
Trump is dismantling a key worker safety group. It's another betrayal of the working class
A s Donald Trump announced his tariffs in the White House Rose Garden last month, he proclaimed: 'We're standing up for the American worker.' While it remains to be seen what impact these tariffs will have on American workers, his words were belied by the fact that just a day before this announcement, hundreds of workers at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Niosh) – an organization that has stood up for US workers since 1970 – discovered that they had been laid off.
Niosh was founded as part of the Occupational Health and Safety Act with the purpose of 'developing and establishing recommended occupational safety and health standards'. The organization has been on the frontline of protecting worker health and safety ever since. Its work has focused on understanding the risks faced by millions of workers throughout the country who put their safety on the line every day to perform their jobs. For example, Niosh's Fire Fighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program investigates fatalities to understand their circumstances and make recommendations, ensuring that more of these workers, who risk their lives for others daily, can be safer in the line of duty.
Far from being a caricature of a federal body firmly entrenched in the Beltway, Niosh's work is spread across the country. One of Niosh's most notable sites is its Morgantown, West Virginia, facility. Located in the heart of coal country for decades, it has focused on studying the health impacts of coalmining – particularly black lung disease – which has seen notable increases in recent years. Nearly 200 workers were fired from the Morgantown location, which will severely hamper this work. (Some were temporarily rehired.)
Niosh also supports surveillance programs run out of 23 states. These state-based programs focus on the unique needs of the workforce in those areas. For several years, I was fortunate to have been an epidemiologist with such a program in Massachusetts, where my colleagues and I focused on understanding and preventing health challenges ranging from bloodborne pathogen exposure among healthcare workers, to asthma risk among cleaners, to fatalities in the construction industry.
Since its founding, Niosh has been a nimble organization, adapting to and studying new and emerging threats. The World Trade Center Health Program, which is administered by Niosh, was created to study the health impacts of responding to those terrorist attacks – ranging from traumatic injuries and respiratory disease to cancer and mental health – while providing support for those responders.
In a similar way to its response to the September 11 attacks, in the grip of the epidemic of opioids and suicides that have cost tens of thousands of lives over the past two decades, Niosh has sought to understand the workplace component of these challenges. These efforts have helped to shed light on the pathway linking occupational injuries to a high risk of drug overdoses among workers in certain occupations, particularly in the construction industry, and contribute to efforts to prevent these deaths.
During the Covid-19 pandemic, Niosh studied the risks faced by frontline workers. The pandemic also highlighted one of Niosh's most essential functions: air filtration ratings. Niosh tests, approves and certifies respirators to ensure that workers are protected from airborne risks ranging from silica dust to lead.
Niosh also supports the future of occupational safety and health workers. Niosh traineeship programs across the country provide support to students studying occupational health and safety. I was fortunate to be supported by such a program when I was in graduate school. Throughout the country, hospital employee safety departments, union workplace safety committees, and community occupational health and safety advocacy organizations are staffed by others like myself who received this support.
Now is the worst possible time for Niosh to be dismantled. Traditional workplace hazards still remain. In 2023, the last year with available data, there were 5,283 fatal occupational injuries – one every 99 minutes. Violent injuries at work are a growing concern, particularly among healthcare workers. Increasing temperatures caused by climate change place many vulnerable workers at high risk for illness, injury, and death, while extreme weather events, such as the wildfires that devastated southern California earlier this year, threaten the health and safety of emergency workers. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence are changing the nature of work, presenting new dynamics and hazards.
We need Niosh to study these emerging threats and safeguard workers.
It remains to be seen what will happen to the remainder of the organization and the programs supported by Niosh throughout the country. Regardless of what occurs, we should support the current and former workers of the organization and carry forward its mission, just as Niosh workers have advocated for the health and safety of workers across this country since the organization's inception.
Devan Hawkins is a writer and researcher from Massachusetts. He is the author of the book Worthy and Unworthy: How the Media Reports on Friends and Foes
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Guatemalan man deported to Mexico flown back to US after judge's orders
A Guatemalan man who said he was deported to Mexico despite fearing he would be persecuted there was flown back to the US on Wednesday after a judge ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return, his lawyer said. Brian Murphy, a US district judge in Boston, Massachusetts, had ordered the man's return after the US Department of Justice notified him that its claim that the man had expressly stated he was not afraid of being sent to Mexico was based on erroneous information. In a court order last month, Murphy found that the deportation of the man, identified in legal filings only as OCG, likely 'lacked any semblance of due process'. 'No one has ever suggested that OCG poses any sort of security threat,' Murphy wrote, adding: 'In general, this case presents no special facts or legal circumstances, only the banal horror of a man being wrongfully loaded onto a bus and sent back to a country where he was allegedly just raped and kidnapped.' Murphy went on to say: 'At oral argument, defendants' counsel confirmed that it is 'the policy of the United States not to expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country in which there are substantial grounds for believing the person would be in danger of being subjected to torture' … The return of OCG poses a vanishingly small cost to make sure we can still claim to live up to that ideal.' According to a court declaration, OCG, who had returned to Guatemala following his deportation to Mexico two months ago, said: 'I have been living in hiding, in constant panic and constant fear.' OCG, who is gay, had applied for asylum in the US last year after he was attacked multiple times in homophobic acts of violence in Guatemala. 'I don't stay in any of the places I used to stay because the story is the same as ever here: gay people like me are targeted simply for who we are. This produces constant fear and panic,' OCG said in his court declaration from Guatemala, adding: 'Living a normal life is impossible here, and I live in fear because of the past hateful incidences I experienced … There is no justice for me here.' Following Murphy's court order, Donald Trump's administration said in a court filing on 28 May that federal immigration officials were working 'to bring OCG back to the United States on an air charter operations flight return leg'. Last month, Trump officials admitted to an 'error' of falsely claiming that OCG was not afraid of being returned to Mexico. 'Upon further investigation, defendants cannot identify any officer who asked O.C.G. whether he had a fear of return to Mexico. Nor can defendants identify the officer who O.C.G. states 'told [him] that he was being deported to Mexico',' government lawyers said in a court filing. The Guardian has reached out to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for comment. Reuters contributed reporting


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists' startling warning popular health drinks flooding our fridges will put you in an early grave
They build muscle and are seen as a convenient on-the-go meal. But new research suggests protein shakes could increase your risk of an early death.


Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Elon Musk's DOGE exit leaves leadership vacuum at unit
WASHINGTON, June 4 (Reuters) - The Department of Government Efficiency, the brainchild of Elon Musk that upended Washington with its rapid-fire drive to slash thousands of federal jobs and cut costs, is effectively leaderless now that the billionaire and his deputy have stepped down, U.S. lawmakers heard on Wednesday. U.S. President Donald Trump's budget chief, Russ Vought, told a congressional committee that efforts are under way to establish new leadership at DOGE, but its staff currently answer to Trump's cabinet secretaries. "The Cabinet agencies that are in charge of DOGE, the consultants that work for them are fundamentally in control of DOGE," Vought said. "We're in the midst of establishing the leadership on an ongoing basis." Vought's comments will only add to the uncertainty around the future of DOGE and its cost-cutting effort following Musk's announcement last week that he was ceasing work as a special government employee. A key lieutenant, Steve Davis, who was in charge of day-to-day running of DOGE, has also left. The White House has said that DOGE's mission will continue in the absence of Musk, who has since publicly broken with Trump over his sweeping tax cut and spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination." The rapidly receding power and influence of DOGE was almost unthinkable as recently as a few weeks ago when it dominated the political landscape in Washington with its aggressive push to fire a swath of government workers. Trump established DOGE to streamline what he says is a bloated and inefficient government. DOGE struggled to cut costs but was more successful in pushing thousands of workers to quit or take early retirement after threatening dismissal without benefits. It is unclear if DOGE and its cadre of young computer technicians will survive in Washington without Musk, especially as some members of Trump's cabinet have soured on DOGE's tactics.