
How undervaluation of Vancouver sites could cost millions in property taxes
The former Dunsmuir Hotel is demolished in Vancouver, on Saturday, Jan. 18, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Ethan Cairns
VANCOUVER — Retired architect Michael Geller says he's always keen to restore some 'justice' to Vancouver's real estate scene.
So, when he noticed an official BC Assessment valuation of about $6.4 million on the site of a former heritage hotel in downtown Vancouver — about a third of its true value for tax purposes, by Geller's reckoning — he felt he had to act.
'The point is we all go through life, and when we see things that aren't fair, some people say: 'Oh, I'm not going to get involved.' I usually get involved when I don't think something's fair, so that's why I did it,' said Geller.
His third-party appeal against the valuation of the site at 500 Dunsmuir Street, owned by developer Holborn Properties Ltd., yielded agreement from B.C.'s property assessment review panel, which increased the valuation to $18.9 million, in line with Geller's estimate.
He said that means property taxes on the site of about 12,000 square feet will increase by at least $130,000 for Holborn.
'I was pleased,' said Geller upon seeing the new valuation. 'We got some satisfaction.'
Observers of Metro Vancouver's real estate scene say the site of the 115-year-old Dunsmuir Hotel, which was demolished in January after falling into what the city called 'severe structural deterioration,' is far from unique.
Retired appraiser Derek Holloway said B.C. could be losing hundreds of millions in property taxes due to underassessment, while retired Burnaby city planner Robert Renger said municipalities seem to take little interest fixing underassessments that can be obscured by loopholes.
They say the use of company ownership changes to dodge property transfer taxes make it difficult for BC Assessment to do its job, and the agency needs to be strengthened to give appraisers power to compel owners to respond to requests for information.
Geller said he appealed to the review panel in February after noticing the 'ridiculously low' valuation of $6,375,000, which worked out to about a third of the per-square-foot valuations of five surrounding properties.
For instance, Geller wrote in his appeal, the land at 570 Dunsmuir Street next door had been assessed at $1,572 per square foot, compared to about $540 per square foot at Holborn's site.
He said he was particularly aggrieved by the treatment of the hotel by Holborn leading up to its demolition, 'and then they got rewarded by getting a lower assessment.'
The firm has also been criticized for years over the slow pace of development at its Little Mountain site in Vancouver that it bought off the provincial government in 2008, a sale that resulted in the displacement of hundreds of residents from social housing.
'So, I appealed it,' said Geller.
Holborn said in a statement that it received the reassessment and its priority for the site was working with the city on a redevelopment to deliver housing, 'activate the street' and contribute to downtown Vancouver's economic revitalization.
Holloway, who was an appraiser with BC Assessment for 28 years, said he had identified hundreds of under-assessed properties in recent years, calling them 'the tip of the iceberg.'
For instance, Holloway pointed to two sites on the 4400 block of Kingsway in Burnaby, sold for $145 million in 2022. But their assessed values have never come close to that, peaking at $69.7 million in 2024.
In 2025, they were assessed at $58.2 million.
Then there is the 14-acre former Oakridge Transit Centre on West 41st Avenue in Vancouver, which transit provider TransLink sold for $440 million in 2016. Holloway said its assessment has never neared the sales price, and BC Assessment currently has it valued at $271.1 million.
The site was resold to developer Grosvenor, which says it plans to build 1,630 homes there.
Holloway said he suspected BC Assessment had never seen a copy of either sales agreement.
He said BC Assessment often accepts the property owner's position when assessing such sites because the agency is afraid to exercise its 'very limited power' within the Assessment Act, and it lacks reliable market information.
'They have very limited expertise for the valuation of large, sophisticated properties, and finally and most importantly, their other customer, the taxing jurisdiction is not interested. They can always say that they were just relying on BC Assessment, (and say) it is their fault, not ours' said Holloway.
'That's how medians and averages work'
BC Assessment said in an email that it can't comment on any individual case.
But Bryan Murao, the Crown corporation's assessor for residential Lower Mainland, said in an interview that it's easy for critics to pick sales that exceed assessed value. Others could point to sales below assessment.
'I mean, that's how medians and averages work,' said Murao, 'I think it's been convenient for people to go and pick the sales they want to try to prove something that they're trying to prove.'
He said an assessor looks into every single sale that comes through, although he was aware of practices in which commercial properties are traded without actual title transfers.
'We do our best to try to find every single type of sale that occurs in the market, and to be able to include that in our analysis that we use to determine how much properties are worth.'
The legal transfer of properties by use of company ownership is a well established way to avoid the property transfer tax that is incurred when title changes hands. The change of beneficial ownership is instead achieved by selling a company that owns a site, so title does not actually change.
Renger, a retired senior development planner for the City of Burnaby, B.C., applauded Geller's intervention in the Dunsmuir case, calling him 'a hero.'
But he said he was disappointed the City of Vancouver didn't do so first.
'They are not trying to protect the little guy,' said Renger, 'Basically, they could have done the appeal that Michael did.'
He said many sales in B.C. involve bare trust companies, in which legal ownership of a site is separate from true beneficial ownership, making it more difficult for authorities to trace records.
When it comes time to sell the property, the bare trust company is sold to the new owner, without triggering any property transfer tax since there is no change in title.
'It makes it a bit harder for people, both the public and BC Assessment, to track sales that are happening because they're not well-documented,' said Renger.
Holloway agreed, pointing to bare trusts and deferred sale completion dates as ways to keep BC Assessment 'in the dark.'
He said sections of the Assessment Act were 'toothless,' allowing some property owners to ignore BC Assessment requests for information without penalty or serious consequences.
Holloway said his own reviews have revealed 'hundreds of under-assessed properties' and extrapolating this across B.C. could mean 'hundreds of millions of lost property taxes.'
The Ministry of Finance said in a statement that it's important that commercial property owners pay their fair share, and the province 'closely follows reports of under-assessed properties.'
It said the ministry also audits property transfer tax payments, which helps ensure transparency from commercial property owners.
The City of Vancouver said it 'respects and relies' on BC Assessment's expertise in property assessment, and the city typically does not initiate appeals or apply for intervener status unless they pose 'significant precedent-setting implications.'
Geller said big developers are usually armed with experienced consultants to appeal to BC Assessment and its 'relatively small number' of professionals, putting the assessor in a 'David and Goliath' situation.
He said that if commercial assessments are too low, the burden of tax paying might be shifted to the residential property owners.
'And that's why I did go around to my friends and said: as a result of this appeal, I may have knocked a couple of cents off your property taxes,' said Geller.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 11, 2025.
Nono Shen, The Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
42 minutes ago
- CTV News
Sudburians did you feel the ground move Wednesday morning?
Earthquakes Canada and Vale Ltd. in Sudbury confirm a 3.1 magnitude seismic event occurred at Garson Mine just after 9 a.m. on Wednesday. Many Greater Sudbury residents took to social media on Wednesday morning to ask if others fell the ground shaking. Sudbury 3.1 magnitude earthquake Earthquakes Canada confirmed a 3.1 MN magnitude seismic event was recorded at about 9:03 a.m. on May 22 in the Greater Sudbury area. (CTV News Northern Ontario/Map Source: Google Earth) Earthquakes Canada confirmed a 3.1 MN magnitude seismic event was recorded at about 9:03 a.m. on May 22 in the Greater Sudbury area. Officials with Earthquakes Canada told CTV News that the seismic activity was related to mining activities at Vale's Garson Mine site. A Vale spokesperson told CTV News in an email that Garson Mine did experience a seismic event below the 5300 east mining level shortly after 9 a.m. on Wednesday. 'It is common for deep mines such as Garson to experience periods of increased seismic activity from time to time,' said Jonathan Laderoute, a communication specialist with Vale Base Metals. 'Seismicity can occur as part of mining, especially at significant depths.' Vale said no injuries or equipment damage have been reported because of the event. 'Everyone in the mine has been accounted for and the affected area of the mine has been restricted,' said Laderoute. 'We are currently following our Significant Seismic Event protocol and will inspect affected areas when safe to do so.' Vale said any residents with questions or concerns about this morning's seismic can contact the company's community concerns line at 705-222-VALE (8253). Vale's Garson Mine A photo of the exterior of Vale's Garson Mine site from March 2022. (File photo/CTV News Northern Ontario)


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Skepticism, cautious optimism as work on Somerset House begins
Social Sharing There's skepticism about whether substantial renewal work has finally begun on Somerset House, which has sat derelict for nearly 18 years in the heart of Ottawa's Centretown neighbourhood. The 129-year-old building at the corner of Bank Street and Somerset Street W. partially collapsed in October 2007. The eastern half of the building was demolished nine years later, while the western half has been boarded up since the collapse. New work on the building began at the start of June, but for those who've been following the Somerset House saga, there's still doubt as to whether it will ever be fully restored. 'Blot on the landscape' "It's better than we've seen for a long time," Linda Hoad told CBC as she looked out onto the concrete foundation that had been laid and what appeared to be fresh wood on the basement floor. As co-chair of the Heritage Ottawa advocacy committee, she's been attuned to what's been happening with Somerset House and says she's now "cautiously optimistic." "It's a blot on the landscape — and on the reputation of the city, to some extent," Hoad said. "We've seen more work done these past two weeks than we have for I don't know how many years," she added. "But we aren't counting on anything at this time." Once home to hotels, pubs The three-storey downtown building has a long history. Built in 1896, Somerset House was originally a department store for the Crosby, Carruthers Company. It then transformed into a series of hotels and pubs, including the Lockmaster and the Duke of Somerset. According to the city, permits to restore the building — which would include 14 apartments and two businesses —were issued in 2023, but as a private property it remained the owner's decision as to when the work would be done. Lesley Collins, program manager of heritage planning with the city, wrote in a statement to CBC that work is "actively underway" to repair and stabilize the building. CBC contacted building owner Tony Shahrasebi twice but did not hear back. With little done to Somerset House over the last 18 years, many people have been using similar words as Hoad has to describe the building's progress — or lack thereof. "That's been part of the problem is that every time, there's a promise to move ahead," said Ottawa Centre MPP Catherine McKenney. "It drags out. Next thing you know, another six months, year, two years has gone by. And here we are, 18 years later, and nothing has been done on that building." McKenney, the former two-term councillor for Somerset ward, also said the building has been an "eyesore" since long before they joined city council. They said they've watched various parts of the building rot away, including around the windows and window wells. 'Poster child for demolition by neglect' Ariel Troster, the ward's current councillor, has also seen the building deteriorate, calling it "the poster child for demolition by neglect." "People are right to be concerned, and they're right to be cynical. The reality is that we don't have a lot of tools to compel a property owner to take care of their property, to develop it and to do those added renovations," Troster said. The city can fine someone under the Property Standards Act if a property is falling apart, Troster said, and can send bylaw officers when there are maintenance complaints. But "when it comes to carrot and stick, we don't really have a big stick," she added. In a September 2023 report, the city said 19 orders had been issued since 2007 against the property under the Building Code Act. There had also been 31 calls to bylaw, resulting in 11 violation notices and six property standards orders. In that report, staff said that aside from the removal of the easterly wing in 2016, nothing had been done to the property. But Troster also said there are rumblings of a possible plan to impose a vacant commercial property tax on buildings like Somerset House, left vacant for years, similar to the residential vacant unit tax. On Tuesday, the built heritage committee also approved additional money for owners of heritage properties on a stretch of Bank and Somerset streets to improve those buildings' facades — including the windows, brickwork and heritage signage. While also skeptical that significant repairs are underway, Jack Hanna, co-chair of the planning committee of the Centretown Community Association, said he hopes the once "magnificent" Somerset House — with its exquisite masonry and a six-metre sheet metal spire that soared up on its leading corner — eventually returns to its original glory.

CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Carney's first foreign policy test begins at G7 — amid Middle East crisis and Trump's trade war
Prime Minister Mark Carney will welcome leaders of the world's most powerful democratic countries Sunday for the start of a three-day meeting in the Rocky Mountains — a high-stakes summit that longtime G7 observers say could be one of the most consequential in years. Carney's priorities for this gathering in Kananaskis, Alta., reflect the challenges of our time: war and peace, energy security with a focus on critical minerals and artificial intelligence and "securing the partnerships of the future," according to the Prime Minister's Office. This will include talk about U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressive trade actions against Canada and other G7 countries. And as parts of Western Canada go up in flames, Carney has also put wildfires on the agenda. The leaders will discuss bolstering joint responses to climate disasters and some sort of "wildfire charter" is expected. Israel's strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities and military sites, which began Friday, could overshadow the discussions on the official agenda. The guest list for the summit, which includes India's Narendra Modi, has drawn some domestic criticism but Carney has argued that big global challenges should be addressed by the world's big players — even if there are some lingering tensions. WATCH | How this G7 summit will differ from 2018: Why won't there be a leaders' communique coming out of next week's G7? | Power & Politics 2 days ago Duration 14:19 The Power Panel discusses the strategy behind Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to forego a final communique at next week's G7 leaders' summit that will be attended by President Donald Trump. "It's a landmark summit because never before have these leaders had to confront so many strong, simultaneously interconnected crises," said John Kirton, director of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto. Kirton is pleased with the guest list Carney has assembled, saying there are more leaders of consequence coming to Kananaskis than perhaps any other such meeting in recent memory. In addition to the G7 members and India, Brazil, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, South Korea, Ukraine, Mexico and Australia — the secretaries general of the UN, NATO and EU along with the head of the World Bank will be there for at least part of the proceedings. When Trudeau hosted in 2018, Canada's guest list included leaders from "overwhelmingly little countries" with a focus on those facing endangered by rising shorelines like Jamaica, the Marshall Islands and the Seychelles, Kirton said. "Carney's list — it's a great one," Kirton told CBC News. "If you really want to lead the world, and not just the G7 part of the world, then you want the next tier of the biggest leaders there at the table." Leaders will begin to arrive Sunday and then be ferried by helicopter to the summit site. Monday's session will be broadly focused on the economy and "economic peace," and then security matters, government officials said in a background briefing. The second day will be when the non-G7 leaders will be brought in. It's also when Ukraine will be a major focus. Carney personally invited Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss a path forward for that war-torn country. Trump has been hostile to Ukraine at times as he pushes for a swift resolution to the war Russia started — but he has largely maintained U.S. military support and anti-Russia sanctions despite some of his tough talk. On trade and Ukraine, the summit's success will depend on what Trump does or does not do, said Fen Hampson, a professor of international relations and the co-chair of the expert group on Canada-U.S. relations at Carleton University. "Even when it comes to his tech bro buddies, things can go sideways pretty quickly," Hampson said. "That's really the big risk here — does the president arrive in a good mood willing to do business, or is he in a bad mood?" While he's not expecting Trump to drop all of his tariffs after a few days in the mountains, Hampson said a U.S. "commitment to work together in a positive way" and revisit trade actions could be spun as a win by Carney. A commitment from Trump to stay the course in Ukraine would also be well-received by Carney and the Europeans in the room, Hampson said. To secure that sort of shift, Europe may commit to dropping policies that irritate Trump, including its digital services tax, while Canada could play up its newfound commitment to a stronger military and more defence spending, longtime U.S. demands, Hampson said. But depending on Trump to play nice is a risky proposition, he said. "Carney is more than just the head waiter at this meeting," Hampson said. "This is going to be a real test of his own negotiating skills." Increasing tensions in the Middle East after Israel launched airstrikes in Iran will further test Carney. Iran fired dozens of missiles toward Israel hours later. "With Israel's attack on Iran, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Iran-Israel dynamics have to be at least informally on the agenda," University of Ottawa political science professor Thomas Juneau said. "It makes Prime Minister Carney's job way more complicated than it already was." No joint communique Unlike at past G7 summits, Canada is not planning to get all leaders to agree to a joint communique — a sometimes unwieldy list of priorities and accomplishments that all countries agree to sign. Instead, Canada has been working with the other countries ahead of time to secure leaders' approval on a series of short, joint statements focused on concrete actions and outcomes in key areas, a senior government official said ahead of the summit. This strategy could be interpreted as a way to avoid what befell the 2018 G7 meeting Canada hosted in Charlevoix, Que. Trump did not want to sign on to a series of climate change-focused measures — something former prime minister Justin Trudeau made a priority at those talks despite Trump's well-known hostility to environmentalism. The president ultimately agreed to the joint communique while withholding U.S. support for some green measures — but then torpedoed G7 unity entirely in a series of post-summit tweets, saying he was offended by what Trudeau said at a closing news conference. Rather than squabble over policy measures Trump will never support, Carney is focused on getting G7 leaders to coalesce around things that have a reasonable chance of garnering a consensus, a senior government official said. The government is framing this agenda as a more streamlined, focused document than the last one. Trudeau, by comparison, tried to get G7 support for 28 areas of agreement in Charlevoix. Trump may be the sticking point on trade and Ukraine, but Kirton said Carney's program suggests Canada is setting up this meeting to be a success on other issues. "If you're going to hit home runs, you really need the U.S. to go along with you. On many of Mark Carney's priorities, it's easy to see Donald Trump agreeing," he said, referring to defence spending, AI and a move to crack down on deadly drugs like fentanyl. "Carney has said he wants Canada to be a global leader. This is the way to make that happen — if he can pull it all together on the spot."