Police officers ‘mocked and ostracised' for paternity leave in England and Wales
Police officers have described being ostracised for taking paternity leave, as it is revealed that back-office staff in the Metropolitan police are entitled to nearly three times as much paternity pay as frontline fathers.
A freedom of information request has revealed that most serving police officers in England and Wales only take one week of paternity leave, with some describing being on 'blue lights' duty and carrying Tasers a week after the birth of their babies.
Among the 44 forces that replied to an FoI by the paternity rights campaign group the Dad Shift, 75% provided one week paternity leave at full pay, with a second week on statutory pay.
Forces were asked for their paternity leave policy, how many officers had taken paternity leave over the last three years, and how many weeks they took.
Thirty-five forces provided data on paternity leave take-up. In the 30 forces providing only one week full pay, 60% of officers returned to work after seven days. In the five forces that provided data and offered two weeks' fully paid leave, only 12% of officers went back to work after a week.
More than 50 testimonies from officers and their families raised concerns about the treatment of fathers, with officers describing a culture where involved fathers were 'mocked', 'slagged off' or 'ostracised'.
One former officer, who said the strain of his family was one of the biggest reasons he left the force, said he was 'treated very poorly' and 'slagged off behind his back' for taking two weeks' unpaid leave to care for his partner after an emergency caesarean.
'Overall the police service doesn't support fathers fairly at all,' he said. '[The] culture makes men feel like they need to be back at work asap. If you're not, you're looked down on or treated differently.'
In another example, a firearms officer was not allowed to adjust the dates of his paternity leave when his baby arrived three weeks early, meaning that on the day his wife and baby came out of hospital he did a night shift carrying a firearm.
The Met police, the largest force in England and Wales, offers civilian staff – in roles such as administration or 999 call handling – three weeks of paternity leave at full pay. However, frontline officers get one fully paid week, with the second paid at the statutory rate of £184.03 a week, a quarter of the starting salary for a Met officer.
Asked why this disparity existed, a spokesperson from the Met said the Home Office set the police pay regulations for every force and it was not something individual forces could change, unlike for civilian staff.
The Met said in a statement: 'Officers and staff have different terms and conditions, set separately. For officers, these are governed nationally via police regulations and for staff, set by the Met. Fair terms and conditions are important to everyone.'
Paternity leave for police officers is governed by police regulations, set by the Home Office, a spokesperson for the National Police Chiefs' Council said. Forces have to offer one week at full pay and one week at statutory pay for qualifying officers.
However, at least nine forces across England and Wales now offer a second week of paternity leave on full pay. British Transport Police and the Civil Nuclear constabulary give officers three weeks' leave on full pay, while Derbyshire, Greater Manchester, Nottinghamshire, Staffordshire, Warwickshire, West Mercia and West Midlands give two weeks' full pay.
A spokesperson for Greater Manchester police said the increase in paternity pay, made last year, reflected 'the changing nature of modern families'. They added: 'It's important to us that we do our utmost to support our officers and staff as they enter their journey into parenthood.'
A survey from the Police Federation found that more than one in five officers were ready to quit the service in 2023 – up from 18% in 2022 and 12% in 2021. Of 2,654 officers who left the police between 2017 and 2024, 27% resigned before they reached pension age, with 63% saying the impact on their family life was a critical factor.
Alex Lloyd Hunter, a cofounder of the Dad Shift, urged Yvette Cooper to improve paternity pay for officers and speak to the Met commissioner to tackle its 'grossly unfair policy'.
'The home secretary has done a lot to ensure the police are doing better to protect women and girls,' he said. 'Supporting dads in the force properly, so they can be involved caregivers, is part of that same equality agenda.'
A Home Office spokesperson said police bodies made recommendations on pay, and that the government recognised that support for officers was 'vital, as a healthy and engaged police workforce will be better able to tackle crime and protect the public'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Householders who racially abuse police at home to face prosecution
People who racially abuse police making house calls will be prosecuted under plans to close a legal loophole. Offenders will face up to two years in jail if they are found guilty of directing religious or racial abuse at emergency service workers who enter their homes. The Public Order Act of 1986 made it illegal to racially or religiously abuse anyone in public but did not cover behaviour within a private home. The legislation was designed to let police keep public spaces free from abuse but not overstep into conversations held in private. But the Home Office said this left police and other emergency workers vulnerable and unprotected from racial and religious harassment during house calls, and meant they could not bring perpetrators to account. Home Office officials said ministers had decided to close the loophole because of an increase in reports of emergency workers being abused for their race or religion while in private homes. 'They should not have to tolerate abuse' A Home Office spokesman said: 'By closing the loophole in the Public Order Act 1986, the Government is making clear that racially or religiously motivated abuse and threats towards our emergency workers will never be tolerated, regardless of where it takes place.' Dame Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said: 'Our emergency workers put themselves in harm's way every day to keep us safe and they should never have to tolerate abuse due to their race or religion while simply doing their job. 'By closing this loophole, we're sending a clear message that racial and religious abuse directed towards those who serve our communities will not be tolerated.' The changes will be introduced through amendments to Labour's Crime and Policing Bill, which will also extend police powers to enter homes to seize knives and mobile phones. At present, the law only allows officers to seize blades that are on the banned list, such as 'zombie' knives and machetes, and ministers said police were hamstrung when they raided suspects' homes. They are not allowed to take weapons such as kitchen knives, which are not on the list, even if they suspect they will be used in crimes. Police will also be able to enter homes and search for stolen mobile phones without a warrant, if the devices have been electronically tracked to that location. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, said the law change would enable emergency workers to save lives free from violence or intimidation. 'Anyone who violates this core principle brings shame on themselves and will feel the full force of the law, wherever they are,' he said. 'I will not stand any health worker being subjected to abuse and take a zero-tolerance approach, and these new measures will crack down on perpetrators.'
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Why a blank cheque won't solve Britain's policing woes
In 2023, a productivity review led by two former chief constables identified 26 ways of freeing-up 38 million hours of police time. That would equate to 20,000 extra police officers. The recommendations included cutting red tape, reducing sickness absence and using computer technology for clerical tasks. A second report from the productivity panel, in 2024, said a further 23 million hours could be saved – including through the expansion of AI. 'Modern technology is the golden key to police efficiency and effectiveness,' says Winsor. Yet, progress on technology has been painfully slow – and not helped by a failure to manage large-scale projects, such as ESN (Emergency Services Network), an upgrade on the ageing emergency services communications network Airwave, which is a decade behind schedule and £3.1 billion over budget. 'You have to lay much of it at the door of the Home Office,' says Trotter. 'The replacement of Airwave has gone on for years – it's an area that has not been a success, it's wasted a lot of money and is still not resolved. It needs an inquiry,' he adds. Failing to see 'beyond force boundaries' There are glaring inefficiencies in other areas, too. Across England and Wales, each of the 43 forces, no matter how large or small, has its own leadership team, civilian support set-up and administrative functions, such as payroll, legal affairs and human resources. Pooling some of that work would make financial sense, says Winsor. 'The back office stuff could and should be done either regionally or nationally, in the way it's done in the NHS or the military,' he says. In 2022, a report from the independent think-tank, the Police Foundation, estimated that forces in England and Wales could save 'hundreds of millions' of pounds annually by combining support teams – as well as purchasing police uniform, equipment, vehicles, forensic services and computers centrally, rather than negotiating individual contracts with suppliers, as many constabularies do. But it seems the introduction of police and crime commissioners, a decade earlier, cemented a 'localist' approach, hindering prospects for developing a more cohesive and less fragmented system of policing, with the economies of scale that would result. 'The police and crime commissioner model has some strengths but it can hold things back, because in my time there were far too many who could not see beyond their force boundaries – and crime doesn't stop at force boundaries,' says Winsor, who left the watchdog three years ago. The author of the Police Foundation report, its former director Rick Muir, is now working as a Home Office adviser, developing plans for a white paper, based around the establishment of a new National Centre of Policing. It is long overdue. Rowley and other police leaders support the case for a reorganisation. Although their immediate concern is whether they'll have enough resources over the next three years, they are aware that it is not just about the money – radical structural reform is needed to put forces on a long-term sustainable financial footing and ensure the public get the police service they deserve. As Peter Kyle, the Science and Technology Secretary, put it at the weekend, the police must 'do their bit' and 'embrace change'.
South Wales Guardian
5 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Emergency workers to get greater protection from racial abuse in house calls
The Government said it would close an existing loophole that allows people to get away with racial and religious abuse towards police, fire and ambulance workers making house calls. The measures were tabled on Tuesday as amendments to the Government's Crime and Policing Bill. It is currently illegal to racially or religiously abuse anyone in public, but this does not extend to behaviour within a private home under the Public Order Act 1986. The gap was originally designed to ensure that laws allowing police to keep public spaces free from serious disorder did not overstep into private conversations held in homes. The Home Office said the law has left 'emergency workers vulnerable and unprotected to racial and religious-based abuse and harassment during house calls', and 'unable to hold the perpetrators to account for their behaviour'. The department added that 'reports of emergency workers being abused for their race or religion while in private homes have increased'. Under the change, those abusing emergency workers in any setting could face a maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. Policing minister Dame Diana Johnson said emergency workers 'should never have to tolerate abuse due to their race or religion while simply doing their job'. Dame Diana added: 'By closing this loophole, we're sending a clear message that racial and religious abuse directed towards those who serve our communities will not be tolerated.' Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said the new measures would 'crack down on perpetrators'. Mr Streeting added: 'Our emergency workers carry out lifesaving work every day and deserve to feel safe from violence or intimidation. 'Anyone who violates this core principle brings shame on themselves and will feel the full force of the law, wherever they are.' Andy Rhodes, director of the National Police Wellbeing Service, said the amendment would 'better protect officers and staff who are there to protect the public'. Mr Rhodes added: 'Sadly, the role they play means they can often be faced with some incredibly challenging and hostile situations, especially in private homes, and over time this can take a toll. 'The protection of our officers and staff is a clear priority for all police chiefs. Hate crime has a devastating impact on individual victims and racial and faith-based discrimination against officers or emergency workers cannot be tolerated in any form.' Minister for Fire Alex Norris said the Government 'stands firmly behind emergency service workers and will not tolerate abusive behaviour towards those risking their lives to keep us safe'.
