
The true story of the secret program that brought Nazi scientists to the U.S.
The first U.S. test of a captured German V2 in 1946. At the end of World War II, a race began between the United States and the USSR to retrieve as many V2 rockets and staff as possible. Photograph by Photo12/UniversalOn July 20, 1969, a crew of American astronauts successfully landed on the moon for the first time. Though only three of them were in the spacecraft, thousands of people had contributed their brainpower to put the astronauts in flight.
Among the contributors: German scientists who had been members of the Nazi Party. The United States recruited them in the years after World War II under a federal program called Operation Paperclip.
The program remains a controversial chapter in American history, when U.S. officials incorporated former Nazis into American life and institutions. Here's how Operation Paperclip got off the ground. Over 100 German scientists on the Von Braun Rocket Team gather at Fort Bliss, Texas in 1946, including Wernher von Braun, Ludwig Roth, and Arthur Rudolph. Many pictured worked to develop the V-2 Rocket at Peenemünde, Germany before coming to the United States after World War II. While in the U.S., they worked on various rockets including the Explorer 1 Space rocket and the Saturn rocket at NASA. Photograph byIn the spring of 1945, Allied forces were closing in on Nazi Germany, and the end of the war in Europe was in sight. Officials started to make plans for what the post-war world would look like—and that involved securing some of Germany's best scientific minds to support American technological advancement.
After all, Americans were simultaneously impressed and terrified by what they had considered to be German technological supremacy during the war. They braced themselves for a next-generation Wunderwaffen (wonder weapon) and heard reports of fatally precise weapons like the V-1 cruise missile and V-2 rockets.
The U.S. worried that France or the Soviet Union would poach the best German scientists, especially as the Cold War intensified. 'The U.S. had to deny German scientists from the Soviet Union by keeping them in the U.S.,' says Brian Crim, professor of history at the University of Lynchburg and author of Our Germans: Project Paperclip and the National Security State. Americans wooed scientists that had formerly worked for the German Nazi Party with promises of contracts and a home in the U.S. Bulgaria's cultural capital
Operation Paperclip—sometimes called Project Paperclip—was overseen by the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency. It hoped to harness this technological expertise to develop America's aeronautics, military, and space programs. Lasting officially until 1947, but continuing on through similar programs until 1962, Operation Paperclip brought 1,500 scientists from Germany and Austria to the United States, where most of them became citizens.
When deciding which German scientists to recruit, U.S. officials worked off a list of 15,000 scientists curated by German engineer Werner Osenberg during the war. As Allied troops advanced in 1945, German officials panicked. They tore up Osenberg's documents and attempted to flush them down a toilet at Bonn University. The almost-destroyed documents were recovered and helped American officials decide which scientists to select.
The program's name boils down to the use of paperclips as a kind of earmark on candidates' files. According to according to journalist Eric Lichtblau's book The Nazis Next Door: How America Became a Safe Haven for Hitler's Men, recruiters vetted scientists to learn whether they were current members of the Nazi Party or sympathetic to the party's core tenants—officially, at least. And so, officials 'placed paperclips at the top of security dossiers for the scientists that interested them,' Crim explains.
'The reason for this was to indicate to investigators that the scientists should only receive the most cursory review of their record. Most scientists were Nazi party members or belonged to prohibited Nazi organizations, including Schutzstaffel, also known as the SS. The paperclip basically announced, 'Don't look too closely—this guy is one of ours.''
Although no U.S. agencies have publicly addressed the vetting process used during Operation Paperclip, independent investigations by scientists and journalists have raised questions about the backgrounds of several scientists in the program. The V2 rocket is pictured at an underground factory. V2 rockets were used by the Nazi's against Britain in the closing stages of World War II. Photograph by IWM/Camera Press/Redux Former President Harry S. Truman (left) examines rocket models on Nov. 3, 1961 at the newly opened NASA Headquarters in Washington D.C. Accompanied by former NASA Administrator James E. Webb (right), President Truman was presented with a collection of rocket models for his Presidential Library in Independence, Missouri. Photograph by Heritage Space/In the 1950s and 1960s, the American space program accelerated as the U.S. and Soviet Union vied to put a man on the moon. Some beneficiaries of Operation Paperclip played a role in supporting America in this so-called space race.
One participant was German scientist Wernher von Braun. Von Braun's crowning achievement in Germany had been the creation of the V-2 rocket, a ballistic missile that could strike long-distance targets. He also had been an officer in the SS, an elite paramilitary organization dedicated to the Nazi Party. J-2 engines for the Saturn IB and Saturn V launch vehicles are lined up in the assembly area at Rocketdyne's manufacturing plant in Canoga Park, California. Marshall Space Flight Center finishes hydrostatic testing on the Saturn V S-IC stage fuel tank. The Saturn V S-IC stage was crucial for lifting the entire Saturn V vehicle, including the Apollo spacecraft, from the launch pad. A J-2 engine undergoes static firing. Developed under the Marshall Space Flight Center, the J-2 engine was used during the Saturn IB and the Saturn V program and was propelled by liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The 363-foot tall Apollo 11 spacecraft launches from the Kennedy Space Center at 9:32 a.m. EDT on July 16, 1969. Apollo 11 was the United States' first lunar landing mission.
More scientists would face scrutiny in the subsequent decades.
'The public history of many of the famous names was whitewashed from the start, but a few intrepid journalists in the 1970s and 80s unearthed some of the details of Paperclip's deliberately shoddy vetting process,' Crim says.
Arthur Rudolph was one of Rickhey's subordinates at Mittelwerk, where he managed rocket production. In the United States, Rudolph helped develop the Saturn V launch rocket that enabled the American mission to the moon in 1969.
(Read more about rocket launches here.)
In the early 1980s, the Justice Department assembled a war crimes case against Rudolph. As a result, the rocket scientist renounced his American citizenship and left the country in 1984 to avoid trial. Flight controllers celebrate the successful landing of the Apollo 11 mission in the Mission Operations Control Room in the Manned Spacecraft Center. Apollo 11 marked a pivotal moment in human history as Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin became the first people to land on the Moon and walk on its surface.
Historians are still grappling with how crucial the scientists recruited by Operation Paperclip were to the U.S.'s successful space program.
'I think the lasting impact on American science is less than people imagine,' Crim says, pointing out that 'Wernher von Braun saved the U.S. a few years of research and development when it came to missiles […] but many experts question just how necessary the rocket team was to help the U.S. space program.'
Crim emphasizes that the program brings up uncomfortable questions about national security and naturalization. 'Paperclip rewarded hundreds of devout Nazis with coveted U.S. citizenship, excellent jobs, and public acclaim at the same time Holocaust survivors were kept out of the country.'
These ethical questions continue to cast a dark cloud over the program, especially as details about scientists involved in Operation Paperclip continue to emerge and American space exploration expands. Crim asks, 'Is it justifiable to accommodate yourself to a toxic ideology if you are a scientist? Is science truly apolitical? Paperclip is one case study involving these questions, but certainly not the last.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
American biotech dominance under threat
And while Massachusetts remains a cornerstone of US biotech dominance, similar ecosystems have taken root and thrived in cities across the country — each contributing to our national strength in science and innovation. But this engine of innovation and economic growth is under threat. Advertisement Recent federal actions . As a recent Advertisement Many small biotechs — the true engines of innovation — are struggling to navigate this great uncertainty. Meanwhile, China has prioritized investment in biotechnology, This matters far beyond company balance sheets. The global bioeconomy is estimated to be The stakes couldn't be higher. If American biotech leadership is allowed to erode, critical discoveries, economic growth, and strategic leverage will migrate to rival nations. The suffering of patients waiting for cures and new medicines will be prolonged unnecessarily. But there is reason for optimism. The biotech industry is resilient precisely because its core has always been patients. Through economic downturns, policy shifts, and scientific setbacks, the mission to develop life-changing therapies has never wavered. And the industry is ideally positioned to lead what will be the next revolution in medicine: the integration of artificial intelligence and other advanced technologies into drug discovery, clinical trial operations, and diagnostics. When we emerge from this period of uncertainty, we will have strong science and battle-tested leaders. But a future that accelerates innovation, while reducing costs, depends on our actions today. Strategic investment in research, fully staffed and highly capable regulatory agencies, and stable, open supply chains are not Republican or Democratic issues — they're imperatives for safeguarding American biotech innovation. Advertisement There needs to be an immediate course correction, starting with clear and consistent regulatory policy. Predictable rules, timely reviews, and independent oversight are essential for restoring confidence in the US biotech ecosystem. The National Security Commission on Emerging Biotechnology has underscored this need, calling for a long-term federal strategy to support innovation and strengthen our competitive edge. That includes at least The choice is clear: Lead the world in biotechnology or watch critical discoveries happen elsewhere. As the biotech community convenes in Boston, we call on policy makers across the political spectrum to protect America's innovation leadership.


San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
New documentary reveals the triumphs and heartbreak of Sally Ride's legacy
The inspiring story of Sally Ride, the first American woman in outer space, is given its full, deserved due in a new National Geographic documentary. And it broke my heart. Not because of how 'Sally' depicts the incredibly capable, Stanford-educated physicist's efforts to break the highest of glass ceilings and be recognized for her abilities rather than her sex. Utilizing plentiful archival footage, contemporary commentary, recent interview observations from people who were there and some dramatized recreation, director Cristina Costantini gets some sly laughs, edged with appropriate anger, out of the sexist mindsets Ride deftly steered her career through in the 1970s and '80s. What makes 'Sally' so sad was the astronaut's decision to keep her sexuality secret — as her public image soared to heights few women had ever known — until her death from pancreatic cancer in 2012. This aspect of her life grows especially poignant in the film due to the participation of Tam O'Shaughnessy. A tennis buddy Ride met when they were tweens (both Southern California girls were mentored by Billie Jean King), O'Shaughnessy later became her life partner of 27 years. An erudite biology professor, O'Shaughnessy provides much of the film's insight into Ride's personal life during extensive interview stretches and, presumably, via additional input behind the scenes (she has an executive producer credit). Subjective as some of this may be, it's powerful emotional stuff that often reveals more about O'Shaughnessy's own feelings than about Ride herself, who remained enigmatic — even to the love of her life. Fellow astronaut Steven Hawley, who was married to Ride for five years, still seems baffled by what was really going on with her. But like her subject, Costantini maintains a certain rigor in the sentiment department. She doesn't come close to suggesting that Ride was riddled with personal anxieties or fears of being outed. On the other hand, the NASA legend is neither presented as emotionless, calculating nor furtive, but rather as a focused professional who could separate the joy in her achievements from the cacophony of everything else. One brief clip of her mother Carol reinforces the telling intel that Ride was not raised in a demonstrative home. 'If I knew how I felt about feelings, I would probably not tell you,' an immovable Carol says to the camera. Yet Ride's determination, boldness and courage come across palpable. This is brought home when, following her own groundbreaking missions, Ride became the only Space Shuttle astronaut on the committee investigating the Challenger disaster. As the movie frames it, she essentially sacrificed her own future at NASA to expose the cause of the post-launch explosion, and the systemic incompetence that led to it. Costantini ('Science Fair,' 'Mucho Mucho Amor') said she has been a Sally Ride fan since third grade, when she painted a mural of her hero on a school wall. With 'Sally,' she presents a portrait of a pure scientist cognizant of the example she was setting for girls and women of all generations to come. The film is indelibly triumphant in that way; its sadness is generated partly by Ride's apparent inability to fully master the science of love, and certainly by the restrictions a homophobic culture placed on her at the time. There's a clip near the end of Barack Obama presenting Ride's posthumous Presidential Medal of Freedom to O'Shaughnessy. It's a beautiful moment of acknowledgement too-long delayed — one that would never happen today. Perhaps the most heart-rending lesson 'Sally' imparts is that that final frontier keeps getting moved out of reach.


New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
‘Spectacular' temple dedicated to Ancient Greek God uncovered by archaeologists: 2,700-year-old treasures found
Archaeologists have unearthed a 'spectacular' ancient temple housing hundreds of statues dedicated to the Greek God Apollo. The site, known as the Sanctuary of Apollo, is located in a remote valley in Cyprus, and the uncovered artifacts are believed to date back 2,700 years. A team of German experts initially began excavating in the area in 2021, with the finds of their four-year dig disclosed in a statement from the Cyprus Department of Antiquities. '[The sanctuary] was furnished with a lavish abundance of votive statues numbering in the hundreds, some of which were of colossal dimensions,' the statement, translated from Greek to English, read. 'In addition, evidence of other previously unknown types of votive objects was also found, such as marbled glass beads or Egyptian amulets made of faience [tin-glazed pottery].' The site, known as the Sanctuary of Apollo, is located in a remote valley in Cyprus, and the uncovered artifacts are believed to date back 2,700 years. Department of Antiquities Cyprus Three ancient statues from the Apollo sanctuary at Frangissa. Department of Antiquities Cyprus Apollo, the Greek god of archery and the son of Zeus, was a prominent deity in ancient Greek and Roman mythology. The Sanctuary of Apollo was first discovered by German archaeologist Max Ohnefalsch-Richter in 1885, and was 'considered one of the most spectacular finds of its time.' However, following his 'inadequate' excavations, Ohnefalsch-Richter reburied the site, causing its precise whereabouts to be forgotten for over a century. In 2021, the new team of German archaeologists rediscovered the long-lost temple in the remote valley of Frangrissa, near the ancient city-kingdom of Tamassos. After conducting a more extensive examination of the site, they uncovered treasures that were initially overlooked, including fragments of colossal statues, parts of which appeared to be feet. 'Apparently in 1885 [the votive statues] were not recognized as artifacts in the rush,' the new statement from the Cyprus Department of Antiquities declared. Thus, the new finds 'fundamentally expand our knowledge of this sacred place.' 'Μany statues in the Cyprus Museum and the Royal Ontario Museum at Toronto can be completed with newly found fragments and thus restored to their original appearance,' the statement continued. 'Completely new types of statues have also been documented that were previously unknown from Frangissa. The discovery of clearly larger-than-life feet, for example, means that the existence of colossal male limestone figures from archaic times can now be proven.' 'Such larger-than-life figures were previously only known here in Frangissa made from terracotta, including the famous 'Colossus of Tamassos' in the Cyprus Museum exhibition.' Meanwhile, the discovery of two inscriptions on the bases of the figures dates them to the 6th and 7th centuries BC. 'The discovery of two bases with inscriptions is spectacular,' the statement read. 'One is inscribed with several local Cypro-Syllabic characters, while the other refers in Greek letters to the Ptolemies, the Hellenistic rulers of Egypt who also controlled Cyprus at the time.'