
As Delhi slums razed, employers ask domestic helps: Why didn't you come to work?
When the bulldozers arrived at Madrasi Camp on Sunday morning, 38-year-old Pushpa was gathering her steel utensils, trying to save what little she could. Her phone rang four times. Each call was from her 'madam' in Jangpura. Each one asked the same thing: "Kaam pe kyun nahi ayi?" (Why didn't you come to work?)Pushpa says she didn't take any leave for one and a half months, knowing the court case meant trouble, and she'd need those leaves later. Even then, she kept getting calls from the kothis. When asked whether she hadn't informed her employers earlier, she responds, "Kya bolen? Woh bol rahe hain, todhne mein tumhara kya kaam? Bataiye, sadak pe ghar ka samaan chhod ke kaise jaayein? (What do I say? They (employers) are saying, 'What is your business with the demolition?' Now how do I explain that I can't leave my belongings on the streets and come to work?)"advertisementPushpa is one of the 155 families who didn't receive rehabilitation. She says those who've been moved to Narela are already anxious—there's no scope for household work there. "Kaun posh area hai wahan? Koi bartan kapda ka kaam nahi milta (There is no posh area over there that they will find work in others' homes)," she adds.
No one asked if her home was still standing. No one came to see if she has a place to sleep tonight. The women who kept the drawing rooms dust-free, made the morning tea, washed the dishes, and scrubbed the marble floors—were conveniently invisible.THE BULLDOZER AND THE DRAIN
advertisement
The demolition at Madrasi Camp didn't happen out of nowhere. It was part of a Delhi High Court-ordered clearance under the Barapullah Drain Decongestion Project—a critical civic initiative aimed at preventing waterlogging and flooding in South and Central Delhi during the monsoon.The Barapullah Drain, also called the Barapullah Nallah, is a major stormwater channel that cuts across South Delhi—from Lajpat Nagar to Sarai Kale Khan and into the Yamuna. Over the years, rampant encroachment on its embankments had reduced the carrying capacity of this vital drainage artery. What once drained away monsoon deluges now frequently overflows, flooding arterial roads like the Ring Road, Ashram, and Bhogal.According to the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB), Madrasi Camp was located directly atop a critical section of the Barapullah embankment, narrowing the natural flow of rainwater and acting as a chokepoint. Court orders in 2023 had directed the DDA and Delhi government to clear these encroachments before the 2024 monsoon.On June 1, 2025, the bulldozers came—flanked by Rapid Action Force (RAF), riot control police, and civic officials. 370 homes were razed. 215 were found 'eligible' for rehabilitation. The remaining 155 were not.ELIGIBLE OR INVISIBLE? THE REHABILITATION GAPOut of 370 structures, only 215 families were allotted flats in far-off Narela Pocket 4 and 5—over 35 kilometres away, on the city's northern industrial edge. The rest—155 families—were declared ineligible. Their homes were demolished anyway.advertisementWhy the exclusion? Survey officials told some residents they did not meet cut-off documentation norms—such as having proof of residence before 2015, or voter ID cards linked to the address. Several residents say survey workers even asked whether they had voted in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.'They came with clipboards and asked if we had voted,' says 42-year-old Anand, who also works in four Jangpura homes. 'When we said no, they just said, 'Then you're not on the list.' How does voting decide if we deserve a home?'Anand wasn't alone in making this allegation. At least six families India Today spoke to claimed that surveyors came with printed lists and suggested their names were missing because they hadn't voted in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. In some cases, families were told they had skipped two consecutive elections—which, according to officials, made them ineligible for rehabilitation.'I've lived here for over 20 years,' says 55-year-old Rani. 'Last election, I had to go to my hometown in Tamil Nadu—my mother was ill. I couldn't vote. Does that mean you'll take away my home and not give me another?'
advertisementThis claim raises urgent questions: Can political disenfranchisement become a tool of exclusion in welfare delivery? With no formal mechanism to challenge survey outcomes, those left out of the list are now sleeping on footpaths or sharing tin-roof shelters with neighbours—left to wait, as fate decides the rest.According to official procedure, the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) is tasked with issuing eligibility certificates. Initially, 189 families were found eligible. A revised list has added 26 more, but that still leaves over 150 families without any alternative housing.The Delhi unit of the CPI(M) has demanded fair rehabilitation for all, raising concerns that the allotted flats in Narela lack basic facilities—such as water supply and electricity connections.When India Today reached out to officials involved in the survey, they said the rehabilitation process followed Delhi High Court orders. 'Those not found eligible were not issued certificates. Grievances are still being reviewed,' one official said.advertisementThe Madrasi Camp has existed for over 60 years. Its shift to Narela, miles away from South Delhi, has stirred anxiety—not just over housing, but livelihoods. For women working as domestic help in nearby Jangpura homes, the move means losing access to employers. For families, the concern runs deeper: around 200 children from the camp attend the Tamil government-aided school near Barapullah. With relocation, their school admissions are now in limbo. If they move to Narela, their education suffers. If they don't, life remains uncertain.FROM BREADWINNERS TO LIVES IN LIMBO
The women of Madrasi Camp were part of Delhi's invisible workforce—maids, cooks, ayahs—who served the city's middle and upper classes. The posh colonies of Jangpura, Bhogal, and Lajpat Nagar relied on them.Now, many of them are jobless not because their employers let them go, but because they can't afford the commute.'From Narela to Jangpura, it's 2 hours one way,' says Indra, who got a flat in Narela. 'I would need Rs 150 daily just for bus fare. What's the point of a Rs 10,000 - 15,000 salary if Rs 4,000 goes in travel?'advertisementFor those without rehabilitation, it's worse. They don't know where to go. 'I am getting calls from madams asking if I can come now,' says Mumtaz, adding, 'But I have no place to sleep. How can I go to clean someone else's house? To them, we're just hands for housework."The story is no different for Amuda, Shivgamini, and Walarmati—all domestic workers from Madrasi Camp who've spent years working in Jangpura's upscale homes. But now, with their shanties demolished and futures uncertain, what hurts more than the loss of shelter is the complete apathy from the very employers whose homes they've cared for.'Inko kuch nahi padhta humari—bas chahte hain ki hum kisi bhi haalat mein kaam pe aayein (Our employers don't care about us. They just want us to turn up for work)," says Amuda, her voice steady but her eyes restless."They don't care what happens to us. They just want us to show up, no matter what state we're in," she further said.For Shivgamini, the pain is no different. 'Aaj Sunday hai, chhutti ka din hai—phir bhi ek din ki bhi samajh nahi. Aap hi batao, koi makan malik aaya kya humare liye? Koi khada bhi nahi hua. Unhe humari bilkul bhi nahi padhi (Today is Sunday. No one (employers) came to visit us. They don't care about us)," she said.She pauses before adding, 'We give all our energy to their homes—I know they pay us for it. But when our own homes fell, not one came to ask, even once, if we were okay.IS A HOUSE ENOUGH? WHAT ABOUT THE LIVELIHOOD?Government officials call the Narela flats a 'rehabilitation success.' But for the women of Madrasi Camp, it's displacement disguised as assistance.'Narela has factories and godowns,' says Pushpa, a domestic worker. 'There are no bungalows there. No work. No money. So what do I do with four walls and a ceiling?'For most women, the economy of domestic labour is hyper-local. They work within walking distance—juggling children, husbands, and multiple employers. Rehabilitation schemes rarely account for this reality. A 'house' 35 kilometers away isn't a solution—it's a new problem.DRAIN CLEARED, LIVES CLOGGEDThe Barapullah Drain may flow freer this monsoon. But the social cost is now writ large across Delhi's footpaths and underpasses—where women who once earned their keep now queue for rations, search for water, or wait for a text from a kothi madam who may never call again.Development isn't just about concrete and court orders. It's about people. And Delhi's latest demolition drive has shown just how quickly those people can be forgotten—until someone asks, 'Kaam pe kyun nahi ayi? (Why haven't you turned up for work?)"
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Back in public eye: Madhya Pradesh minister who put party in a spot with remarks on Col Sofiya Qureshi
After his remarks on Operation Sindoor caused an uproar, Madhya Pradesh Tribal Welfare Minister Vijay Shah made his first public appearance in 17 days when he visited the family of a rape-murder victim in Khandwa. Shah was booked by the Madhya Pradesh Police last month after saying in a public meeting in Mhow on May 11 that India taught a lesson to those responsible for the Pahalgam terror attack using 'their own sister'. While he did not name anyone, it has been alleged that he was alluding to Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, who had briefed the media when Operation Sindoor was underway. The minister is now under investigation by a Supreme Court-ordered special investigation team (SIT), and had not been seen in public until May 28, when he visited the grieving family of a woman who was gangraped and murdered in Khandwa district's Khalwa region. Both the Madhya Pradesh High Court and the Supreme Court have reprimanded the minister for his statement, and Shah has apologised for the comments three times. The ruling BJP went into damage control mode, and the central leadership of the party is yet to take a call on Shah's future. While his visit to Khandwa on May 28 marks his first public outing since the backlash, he did not speak to the media. Local BJP sources said Shah spent over two hours with the victim's family and promised both financial support and systemic interventions. He reportedly handed over a Rs 60,000 cheque, committed to building a tin roof for the family's house, and promised further financial assistance, sources said. 'He also said that a young girl in the family who had dropped out of school would be re-enrolled. Monthly monitoring meetings are to be initiated in the area to track school dropouts,' a BJP leader said. The Opposition Congress had launched a sarcastic 'missing minister' campaign, plastering posters across Indore and Bhopal with his photograph and a mock reward of Rs 11,000 for anyone who could find him. During this period, Shah skipped the special Cabinet meeting in the historic Rajwada palace to commemorate regional icon, Ahilyabai Holkar, on May 20 and another special Cabinet meeting hosted in the scenic town of Pachmarhi on Tuesday, to honour tribal icon and freedom fighter, Raja Bhabhoot Singh. Shah had also skipped the 300th birth anniversary events of Ahilyabai Holkar, for which Prime Minister Narendra Modi had arrived in Bhopal on May 31. The Supreme Court has extended the operation of its interim order protecting Shah from arrest. It also closed the suo motu proceedings pending before the Madhya Pradesh High Court as it is already seized of the matter. The SIT had submitted its report to the Supreme Court, which contained investigation details like forensic evidence, and sought more time for the probe.


India Gazette
10 hours ago
- India Gazette
Law Researchers file petition in Delhi HC for salary hike, pending arrears
New Delhi [India], June 3 (ANI): A group of law researchers has moved the Delhi High Court, seeking implementation of the Chief Justice's directive to increase their monthly remuneration to Rs 80,000, effective from October 1, 2022. Their plea also demands arrears along with 18 per cent annual interest. The petition underscored that under Article 229, the Delhi High Court framed the Establishment Rules, 1972, leading to the creation of 367 posts of Senior Judicial Assistants, 120 of which were designated for law researchers under the Scheme for Engagement of Law Researchers in the High Court of Delhi. The case was listed for hearing last week before a bench comprising Justice C Harishankar and Justice Ajay Digpaul. However, due to Justice Digpaul's recusal from the matter, it was transferred to a different bench. During proceedings, Justice Harishankar acknowledged that law researchers often work longer hours than judges and that Supreme Court law researchers receive significantly higher remuneration. He expressed concern that, despite two years having passed since the proposal's approval, no action had been taken, stating that law researchers deserve recognition and fair compensation for their work. Consequently, the matter was referred to a different bench for review after court vacations. Initially, law researchers received Rs 25,000 per month, which was increased to Rs 35,000 in August 2017 upon approval from the then Acting Chief Justice. Further increments under Article 229 saw their pay rise to Rs 50,000 in August 2018, Rs 65,000 in August 2019, and, most recently, Rs 80,000 from October 2022, sanctioned by the Chief Justice. Despite these approvals, the proposal remains pending with the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD). Repeated representations by law researchers urging implementation have gone unheeded, with only a prospective increase from Rs 35,000 to Rs 65,000 being sanctioned in November 2021, overlooking prior approvals. Frustrated by delays, the petitioners filed RTI applications in March and August 2024, revealing that the proposal had been submitted to GNCTD in September 2023 but was yet to be approved. Further queries to the Finance and Law Departments highlighted bureaucratic obstacles, with officials withholding information under Section 8(1)(i) of the RTI Act. Nearly two years since the initial proposal submission, despite multiple reminders and High Court clarifications provided in May 2024, the remuneration increase has not been implemented. The petition asserted that the prolonged delay in executing the Chief Justice's directive and the continued withholding of arrears, despite clear administrative and constitutional approvals, necessitate urgent judicial intervention. (ANI)


Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
2020 Riots: Delhi Court To Rehear Arguments In UAPA Case After Judicial Transfers
New Delhi: A Delhi court will hear fresh arguments on charges in the northeast Delhi riots larger conspiracy case following transfer of judges. Additional sessions judge Lalit Kumar of Karkardooma court, in his June 2 order, stated that the counsel appearing for the accused and the prosecution must now furnish a time frame and the manner in which they would address arguments. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The next hearing of the matter is scheduled for June 6. The special public prosecutor informed the court that the prosecution has already completed its arguments, and even five accused persons have completed their arguments on the point of charge. "This court considers it fit that a considerable time has already lapsed, and therefore, arguments on the point of charge have to be expedited. Since the court has been transferred, the prosecution and the accused persons and their counsels seek some time to consult with each other regarding the time frame to address the arguments," the judge said. The FIR in the case was registered in 2020 by Delhi Police's Special Cell. Arguments on charge began last year and were being heard by additional sessions judge Sameer Bajpai. However, an administrative order was published by Delhi High Court on May 30, notifying the transfer of 135 judges, including Bajpai. This new development means that the prosecution will again take Kumar through all the relevant documents, including the 17,000-page chargesheet. The arguments will be reheard by Kumar. The accused in the case are Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Safoora Zargar, Natasha Narwal, Asif Iqbal Tanha, Tahir Hussain, Khalid Saifi, Isharat Jahan, Meeran Haider, Gulfisha Fatima, Shifa-Ur-Rehman, Shadab Ahmed, Tasleem Ahmed, Saleem Malik, Mohd Saleem Khan, Athar Khan and Faizan Khan. Delhi Police has invoked stringent provisions of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act against them. Most of the accused have been in jail for more than five years.