logo
Andrew Tate's UK civil trial over abuse, coercive control allegations moved to 2026

Andrew Tate's UK civil trial over abuse, coercive control allegations moved to 2026

Straits Times4 hours ago

LONDON - Andrew Tate, an internet personality and self-described misogynist, faces a trial in Britain next year in four women's civil lawsuits for alleged physical and sexual abuse, after the case was brought forward on Wednesday.
The four claimants, who have been granted anonymity, allege Tate subjected them to physical or sexual violence between 2013 and 2015. Two say they were in an intimate relationship with Tate, while two worked for his online webcam business.
The women's lawyers say in court filings that one woman was threatened with a gun as Tate said "you're going to do as I say or there'll be hell to pay", while another alleges Tate strangled her until she was unconscious during sex.
Tate, 38, denies the allegations and his lawyers say in his written defence that the claims are false and that all sexual activity was consensual.
During a preliminary hearing at London's High Court on Wednesday, the trial was brought forward to June 2026, having previously been due to start in early 2027.
"It's not in anyone's interest that this case goes into the long grass of 2027," judge Christina Lambert said.
The claimants' lawyer Anne Studd said that, in addition to the four women, there would be a further six to eight witnesses.
The four British claimants welcomed the decision.
"We've already spent years waiting for justice, and so it's of some comfort to hear that Andrew Tate will face these allegations in a court earlier than the original plan of 2027," they said.
Tate did not attend Wednesday's brief hearing and was not required to do so. His lawyers previously said he intends to give evidence in his defence at the trial.
Tate and his brother Tristan are under criminal investigation in Romania and face a criminal case in Britain. Their lawyers said last month the pair will return to face those charges once proceedings in Romania conclude. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German Court fines FA over 2006 World Cup-related payment
German Court fines FA over 2006 World Cup-related payment

Straits Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

German Court fines FA over 2006 World Cup-related payment

FRANKFURT, Germany - A German Court on Wednesday fined the German Football Association (DFB) just over 100,000 euros in relation to a World Cup 2006-related payment which had been at the heart of a years-long scandal that tarnished the reputation of the tournament. The DFB said it took note of Frankfurt Regional Court's decision on Wednesday, adding that an appeal was possible but it would first study the written verdict once published. The case regarding a payment of 6.7 million euros ($7.8 million) made two decades ago damaged the image of the global showpiece event held in Germany. At the heart of the case that dragged through the legal system and involved several other separate investigations is the payment linked to a 2006 World Cup-related event that never took place. The tax return included a 6.7 million euro payment from the DFB to world soccer's governing body FIFA for the 2006 World Cup, although the funds were actually used for another purpose and should not have been offset against tax, prosecutors had said. "According to the ruling, the court assumes that the DFB fully declared and taxed its income from the 2006 World Cup. However, it believes that the 6.7 million euros should have been deducted for tax purposes in 2002, not in 2006," the DFB said in a statement. "The Regional Court imposed a fine of 130,000 euros on the DFB because it ruled in isolation on the year 2006 and did not take into account the excessive tax paid for 2002," the DFB said. "The DFB only has to pay 110,000 euros because the court deducted 20,000 euros due to the excessive length of the proceedings. In April, the same court had discharged former DFB President Theo Zwanziger after ordering him to pay a 10,000-euro fine. The payment in question had triggered investigations over allegations it had been used as a slush fund to buy votes in favour of Germany's bid to host the 2006 tournament. A DFB-commissioned investigation in 2016 had said the sum was the return of a loan via FIFA from former Adidas chief Robert Louis-Dreyfus. The German tax office ordered the DFB in 2017 to pay more than 20 million euros in back taxes related to the year 2006. The tournament was nicknamed the "summer fairytale" because of the home team's run to the semi-finals, and the sold-out stadiums and outdoor viewing areas across the country which attracted hundreds of thousands of fans. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Young people in Singapore carrying weapons as 'fashion accessory': Counsellor
Young people in Singapore carrying weapons as 'fashion accessory': Counsellor

New Paper

timean hour ago

  • New Paper

Young people in Singapore carrying weapons as 'fashion accessory': Counsellor

Young people may be carrying weapons in public as a "fashion accessory", and brandishing them during heated arguments, a counsellor who works with at-risk youth flagged. Mr Narasimman Tivasiha Mani, co-founder of the charity Impart, said he has seen an increasing number of young people carrying weapons as accessories in the last 10 years. "Some of these weapons look quite nice, so (young people) buy them and carry them around to show off," he said. Mr Narasimman, who said some of the weapons can be found on sale on platforms like Carousell, Telegram and Facebook, added that they would be used when these young people get into confrontations with others. His comments come in the wake of a spate of incidents over the last year that saw young people linked to violent crimes. In March, a 16-year-old was convicted of rioting with a deadly weapon after he brandished a flick knife at another teen during a group attack, which involved five others aged 13 to 17. The teen, who has yet to be sentenced, had asked the victim if he wanted to "try the knife". In September 2024, a 22-year-old man was charged with murder after a brawl in Kitchener Road. Three other men and two women were charged with rioting with a deadly weapon over the same incident. In June 2024, a 19-year-old was charged with voluntarily causing hurt with a dangerous weapon. He had allegedly slashed a 20-year-old man with a chopper during a fight in Sembawang. Mr Amalraj Thevar Manivannan, 27, is a friend of Mr Dhinessh Vasie, who died in the Kitchener Road brawl. "He was so young and there was so much ahead for him," said Mr Amalraj of the 25-year-old victim. A father of a three-month-old girl, Mr Amalraj said he is concerned that young people may be carrying weapons in public. "My worry is when my daughter starts going to school. Will there be enough advocacy against violence and use of such weapons, or will things be worse?" he said. Official figures from 2019 to 2023 show that the number of offenders aged 10 to below 21 involved in offences under the Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act had climbed from 92 to 133. Offences under the Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act involved mainly youth who were seen with offensive weapons such as knives. The Straits Times checked and found weapons like karambit knives sold on online platforms like Carousell and Shopee, many with intricate designs and videos demonstrating how they could be used. The karambit knife is a scheduled weapon. Possession of a scheduled weapon - which includes flick knives, gravity knives and knuckle dusters - without lawful authority can result in a jail term of up to five years, with a minimum of six strokes of the cane for a first conviction. Mr Narasimman said the use of weapons in the gaming world can play a part in influencing a young person to carry a weapon in real life. "It becomes a thing for them to have a weapon, because in the game, a weapon increases the chance of them winning the fight. It conditions them to think that violence is an option," he added. MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC Darryl David had raised the issue in Parliament in September 2024 after a spate of rioting cases involving young people aged below 21 and deadly weapons. Minister for Home Affairs K. Shanmugam said in a written reply that there was an average of 10 cases of rioting with deadly weapons every year between 2019 and 2023. Slightly more than half involved offenders below 21 years of age. Speaking with ST, Mr David said young people may be influenced by violent content they are watching on social media. "When they have all this unfiltered content coming through without proper guidance, it could lead to acts of violence in real life. "(The acts of violence) might also be due to the lack of adequate social and familial structures, and inability to manage anger, frustration and unhappiness," he said. Mr Narasimman said young people lack emotional regulation because their brains are not fully developed. "Their executive functioning skills (at that age) might be poor, so they tend to act based on their emotions. Impulsivity is a huge trait among young people who use weapons. "They don't know what to do when they feel threatened, and their need to fight back is strong, so they resort to using weapons," he said, adding that childhood trauma and negative influences from friends might also contribute to their violent tendencies. Mr David said educators and counsellors can help young people navigate the plethora of information available to them. "As an educator, I believe that we've never had a generation exposed to so much information, with so little maturity. "It's a very dangerous combination," said Mr David, who was formerly deputy director of Temasek Polytechnic's School of Design. He said more can be done to show young people that there are other avenues to share their fears and anxieties. "With youth, we need to help them learn how to deal with fear and anxiety, and prevent these emotions from manifesting in acts of violence. We can teach them to manage their feelings, and find healthy channels for release," he said. When counselling at-risk youth, Mr Narasimman focuses on understanding their backgrounds and teaching them how to regulate their emotions. These include equipping them with coping skills such as breathing exercises or clenching their fists to help them calm down in moments of anger. As incidents of violence most commonly involve males, part of Mr Narasimman's work involves reshaping these young people's narratives of what it means to be a man. He added: "Many of them have been told not to cry, because boys must be harder and stronger. "But when these youth are not in touch with their emotions, they bottle it up, and it may eventually burst."

Spain's High Court upholds conviction of ex-soccer chief Rubiales' in kiss case
Spain's High Court upholds conviction of ex-soccer chief Rubiales' in kiss case

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Spain's High Court upholds conviction of ex-soccer chief Rubiales' in kiss case

MADRID - Spain's High Court on Wednesday upheld a verdict that found former soccer federation president Luis Rubiales guilty of sexual assault for an unsolicited kiss on the lips of national team player Jenni Hermoso at the 2023 World Cup in Sydney. The court rejected multiple appeals against the conviction, reaffirming Rubiales kissed Hermoso without her consent during the medal ceremony after Spain's women had won the trophy, according to the ruling seen by Reuters. Rubiales was fined over 10,000 euros ($11,592) and acquitted of coercion charges alongside three co-defendants. Prosecutors had sought a 2-1/2-year prison sentence and called for a retrial, both of which were dismissed. The incident sparked widespread debate about sexism in Spanish society and women's football, fueling momentum for the "Me Too" movement in the country. Rubiales argued that his actions were motivated by an uncontrollable joy, but the court ruled that his restraint with other players and attendees demonstrated he could have avoided such behaviour with Hermoso. "Since that emotion did not lead him to express his joy so effusively by kissing the other players or the accompanying persons in the box, and he restrained himself, he could also have done so, without too much effort, with the captain of the team," the court said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store