
Over 400 with heart valve condition dying each year on NHS waiting list, research finds
Hundreds of patients with a deadly heart condition are dying every year while stuck on an NHS waiting list amid long delays for life-saving treatment, research reveals.
About 300,000 people across the UK have aortic stenosis (AS), a serious but symptomless disease that weakens the heart's aortic valve, which helps push blood around the body. Although AS is often fatal, if detected and treated early, patients survive and regain a normal life.
However, more than 400 people a year with AS die because they cannot get access fast enough on the NHS to a life-saving non-surgical procedure called transcatheter aortic valve implantation (Tavi), it has emerged.
The disclosure has come from a survey of Tavi waiting times at the 35 specialist centres across the UK that provide the procedure. Heart doctors say the findings have exposed an 'unacceptable' mortality in Britain linked to the fact that it carries out far fewer Tavi procedures than many other European countries.
Dr Jon Byrne, a cardiologist at King's College hospital in London, who initiated the research, said: 'Of all the people on the waiting list to have Tavi, 8% died before they received treatment – 8% is a big figure. That 8% is just over 400 patients a year.
'It's disturbing that this is happening. While some of those waiting die of other conditions, a significant proportion of them would have survived if they had been treated with Tavi.'
The true death toll is much higher – probably about 800 a year, Byrne said – – because the survey only received data from 18 of the 35 centres. AS mainly affects people in their 70s, 80s and 90s.
The research, by the medical group Valve for Life, also found that:
A death rate as high as 20% at some hospitals which perform Tavi.
The average waiting time for the procedure across the UK is 142 days – over 20 weeks – even though those with severe AS have a 50% risk of dying.
White patients are more likely to undergo Tavi than those from ethnic minorities.
In an article for the website Cardiology News that will be published on Monday, Byrne writes: 'These findings expose a growing crisis in access to Tavi across the UK.
'Despite the dedication and expertise of clinicians delivering exceptional care under increasing pressure, system inefficiencies, health inequalities and capacity constraints continue to put patients at risk.'
The long waiting times for patients between being referred for Tavi and having it 'are leaving thousands of patients at risk', Byrne writes, in an opinion piece co-authored with Wil Woan, the executive director of the charity Heart Valve Voice.
However, NHS England is understood to be developing plans to tackle mortality through a fast-track process under which the most urgent AS cases will undergo Tavi within eight weeks.
Delays in accessing Tavi also put 'a significant strain on the NHS' because patients who go untreated end up needing to be admitted to hospital as emergencies, they add.
Dr Sonya Babu-Narayan, the British Heart Foundation's clinical director, said: 'It's concerning to hear red flags raised about patients dying whilst waiting in situations in which a timely heart procedure may have saved their life.
'Nearly four out of 10 people are waiting more than 18 weeks [for treatment], which is too long when it comes to heart conditions, where timely care is critical.
'Long delays at this scale put people at risk of living in ill health or being unable to work due to heart failure which could have been avoided, and having their lives cut short.'
The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledged that heart patients were facing long delays.
A spokesperson for the department said: 'Because of the dire state of the NHS this government inherited, patients around the country, including those suffering from aortic stenosis, are waiting too long for treatment.
'Through our Plan for Change, we are delivering the investment and reform needed to get the NHS back on its feet and provide faster treatment for everyone who needs it, including those waiting for Tavi.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Patients missing NHS appointments to be removed from lists
Jeremy Miles warned more than 700,000 appointments are missed each year, with 14 per cent of all outpatient appointments lost because people do not turn up or cannot attend. "That's not right and it's not sustainable," said the Labour politician. "And it doesn't help us to make sure the public gets faster access to the care they need. "So, in future, we will provide patients with two offers of dates for an NHS appointment. "If those appointments are not kept without a good reason, they will be removed from the list so that their place can be taken by somebody else. "Every person's circumstance will be considered. "Patients who are vulnerable and children will be protected but we want patients to keep their appointments or to cancel in good time so their place can be taken by someone else." James Evans, the Conservatives' shadow health secretary, responded: "We need to make sure the public do actually take a bit more responsibility with their appointments within the NHS but I do urge a little bit of caution. "And I just need to make sure… this policy is not going to unfairly penalise vulnerable people, those who struggle to get transport, especially in Powys, for example, where people have to rely on public transport to get to appointments. "It's not always readily available." Mr Miles added: "It is really important that that capacity is available for patients who are able to take up those appointments. "We all want to see access to care becoming faster, and so that's an important part of the solution." Mr Miles stressed that reducing long waits is his number one priority, adding that waits of over two years have fallen by two-thirds. However, Mabon ap Gwynfor, Plaid Cymru's shadow health secretary, warned Welsh ministers have failed to hit their targets from 2022. He called for a fair funding settlement for Wales, stating the current system fails to provide resources in proportion with the needs of Wales.

South Wales Argus
18 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Patients missing NHS appointments to be removed from lists
Jeremy Miles warned more than 700,000 appointments are missed each year, with 14 per cent of all outpatient appointments lost because people do not turn up or cannot attend. "That's not right and it's not sustainable," said the Labour politician. "And it doesn't help us to make sure the public gets faster access to the care they need. "So, in future, we will provide patients with two offers of dates for an NHS appointment. "If those appointments are not kept without a good reason, they will be removed from the list so that their place can be taken by somebody else. "Every person's circumstance will be considered. "Patients who are vulnerable and children will be protected but we want patients to keep their appointments or to cancel in good time so their place can be taken by someone else." James Evans, the Conservatives' shadow health secretary, responded: "We need to make sure the public do actually take a bit more responsibility with their appointments within the NHS but I do urge a little bit of caution. "And I just need to make sure… this policy is not going to unfairly penalise vulnerable people, those who struggle to get transport, especially in Powys, for example, where people have to rely on public transport to get to appointments. "It's not always readily available." Mr Miles added: "It is really important that that capacity is available for patients who are able to take up those appointments. "We all want to see access to care becoming faster, and so that's an important part of the solution." Mr Miles stressed that reducing long waits is his number one priority, adding that waits of over two years have fallen by two-thirds. However, Mabon ap Gwynfor, Plaid Cymru's shadow health secretary, warned Welsh ministers have failed to hit their targets from 2022. He called for a fair funding settlement for Wales, stating the current system fails to provide resources in proportion with the needs of Wales.


Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The public sector sicknote epidemic: They're 60% more likely to be off than staff who work for private firms
Public sector workers are 60 per cent more likely to be off work due to illness than employees in the private sector. The extent of Britain's sick note epidemic is exposed in Office for National Statistics figures that reveal 148.9 million working days were lost last year, equivalent to 4.4 days for each worker. And the share of such absences among public sector employees was 2.9 per cent, significantly higher than the private sector's 1.8 per cent. The ONS claimed it could be explained by differences in types of jobs in the sectors and that workers in state-funded jobs were more likely to be paid for being off than those in private employment. But John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Taxpayers are fed up with footing the bill for a public sector that's far more likely to be off sick. 'It reflects poor management and weak accountability. In the private sector, this would raise serious questions – in the public sector, it's too often ignored. Ministers must set clearer expectations, better oversight and ensure taxpayers aren't left footing the bill for unchecked absenteeism.' Sick rates have been higher in the public sector for every year on record, the ONS said. But in both cases, rates were lower last year than in 2023. The overall number of working days lost last year was 14.9 million down from 2023 but still 9.9 million higher than pre-pandemic levels in 2019. The sickness absence rate of 2.5 per cent for women was higher than for men, at 1.6 per cent. James Cockett, from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, said some public sector roles – healthcare, education, social care and policing – could increase exposure to illness and also often be 'physically and emotionally demanding'. He said this could lead to greater rates of stress-related absence He added more public sector employers offer occupational sick pay compared with private sector employers.' Len Shackleton, of the Institute of Economic Affairs think-tank, said: 'Private sector workers are more likely to be employed in small workplaces where absence is more noticeable and they may feel obliged not to let colleagues down. 'Their jobs may also be less secure than those in the public sector, again a motive for 'presenteeism' [where employees go to work despite being sick] which public sector workers don't feel to the same extent.'