Lioncor renews bid to build Terenure development
Lioncor has lodged revised proposals for its planned 284 residential units for lands at Terenure College aimed at overcoming Dublin City Council's previous refusal.
The scheme comprises 265 apartments and 19 four bed houses with the apartments located across four blocks with one block rising to six storeys.
The council previously refused planning permission to Lioncor subsidiary, 1 Celbridge West Land Ltd after concluding that it had 'failed to demonstrate that the range of travel needs of the future resident population can be met by the proposed development'.
In the one reason for refusal linked to transport issues for the new scheme, the council found that the proposed car parking provision is considered inadequate to serve the needs of future residents of the development.
READ MORE
The planning authority stated that the proposal would as a result give rise to unacceptable levels of overspill and haphazard parking on adjacent roads and bus corridors.
However, as part of the revised proposals lodged with An Bord Pleanala as part of a first party appeal against the Council refusal, Lioncor is now proposing 38 additional car spaces for residents and An Bord Pleanala is now inviting submissions from local residents on the fresh proposals over the next five weeks.
The 11.5 acre proposed development site is at the northwest corner of the grounds of Terenure College Senior school and the main part of the site is an open field that was formerly used as playing pitches associated with the now closed junior school.
The new scheme was 'build to sell' compared to the 'build to rent' 364 unit scheme and 21 houses that were refused planning permission two years ago by An Bord Pleanala.
In its appeal on behalf of 1 Celbridge West Land Ltd, McGilling Planning state that the number of car-parking spaces would increase from 157 to 195 and has lodged revised plans for an extended basement to accommodate the additional 38 car-parking spaces.
McGill Planning state as part of pre-planning consultation on the LRD, there was no indication that a perceived shortfall in car-parking could lead to a recommendation of refusal.
The appeal states that given the proximity of local bus stops to the proposed development, future occupants are likely to commute to work or education by public transport.
In the appeal drawn up by McGill Planning Associate Director, Brenda Butterly, she points out that every department at Dublin City Council with the exception of the Transport Planning Department believed that a grant of permission was appropriate.
Ms Butterly stated that it was 'very disappointing' that the council did not seek further information on the plans or include a condition on the issue of parking.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ryanair to boost Shannon winter services
The Government should expand the State's regional airports programme, Ryanair argued after announcing that it will base a new aircraft at Shannon and offer new routes from the mid-western gateway this winter. The carrier said it would base one of its new Boeing 737 'gamechanger' aircraft at Shannon for winter 2025/26, calculating that this should boost passenger numbers there by 100,000. Ryanair will add new routes to Lapland, Madeira and Spanish capital Madrid. The airline intends to increase the number of flights a-week to existing destinations including Alicante in Spain, Lanzarote in the Canaries, Kraków and Wroclaw in Poland, and Edinburgh and Manchester. READ MORE Ryanair estimates that the additional jet amounts a $400 million (€350 million) investment in Shannon. The additional 100,000 passengers will bring the airline's numbers at Shannon to 1.6 million a-year, a statement said. It will also add more than 1,500 jobs, including 350 pilots, cabin crew and engineers. Jason McGuinness, Ryanair's chief commercial officer, said the airline wanted to grow business at Shannon, Knock and Kerry. But he argued that the Government needed to support these gateways by expanding its regional airports programme to cover those that handle up to three million passengers a-year. Mr McGuinness added that this would allow regional airports to 'grow traffic without being penalised for doing so'. Currently the programme is limited to airports with scheduled services that handle up to one million passengers a-year. Mary Considine, chief executive, Shannon Airport Group, said Ryanair's investment was a powerful endorsement of its potential. 'We see a huge potential for growth and believe there is a real opportunity for Shannon Airport to lead the way in re-balancing the national landscape,' she said. Shannon grew passengers by 7 per cent to 2.1 million in 2024, the first time it passed the two-million mark in 15 years.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ryanair's Michael O'Leary sells shares worth €21m
Ryanair Holdings chief executive Michael O'Leary sold almost €21 million worth of shares in the airline group, personally and through his pension scheme this week, stock exchange statements show. The carrier, Europe's largest, recently reported that profits slipped 16 per cent to €1.61 billion in the 12 months to March 31st while it flew a record 200.2 million passengers. Ryanair told the Euronext Dublin stock exchange that Mr O'Leary personally sold 846,726 shares at €23.33, worth €19.75 million in total, on Tuesday. The company also informed the market that Fennor Pension Scheme, managed by Dublin stockbrokers, Davy, sold 53,167 shares at the same price, worth €1.24 million, also on Tuesday. READ MORE [ Michael O'Leary set for one of the biggest payouts in European corporate history after Ryanair hit key target Opens in new window ] The scheme is understood to be Mr O'Leary's. The filing describes it as a 'person closely associated' with the Ryanair Holdings' chief executive. Mr O'Leary personally holds 44 million shares in Ryanair following the sale of his 846,726 units, which amounted to less than 2 per cent of his total stake in the airline. Ryanair has more than one billion shares in issue. Late last month, Mr O'Leary qualified for share options currently worth more than €100 million when Ryanair's shares closed at more than €21 for a 28th consecutive day. Under a deal agreed with the company's board in 2019, he must remain in his job until the end of July 2028, after which he has until the following February to take his option to buy the shares for €11.12 each. Ryanair pays Mr O'Leary €1.2 million a-year plus a bonus of up to half that amount. Speaking after Ryanair published full-year financial results in May, Mr O'Leary told analysts that he and the other company executives gave shareholders good value in an 'era when premiership footballers and managers earn €25 million a-year'. Ryanair blamed weakness in fares for the slip in profits. The airline believes that prices will recover during the current financial year, although delays in the delivery of aircraft will slow passenger growth. It expects growth to normalise from 2026 and argues that it will be the only European airline adding 'meaningful capacity' up to the end of this decade. Mr O'Leary has run Ryanair since 1994, turning it from a loss-making regional airline to Europe's biggest carrier by pioneering low-cost flying, ushering in a new era in air travel in the process. He said last month that he intended to stay in the job until his current contract ends in 2028. Stock exchange rules govern when directors, executives and others connected with publicly-listed companies can trade shares in those businesses. These limit trades to periods when the company does not have access to important financial or other information that it has not yet made public.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Warring couple's estimated €500,000 ‘high-conflict' litigation costs is ‘cautionary tale', warns judge
A warring couple's 'high conflict' proceedings involving estimated legal costs of about €500,000 are 'a cautionary tale' about the price of family law litigation, a High Court judge has said. The €1.1 million value of the remaining assets of the marriage of less than five years puts the scale of the legal costs 'in context', Mr Justice John Jordan said. He made the comments when upholding the man's appeal against certain Circuit Court orders made in divorce proceedings. Orders requiring the man to pay the woman a €150,100 lump sum for spousal maintenance, €173,500 to achieve pension equalisation and €61,500 towards her legal fees were described as 'punitive' by Mr Justice Jordan. READ MORE It was a short marriage with few matrimonial assets generated during its existence, the judge said. Taking this into account, and that inheritances accounted for much of the husband's assets, the woman should have about 25 per cent of the available assets, meaning a total lump sum of €275,000, plus payment of her health insurance, the judge ruled. The man has valuable pensions, while the woman's are of nominal value, but that must be viewed in the context of the marriage's short duration, he said. The man has a reasonably good salary and, while the woman earns significantly less, her part-time earnings are reasonable and likely to increase, he said. The Circuit Court failed to properly take into account the man will separately pay €1,100 monthly maintenance, plus some other costs, for their child and had put €56,000 in a trust fund for the child, the judge noted. He set aside a safety order the Circuit Court granted to the woman against the man. He found she had not pressed that court for it and there was a lack of evidence of any violence, or threats of violence by the man. 'Simply to set necessary lines of demarcation,' the judge said he would make orders restraining the man from entering the woman's property. The dispute between the man and woman has been before the District Court, Circuit Court and High Court, he said. The woman initiated judicial separation proceedings and there were other proceedings related to access and custody. He was satisfied both sides contributed to the disagreements and the 'high conflict' nature of the litigation. To their mutual credit, against a 'difficult backdrop' and medical issues, their young child is doing well, the judge said. A summary of legal costs indicated the woman's costs were about €258,000, of which €44,000 was paid, while the man's were €212,000, most of which have been paid. He estimated accountants' fees at €20,000-€30,000. Both sides must negotiate their own fee payments, the judge said. Hers are likely to be much less than the 'aspirational' €258,000 referred to, he believed. It seemed the woman would probably have qualified for legal aid but she decided not to apply, apparently in the belief the service would have been inferior to that of private lawyers, the judge said. There was 'no reason' to doubt the quality of the legal aid service and nothing to suggest there would have been any greater delays if she was represented by the Legal Aid Board, he said. Her decision not to seek legal aid was 'somewhat irresponsible' when she clearly could not afford private representation and the total resources of the marriage 'were not great', he said. Considering this factor, alongside other reasons, the judge set aside an order requiring the man to pay €61,000 towards her legal fees.
