugurated Jinnah Square project in the federal capital has come under heavy criticism after a section of the road collapsed during the season's first monsoon rain, exposing serious concerns about construction quality. The road near Serena Chowk caved in just weeks after completion, causing significant traffic disruption and drawing public anger. Rs4.2 billion project was completed in just 84 days and had been hailed by the government as a model of rapid development. 'This is a cruel joke on taxpayers. If a multi-billion-rupee road can't withstand a single spell of rain, it reflects alarming negligence,' said a commuter at the site. The affected section, a loop connecting G-5 to Aabpara, reportedly sank following the rainfall, impeding traffic and raising safety concerns. Construction experts have demanded an independent investigation into the project's structural integrity. Capital Development Authority (CDA) teams began emergency repairs soon after the collapse. However, engineers and citizens alike have expressed serious doubts about the quality and oversight of the construction. The public is now urging Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and the CDA chairman to launch an inquiry and hold those responsible for any negligence or malpractice accountable.
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PM pledges tax cuts on farm inputs, boost to agritech
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday pledged to reduce taxes on agricultural inputs and promote investment in agritech, as part of the government's efforts to revive Pakistan's struggling agriculture sector. 'Agriculture is the backbone of the country, and sustainable reforms in the agriculture sector will further boost the economy,' PM Shehbaz said, while chairing a review meeting. According to a statement released by the Prime Minister's Office (PMO), the prime minister said that reforms in the agriculture sector will significantly increase production per acre, which will further reduce production costs. 'Taxes on agricultural machinery and equipment should be gradually reduced to promote farm mechanisation,' he said. Moreover, steps should be taken to increase the storage capacity of agricultural commodities. The premier urged provinces to come up with new projects and funds for the development of the agriculture sector. He said that the government has not imposed taxes on fertilisers and agricultural chemicals in the upcoming budget for the development of agriculture. PM was hopeful that people sent to China on agricultural scholarships would render valuable services as entrepreneurs for the development of Pakistan's agriculture sector. During the meeting, the prime minister was presented with proposals regarding reforms in the agricultural sector, especially in terms of increasing agricultural production, agricultural infrastructure and easy access to agricultural credit for farmers. The attendees were briefed that the National Agriculture Innovation and Growth Action Plan focuses on increasing farmers' income, increasing production and reforms in the right direction. By adding value to the agricultural sector, farmers' income will be increased from exports and valuable foreign exchange will be earned, it was said. The meeting was attended by Federal Minister for Food Security Rana Tanveer Hussain, Federal Minister for Climate Change Dr Musaddiq Masood Malik, Prime Minister's Chief Coordinator for Agriculture Musharraf Zaidi, Prime Minister's Chief Coordinator for Agriculture Ahmed Umair, private sector entrepreneurs associated with the agricultural sector and senior government officials.
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Judicial credibility hangs in balance
Listen to article As the Supreme Court's Constitutional Bench (CB) gears up to resume hearing on review petitions against the majority verdict in the reserved seats case on Thursday, speculation is swirling about the direction of the decision and the political tremors it may unleash. Experts believe the ruling will rest on how the court chooses to read the Constitution: either with a microscope or a magnifying glass. Former additional attorney general Waqar Rana notes that the fate of the case hinges on two distinct interpretative approaches to the Constitution: a literal and pedantic reading, treating the Constitution as an ordinary statute or a liberal and organic interpretation that upholds foundational constitutional values. "It is a test of the judiciary when judging the state (Paula Newberg) whether it follows and upholds the Constitution by approaching it with the latter rules of interpretation or it follows the former rules," Rana stated. He added that from a historical perspective, the judiciary has been split into two camps: one aligned with the tradition of Justice Cornelius and the other with that of Justice Munir. "Choices are simple. The Court either follows constitutional faith or continues with idolatry of necessity. In the ultimate analysis, the faith of people in the judicial system as an independent arbiter of justice and the rule of law is at stake." The reserved seats case is pivotal in determining whether Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) secures 23 additional National Assembly seats, which would significantly affect the power balance in the lower house and determine whether the ruling coalition secures a two-thirds majority. To date, the judgment authored by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah – and endorsed by seven other judges – has not been implemented by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), despite being nearly a year old. Observers note that four judicial opinions were rendered in the case. Among them is the second opinion, authored by Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail and supported by then chief justice Qazi Faez Isa. This view, widely referred to as the "Mandokhail Formula," allows PTI some representation in the National Assembly. Should this view be endorsed by a new majority, the ruling coalition could achieve a two-thirds majority, while PTI reclaims a parliamentary presence. A senior lawyer commented that endorsement of Justice Mandokhail's view could offer a "win-win situation" for both the government and PTI: the ruling alliance gets its supermajority, and PTI regains entry into Parliament. The third opinion was penned by Justice Aminuddin Khan, head of the CB, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan. They dismissed the Sunni Ittehad Council's (SIC) petition, upholding both the Peshawar High Court and ECP decisions, which held that reserved seats could not be allocated to SIC. Their opinion called for the redistribution of the 78 unallocated seats among all qualifying parties, especially the PML-N and PPP. Justice Amin's role as the CB's presiding judge gives his position added weight, and notably, six new judges have joined the current bench. However, none of the six judges who were part of the original bench are included in the review proceedings. Even two judges who had earlier endorsed the majority order are not publicly supporting the July 12 judgement in court. One judge, during recent hearings, even used the term "biased" to describe the original majority decisionan unprecedented move that has added further uncertainty to the case's outcome. Meanwhile, debate is growing over whether the new majority will side with Justice Amin's stance or adopt the Mandokhail formula. Legal insiders note that although two judges – Justice Ayesha Malik and Justice Aqeel Ahmad Abbasi – have already dismissed the review petitions and their votes will count in the final decision, many believe the July 12 majority judgement may not survive the ongoing review. Some pro-government legal voices claim that the 27th Constitutional Amendment is under discussion, allegedly aiming to restructure judicial authority over the long term. This has reignited debate on whether judicial independence, a core feature of the Constitution, is being preserved or compromised. Notably, petitions challenging the 26th Constitutional Amendment have yet to be scheduled by the CB, despite repeated calls from senior SC judges. Observers argue that the judges who benefited from the 26th Amendment appear less concerned about judicial independence than those who were sidelined by it. Though the government appears confident about the outcome, the bench is reportedly eager to conclude the review proceedings swiftly. PTI's counsel, Hamid Khan, has requested adjournment until August 5, citing his general adjournment, but sources suggest the court is unlikely to delay proceedings, especially with judges' summer vacations already in effect.
