
The American dream was stolen long before Trump
Even within the US, people have long felt that the American dream has been 'stolen' because wealth distribution in the past half-century has become skewed. A minuscule percentage of Wall Street, Ivy League and Silicon Valley types are accused of having rigged the system. They argue that between the 1950s and the 1970s, the American dream had created 'shared prosperity' and expanded the middle class. In 2012, Pulitzer-winning journalist Hedrick Smith even wrote a bestseller titled Who stole the American dream? Philosophers like Michael Sandel at Harvard have also questioned the meritocratic system—an inevitable component of the dream.
Historians and commentators have seen the 1970s as a decade of transition in the US when parts of the powerful American establishment started rethinking its welfarist idealism of the 1950s through the 1960s. They were plotting to impart a harder pro-business, laissez faire identity to the nation. This put the 'share-the-wealth ethic' under a cloud and aided the burglary of the American dream, eventually. From being an 'empire of production', it started moving towards becoming an empress of consumption. The loss of jobs argument that began then haunts America to this day.
In India, of course, the 1970s was the reverse. The Nehruvian-socialist dream had taken a crude turn. We were into nationalisation of nearly everything. The state was the final arbiter of nearly everything from industrial licences to prescribing the size of the family that one should raise. The Emergency was a part of this authoritarian micro-management of a nation's destiny. India's middle-class expansion came late, only in the 1990s. That is when we borrowed the American dream that was already in a crisis.
Even during the 1950s and 1960s America, although one section imagined the full bloom of the American dream, racial inequalities and segregation ensured the dream was a truncated, one-dimensional affair that cleverly brushed everything that disturbed the formulation under the carpet.
Those who dreamt the American dream when the first waves of big immigration happened from India, notoriously labelled the 'brain drain', constructed the dream very differently. Economist J N Bhagwati even spoke of a 'brain drain tax'. They did not abandon their motherland, but had a constructive narrative that was about scouting for technology, enterprise and education to take back. Interestingly, rural development was a running theme among the conscientious who had migrated in the 1960s and 1970s.
All this, of course, changed in the mid-1980s when a new generation of Indian-Americans, quite naturally, grew independent of their obligations back home. Assimilation in American society became a far greater pull. In the next few decades, India became an important member of the global technology network. For Indians, the American dream changed yet again. The diaspora perhaps imagined that the 'brown' had escaped the humiliations of the 'black' and had found a seat at the high table of American destiny. They had become an aspirational class of power and influence back in India, which had become a back office for the American dream.
Sugata Srinivasaraju | Senior journalist and author of The Conscience Network: A Chronicle of Resistance to a Dictatorship
(Views are personal)
(sugata@sugataraju.in)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
33 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. lawmaker tells Pakistan delegation to eliminate ‘vile' terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed
A senior American lawmaker has told a visiting Pakistani delegation, led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, that the country should do "all it can' to eliminate the 'vile' terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed as well as ensure protection of religious minorities. The Pakistani delegation met Congressman Brad Sherman on Thursday (June 5) , timing their visit to the U.S. capital around the same time as a multi-party delegation of Indian parliamentarians led by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor is in Washington DC. The all-party delegation is briefing key interlocutors about Operation Sindoor in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack and India's strong resolve to fight terrorism emanating from Pakistan. In a post on X, Sherman said that he 'emphasised to the Pakistani delegation the importance of combatting terrorism, and in particular, the group Jaish-e-Mohammed, who murdered my constituent Daniel Pearl in 2002'. During my discussion with the #Pakistan delegation yesterday, I raised the critical issue of water for Sindh. The Indus River is the lifeline for tens of millions of Pakistanis, and protecting that water resource is vital. I am also very concerned to hear of unrest in the city… — Congressman Brad Sherman (@BradSherman) June 6, 2025 Terrorist Omar Saeed Sheikh was convicted of orchestrating the 2002 kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. Mr. Sherman said Pearl's family continues to live in his district and 'Pakistan should do all it can to eliminate this vile group and combat terrorism in the region'. Mr. Bhutto also landed in the U.S. at the same time as the Tharoor-led delegation. Mr. Bhutto met UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres with his delegation as well as Security Council Ambassadors in New York, and later travelled to Washington in Pakistan's bid to internationalise the conflict with India as well as the Kashmir issue but instead got instructed to deal with terrorism emanating from its soil. The U.S. lawmaker also told the Pakistani delegation that the protection of religious minorities in Pakistan remains an important issue. "Christians, Hindus and Ahmadiyya Muslims living in Pakistan must be allowed to practice their faith and participate in the democratic system without fear of violence, persecution, discrimination, or an unequal justice system.' Sherman further urged the Pakistani delegation to relay to their government the need to free Dr Shakil Afridi, who continues to languish in prison for helping the United States kill Osama bin Laden. 'Freeing Dr Afridi represents an important step in bringing closure for victims of 9/11,' he said. Afridi is a Pakistani physician who helped the CIA run a polio vaccination programme in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province to collect DNA samples of bin Laden's family. Afridi was arrested by Pakistani authorities shortly after the American raid on bin Laden's compound in Abbottabad in May 2011. In 2012, a Pakistani court sentenced Afridi to 33 years in prison.


The Hindu
39 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Mediation between two unequals not possible: Shashi Tharoor on Trump's claims
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has said that to suggest one can mediate between two unequals is not possible because there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims, amid repeated claims by U.S. President Donald Trump that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. Mr. Tharoor, currently in the U.S. leading a multi-party delegation on Operation Sindoor, made the comments in response to a question during a conversation at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington on Thursday. "…Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. I'll tell you why not. The fact is that this implies, even when you say things like broker or whatever, you're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist," Mr. Tharoor said. He said there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. "There is no equivalence between a country that provides safe haven to terrorism, and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business," he said. "There is no equivalence between a state that is a status quo power that just wants to be left alone by its neighbours, where the neighbours don't agree with us, and a revisionist power that wants to upset the geopolitical arrangements that have existed for the last three-quarters of a century. There is no equivalence possible in these cases, and in these circumstances, to suggest that you can mediate between two unequals is not possible,' Mr. Tharoor added. Since May 10, when Mr. Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a 'full and immediate' ceasefire after a 'long night' of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over a dozen times that he 'helped settle' the tensions between India and Pakistan. He has also claimed that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America would do a 'lot of trade' with them if they stopped the conflict. On being asked how he would characterise the American role in the conflict, Mr. Tharoor said he is "guessing to some degree' that the American role would have been first of all to keep themselves informed, conversations on both sides, and 'certainly my government received a number of calls at high levels from the U.S. government, and we appreciated their concern and their interest.' He said that at the same time, the U.S. must have been making similar calls at the highest levels to the Pakistan side, and 'our assumption is that's where, because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process, that may well have been where their messages really had the greatest effect. But that's guesswork on my part. I don't know what they said to the Pakistanis.' Mr. Trump repeated the claim as recently as Thursday when during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, the U.S. President said that he is 'very proud" that he was able to stop the conflict between nuclear powers India and Pakistan. 'I spoke to some very talented people on both sides, very good people on both sides' and said that Washington will not do any trade deals with either 'if you are going to go shooting each other and whipping out nuclear weapons that may be even affect us. Because you know that nuclear dust blows across oceans very quickly, it affects us," Mr. Trump said. 'You know what, I got that war am I going to get credit? I'm not going to get credit for anything. They don't give me credit for anything. But nobody else could have done it. I stopped it. I was very proud of that,' Mr. Trump added. About two weeks after the horrific April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Maryland man Kilmar Ábrego García returns to US from El Salvador to face criminal charges. But there's a catch
Maryland's Kilmar Ábrego García, the man who was 'mistakenly' deported by US President Donald Trump's administration to El Salvador in March, returned to the US only to face further criminal charges. read more Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran migrant who lived in the U.S. legally with a work permit and was erroneously deported to El Salvador, is seen wearing a Chicago Bulls hat, in this handout image obtained by Reuters on April 9, 2025. File image/ Reuters The man who was mistakenly deported from Maryland to El Salvador by US President Donald Trump's administration in March returned to the United States on Friday, only to face criminal charges. In a press briefing on Friday, the US attorney general, Pam Bondi, announced that a federal grand jury in Tennessee indicted 29-year-old on counts of illegally smuggling undocumented people as well as of conspiracy to commit that crime. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Our government presented El Salvador with an arrest warrant, and they agreed to return him to our country,' Bondi said of Ábrego García during the presser. She went on to thank Salvadorian president, Nayib Bukele, 'for agreeing to return him to our country to face these very serious charges'. 'This is what American justice looks like upon completion of his sentence,' Bondi added. Meanwhile, in a statement to The Hill on Friday, Ábrego García's lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, accused the Trump administration of 'disappearing his client to a foreign prison,' calling it a 'violation of a court order. 'Now, after months of delay and secrecy, they're bringing him back, not to correct their error but to prosecute him,' he added. 'This shows that they were playing games with the court all along. Due process means the chance to defend yourself before you're punished, not after,' the lawyer explained. Sandoval-Moshenberg argued that the White House's treatment of his client was 'an abuse of power, not justice'. What are the two sides saying? Sandoval-Moshenber called on Ábrego García to face the same immigration judge who had granted him federal protection in the past against the order of the administration to deport him to El Salvador. He said that it should be done 'to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent there". He also mentioned the fact that this is what 'the US Supreme Court ordered back in April. Meanwhile, Bondi on Friday noted that federal grand jurors found that Ábrego García 'has played a significant role' in an abusive smuggling ring that had operated for nearly a decade. The attorney mentioned that if convicted, Ábrego García would be deported to El Salvador after completing his sentence in the US. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is pertinent to note that, as per the record filed in the court, Ábrego García entered the US without permission in about 2011 while fleeing gang violence in El Salvador. Despite a judicial order that provided him protection from being deported, on 15 March, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials deported him to El Salvador after arresting him in Maryland. He was held in the so-called Centre for Terrorism Confinement, a controversial mega-prison better known as Cecot . It is important to note that Ábrego García had no criminal record in the US before the indictment was announced on Friday, according to court documents. Not only this, but the Trump administration subsequently admitted that Ábrego García's deportation was an ' administrative error '. However, he was repeatedly painted as an MS-13 gang member on television – a claim which his wife, a US citizen, and his attorneys staunchly reject. With inputs from agencies.