&w=3840&q=100)
Here's why Huawei's expansion in smart driving stirs competition, scrutiny
Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi Corp.'s pivot into cars has become a high-profile success story. Its SU7 is a hit, forecast to sell 350,000 units this year and even Ford Motor Co. CEO Jim Farley has heaped praise on the model.
Less well-known is how rival smartphone maker Huawei Technologies Co. has also cemented a dominant position in China's intensely competitive electric vehicle market — not by making cars of its own, but by creating the intelligent driving software that's found its way into the cockpits of marques from BYD Co. to BMW AG.
Its smart driving solutions unit turned profitable last year, after revenue more than quintupled. Huawei's software doesn't just help sell cars to Chinese drivers who are highly attuned to intelligent driving features, it also collects vast amounts of data that may ultimately help the company crack the holy grail of autonomous driving.
Huawei's 'background in hardware and software definitely shows,' Tu Le, founder of Detroit-based automotive advisory firm Sino Auto Insights, said. 'People I trust tell me it's one of the best systems in China. Their aggressiveness points to how important being a player in the space is for them.'
In the EV era, companies are reconfiguring how cars are designed and function. The 'brains' of a vehicle have a power that extends way beyond cruise control, emergency braking or parking sensors. And who gets to be in control of that is a topic sure to be high on rotation at this year's Shanghai auto show, which kicks off Wednesday in China's financial capital.
But Huawei and other intelligent driving software providers are under pressure after a fatal crash involving a Xiaomi EV late last month. That's sparked a renewed focus on the claims around assisted driving technology and how such features are marketed to consumers.
Officials have laid out rules to avoid describing advanced driver assistance systems as 'self-driving' and to encourage drivers to keep their hands on the steering wheel while using such features, people familiar with the matter said. The new rules could mean the roll out of upcoming smart cockpit and driver assistance systems are delayed for months.
Huawei's insistence on maintaining control over its intelligent driving ecosystem also means that it's unlikely to be able to sign up customers overseas.
Intelligent driving technology overlaps with issues of national security and data privacy. Western governments, especially the US, are already wary of Huawei due to its alleged ties to the Chinese government.
Fears that autonomous driving software, which processes real-time data from public roads, could be accessed or exploited may see countries block or restrict Huawei's technology in foreign-made cars, clouding the company's growth ambitions just as it's getting started.
'As long as Huawei's solution continues to improve, they can continue to be a leader,' Tu said. 'The wild card is, can they convince a foreign manufacturer to use their system outside of China?'
At the heart of Huawei's strategy is the Harmony Intelligent Mobility Alliance (HIMA). It's a factory floor to showroom approach whereby end-user consumers can order vehicles with Huawei's software through its online stores or authorized distributors. At its most basic, Huawei just provides the hardware to automakers that facilitates smart cars.
At the auto show, several of the brands on display will be part of Huawei's alliance.
There's Aito (a partnership with Seres Group Co.), Luxeed (in collaboration with Chery Automobile Co.), Stelato (with BAIC Motor Corp.) and Maextro (with Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group Corp.). Deliveries under the HIMA framework approached 445,000 units in 2024 and Huawei has set an ambitious target of 1 million units across more than a dozen models in 2025.
Beyond HIMA, Huawei Inside has found its way into the cockpits of Audi's Q6 e-tron and A8 L models, Chongqing Changan Automobile Co.'s Deepal and Avatr ranges and even BYD's Fang Cheng Bao 8 and 5 models, even though BYD has its own suite of advanced driver-assistance systems that it calls God's Eye.
BMW and Huawei meanwhile are collaborating to develop smart applications based on the Harmony operating system while Huawei's HiCar system (the company's mobile app that connects devices with vehicles) should go into made-in-China BMW models in 2026, the German automaker said last month. It noted that approximately a quarter of BMW's app users in China use Huawei smartphones.
Some in the industry have chafed at Huawei's dominance. Chen Hong, the former chairman of SAIC Motor Corp., famously stated in 2021 his unwillingness to cede the 'soul' of the vehicle to companies like Huawei. 'It's unacceptable,' Chen said during that year's shareholder's meeting. 'We have to grasp the soul in our own hands.'
But with the winner-takes-all nature of artificial intelligence and the high barriers of entry to producing a system that can rival Huawei's, resistance seems to be fading away.
In February, SAIC announced a strategic partnership with the Shenzhen-headquartered tech giant, completing Huawei's client list so that it now covers every one of China's state-owned auto manufacturers.
Representatives for Huawei declined to elaborate about the company's smart driving solutions and philosophy.
However Eric Xu, Huawei's deputy chairman, told Chinese media in September that considering not all automakers can afford the investment in smart car technology, 'we'll make the systems and make them well, and carmakers can use them directly.'
'We hope to build an open platform that all carmakers can participate in,' Xu said. 'Under these new cooperation models, carmakers and component providers are more than just in a simple buy-and-sell relationship. Instead, it's an in-depth partnership where all parties share the risks and benefits, and get things done together.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US Supreme Court allows DOGE access to Social Security data
The US Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Department of Government Efficiency, billionaire Elon Musk's former department, broad access to the Social Security Administration's data systems. This will allow the DOGE to access personal information of millions of Americans logged under the SSA, news agency Reuters reported. Justices put on hold the order of Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander, who had largely blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" in data such as medical and financial records while litigation proceeded in a lower court. This move came at the Justice Department's request. The court, which had a 6-3 conservative majority, did not provide a rationale for siding with the DOGE. Two labor unions and an advocacy group sued to stop DOGE from accessing sensitive data at the SSA. The plaintiffs of the lawsuit argued that SSA had been "ransacked" and that DOGE members had been installed at the agency without proper vetting or training and demanded access to some of its sensitive data systems. Earlier in February, DOGE's move to seek access to SSA data prompted the acting commissioner, Michelle King, to step down against the backdrop of the Musk-security system issues. King chose to resign after over 30 years of service as she refused to provide the requested information to the DOGE staffers at the SSA. A day later, the White House had said that the Trump administration put an "anti-fraud expert" temporarily in charge at the SSA. At the time, Trump also directed Musk and DOGE to identify fraud at the agency, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying that several dead people have been receiving fraudulent Social Security payments. "They haven't dug into the books yet, but they suspect that there are tens of millions of deceased people who are receiving fraudulent Social Security payments and so their goal in going into the Social Security Administration is to identify three things: Number one, to identify duplicate payments and to end them, Number two, to identify payments that are going to deceased people who are no longer living and should no longer be receiving that money and number three, to protect the integrity of the system for hardworking Americans who have been paying into it their entire lives,' Leavitt had told Fox News. Nancy Altman, president of the Social Security Works, an advocacy group for the preservation of Social Security benefits, said that there is no way to overstate "how serious a breach this (DOGE seeks SSA data) is". "And my understanding is that it has already occurred. The information collected and held securely by the Social Security Administration is highly sensitive," she had added. SSA has the data of everyone with a Social Security number, Medicare, and every low-income American who has applied for Social Security's means-tested companion program, Supplemental Security Income. In addition, Social Security payments account for around $1.5 trillion, or a fifth, of the annual federal spending in the US. An audit from last year, a NYT report cited. The agency is a major provider of government benefits, sending checks each month to more than 70 million recipients including retirees and disabled Americans.


Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
Paul Weiss Loses Ex-US Attorney Williams After Trump Deal
A former federal prosecutor who joined Paul Weiss in the month leading up to President Trump's second term left for Jenner & Block. New York-based partner Damian Williams will co-chair Jenner's litigation department and investigations, compliance and defense practice, according to the firm's announcement on Friday. He leaves a firm that struck a controversial deal with the Trump administration to avoid punitive sanctions to a firm that sued Trump to block a similar attack. Williams' departure comes only months after he re-joined Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison. Paul Weiss announced Williams' arrival in January, and said he began his legal career as a Paul Weiss associate in 2009. 'Damian led the Southern District with excellence and integrity, and we are excited to welcome him to Jenner as part of our firm's long tradition of hiring former public servants who are zealous and effective advocates,' said Jenner's chair Tom Perrelli, former Associate US Attorney General. A representative for Paul Weiss thanked Williams for his contributions to the firm and wished him well. Paul Weiss roused controversy within the legal community as the first of nine firms to pledge a collective $940 million in free legal services to Trump-approved causes in exchange for avoiding punitive White House sanctions. The firm drew Trump's anger as the former professional home to Mark Pomerantz, who left the firm in 2021 to assist with the Manhattan District Attorney's investigation into Trump's finances. Along with other Trump-targeted firms Perkins Coie, WilmerHale and Susman Godfrey, Jenner sued the Trump administration to reclaim security clearances and access to federal buildings that were threatened by a Trump executive order. Williams served as the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York from 2021 to 2024, when he left to join Paul Weiss. He oversaw the high-profile prosecutions of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried and US Senator Bob Menendez. He was the first Black US Attorney in the history of the New York Southern District. Jenner's announcement said Williams will be a 'driving force' in the firm's litigation and white-collar work. 'Jenner & Block fearlessly advocates for its clients and provides outstanding strategic counsel through their most difficult challenges,' Williams said. 'I've seen firsthand how this firm expertly tackles the toughest cases and lives its values. I'm excited to join a team with an extraordinary depth of legal talent that doesn't shy away from hard fights—and delivers results that matter.' Paul Weiss has sustained a string of partner exits in the wake of the announcement of its deal with the Trump administration. Litigation department co-chair Karen Dunn, an outside counsel to Google and former campaign adviser to Kamala Harris, left with three partners last month to start a new litigation boutique. Dunn and colleagues have represented Apple Inc. and Facebook. Their exits followed Jeh Johnson, Homeland Security Secretary under President Barack Obama, and Steve Banks, who oversaw the firm's pro bono practice. Trump issued an executive order against the firm March 14, which he rescinded within a week when firm chairman Brad Karp said the firm would devote $40 million in free legal services to mutually-agreed upon causes during Trump's presidency. Karp's pledge was expanded upon by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom's March 28 deal with the president, which saw the firm promise $100 million in free legal services. Within a month, seven other firms, including Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins, made similar pledges, some as high as $125 million. The firms, as part of their deals, also promised not to engage in 'illegal DEI' activities and commit to 'merit-based' hiring. Skadden also faced departures in the wake of its deal with Trump, one being Kathleen Rubenstein, executive director of the Skadden Foundation, resigning from the public interest law group. To contact the reporter on this story: Justin Henry in Washington DC at jhenry@ To contact the editors responsible for this story: Chris Opfer at copfer@ John Hughes at jhughes@ Alessandra Rafferty at arafferty@ This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Economic Times
43 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Nvidia sounds the alarm: Chinese AI talent defecting to Huawei as U.S. chip curbs push them out the door
Nvidia is sounding the alarm about the unintended impact of US export restrictions on sending chips to China, as the company's senior VP of research and chief scientist, Bill Dally, said that the chipmaker is now witnessing an increasing number of former Nvidia AI researchers joining Huawei, a move prompted primarily by the tightening export controls, as per a PC Gamer to Dally's calculation, the number of AI researchers working in China has grown from a third of the world's total in 2019 to nearly half at present, reported PC Gamer, which cited a translation from the Taiwan Economic Daily report. The AI chipmaker's rationale is that without US restrictions, Huawei wouldn't be forced to focus so much on domestic AI solutions, but now it must do so to keep up, according to the PC Gamer report. However, this is not the first time Nvidia is pointing out that the US export restrictions for China are harming the AI industry in America. Even during Computex last month, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said, "AI researchers are still doing AI research in China and if they don't have enough Nvidia, they will use their own [chips]," and he also spoke regarding Huawei specifically, saying the company has become "quite formidable", reported PC Gamer. While, it is not just the US national interest that has urged Nvidia to highlight all the possible negatives of export controls, as these restrictions have cost and will cost the chipmaker lots of money, according to the report. Nvidia had revealed that after billions of dollars lost due to the restrictions of its H20 chips to China in Q1, it's expecting another $8 billion to be lost for the same reason in Q2, reported PC Gamer. According to the report, Huawei's latest Ascend 910 and 920 chips, with the help of China's SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation), would be a better option for Chinese AI companies than trying to get their hands on Nvidia chips, as per the report. Why is Nvidia concerned about its AI researchers joining Huawei? Because it signals that export restrictions might be pushing top talent and innovation into China, instead of slowing its progress. How much money has Nvidia lost from these restrictions? Nvidia says it lost billions in Q1 and expects another $8 billion in losses in Q2 due to blocked chip sales to China.