logo
Pahalgam to Rawalpindi via DC: Tale of a conflict

Pahalgam to Rawalpindi via DC: Tale of a conflict

Hindustan Times11-05-2025

India has shown that it will not accept terror attacks emanating from Pakistani soil and displayed serious political intent and military capacity to counter it. Pakistan has shown that it is not a pushover although the asymmetry in power was evident, and that it possesses military and diplomatic capabilities to stand its ground. China has shown that it will leave no stone unturned to use Pakistan to weaken India. And, America has shown that despite being a distracted power with the intent to do less in the rest of the world, it remains the decisive player in the international system to shape the course of war and peace.
That is the big picture that emerges out of the post-Pahalgam churn. But first here is a quick summary of how India and Pakistan got here based on the limited information in the public domain.
Pakistani-backed terrorists killed civilians based on their religion in Pahalgam. India decided that wasn't acceptable and prepared for a fortnight before mounting unprecedented strikes in both Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) and Punjab against nine terror camps and bases. With Chinese equipment and support, Pakistan was possibly able to inflict some damage on Indian air capabilities, a fact that India hasn't yet publicly acknowledged. Pakistan then began an offensive against key Indian military bases across the western border, which India countered effectively and then responded by neutralising Lahore's air defence system.
Pakistan then mounted a drone-based offensive against urban centres and military bases in India which were intercepted; India responded with drone attacks of its own on military sites in Pakistan. Pakistan continued its offensive the next day, adding missile strikes on Indian air bases. India lost patience and hit three key Pakistani Air Force bases, including the one in Rawalpindi. This led to a renewed Pakistani offensive against Indian military installations and civilian centres and the likely mobilisation of ground troops. All this while, cross-border shelling at the Line of Control (LoC) kept intensifying with an increasing loss of lives. At this point, on Saturday evening, as the world moved from being exasperated to alarmed, Donald Trump announced that US 'mediation' had led to a ceasefire deal.
To be sure, this is a rough and incomplete story. The attacks and counter-attacks weren't neat and sequential but often simultaneous and multi-domain. In the next few days, all sides will attempt to cast themselves as the victor. And, over the next few weeks and months, we will know a lot more about what happened between the night of May 7 and May 10 in New Delhi, Rawalpindi and Washington DC, at the LoC and International Border, in the skies, and who gained what and lost what. But based on an admittedly incomplete sketch, here is a set of preliminary conclusions.
One, India has institutionalised a new template. Uri gave an indication, Balakot provided further proof, but Operation Sindoor has established for sure that New Delhi has no political tolerance for major terror attacks on Indian soil anymore. From quick cross-border surgical strikes in 2016 and an air strike in PoK in 2019, India moved to conduct strikes in a wider geography against a larger set of targets in Pakistan. This was an impressive logistical and military feat. On Saturday, India also decided that any future terror attack would be considered an act of war.
The principle of zero tolerance for terror, when translated into real policy, means that Pakistan will have to really think hard about whether it wants to incite a wider conflict with India when it sends its boys across the border to shatter the calm in Kashmir or beyond. While one can hope that better sense prevails in Rawalpindi, India will also have to prepare for the worst, boost its military capabilities, plug diplomatic weaknesses, enhance its internal security preparedness given the possibility of terror ground seeking revenge, and prepare its citizens for more frequent bouts of violence, losses and disorder.
Two, Pakistan has shown that while it may be weaker, it is no pushover. Yes, the Indian GDP is eleven times more than that of Pakistan. And yes, India's government wants to build the country unlike Pakistan's army which is happy to burn their own country for the sake of propping up terror proxies and to cement domestic legitimacy or make their chief look like a superhero. But it is important to recognise that the army's dominance, its control over the budget, its historical utility to major powers and therefore ability to extract weapon systems, its dense and intimate relationship with China and Turkey, and decades of anti-India nationalist propaganda and Islamist radicalisation have given the Pakistanis a set of tools.
This operates both at the level of mustering social support for prolonged conflict or escalation and at the level of having more military options. Drones have opened a new chapter of warfare. Pakistan showed an ability to strain India's air defences. The nuclear blackmail option persists even as India has now thrice successfully pushed the envelope on what's possible below the nuke threshold, effectively calling Pakistan's bluff. Pakistan's mobilisation of ground troops had created a possibility of a prolonged land-based war. And exporting terrorism remains a cheap option for a perennially irresponsible state. Make no mistake: India has overwhelming dominance in all domains, it would have won any war, and it has showed the ability to withstand Pakistan's asymmetric warfare for decades. But Pakistan's ability to cause destruction must not be discounted and was visible in this episode.
Three, China was absolutely central to Pakistan's ability to defend itself. All accounts suggest that Beijing provided diplomatic support at the UN, material support for operations and possibly intelligence support to Rawalpindi. For anyone in Delhi who still harbours dreams of detente or rapprochement with Beijing, if Galwan wasn't enough, the past five days should be a reminder that India's tensions with China are deep and have a strong Pakistan dimension. China controls parts of Kashmir. China wants parts of Ladakh. China has an active military presence and upgraded infrastructure at the border. Stability at the Line of Actual Control is fragile. And on top of that, China is behind Pakistan's nuclear and conventional military capabilities. China's relationship with Russia has meant that Moscow may no longer be as solid an Indian ally even on Pakistan as in the past. China is, clearly, happy to see India, on the cusp of ripe geopolitical opportunities, dragged back into a hyphenated morass with Pakistan. All of this means that Delhi will have to live with two active and fragile fronts and be prepared for challenges on either or both any time.
And, finally, the entire post-Pahalgam churn has shown the continued salience of America despite the rhetoric of disengagement and the reality of incompetence and limited personnel. Donald Trump doesn't want wars under his watch; go back to his inaugural speech where he said the one thing he would like to be is a 'peacemaker'. He is particularly obsessed with nuclear threats. And America's ability to wield both carrots and sticks with both India and Pakistan remains enormous. India may not have liked his tendency to claim credit and his use of the word 'mediation'. India may well have rejected Secretary of State Marco Rubio's claims that the ceasefire would be followed by dialogue between India and Pakistan at a neutral place. But it is clear that the US played a central role in facilitating conversations between the two sides and getting the firing to stop. The global cop is still the global cop. At the same time, there were also other players, particularly the UK, Saudi Arabia and UAE, that played a key role in weighing on Pakistan.
India can take satisfaction that it displayed serious political intent to battle terror, showed it had the capability to degrade terror infrastructure, remained unified and mature in its response, and kept the big picture of its developmental objectives in mind even at a highly emotive time as it decided to end this bout of confrontation. But it must also acknowledge that the task of imposing deterrence hasn't been met fully, and it must prepare for a more volatile security situation and a neighbourhood that may just have got more fragile.
Prashant Jha is a political commentator. The views expressed are personal

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Okay with my daughter abusing...': Sharmishta Panoli's father hits back after influencer gets bail
'Okay with my daughter abusing...': Sharmishta Panoli's father hits back after influencer gets bail

Hindustan Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Okay with my daughter abusing...': Sharmishta Panoli's father hits back after influencer gets bail

The father of influencer Sharmishta Panoli, who was granted interim bail by the Calcutta High Court, has spoken out following her arrest over controversial social media comments related to Operation Sindoor. The 22-year-old was arrested by Kolkata Police from Gurugram and accused of hurting religious sentiments with allegedly communal remarks made in a video posted online. Days after she was granted bail, her father, Prithviraj Panoli, shared a post on X, quoting Urdu poet Allama Iqbal's song 'Saare Jahan Se Accha'. Referencing a verse which calls for no religious animosity, Panoli said, "He preached this to the secular Hindustan and then became one of the founding voices for Islamic Pakistan." Defending his daughter, Panoli urged others to follow in her footsteps. After a social media user urged him to discourage his daughter from using "inappropriate or offensive language", he hit back, saying he was "ok" with his daughter abusing 'Pakistani terrorists.' "I am OK with my daughter abusing Pakistani terrorists who killed innocents in the name of religion. She only used some words what many maulanas preach openly. Are you OK for her getting rape threats for that despite apologising? Did you raise your voice against that? If yes, I am with you," he wrote. A 22-year-old law student from Pune, Sharmishta Panoli, found herself at the centre of controversy after she allegedly made remarks about Bollywood celebrities' silence on 'Operation Sindoor.' The video quickly went viral, drawing sharp backlash online, with many accusing her of spreading hate speech. Panoli also received threats in the comments section of her post. Following the uproar, she deleted the video from Instagram and issued a public apology. In her statement, she expressed regret and stated that she never intended to hurt anyone's religious sentiments. She also deleted her previous posts. Panoli's arrest by Kolkata Police triggered a political storm in West Bengal, with the Opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) slamming the move as 'selective enforcement' of the law.

India will protect farmers' interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan
India will protect farmers' interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan

The Print

time16 minutes ago

  • The Print

India will protect farmers' interest in US trade talks: Shivraj Singh Chouhan

He was responding to a query on how India would safeguard farmers amid US pressure for greater market access for American agricultural and horticultural products. 'Our priority is to protect the interest of our farmers. India will not work closing its eyes. We will assess our gains and losses. Keeping that in mind, an agreement will be finalised,' Chouhan told PTI in an interview. New Delhi, Jun 8 (PTI) India will prioritise protecting its farmers' interests while assessing potential gains and losses in the ongoing trade negotiations with the United States over agricultural market access, Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan said. The negotiators are expected to agree on the framework for the broad contours of the first phase of the bilateral deal, expected to be signed by fall (September-October) 2025. 'The discussions are ongoing between India and the US. One thing is clear, we will protect the interest of our farmers. When we talk about two nations, we need to see the overall trade,' the minister added. According to a NITI Aayog report, 'Promoting India-US Agricultural Trade under the new US Trade Regime', the value for US agriculture and allied product exports to India was about USD 2.22 billion in the triennium ending 2024. In the same period, India exported USD 5.75 billion worth of agricultural products to the US. India's main agricultural exports to the US include frozen shrimp, basmati rice, spices, processed cereals, and other value-added products. The US wants to export more agricultural products such as corn, soybeans, and animal feed, but faces high Indian tariffs — especially in agriculture, where average tariffs can reach up to 39-50 per cent. The minister's comments come as India and the US continue negotiations on expanding agricultural trade, with Washington seeking reduced tariffs and improved market access for its farm products in the Indian market. India is cautious about fully opening its agriculture and dairy markets due to concerns about potential backlash from rural communities and the need to protect domestic producers from global price volatility. PTI LUX TRB TRB This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

In Pics: Burning Cars, Tear Gas At Los Angeles Anti-Immigration Protests
In Pics: Burning Cars, Tear Gas At Los Angeles Anti-Immigration Protests

NDTV

time17 minutes ago

  • NDTV

In Pics: Burning Cars, Tear Gas At Los Angeles Anti-Immigration Protests

Los Angeles: Demonstrators clashed with the US National Guard and police in Los Angeles on Sunday, where tear gas and pepper spray were fired at the crowd protesting against the anti-immigration raids by authorities. US President Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops to the streets of Los Angeles after protests erupted when federal immigration authorities arrested dozens of people across Los Angeles as part of an immigration crackdown. Trump also threatened to deploy Marines to the demonstrations for the "escalating situation", even as California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom called the troop deployment unlawful, saying it would only escalate tensions. In a post on X, Newsom said Trump's move came "despite protests already being managed by the LAPD". "Los Angeles: Remain peaceful. Don't fall into the trap that extremists are hoping for," he said, adding that "We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved." "This is a serious breach of state sovereignty -- inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California," he said in another post over the deployment of the National Guard. Meanwhile, unrest continued for a third day, with protesters angry at the action by immigration officials--which began in broad daylight on Friday in a city with a large Latino population-- that has resulted in dozens of arrests of what authorities say are illegal migrants and gang members. Meanwhile, protestors burned at least three self-driving Waymo cars on Sunday, with two others vandalised as protesters roamed around a limited area in downtown Los Angeles. Traffic was halted on a key freeway for over an hour while scores of people thronged the roadway. They were moved off by California Highway Patrol officers, who used flash-bangs and smoke grenades. By early afternoon, LAPD officers established containment lines some distance from federal buildings, preventing contact between angry demonstrators and the scores of armed National Guardsmen from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, who had gathered in helmets and camouflage gear. Demonstrators wave flags from atop a wrecked car, standing beside burning Waymo vehicles, as protesters clash with law enforcement in the streets surrounding the federal building during a protest following federal immigration operations in Los Angeles (Source: AFP) As night fell, a few dozen people -- many wearing masks and hoodies -- remained in hotspots, with some lobbing projectiles and fireworks. Law enforcement has arrested at least 56 people over two days, and three officers have suffered minor injuries, LAPD said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store