'Mission: Impossible' Movies Ranked From Worst to Best
For almost 30 years, Tom Cruise's 'Mission: Impossible' has supplied moviegoers with the most consistent and thrilling spy-themed adventures of any Hollywood franchise outside of the James Bond films.
More from Variety
Tom Cruise in 'F1' Over Brad Pitt Would've Been 'Scaring Us More,' Says Joseph Kosinski; Action Supervisor Quips: Tom 'Terrifies Me' and 'We'd Have Had a Crash'
'Lilo & Stitch' Outpaces 'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning' as Box Office Surges in U.K. and Ireland
Tom Cruise Rejoices Over 'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning' Box Office Record Amid Speculation the Franchise Is Over: Thank You Paramount for 'Years of Unwavering Support'
For the first entry, David Koepp and Robert Towne adapted the 1966 television show of the same name for the big screen with a screenplay that, with a handful of granular exceptions, has become a blueprint for every subsequent installment. Anchored by the indefatigable Ethan Hunt, the Impossible Mission Force is given data about — and the choice of whether or not to try and prevent — a calamity of some significance to the U.S., the intelligence community or even the entire world. Almost always, the team is disavowed and finds themselves being chased — not only by their enemies, but their purported allies too.
After eight chapters, Ethan Hunt's tenure with the IMF appears to be coming to an end. To commemorate the occasion, filmmaker Christopher McQuarrie has pulled out all of the stops to deliver 'The Final Reckoning' — a finale that he hopes lives up to, and possible exceeds, the almost endless string of nail-biting scenarios that he and his predecessors conceived over the last three decades. Did he succeed? Each viewer's mission, should they accept it, is to determine that for themselves.
In the meantime, Variety takes a look back at the eight 'Mission: Impossible' films and ranks them — let's say, from 'I wouldn't watch it without wearing a mask to disguise my identity' to 'I'm willing to HALO jump out of a plane to see it again.'Rightly the chapter in this series with the lowest Tomatometer score (a generous 57% fresh), this follow-up to the original 'Mission: Impossible' overcompensated for criticisms that its predecessor was too complicated by telling a story that is just plain dumb. Perhaps emboldened by the silliness of his (fun) previous Hollywood movies 'Broken Arrow' and 'Face/Off,' director John Woo leans heavily into his visual playbook to create a film full of balletic imagery trying to disguise absolutely preposterous storytelling and action choreography. But most of the story boils down to a fight over a girl (a hard-working Thandiwe Newton). Villain Dougray Scott, looking like an artist's rendering of a genetic splicing of Ewan McGregor and Hayden Christensen, isn't up to the task of intimidating Tom Cruise — an insult added to the injury of losing out on playing Wolverine in 'X-Men' as a result of taking the role.As a set up to what's meant to be the coup de grace for the series, 'Dead Reckoning' is unfortunately a bit of a slog, even if it replicates with great energy and dexterity the elements that have made earlier chapters so entertaining. Particularly because the film only ever addresses Ethan Hunt's origin story obliquely but also because of the villain's penchant for tiresome self-seriousness, Gabriel (Esai Morales) is a fairly underwhelming final boss, necessary though he may be since his counterpart — the Entity, a rogue AI — is an oscillating electronic eyeball. Putting new recruit Grace (Hayley Atwell) through her own reluctant hero's journey takes too long — almost to the point of exasperation. But then again the whole film is kind of like that: the Rome car chase, the Venice fight, the build to Ethan's mountain jump, even the number of cars they have to climb through after stopping a runaway train — each sequence takes one or two more beats than feels necessary. Also, revealing the Sevastapol in the first scene (rather than where it belongs, in the first scene of 'The Final Reckoning') means that Ethan spends the whole movie chasing after something viewers already know about, marking the first time in franchise history where it feels like the audience is ahead of the characters.Latter-day assessments that characterize this J.J. Abrams film as a glorified episode of his TV series 'Alias' aren't completely off base, but the future 'Star Trek' and 'Star Wars' fan-disappointer manages something more sly and nuanced with this franchise's mythology than he does later in his career: Abrams dismantles and deconstructs its core iconography, from a malfunctioning mask-maker to the multiple times Ethan Hunt fails to do his job or save the lives of those closest to him. An absolutely ruthless Philip Seymour Hoffman remains one of the best adversaries Cruise faces in the series, and as much as Abrams likes to cute-ify Ethan Hunt's life in between missions, he creates the super spy's purest civilian relationship with Julia Meade (Michelle Monaghan), which elevates every subsequent film from (basically) a James Bond riff to a saga with meaningful emotional connections — and stakes.The conclusion to Ethan Hunt's story is already dividing audiences — a debate that undoubtedly will continue as the world moves forward without his essential but frequently disavowed brand of heroism. In the years to come, what will carry more weight with viewers? The first half of this film, chock-full of endless, wildly overserious exposition? Or the back half, featuring two of the most thrilling set pieces in the history of the franchise (and arguably cinema itself)? The film's derring-do is enough that the tedium of the build-up to it kind of washes away. Certainly, the entire ensemble's relentless determination to characterize Ethan Hunt as the only man on Earth with the right moral compass to defeat the Entity fails to yield new insights about him, them or the world they inhabit. It feels especially repetitive since the previous chapter already overexplained the challenges the IMF faces, and the stakes if they fail. But with its climactic piggybacking of a (literally) slow-rolling hunt through a wrecked submarine back-to-back with an aerial fight so urgent and visceral that it feels, well, impossible to believe it's real, 'The Final Reckoning' sticks the landing and then some.Making his own live-action feature debut, Pixar stalwart Brad Bird translates Abrams' snarky wit as an ironic counterpoint to tension-relieving humanity, with the series' biggest action canvas yet. Introducing Jeremy Renner as a 'no, we promise he was never supposed to be a replacement' co-star for Tom Cruise, the film's success revitalized 'Mission: Impossible' at the time, eliminating the need to even consider swapping out (or letting free) its tireless star. But as a high-stakes tentpole film with a well-modulated sense of humor about itself ('Mission accomplished!' triumphantly — if mistakenly — shouts Ethan at one point), 'Ghost Protocol' firmly and permanently roots the series in the realm of adult entertainment by finding a perfect balance between briskness and nail-biting intensity — something that the best subsequent installments not only carried forward, but further deepened.Though it looks almost quaint in comparison to the ambitious, muscular chapters that followed, O.G. auteur-turned-crowd pleaser Brian De Palma delivers a franchise-starter that codifies all of the essential ingredients needed for a 'Mission: Impossible' film (with proportions to be determined by each subsequent director). The vault heist remains an all-time gold standard for action set pieces (here or elsewhere), and it's where Cruise first really began to hone the smoldering, delicately-cheeky intensity that has made him an A-list mainstay for decades. Those old enough may remember David Koepp and Robert Towne's script absolutely bewildering audiences at the time of its release, but in retrospect not only was it deceptively — and delightfully — complex, but ultimately a template for intriguing misdirection that, like so many other elements in the film, has become a franchise hallmark.An oversized version of its predecessor 'Rogue Nation,' 'Fallout' gives you the sense that Christopher McQuarrie had not only gotten his sea legs beneath him, but started running with the speed of Ethan Hunt. Bringing back Ilsa (Rebecca Ferguson) as a frenemy yet again feels just a bit like the filmmaker walking back what he previously accomplished just to keep her around as a simultaneous screen magnet and plot device, not that anyone minds because Ferguson is just as good here as before. But Henry Cavill absolutely lights up the film as August Walker, a double operative who thrillingly — and unambiguously — hates Ethan on sight, resulting in a friction that overshadows the elaborate machinations of the terrorist groups he leads. Meanwhile, the set pieces are unilaterally great here, from the HALO jump to the nightclub fight to the breakout of Solomon Lane to the helicopter chase that wraps the film. But after the tightly-plotted perfection of 'Rogue Nation,' the freedom the filmmakers indulge here leaves audiences feeling like they've just eaten an especially rich meal: satisfying but just a tiny bit overstuffed.The apotheosis of Tom Cruise's collaboration on the franchise with any of its directors, Christopher McQuarrie's 'Rogue Nation' delivers massive (and in one case literally) operatic set pieces in a story that operates with Swiss-clock precision. Introduced unforgettably in this film, Rebecca Ferguson's Ilsa Faust remains the second-best character ever created for 'Mission: Impossible,' and her role creates a thrilling dynamic that gives Ethan an adversary who's also a friend, both to complicate the plot and enhance its emotionality. In an 'embarrassment of riches' quandary, it's a toss-up whether the opening plane sequence, the opera assassination, the underwater vault or the motorcycle chase is the best sequence in the film. But McQuarrie's seemingly inexhaustible creativity strengthens all of the characters and supercharges the world they operate in, turning a film series into a bona fide saga.
Best of Variety
All 23 Best Picture Nominees Directed by Women in Oscars History
'The Last of Us' Season 2 Cast Guide: Who's Who From the Video Game?
The 15 Best 'Black Mirror' Episodes, Ranked
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
The World's Best Gins-According To The 2025 International Wine And Spirit Compeition
The Gold Outstanding medal winners in gin at the 2025 International Wine and Spirits Competition. Gin, a spirit that can trace its origins back to the Middle Ages, has seen a surge of interest in the new millennium. That's due to its fantastic versatility across a wide array of cocktail styles that have come to define today's cocktail culture. The botanical flavors inherent to gin make it a veritable 'Swiss army knife' of a spirit. From a classic martini to an elegant negroni, cocktails that feature gin have never been more popular. While gin may be intrinsically linked to the United Kingdom these days, there are an untold number of craft distillers across the globe making some fantastic gins loaded with flavor. Their brilliance is on display at the 2025 International Wine and Spirit Competition (IWSC). As one of the oldest and most prestigious annual spirits judging events in the world, the IWSC sees the best bottles in the world sent each year to its esteemed judging panel. The IWSC has just announced the recipients of its coveted Gold Outstanding medals, its highest accolade, in the gin category. To receive one, a bottle must score a minimum of 98 out of 100 points in their blind taste-testing format. To put the scope of the difficulty of landing such an award, the event bestowed medals (silver, gold, gold outstanding) on 264 gins this year; only eight took home the top prize. One of those will take home the Gin Trophy at their gala event in the fall, earning the title of the World's Best. Here is a brief snapshot of each medal winner and the judges' tasting notes. From Saskatchewan, Canada, Black Fox Farms and Distillery has crafted its unique Haskap Gin (40 % ABV) using an ingredient close to home. That would be its farm-grown, hand-picked haskap berries, a hearty Canadian fruit infused in the distilling process alongside gentian root, black tea leaves, and a touch of Black Fox honey. It's an innovative spirit that showcases the untapped potential of regional ingredients. Here is what the judges had to say about it: Deep ruby in hue, the enticing aroma evokes rich, woody notes with a hint of sweetness reminiscent of port. On the palate, it is a powerful and complex blend of deep red fruit and gin botanicals, offering a delightful freshness. France's Loire Valley might be famous for wine, but Distillerie Combier's Meridor Gin proves its spirits pedigree. This 41.9% ABV London Dry is the result of two years of research and development. It offers a sophisticated blend of rose petals, elderflowers, licorice, lemon and other botanicals. It presents a full floral aroma that leads to a peppery kick, resulting in a fresh yet complex profile. Named for a local legend, Meridor Gin is an elegant expression of French distilling and proof that the country is more than a one-trick pony when it comes to alcohol. Here is what the judges had to say about it: Light and fragrant, the aroma reveals vibrant juniper and citrus notes. Rich, bold palate, offering pronounced juniper alongside a delicate spiciness and a hint of bittersweet bergamot. Long, warm finish echoing the citrus character beautifully. A truly exquisite gin. If you appreciate a gin with backbone, the Australian Distilling Co.'s Navy Gin should be on your radar. At a robust 57% ABV, this is a serious spirit. It's a bold take on navy strength, featuring pronounced woody spices like cardamom and nutmeg, alongside classic juniper and fresh pine notes. Layers of herbaceous, spicy, and sweet notes lead to a long, structured finish. This is a gin designed to perform, making it a powerful choice for a classic Negroni or a truly assertive Martini. Here is what the judges had to say about it: Intense spice and inviting citrus notes. The palate is bold and layered, showcasing a delightful interplay of citrus and peppery warmth. A long, complex finish lingers, brimming with herbal nuances that beckon for another sip. From Osaka, Japan, Mikuni Distillery's Osaka Gin is certainly worth noting. A small-batch gin, it can be hard to find outside of Japan. It isn't a typical juniper bomb; instead, it leans into floral flavors with a smooth finish. As Osaka's sole craft gin distillery, it brings a distinctive local essence to the global gin landscape. This is a gin that captures its origin in every sip. Here is what the judges had to say about it: A delightful burst of lemon verbena and lemon-lime on the nose. The palate reveals a harmonious blend of spices and citrus, with cardamom and earthy roots shining through. Lingering finish, leaving a refreshing impression of vibrant citrus and juniper. Outstanding. Singapore's Brass Lion Distillery truly shines with its Pearl Jasmine Gin. This 40% ABV gin is an elegant homage to the classic jasmine tea. Crafted using hand-rolled Dragon Phoenix Jasmine Tea pearls that were gently infused into the gin to capture their delicate essence, it closely resembles a cup of tea. That makes sense since it's part of the brand's Tea Series. Here is what the judges had to say about it: Beautifully golden in color, this gin has a nose featuring light jasmine tea and honey sweetness. The palate mirrors this and adds tannins to the benefit of the jasmine. The perfumed finish lingers delightfully. Out of NSW, Australia, Nine Circles Distillery offers a very well-executed Signature Gin. This isn't about overpowering; it's about harmony. With 14 carefully selected botanicals, it achieves a balanced profile that showcases citrus, spice, and aniseed. It's the kind of versatile gin that works perfectly in a simple G&T with an orange slice but also holds its own in more complex cocktails. Nine Circles truly commits to artisanal production, making this a fine example of modern Australian gin. Here is what the judges had to say about it: An intense and inviting scented with menthol, citrus blossom, and herbal tea greets the senses, leading to a structured and rounded palate. Bright citrus notes intertwine with delicate floral peppercorns, culminating in a long, gentle finish that lingers beautifully. If it isn't apparent yet, the distillers in Australia are turning out some excellent gins these days; four of the eight GO medal winners are from there. 30 Knots Spirits Sea Spray Gin from Western Australia is an intriguing gin, at 40% ABV, designed for refreshment. It expertly blends bold juniper with traditional botanicals and the unique, native Ruby Saltbush, creating a subtly salty and warming character. With clear notes of saltwater, juniper, and desert lime, it's a gin that truly evokes its origins. It's a compelling option for anyone seeking something distinctive and invigorating in their glass. Here is what the judges had to say about it: Green botanicals, complemented by a subtle freshness and a hint of vegetation. Pepper and spice layers emerge beautifully; the botanicals dance in harmony, revealing a creamy, zesty character with earthy and nutty undertones, culminating in a captivating complexity. Hailing from Tasmania, Australia, Turner Stillhouse is making a clear mark with their Three Cuts Distiller's Release Gin. Built using local ingredients and pure Tasmanian water, this 42.0% ABV small-batch release focuses on refinement. Its botanical blend includes green cardamom, Tasmanian lime and lemon, white peppercorn and three cuts of rose petals that add unique floral layers. The result is a balanced gin that delivers organic juniper with bright citrus and exotic warmth. Here is what the judges had to say about it: A soft and floral bouquet with notes of juniper and citrus lead into a vibrant palate where sweet herbal notes intertwine seamlessly. This delightful harmony culminates in a long, laced finish with earthy undertones. Lovely botanical integration with excellent complexity. Follow here for the most up to date information about the ever changing beer, wine, and spirits industry.


Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
2025 Tony Awards: Who will win, who should win in a year with few sure things
Will Nicole Scherzinger, sizzling in 'Sunset Blvd.,' beat out Audra McDonald, who made Rose a metaphor for the tragic human condition? Could Jonathan Groff, a knockout Bobby Darin, win back-to-back kudos? Might Sadie Sink of 'John Proctor Is the Villain' be sunk by the wild-eyed Laura Donnelly of 'The Hills of California' or the ever-savvy Mia Farrow of 'The Roommate,' even though all three women played equally terrifying characters? These and many other questions will be answered on Sunday at the Radio City Music Hall in New York, where host Cynthia Erivo will present the 78th annual Tony Awards (beginning at 7 p.m. June 8 and broadcast on CBS and streamed on Paramount+). The ceremony will be the climax of the 2024-25 Broadway season and the reason that several struggling musicals ('Real Women Have Curves,' 'Boop! The Musical') are hanging in there, hoping for a life-saving boost. Tony Award voters are casting their ballots. Let's look at who should be ascending to the dais in the traditional ebullient panic, holding back tears and staring into the camera to tell all the envious theater kids at home how you, too, can have all this if you only fight off the naysayers and follow your dreams! Right. Down to it. This one will be, and rightly should be, a runaway victory for 'Maybe Happy Ending,' a delightfully unnerving musical that most everyone on Broadway underestimated because it was an original love story between two retired South Korean 'helperbots.' To my mind, Will Aronson and Hue Park's quirky, charming little tuner succeeds mostly because of one small but pivotal idea: the notion that a robot's battery life can be a proxy for human mortality. Oliver and Claire fall in love as their percentages drop. Thus, the show manages to simultaneously tap into the fear we all have of an imminent robotic takeover (oh, it's coming) while avoiding the problem of making a dystopian musical. By making the robots as vulnerable as us, they forged a charming romantic comedy performed by Helen J. Shen (robbed of an acting nomination) and Darren Criss (who dove deep into robotland). The competition? Nothing credible. 'Buena Vista Social Club' is a very good time, musically speaking, but has a predictably formulaic book. The inventive 'Death Becomes Her' works just fine as a campy frolic but it relies much on its source movie. And 'Operation Mincemeat' is the most jolly of pastiches, rib-tickling fun all the way. Only 'Dead Outlaw' represents truly credible competition and deserves to siphon off some votes. But at the end of the day, it's a musical about a corpse. There were two excellent, Tony-worthy new plays in this Broadway season: Jez Butterworth's 'The Hills of California,' set in the British working-class resort of Blackpool, and Branden Jacobs-Jenkins' 'Purpose,' both a high-style dissection of the dysfunctional family of the civil rights icon Jesse Jackson and a moving exploration of what it's like to be an introverted kid in a high-pressure family. 'Purpose,' which is still running and more relevant to most Tony voters, is likely to win. But Butterworth's play forged a complex dramaturgical structure and explored deeply empathetic characters. Its central point? To explore how and why childhood trauma impacts our adulthoods. Butterworth has been writing plays a lot longer than Jacobs-Jenkins and his experience shows; I wanted the perfectly crafted 'Hills' to never end. Writer Kimberly Belflower's very lively 'John Proctor Is the Villain' might sneak in there, but I think that audiences at this drama about high schoolers studying 'The Crucible' are responding more to a brilliant production than to the play itself, which is at the end of the day a melodrama that relies on someone else's intellectual property. No shame there, but not the equal of the competition and, with much respect, nor is the very smart and potent 'English,' a show about ESL students that also leads to an inexorable conclusion matching the playwright's point of view. This category will hinge on how many voters embrace Jamie Lloyd's cleverly branded deconstruction of 'Sunset Blvd.' over George C. Wolfe's more nuanced approach to 'Gypsy.' In many ways, the two leading candidates represent a kind of yin and yang of musical revival. 'Sunset Blvd.' is showy and radical and replaced the gilded excess of the original production with an excess of concept, deceptively minimalist but only on the surface. Wolfe's 'Gypsy' aimed to excise the show of Patti LuPone-like drama. McDonald, who brought her classically trained voice to Rose, saw her antiheroine more as an everywoman and the production responded accordingly, as if Wolfe were trying to say that 'Gypsy' was the American tragic musical that few previously understood. I see the arguments against 'Sunset Blvd.' but in the end, Lloyd's staging was just so audaciously thrilling that it overcame them for me. As a director, he's obsessed with film, but then this is a musical about a movie star, so if ever there was a show that could stand such a metaphoric obsession, then here it was. And although this may seem counterintuitive, I thought 'Gypsy' missed the chance to stage this title with far more Black actors, allowing it to serve as a metaphor for the condition of Black entertainers in early 20th century America. It almost went there, but not quite. 2025 Tony Award nominations: Steppenwolf's 'Purpose' and 'Death Becomes Her' both score bigThis was not a stellar season for play revivals. 'Romeo + Juliet,' a pretentious and wildly uneven misfire, did not even remotely deserve its Tony nomination and, bracing moments notwithstanding, 'Our Town' was uneven and derivative of David Cromer's prior revival. 'Eureka Day,' a piece about pretentious pre-school parents and teachers, was an effective satire but hardly surprising. That leaves David Henry Hwang's 'Yellow Face,' an autobiographical piece about Hwang himself and a 'Miss Saigon' casting scandal. 'Yellow Face' has knocked around the American regions for years. But this was a truly excellent piece of new direction from Leigh Silverman and for the first time, the play transcended its inside-baseball orientation and had much to say about America and race. Team Nicole Scherzinger or Team Audra McDonald? Both deconstructed iconic characters (Norma Desmond and Madam Rose) using every ounce of their mutually formidable craft. With all due respect to McDonald, I'm Team Nicole because her work was the more radical of the two performances in rescuing Norma from bathetic senility and giving her back her sexuality, and because McDonald's tragic approach to Rose inevitably de-emphasized her chutzpah and self-aware vivacity which is much of why 'Gypsy' is 'Gypsy.' Still, no shame in being on the other team. It would feel strange for either Megan Hilty or Jennifer Simard to win for 'Death Becomes Her' at the expense of the other and I suspect Tony voters will feel the same way. But let's add some props for Jasmine Amy Rogers, truly a perfect Betty Boop who managed to turn a vampish cartoon figure into a complex and vulnerable heroine. If you judge a performance by pizzazz, charm and growing star power, Jonathan Groff is your winner for his dazzling take on Bobby Darin in 'Just in Time.' If immersion inside a character is your choice, you are choosing between Darren Criss for 'Maybe Happy Ending' and Andrew Durand in 'Dead Outlaw.' I thought Durand was just astonishing as the titular outlaw, whose corpse takes on an all-American trajectory of its own. Aside from the technical demands of playing a dead dude, Durand also nailed a guy with zero access to his own feelings. In other words, what he didn't do was probably as important as what he did. I preferred that to Jeremy Jordan in 'Floyd Collins', but I may be in a minority. And Tom Francis, who sings his way through Midtown eight times a week in 'Sunset Blvd.,' will have deserved support. Mia Farrow has acted only rarely in the past decade but her empathetic performance as a vegan, pot-growing Iowan in 'The Roommate' was a reminder of her astonishing ability to fuse what actors think of as externals and internals — her work felt deeply authentic but savvy observers also noted the sophistication of her comic technique and dramatic timing. Alas for Farrow, this is an extraordinary category and by far the most competitive at this year's Tony Awards. Take Sarah Snook, whose work in 'The Picture of Dorian Gray' had not a single syllable out of place on the night I saw the show, notwithstanding the huge technical demands of a video-filled production that co-starred numerous versions of her recorded self. She's one of the world's great performers. Then there was the less-famous Laura Donnelly, who played a mother and (later) her adult daughter in 'The Hills of California,' all in service of the writer's point that we all eventually have to live the way we were raised. So distinct were these two characters that some punters in my row clearly did not know they were watching the same actress they'd seen in a different role just a few minutes before. Donnelly was at once empathetic and Medea-like in her intensity. We were supposed to be scared of both of Donnelly's characters and I swear I could not tell you which terrified me the most. Sadie Sink also has a lot of fans and that was indeed a savvy turn in 'John Proctor.' But this competition is between Snook and Donnelly and it was a hard choice for me. Donnelly haunts me the most. George Clooney is on the list of nominees and I hardly need to recount his formidable talents, but he was fundamentally filmic in 'Good Night, and Good Luck,' rather than truly translating his subtle version of Edward R. Murrow to a stage the size of the Winter Garden Theatre. So, with an additional nod of admiration to the delightfully quirky Louis McCartney, who managed to survive all of the crashes and bangs of 'Stranger Things: The First Shadow,' I preferred Jon Michael Hill, playing a young man born into a famous and famously dysfunctional Black political family even though he just wanted to take photographs and stay as far away as possible from his father and his actions. Hill was the most rooted actor in a stellar Steppenwolf Theatre production of 'Purpose.' But I suspect Cole Escola, the star of 'Oh, Mary!,' a silly but strikingly effective satire of Mary Todd Lincoln and her bearded spouse, who will take the prize. No complaints here. Escola hardly was subtle with a guileless, all-in performance that has been packing the house. It's a one of a kind show and that's its greatest selling point. But Escola also offers a clever commentary on present-day America, fueled by fun, freedom and frustration. What the Tony nominations got right — and wrongDavid Cromer's work on 'Dead Outlaw' was typically detailed and worthy and Christopher Gattelli wrangled 'Death Becomes Her' with witty aplomb, but 'Maybe Happy Ending' was an eye popping career-high for Michael Arden, who created the most romantic of dreamscapes and yet also insisted that the audience look precisely and only where the director wanted its eyes to be. Speaking of career highs, Danya Taymor convinced her youthful cast in 'John Proctor Is the Villain' that the stakes in this high school English class were a matter of life and death. Taymor has to compete with Kip Williams, who employed multiple screens and videographers in 'The Picture of Dorian Gray' for what was more conceptual authorship than direction, and with Sam Mendes, whose mastery of the exquisite ensemble cast of 'The Hills of California' was formidable. Mendes has won many kudos; most Tony voters will want to reward Taymor, a rising talent. Fair enough. Last, here are my picks for the remaining acting categories.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Arellano: Homeland Security's 'sanctuary city' list is riddled with errors. The sloppiness is the point
The Department of Homeland Security's "sanctuary jurisdiction list" has more holes than the plot for the latest 'Mission Impossible' film. All you need to know about its accuracy is how my native Orange County fared. The only O.C. city on the list is Huntington Beach — you know, the 'burb with an all-Republican council that's suing California for being a sanctuary state, declared itself a 'non-sanctuary' community in January and and plans to place a plaque outside the city's main library with an acrostic "MAGA" message. Missing from the list? Santa Ana, long synonymous with undocumented immigrants, which declared itself a sanctuary city all the way back in 2016 and has a deportation defense fund for residents. More laughable errors: Livingston, the first city in the Central Valley to declare itself a sanctuary for immigrants in 2017, isn't on the list. Yet Santee in San Diego County, so notorious for its racism that people still call it 'Klantee,' is. There's even Represa. Ever heard of it? Me, neither. Turns out it's not a city but the name of the post office for two places not exactly known as sanctuaries: Folsom State Prison and California State Prison, Sacramento. Read more: Trump signs orders ramping up immigration showdown with sanctuary cities and states Within hours of his inauguration, Donald Trump signed an executive order tellingly titled 'Protecting the American People Against Invasion' that, among other things, stated that sanctuary jurisdictions should no longer receive federal funds. But the May 29 list laying out the jurisdictions that are supposedly subject to the penalty was so flawed that it was taken off the Homeland Security website within days. It's still not back up. The effort seemed cobbled together by someone who typed 'sanctuary' and a city's name into Google and swallowed whatever the AI spat up without even bothering to cross-check with Wikipedia. Trump's opponents are already depicting this fiasco as emblematic of an administration that loves to shoot itself in the foot, then put the bloody foot in its mouth. But it's even worse than that. The list shows how blinded by fury the Trump administration is about illegal immigration. There is no mistake too big or too small for Trump to forgive, as long as it's in the name of deportation and border walls. The president's obsession with tying all of this country's real and imagined ills to newcomers reminds me of Cato the Elder, the Roman Republic politician famous for allegedly saying 'Carthage must be destroyed' at the end of all his speeches, no matter the topic. That's why the pushback by politicians against Homeland Security's big, beautiful boo-boo has been quick — and hilarious. Huntington Beach Mayor Pat Burns appeared on KCAL News to declare that Surf City's inclusion was 'pure negligence' while holding a small white bust of Donald Trump the way a toddler clings to its blankey. Vista Mayor John Franklin, meanwhile, was on the city council that voted in 2018 to support the Trump administration's unsuccessful lawsuit against California's sanctuary state law. He told ABC 10News San Diego that he thought Vista made the list because 'another city in the county that bears a similar name to ours … may have, and I haven't confirmed it yet, adopted a sanctuary policy.' Dude, say the city's name: Chula Vista, a far cooler, muy Latino town closer to the U.S.-Mexico border than Vista is. It's also on the list and isn't a sanctuary city, either. On the other end of the political spectrum, Rep. Lou Correa (D-Santa Ana) told the Voice of OC that he recently advised Santa Ana officials to 'keep their head low' and not make a big deal about their sanctuary city status — as if hiding under a desk, like a "Scooby Doo" caper, will somehow save the city from the Trump administration's haphazard hammer. Immigration, more than any other part of Trump's agenda, exemplifies the Silicon Valley cliché of moving fast and breaking things. His administration has deported people by mistake and given the middle finger to judges who order them brought back. Trump officials are now shipping immigrants to countries they have no ties to, and shrugging their shoulders. Immigration agents are trying to apprehend people in places long considered off-limits, like schools and places of worship. And yet, this still isn't enough for Trump. Read more: U.S. attorney in L.A. moves to 'neutralize' California's sanctuary rules Deportation rates are rising, but still not to the levels seen in some years of the Biden and Obama administrations, and not even close to Operation Wetback, the Eisenhower-era program that deported over a million Mexican nationals. Trump's deportation dream team — Homeland Security head Kristi Noem, border czar Tom Homan and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller — has berated ICE officials for not doing more to comply with Trump's wishes. The sanctuary list embodies all of this. Who cares if the wreckage involves human lives, or the Constitution? The sloppiness is the point. The cruelty is the point. Homeland Security didn't answer my request to explain the flaws in its sanctuary jurisdiction list and why it was taken down. Instead, a spokesperson emailed a statement saying 'the list is being constantly reviewed and can be changed at any time and will be updated regularly." The decision whether to include a place, the statement said, 'is based on the evaluation of numerous factors.' Except the truth, it seems. Let's laugh at the absurd mistakes while we can. Really, how pendejo can you be to think that Huntington Beach is friendly to undocumented immigrants but Santa Ana isn't? Let's laugh while we can, because things are going to get much worse before they get better. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.