Striking junior doctors no longer have public's backing, Wes Streeting says
Doctors no longer have the support of the public for strike action, Wes Streeting has warned, urging them to vote against proposed walkouts this week.
Resident doctors in England, formerly known as junior doctors, are demanding a massive 29 per cent pay uplift to end the ongoing cycle of strikes that has caused 'so much harm to patients and the wider healthcare system'.
They have started receiving ballots for renewed industrial action after ministers last week announced that most doctors would receive a 4 per cent pay rise following the latest review of public sector pay, with resident doctors to receive an extra £750 on top of the uplift.
While the British Medical Association (BMA), the union representing doctors, said the pay rise does not go far enough in restoring historical pay freezes, Mr Streeting warned: 'We can't afford to return to a continuous cycle of stand-offs, strikes, and cancellations.'
Resident doctor members of the BMA have taken industrial action 11 times since 2022, with NHS England estimating the walkouts led to almost 1.5 million appointments being cancelled or rescheduled.
Writing in The Times, Mr Streeting said: 'The public supported the previous strikes against a government delivering real terms cuts to resident doctors' pay. But patients are now opposed to strike action.
'Following the significant pay rises delivered over the past ten months, they can see that this government is committed to a fair deal for NHS staff. Nor do patients want to see the green shoots of recovery choked off by strike action.'
His comments mark a drastic shift in tone from the approach he took last year, when he brought months of strike action to an end by handing them a 22 per cent pay rise within weeks of entering office. This year, they were awarded another inflation-busting pay rise of 5.4 per cent.
He has now appealed to doctors to vote 'No' in the ballot and instead 'continue the progress we've made, working together to rebuild our NHS.'
'Strikes should always be a last resort, and I don't think they are in anyone's interest today', he warned.
It came after a new poll of 4,100 British adults by YouGov found that 48 per cent of Britons oppose resident doctors going on strike, while 39 per cent support them taking action.
YouGov said this 'marks a shift in opinion' of public support of striking junior doctors last summer, when the majority of Britons – 52 per cent – said they supported it.
It highlighted how Labour supporters were most supportive of strike action, with Conservatives expressing the strongest opposition.
But warning that 'fixing pay….cannot wait for different fiscal circumstances', junior doctors have now asked for their pay to be restored to 2008 levels, which they argue would require a 28.7 per cent rise when taking inflation into account.
Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt said: 'Last week the government finally told us what it would do to restore the pay of doctors: almost nothing.
'Doctors have seen their pay decline by 23 per cent in real terms since 2008. No doctor today is worth less than they were then, but at the rate the Government is offering it would be over a decade before we once again reached that level of pay.
'As ballots once again fall through doctors' letterboxes, we are simply saying: the NHS does not have that time. Waiting lists are too high, too many people can't see their GP, too many patients are being treated in corridors.
'Doctors need to be kept in the country and in their career not in 10 or 20 years' time, but now.'
Earlier this week, writing in The Independent, Mr Streeting admitted the NHS treats doctors 'like crap', acknowledging that pay was not the only thing doctors were unhappy about.
'They are rightly angry about the way they are treated by their employer. So am I', he said.
'The NHS can be a bad employer at the moment, which ends up being bad for taxpayers and patients too. We spend hundreds of thousands of pounds training people, only to treat them like crap and cause them to leave to work in another health service or another career altogether.'
Speaking to Sky News, water minister Emma Hardy urged junior doctors to vote against strike action and 'continue talking to the government, because we need to continue to deliver the improvements in our NHS that patients desperately need.'
'We hugely value everybody who works in the NHS, and we hugely value our doctors. That's why they've had a 20 year increase in their salary compared to three years ago, and why we're offering an above inflation pay rise', she said.
The increase that was recommended by the independent pay review body is above the rate of inflation, which jumped to 3.5 per cent in April, up from 2.6 per cent in March and the highest since January 2024.
But Professor Philip Banfield, the BMA's chairman of council, warned that doctors' pay is 'still around a quarter less than it was in real terms 16 years ago', adding that the pay award 'delays pay restoration even more, without a government plan or reassurance to correct this erosion of what a doctor is worth.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
Strategic defence review: Britain must be ready for war, says PM
Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative Party leader, has dismissed the Starmer government's strategic defence review, saying it wasn't properly funded. In a post on X, she said: 'Labour can't even hold a defence policy together for 48 hours — how can they be trusted to defend Britain?' She added that the UK was in the 'most dangerous era in a generation' and she took aim at the recently signed Chagos deal, where the UK handed over sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, retaining control of a UK-US military base on Diego Garcia. The Conservative leader said Labour found ' billions for the Chagos surrender — but can't commit to properly funding our armed forces … Scrap Chagos. Fund defence.' By Larisa Brown The defence review is at risk of being unaffordable after Sir Keir Starmer clarified spending 3 per cent of national income on defence in the next parliament was still an 'ambition'. John Healey, the defence secretary, told The Times on Thursday there was 'no doubt' Labour would reach the pledge by 2034. 'In the next parliament this country will spend 3 per cent of our GDP on defence,' he said. However he backtracked on the remarks on Sunday, with Whitehall sources saying the policy had not changed. The external reviewers conducted the review on the basis that the 3 per cent target is a certainty. Projects that have been given the go-ahead are only affordable with the spending boost, it is understood. • A £15 billion investment in nuclear warheads• Plans to create a hybrid Royal Navy, blending drones with warship, submarines and aircraft12 attack submarines, developed under the Aukus partnership with the US and Australia• Better housing and equipment for members of the armed forces Sir Keir Starmer had earlier thanked the authors of the strategic defence review, and said: 'What you've delivered is a blueprint to make Britain safer and stronger. A battle-ready, armour-clad nation with the strongest alliances, and the most advanced capabilities, equipped for the decades to come.' Sir Keir Starmer said increased defence spending would not come at the cost of health, education or welfare spending. He said the war in Ukraine had shown the impact of a European conflict on the UK's economy. 'There is no argument, avoiding talking about conflict will hurt the economy,' he told reporters at a shipyard in Glasgow, and added: 'The first duty of the prime minister is to keep your country safe.' He said the strategic defence review would also deliver a jobs boost for both Scotland (25,000 jobs) and the UK (400,000 jobs). Sir Keir Starmer said he was '100 per cent confident' the UK's defence spending would hit 3 per cent of GDP in the next parliament. While Nato has called for member states to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent by 2032, the prime minister said it was a significant step to increase the UK's funding to 2.5 per cent by 2027-28, then 3 per cent in the next parliamentary term. 'I'm 100 per cent confident this can be delivered,' he said. 'We are committed to spending what we need to deliver this review. I am not putting arbitrary dates on that.' Sir Keir Starmer said the UK must 'learn the lessons from Ukraine' to build an army ten times more lethal by 2035. The prime minister said the rise of drone warfare and innovation — which Ukraine had mastered in its three-year war with Russia — must become part of an overhaul of the UK's defence force. 'We need innovation at wartime pace,' he said. He said the government would build six new munition factories in the UK, creating thousands of jobs and new submarines as part of the Aukus defence pact. Sir Keir Starmer said the defence strategic review will 'mobilise the nation in a common cause' as the UK moves to 'warfighting readiness'. At a shipyard in Scotland, the prime minister said the global environment had changed and was the most precarious in 70 years. He said: 'Recognising in defence of the realm … nothing works unless we all work together. Every citizen has a role to play because we have to recognise the threat has changed. The threat is more dangerous than any time since World War Two.' Starmer said the UK now had to end the 'hollowing-out' of the defence force. 'We will build a fighting force that is integrated and more lethal than ever,' he said. Mike Martin, a Lib Dem MP who is on the defence select committee, said: 'The SDR is all jam tomorrow. Three per cent by 2034 is totally inadequate. The PM talks of a grave current threat to our security — in which case he should convene crossparty talks on how to get to 3 per cent ASAP — something the Lib Dems have been calling for for ages. 'The SDR is a nice vision piece. But without any money it will remain just that, and the UK will be less safe as a result' Sir Keir Starmer, who is on a visit to Scotland, will deliver a short speech on the defence strategic review this morning, before a press conference. At about 3.30pm, John Healey, will make a statement to MPs in the House of Commons about the strategic defence review. Ben Wallace, the former defence secretary, told The Times: 'Most defence reviews start out funded and as time passes cost pressures hollow them out towards the end. Without 3 per cent by (20)30 this review is hollow before it has begun.' It is understood that the previous government was warned by the Treasury that if the Ministry of Defence was going to finance 12 submarines as part of Aukus, plus the Trident nuclear deterrence and the GCAP, Tempest fighter jet programme then it would need to 'spend more than 3 per cent and there would be nothing left over'. Britain faces a 'new era of threat' including the 'immediate and pressing' danger of Russia, the long-awaited strategic defence review will warn on Monday. The report, which will be published after nearly a year, consists of 48,000 words and is about 130 pages long. The government is expected to accept all 62 recommendations in full. John Healey, the defence secretary, said Britain must be prepared for a military attack by Russia. The review will also focus on other countries, including China, which is not described as an enemy but as a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge'. • Read in full: The measures we already know will feature The prime minister said he 'very much' hoped he would not need to send British troops into Europe in the future to deter Russian aggression. Asked by BBC Radio 4's Today programme if UK armed forces could be deployed in the defence of a Nato ally, Sir Keir Starmer said: 'In order to make sure that that isn't the case, we need to prepare.' The UK 'cannot ignore the threat that Russia poses,' he added. 'Russia has shown in recent weeks that it's not serious about peace, and we have to be ready.' Sir Keir Starmer said he was buoyed by the footage of Ukraine's mass drone attack in Russia overnight which is reported to have destroyed 40 Russian planes. '[It shows] Ukraine is not defeated,' he told the BBC. 'It shows they are still there and fighting . That is a tribute to Ukraine.' The prime minister said the three-year war between Ukraine and Russia had turned the Ukrainian army into one of Europe's toughest fighting forces. Sir Keir Starmer rejected suggestions his Labour government could not commit the extra £13 billion to reach the 3 per cent defence funding figure because it was being forced to back down on other measures such as the winter fuel allowance. The government is preparing to reverse its tough cuts to fuel subsidies for pensioners, but the prime minister said it would not come at the cost of defence and security. He said he had fixed the 2.5 per cent defence funding figure to 2027, but the 3 per cent figure would not be tied to a particular date. 'I am not going to indulge in the fantasy of plucking dates from the air,' he told the BBC. 'I take the defence and security of our country very seriously. It's the most important task I have.' The prime minister said he was hopeful of reaching the 3 per cent defence funding figure, but made no promises. Sir Keir Starmer said that all Nato countries needed to 'step up' to boost defence spending in the current geopolitical environment. He said that defence spending would reach 2.5 per cent by 2027-28, but denied it was 'wishful thinking' to hit 3 per cent by next parliament. 'Yes, that 3 per cent [is the target]. But I am not going to make a commitment to the exact date until we can make good on that commitment,' he told the BBC. Sir Keir Starmer said the defence strategic review was needed because the 'world has changed', especially since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 'We have to recognise the world has changed and if the world has changed we have to be ready,' he told the BBC. If you want to deter conflict, then you have to prepare for conflict.' The prime minister played down the prospect of a future nuclear warfare, but said nuclear deterrence had been an effective tool since the end of the Second World War. 'We need to ask how Nato can preserve the peace for decades to come,' he said. Luke Pollard, the armed forces minister, has refused to guarantee that defence spending would reach 3 per cent of GDP, saying it would only happen when 'economic conditions allow'. Before the release of the strategic defence review today, Pollard said he hoped to top the 3 per cent figure by the next parliament. 'Well, we've set out that we are spending 2.5 per cent by April 2027 with the ambition to spend 3 per cent in the next parliament when economic conditions allow,' he told Times Radio. 'I agree with the defence secretary that thanks to the chancellor getting our economy back on track by having the highest growth in the G7 that I have no doubt, just as a defence secretary doesn't, that with the growing threats that we're facing that we will be spending 3 per cent in the next parliament.' Please enable cookies and other technologies to view this content. You can update your cookies preferences any time using privacy manager. Britain will build up to a dozen nuclear-powered attack submarines, Sir Keir Starmer is expected to announce as the government unveils its strategic defence review on Monday. The long-awaited review will set out the UK's defence plan for the next ten years. The boats will replace the UK's seven Astute class submarines, which are armed with conventional weapons, and will be in operation from the late 2030s, joining the four Trident submarines that carry the nation's at-sea nuclear deterrent.
BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
PM acknowledges need for clarity on winter fuel payment changes
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said "the sooner" his government provides clarity on changes to the winter fuel payment "the better".Speaking to the BBC's Today programme, he reiterated that ministers were reviewing which pensioners should receive the payment but added he wanted to be "absolutely clear where the money is coming from" before setting out the details. After coming to power in July last year, the Labour government announced it was withdrawing the annual payment - worth up to £300 - from more than 10 million last month Sir Keir said he would be partially reversing that decision, making changes to allow "more pensioners" to qualify again. The government is yet to spell out which pensioners will regain their entitlement to the money, although Treasury Minister Darren Jones has said millionaires should not be getting "subsidy for their energy bills" and that payments would be "targeted to those that need it the most". An announcement could come at the Budget in the autumn or even as early as next week when Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivers her Spending Review. Asked if he still believed his government had been right to restrict winter fuel payments last summer, Sir Keir said he had inherited an economy that was "completely broken"."It was our duty to stabilise the economy and to fill in that £22bn black hole. I'm not going to resile from that."His U-turn came after pressure from some Labour MPs, who are also expressing concern about the two-child benefit cap and proposed cuts to disability on whether he would consider increasing taxes to raise more money, the prime minister said the UK's underlying problem in recent years had been "flat or anaemic growth"."I don't think you can tax yourself to growth - we have got high taxes as it is."Reform UK, the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party have called for the winter fuel payments to be restored to all pensioners. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has said "millionaire" pensioners should not be eligible. Previously, the winter fuel payment had been paid to all pensioners regardless of income or wealth. Households with a pensioner under 80 received an annual lump sum of £200, rising to £300 for pensioners over taking office, Labour restricted the payment to those pensioners who qualify for pension credit and other income-related benefits - a move which saved an estimated £ income threshold for pension credit, the main benefit to qualify to continue to receive winter fuel payments, is currently £11,800 a year for individuals and £18,023 for pensioner a new way of increasing the number of eligible pensioners is likely to be tricky for the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said creating a new means-test would create "hassle" for pensioners and result in many not claiming the think tank, the Resolution Foundation, has estimated that expanding the threshold pension credit by 10% could cost £2.5bn.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Chelsea weighing up £50m bid for Borussia Dortmund's Jamie Gittens
Chelsea are weighing up a bid for Jamie Gittens after holding talks with Borussia Dortmund over the England Under-21 winger. Gittens, who is expected to cost around £50m, is one of several names of interest to the club as they look to bring in a new wide player before heading to the Club World Cup later this month. Bringing in a right-footed winger capable of playing on the left flank is a priority for Chelsea, who are also set to announce a £30m deal for the Ipswich Town striker Liam Delap. Chelsea have tracked Athletic Bilbao's Nico Williams, who is likely to prove too expensive, and were interested in Manchester United's Alejandro Garnacho in January. There were concerns at the time over Garnacho's attitude. A move for Gittens, who previously spent time in Chelsea's academy, would fit with the Stamford Bridge club's strategy of targeting young players. The talks with Dortmund also come amid uncertainty over whether or not Chelsea will meet an obligation to make Jadon Sancho's loan from United permanent for £25m. Some key figures within the club are not sold on signing the winger, citing his inconsistent form this season, but a deal is possible if Sancho agrees to reduce his salary. Chelsea must pay a £5m penalty clause if they send the 25-year-old back to United. It is set to be another busy summer at Stamford Bridge, with Enzo Maresca also hoping to sign a new centre-back after leading his side into the Champions League and winning the Uefa Conference League. It remains to be seen if the arrival of Delap will be followed by the arrival of another striker. Chelsea like Eintracht Frankfurt's Hugo Ekitike but see him as too expensive at £84m. There is long-term interest in RB Leipzig's Benjamin Sesko, who is wanted by Arsenal. Nicolas Jackson's future will be up in the air if two strikers arrive. A host of outgoings are factored into Chelsea's planning and it is understood they are open to offers for Noni Madueke. The England winger joined from PSV Eindhoven in January 2023 and scored 11 goals in all competitions last season, but there is a feeling that the 23-year-old's development has stalled. Christopher Nkunku and Joao Felix, who spent the second half of last season on loan at Milan, are other attackers up for sale. Chelsea have an extensive list of players up for sale. Robert Sánchez and Djordje Petrovic are on the market for clubs looking for a new goalkeeper. Renato Veiga, Ben Chilwell, Axel Disasi are out of favour in defence and Wesley Fofana's fitness problems mean that suitable offers for him will be hard to turn down. Chelsea tried to sell Trevoh Chalobah last summer. Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall, Carney Chukwuemeka and Lesley Ugochukwu are available after making little impression in midfield and Raheem Sterling, who has two years left on his £325,000 a week contract, has no future at the club after a disappointing loan at Arsenal.
