
No country for old politicians? Some California Democrats want an age cap.
The idea, initiated by San Francisco Democrats in a resolution, will be considered by the statewide party when it holds its convention later this month. Although it is largely a symbolic pursuit, the fact that the conversation is occurring at all is noteworthy in a place known for revering its elder leaders.
California is the state of former Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who died in office at age 90 in 2023. It is also the home of Jerry Brown, who served two terms as governor in his 70s; Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the former House speaker, who is 85; and Barbara Lee, the former Congress member who was elected last month as Oakland mayor at the age of 78.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Not all of those leaders have caused worry, and some have had significant achievements late in life. But former President Joe Biden brought the issue to the fore last year when he was campaigning at 81. Many Democrats believe he waited too long to bow out, robbing the party of time to mount an effective effort to beat Donald Trump.
Advertisement
'We can't just act like it didn't happen and like we aren't going to make changes as a result,' said Eric Kingsbury, a San Francisco Democrat.
Advertisement
Former House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., spoke during a news conference on the Equality Act at the Capitol, on Tuesday.
Rod Lamkey/Associated Press
Kingsbury, 36, is a member of the San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee. He said he wrote the resolution as a direct response to Biden staying in the race too long and some Democrats remaining unwilling to even discuss how to clear the way for younger candidates. His resolution called for exploring a mandatory retirement age for all elected and appointed leaders at the state and local levels. Notably, it did not specify a particular age.
The proposal passed last month and will be among hundreds considered by the California Democratic Party at its convention this month, but it may not advance very far. Even if it does, it would take a state law, passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor, to impose an age limit.
This article originally appeared in
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Week in Louisiana Poltics: Approaching the end of the legislative session
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana First) — We're approaching the end of the regular legislative session this week. We've seen many bills debated in the legislature. So far, Governor Jeff Landry has signed into law six bills from his tort and insurance reform effort, which he says will lower insurance rates. We've seen election security bills make it out of committee—they are headed to the House for final passage. And then there's the state's budget, which is House Bill 1 by Representative Jack McFarland. That bill easily passed out of the Committee on Appropriations and then sailed through the full House with bipartisan support. Louisiana House committee rejects bill on homeless camps It's awaiting final passage in the Senate, then will head back to the House, where it'll likely reflect priorities from both the legislature and the governor, including education, fully funding services, and teacher pay raises. This and more on Your Local Election Headquarters. Several injured after Tennessee plane crash Southern University Law Center offering help to clear criminal records with event in Gonzales The best midsize SUVs for 2025 Invasive tick that can be deadly for cattle causing concerns among researchers Tropical Storm Barbara strengthens off Mexico, expected to become hurricane Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mullin fires back at Newsom over National Guard in Los Angeles: ‘Words are cheap'
Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) on Sunday fired back at comments from California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) over the deployment of the National Guard to the Los Angeles area. 'The federal government is moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers. That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions,' Newsom said in a Saturday statement. 'LA authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice. We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need,' he added. During an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union,' the network's Dana Bash noted Newsom's comments. 'Governor Newsom says that the National Guard, at least sending them, is purposely inflaming and will only escalate tensions there,' Bash said. 'Well, words are cheap, especially when you got video,' Mullin responded. 'And so you asked me, did it look like it was under — or I'll ask you, did it look like it was under control?' 'It doesn't. It is absolutely not in control. You saw rioters throwing rocks, throwing fireworks, being extremely aggressive towards not just federal agents, but even the county and the local [police department] that was there. So does it look like it's under control? Absolutely not,' he added. Trump called for the deployment of 2,000 National Guard members to the Los Angeles area on Saturday amid protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said previously the action was due to 'violent mobs' recently attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations.' 'These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens. That is why President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' Leavitt said. The Hill has reached out to the White House and Newsom's office for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats blast Trump's decision to send National Guard to Los Angeles: ‘They want a spectacle'
Several Democrats on Sunday criticized President Trump for ordering thousands of National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area in response to immigration protests over the past two days. Trump has ordered 2,000 troops to assist immigration agents in quelling the protests in L.A., where demonstrators are rallying against federal immigration raids. Troops began arriving in L.A. on Sunday morning. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Saturday said the move is a result of 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations' in recent days. Trump said California Democrats Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass were to blame for the unrest that began as a result of Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Newsom responded to Trump's order by calling it 'purposefully inflammatory' and stating that 'there is currently no unmet need.' 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' Trump wrote in a Saturday Truth Social post. On Sunday morning, Newsom, in a post on the social platform X, claimed the federal government is 'taking over the California National Guard' because 'they want a spectacle.' 'Don't give them one. Never use violence. Speak out peacefully,' he added. In a separate post, Newsom reiterated his call for demonstrators to stay peaceful, claiming that Trump is 'hoping for chaos so he can justify more crackdowns, more fear, more control.' He also slammed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's threat to deploy active-duty Marines into LA, calling it 'deranged behavior.' Bass, in a Saturday night interview, said deploying the National Guard was 'completely unnecessary' and that it would only escalate tensions. 'My conversations with the administration today have been to assure them that if there are protests that break out and if there is violence associated with those protests, that the Los Angeles Police Department is well equipped to handle that,' she said. 'Two thousand officers, 2,000 in our city will not be a positive thing and will not be helpful.' Both Newsom and Bass also called out Trump for thanking National Guard troops on Sunday morning before they had arrived in LA. Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-Calif.) on Sunday echoed Bass in that the troops in the LA area are 'going to escalate the situation.' 'It's a concern,' Barragán told CNN's Dana Bash on 'State of the Union.' 'I mean, it's going to escalate the situation. People are going to protest because they're angry about the situation, and we have to just reiterate to people to do it peacefully.' Democrats outside of California have also pushed back on the Trump administration over its handling of the immigration protests. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Sunday went after Trump over the deployment of 2,000 National Guard members to the Los Angeles area, saying the president 'thinks he has a right to do anything.' 'He does not believe in the Constitution; he does not believe in the rule of law,' Sanders told Bash of Trump on 'State of the Union.' Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) slammed Trump's response to the protests as 'hypocritical at best' compared to how he responded to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. 'Since years before I was born, law enforcement knows it's good when there's cooperation and coordination,' Booker said. 'For the president to do this when it wasn't requested, breaking with generations of tradition, is only going to incite the situation and make things worse.' He compared Trump's reaction to the LA protests to his response to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. 'We are now at a point where we have a president who sat back and did nothing as people stormed our Capitol, viciously beat police,' he continued. 'And then when those people who viciously beat police and led to some of their deaths, therefore, cop killers, were convicted by juries, he then pardoned them all.' Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on X claimed Trump was not trying to 'heal or keep the peace.' 'He is looking to inflame and divide. His movement doesn't believe in democracy or protest – and if they get a chance to end the rule of law they will take it. None of this is on the level,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.