logo
A Texas effort to clarify abortion ban reaches a key vote, but doubts remain

A Texas effort to clarify abortion ban reaches a key vote, but doubts remain

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Three years ago, Dr. Austin Dennard left Texas for an abortion after her fetus was diagnosed with a fatal condition. She later testified in a lawsuit how the state's near-total ban on abortion put her health at risk.
On Wednesday, a key vote is scheduled on a bill that aims to clarify medical exceptions under one of the nation's most restrictive bans. But Dennard's feelings are mixed about the bill, which does not list specific medical conditions or include fatal fetal anomalies as exceptions.
'What is broadly now known among practicing physicians in Texas is that abortions are illegal,' said Dennard, an OB-GYN in Dallas. 'Undoing that broad understanding is going to be difficult.'
For the first time since Texas' abortion ban took effect in 2022, both Republicans and Democrats are coalescing behind legislation to clarify medical exceptions. For Republicans, the bill is a significant pivot after years of defending the ban in the face of legal challenges, while some abortion-rights supporters have questioned whether it will make a difference.
The bill would specify that doctors cannot face criminal charges for performing an abortion in a medical emergency that causes major bodily impairment, and it defines a 'life-threatening' condition as one capable of causing death. It would not broaden exceptions to include cases of rape or incest.
The bill, which passed the Senate last month, could advance to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott as soon as Wednesday if approved by the GOP-controlled Texas House.
Similar near-total abortion bans across the country have faced numerous legal challenges and criticism from medical professionals who have said that medical exceptions are too vague.
Moves to clarify medical exceptions
Lawmakers in at least nine states with abortion bans have sought to change or clarify medical exceptions that allow doctors to perform an abortion if the mother's life is at risk since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports abortion rights.
Supporters of these bills have said they have the potential to save lives. Critics, including some abortion rights groups, have questioned whether they make state abortion laws easier to understand.
In Kentucky, Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear earlier this year vetoed a bill that GOP lawmakers touted as bringing clarity to that state's near-total abortion ban, saying it would not protect pregnant women. Republican lawmakers later overrode his veto.
Last year, South Dakota released a video for physicians that outlined examples of acceptable medical emergencies that received criticism from abortion rights supporters for not being specific enough.
'I think these bills are trying to get at the reality that exceptions are really hard to comply with,' said Kimya Forouzan, principal state policy adviser at the Guttmacher Institute.
Still, Texas Republican Sen. Bryan Hughes, an architect of the state's abortion ban, said the new bill's goal is to avoid confusion among doctors.
'One of the most important things we want to do is to make sure that doctors and hospitals and the hospital lawyers are trained on what the law is,' Hughes said.
Navigating exceptions under bans
In 2024, the Texas Supreme Court ruled against Dennard and a group of women who say they were denied an abortion after experiencing serious pregnancy complications that threatened their lives and fertility. The court ruled that the state's laws were clear in allowing doctors to perform an abortion to save the life of the mother.
Texas' efforts underscore the challenges abortion opponents have had to navigate regarding medical exceptions, said Mary Ziegler, a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law and a historian of abortion politics in the U.S.
Judges have put enforcement of Utah's abortion ban on hold in a case over exceptions, for example, and they struck down two Oklahoma bans over medical exceptions – though most abortions in that state remain illegal.
For abortion opponents, Ziegler said, it's tricky to craft legislation that does two different things.
'Can you provide clear guidance as to when medical intervention is justified without providing physicians discretion to provide abortions they don't think are emergencies?' Ziegler said.
Texas may advance other anti-abortion laws
Texas' ban prohibits nearly all abortions, except to save the life of the mother, and doctors can be fined up to $100,000 and face up to 99 years in prison if convicted of performing an abortion illegally.
Attorney General Ken Paxton's office has filed criminal charges against a midwife for allegedly providing illegal abortions and is also suing a New York doctor for prescribing abortion pills to a Texas woman.
Texas Republicans are also advancing efforts to make it a civil offense to mail, deliver or manufacture abortion pills, expanding on a 2021 law that allows private individuals to sue others whom they suspect are helping a woman obtain an abortion.
___
Associated Press writer Geoff Mulvihill in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, contributed to this report.
___
Lathan is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How unusual is it for the National Guard to come to LA? Here's what to know about the city's history
How unusual is it for the National Guard to come to LA? Here's what to know about the city's history

Associated Press

time4 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

How unusual is it for the National Guard to come to LA? Here's what to know about the city's history

President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests is the latest in a long history of U.S. elected officials sending troops in hopes of thwarting unrest connected to civil rights protests. National Guard troops are typically deployed for a variety of emergencies and natural disasters with the permission of governors in responding states, but Trump, a Republican, sent about 1,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles despite the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats. Confrontations began Friday when dozens of protesters gathered outside a federal detention center demanding the release of more than 40 people arrested by federal immigration authorities across Los Angeles, as part of Trump's mass deportation campaign. Trump said that federalizing the troops on Saturday was necessary to 'address the lawlessness' in California. Newsom said Trump's recent decision was 'purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' Some of the previous National Guard deployments have preserved peace amid violent crackdowns from local law enforcement or threats from vigilantes, but sometimes they have intensified tensions among people who were protesting for civil rights or racial equality. On rare occasion, presidents have invoked an 18th-century wartime law called the Insurrection Act, which is the main legal mechanism that a president can use to activate the military or National Guard during times of rebellion or unrest. Other times they relied on a similar federal law that allows the president to federalize National Guard troops under certain circumstances, which is what Trump did on Saturday. Here is a look at some of the most notable deployments: George Floyd protests in Los Angeles in 2020 Almost five years ago, Newsom deployed approximately 8,000 National Guard troops to quell protests over racial injustice inspired by the death of George Floyd in Minnesota. Well over half of the troops deployed in California were sent to Los Angeles County, where police arrested more than 3,000 people. City officials at the time, including then-Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, supported Newsom's decision. Rodney King protests in 1992 Some have compared Trump's decision on Saturday to George H.W. Bush's use of the Insurrection Act to respond to riots in Los Angeles in 1992, after the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. In just six days the protests became one of the deadliest race riots in American history, with 63 people dying, nine of whom were killed by police. Syreeta Danley, a teacher from South Central Los Angeles, said she vividly remembers as a teen seeing black smoke from her porch during the 1992 uprisings. Danley said that at the time it seemed like law enforcement cared more about property damage affecting wealthier neighborhoods than the misconduct that precipitated the unrest. She said some people in her neighborhood were still more afraid of the police than the National Guard because once the troops left, local police 'had the green light to continue brutalizing people.' The National Guard can enforce curfews like they did in 1992, but that won't stop people from showing up to protest, Danley said. 'I have lived long enough to know that people will push back, and I'm here for it,' Danley said. Watts protests in 1965 There were deadly protests in the Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles in 1965 in response to pent-up anger over an abusive police force and lack of resources for the community. Over 30 people were killed — two-thirds of whom were shot by police or National Guard troops. Many say the neighborhood has never fully recovered from fires that leveled hundreds of buildings. Integration protests in the 1950-1960s In 1956, the governor of Tennessee called the state's troops to help enforce integration in Clinton, Tennessee, after white supremacists violently resisted federal orders to desegregate. President Dwight Eisenhower called the Arkansas National Guard and the 101st Airborne Division of the U.S. Army in 1957 to escort nine Black students as they integrated a previously white-only school. A few years later, the Maryland National Guard remained in the small town of Cambridge for two years after Maryland's Democratic Gov. J Millard Tawes in 1963 called in troops to mediate violent clashes between white mobs and Black protesters demanding desegregation. Selma, Alabama, voting rights protest in 1965 National Guard troops played a pivotal role in the march often credited with pressuring the passage of Voting Rights Act of 1965, when nonviolent protesters — including the late congressman John Lewis — calling for the right to vote were brutally assaulted by Alabama State Troopers in Selma, Alabama, in 1965. Two weeks later, then-President Lyndon B. Johnson sent National Guard troops to escort thousands of protesters along the 50-mile (81-kilometer) march to the state Capitol. Johnson's decision was at odds with then-Gov. George Wallace who staunchly supported segregation. ___ Riddle is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

Dems walk back pro-cop, law and order rhetoric from J6 era in the face of spiraling immigration riots
Dems walk back pro-cop, law and order rhetoric from J6 era in the face of spiraling immigration riots

Fox News

time8 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Dems walk back pro-cop, law and order rhetoric from J6 era in the face of spiraling immigration riots

Elected Democrats from coast to coast championed law and order and embraced law enforcement in the wake of the Jan. 6 protest at the U.S. Capitol in 2021, but have seemingly walked back such rhetoric in the face of federal law enforcement officials carrying out immigration raids in Los Angeles that have spiraled into riots. Democrats have increasingly condemned the immigration raids that began Friday in Los Angeles, claiming they were "illegal" and revealed alleged evidence of President Donald Trump's "authoritarianism," while attempting to characterize the riots as a result of the administration's alleged overreach. "Inciting and provoking violence; Creating mass chaos; Militarizing cities; Arresting opponents," Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on X Sunday. "These are the acts of a dictator, not a President." "Deploying federalized troops on the heels of these raids is a chaotic escalation," Democratic Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass posted to X Sunday. "The fear people are feeling in our city right now is very real – it's felt in our communities and within our families and it puts our neighborhoods at risk. This is the last thing that our city needs, and I urge protesters to remain peaceful. I've been in touch this morning with immigrant rights leaders as well as local law enforcement officials. Los Angeles will always stand with everyone who calls our city home." Federal law enforcement officials converged on the city Friday, with both Newsom and Bass issuing statements shortly thereafter denouncing the raids, which are part of Trump's campaign vow to remove the millions of illegal immigrants who flooded the nation under the Biden administration. Newsom, Bass and other local elected Democrats quickly sounded off that they did not support the raids, while offering words of support to illegal immigrants who reside in Los Angeles. "As Mayor of a proud city of immigrants, who contribute to our city in so many ways, I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass, for example, said Friday. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. My office is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations. We will not stand for this." Protests against the raids soon devolved into violence over the weekend, as rioters targeted federal officials with rocks and other projectiles, set cars on fire, looted stores and took over 101 Freeway Sunday. Trump said Saturday that he was authorizing the deployment of 2,000 National Guard members to Southern California to help quell the violence as it spiraled, bypassing the governor who typically activates the National Guard during state emergencies. The White House has defended calling in the National Guard to restore law and order, after Democrats reportedly failed to control the increasingly violent protests and the LAPD declared an unlawful assembly in the city. Dozens of violent protesters have been arrested since Friday, according to local police. "Gavin Newsom did nothing as violent riots erupted in Los Angeles for days," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted to X Monday. "Federal law enforcement officers were attacked by violent radicals and illegal criminals waving foreign flags because Governor Newsom was too weak to protect the city. The Los Angeles Police Chief has even said the riots were getting out of hand. President Trump has stepped in to maintain law and order and protect federal buildings." As the riots raged, a handful of elected Democrats, as well as Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, have condemned the raids and federal officials cracking down on the protests, which stand in stark contrast to messages they issued in the 2021 era after Trump supporters breached the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 following the 2020 election. Democrats have long argued the Jan. 6 protest was a violent insurrection that trampled on the U.S. Constitution and threatened democracy when an estimated 2,000 people breached the Capitol building that day. "ICE get the f--- out of LA so that order can be restored," Democratic California Rep. Norma Torres posted in a video on TikTok Friday of the raids, which received widespread backlash among conservative critics. But when addressing the Jan. 6 protest, Torres invoked the Constitution, celebrated law enforcement and disavowed the "chaos" seen at the Capitol in 2021. "The American people deserve leaders who will uphold the Constitution and protect our democracy from those who seek to destroy it," Torres said in a statement in January criticizing Trump's pardons of the vast majority of those charged in connection to the protest at the Capitol. "I call on my colleagues, regardless of party affiliation, to condemn this reckless abuse of power and to recommit ourselves to the principles of justice and accountability." "I remember the sound of the mob banging on doors, the bravery of law enforcement officers who risked their lives to protect us, and the sense of betrayal as our sacred democratic institutions were desecrated," she added. When asked about the disparity in comments, Torres said she has "always supported our local law enforcement – whether it be in Los Angeles or Washington, D.C.," adding that the ICE raids is "entirely different.' "LAPD is trained to handle this situation and have the resources to do so," Torres told Fox News Digital on Monday. "What ICE is doing in California is entirely different – we're witnessing ICE ignore federal law, people going missing, families being separated, and even American citizens being mistakenly detained. I do not support violent conduct, but I believe the Los Angeles Police Department can restore calm, and prosecute any violent offenders as needed. Bringing in the National Guard will only escalate tensions by introducing a weaponized military presence into the city." While Sanders joined CNN Sunday and slammed Trump for moving the country toward "authoritarianism" after activating the National Guard as rioters targeted federal law enforcement officials. Sanders, however, also took Trump to task in January for allegedly giving a "free pass to rioters who attacked the police" Jan. 6 at the Capitol. "We have a president who is moving this country rapidly into authoritarianism," Sanders said Sunday. "My understanding is that the governor of California, the mayor of the city of Los Angeles did not request the National Guard, but he thinks he has a right to do anything he wants." Sanders repeatedly condemned the Jan. 6 protest in 2021 and in subsequent years, including earlier in 2025 when Trump pardoned the vast majority of Americans charged in the protest. Sanders lauded police officers who were working at the Capitol on the day of the protest, while slamming Trump as trampling democracy. "President Trump: You do not stand for law and order when you give a free pass to rioters who attacked the police," Sanders posted Jan. 21. "In fact, you are signaling that violence is okay and attacking law enforcement is acceptable behavior." "As someone who was on the Hill that day, I'm grateful to the officers who put their lives on the line to defend myself and my colleagues," Sanders continued. "It's outrageous that the President would betray officers who defended our democracy by absolving violent insurrectionists of their crimes." As Newsom rails against the raids and Trump deploying the National Guard to LA, the Democratic governor called for order to be restored following Jan. 6, when he said there was an "outright assault to our democracy and Democratic institutions." "Peaceful protest is an important mechanism of our democracy but what we are witnessing in our nation's Capitol building is reprehensible and an outright assault to our democracy and Democratic institutions," Newsom said in a 2021 statement. "The people of California have spoken, and our congressional delegation should never have to fear for their lives to represent Californians," the statement continued. "We are concerned for the safety of California's congressional delegation and U.S. Capitol staff, and are reaching out to offer support in every way possible. President Trump must call for an end to this escalating situation, acknowledge the will of the people to bring President-elect Biden to the White House and move immediately to a peaceful transition of power." When asked for comment on Newsom's previous remarks on Jan. 6 compared to his commentary on the riots, Newsom's press office directed Fox News Digital to the governor's comment to NBC News on Sunday: "This is about authoritarian tendencies. This about command and control. This is about power. This about ego. This is a consistent pattern... this guy has abandoned the core principles of this great democracy. He's threatening to go after judges he disagrees with, cut off funding to institutions of higher learning, he's rewriting history and censoring historical facts." The office also noted that Trump said in 2020 during a townhall event that he could not mobilize the National Guard "unless we're requested by a governor," and pointed Fox Digital to comment from retired Maj. Gen. Randy Manner, former acting vice chief of National Guard bureau, criticizing Trump's activation of the Guard. "The President's federal deployment of the National Guard over the official wishes of a governor is bad for all Americans concerned about freedom of speech and states rights," Manner said, Fox News' Jennifer Griffin reported, on Sunday. "The governor has the authority and ability to respond to the civil disturbances with law enforcement capabilities within his state, augmented as necessary by requesting law enforcement assistance from other governors. There are over a million badged and trained members of law enforcement in this country for the governor to ask for help if he needs it. While this is presently a legal order, it tramples the governor's rights and obligations to protect his people. This is an inappropriate use of the National Guard and is not warranted." Failed 2024 presidential candidate and former Vice President Kamala Harris posted to X Sunday that the raids were part of Trump's "cruel, calculated agenda to spread panic and division," adding that the activation of the National Guard was "a dangerous escalation meant to provoke chaos." On the one-year anniversary of the Jan. 6 riots, Harris lauded the heroism of police and the National Guard, while celebrating "the resolve" of elected officials to protect the Constitution and law and order. "The resolve I saw in our elected leaders when I returned to the Senate chamber that night, their resolve not to yield, but to certify the election, their loyalty, not to party or person, but to the Constitution of the United States, that reflects its strength," she said in 2022. "And so of course, does the heroism of the Capitol Police, the DC Metropolitan Police Department, the National Guard and other law enforcement officers who answered the call that day, including those who later succumbed to wounds, both visible and invisible." Federal officials have pinned blame for the Los Angeles violence on Democratic elected officials who have "villainized and demonized" ICE law enforcement, Fox Digital previously reported. "The violent targeting of law enforcement in Los Angeles by lawless rioters is despicable and Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom must call for it to end," DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, for example, wrote in a Saturday statement. "The men and women of ICE put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens.… From comparisons to the modern-day Nazi gestapo to glorifying rioters, the violent rhetoric of these sanctuary politicians is beyond the pale. This violence against ICE must end." The White House defended Trump's activation of the National Guard, saying it was in direct response to Democrats who have "completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens" while law enforcement officials are attacked. "In recent days, violent mobs have attacked ICE Officers and Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations in Los Angeles, California," Leavitt said in a Saturday statement. "These operations are essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California's feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens." "That is why President Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester," Leavitt continued. "The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs. These criminals will be arrested and swiftly brought to justice. The Commander-in-Chief will ensure the laws of the United States are executed fully and completely."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store